-
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024A total of 3102 neurons were recorded before and following acute and chronic methylphenidate (MPD) administration. Acute MPD exposure elicits mainly increases in...
Differential Roles of Key Brain Regions: Ventral Tegmental Area, Locus Coeruleus, Dorsal Raphe, Nucleus Accumbens, Caudate Nucleus, and Prefrontal Cortex in Regulating Response to Methylphenidate: Insights from Neuronal and Behavioral Studies in Freely Behaving Rats.
A total of 3102 neurons were recorded before and following acute and chronic methylphenidate (MPD) administration. Acute MPD exposure elicits mainly increases in neuronal and behavioral activity in dose-response characteristics. The response to chronic MPD exposure, as compared to acute 0.6, 2.5, or 10.0 mg/kg MPD administration, elicits electrophysiological and behavioral sensitization in some animals and electrophysiological and behavioral tolerance in others when the neuronal recording evaluations were performed based on the animals' behavioral responses, or amount of locomotor activity, to chronic MPD exposure. The majority of neurons recorded from those expressing behavioral sensitization responded to chronic MPD with further increases in firing rate as compared to the initial MPD responses. The majority of neurons recorded from animals expressing behavioral tolerance responded to chronic MPD with decreases in their firing rate as compared to the initial MPD exposures. Each of the six brain areas studied-the ventral tegmental area, locus coeruleus, dorsal raphe, nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex, and caudate nucleus (VTA, LC, DR, NAc, PFC, and CN)-responds significantly ( < 0.001) differently to MPD, suggesting that each one of the above brain areas exhibits different roles in the response to MPD. Moreover, this study demonstrates that it is essential to evaluate neuronal activity responses to psychostimulants based on the animals' behavioral responses to acute and chronic effects of the drug from several brain areas simultaneously to obtain accurate information on each area's role in response to the drug.
Topics: Animals; Methylphenidate; Prefrontal Cortex; Rats; Neurons; Caudate Nucleus; Male; Ventral Tegmental Area; Nucleus Accumbens; Behavior, Animal; Locus Coeruleus; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Dorsal Raphe Nucleus; Central Nervous System Stimulants
PubMed: 38892125
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115938 -
Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology &... Jun 2024Methylphenidate (MPH) is a central nervous system stimulant drug and a first order prescription in the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)....
Methylphenidate (MPH) is a central nervous system stimulant drug and a first order prescription in the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Although MPH biochemistry in neurodevelopment is not completely understood, studies showed it alters energy metabolism in rat brains. ADHD prevalence during neurodevelopment is related to males and the investigation has been mainly done in these subjects, therefore, little is known about MPH action in females and, consequently, about sexual dimorphism. In the present study we evaluated markers of mitochondrial dynamics (DRP1 and MFN2, fission and fusion, respectively), biogenesis (mtTFA) and bioenergetics (respiratory chain complexes) in prefrontal cortex of male and female juvenile rats submitted to exposure to MPH to better understand MPH effect during postnatal neurodevelopment. ATP and oxidative stress levels were also evaluated. Wistar rats received intraperitoneal injection of MPH (2.0 mg/kg) or control (saline), once a day, from 15th to 45th day of age. Results showed that MPH increased DRP1 and decreased MFN2, as well as increased mtTFA in prefrontal cortex of male rats. In female, MPH decreased NRF1 and increased Parkin, which are mitochondrial regulatory proteins. Respiratory chain complexes (complex I, SDH, complexes III and IV), ATP production and oxidative stress parameters were altered and shown to be sex-dependent. Taken together, results suggest that chronic MPH exposure at an early age in healthy animals changes mitochondrial dynamics, biogenesis and bioenergetics differently depending on the sex of the subjects.
PubMed: 38880464
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111057 -
Nature and Science of Sleep 2024This study aimed to evaluate nocturnal sleep structure and anxiety, depression, and fatigue in patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1).
PURPOSE
This study aimed to evaluate nocturnal sleep structure and anxiety, depression, and fatigue in patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1).
METHODS
Thirty NT1 patients and thirty-five healthy controls were enrolled and evaluated using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test, and brain function state monitoring. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was performed to control the false discovery rate.
RESULTS
Apart from typical clinical manifestations, patients with NT1 are prone to comorbidities such as nocturnal sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. Compared with the control group, patients with NT1 exhibited abnormal sleep structure, including increased total sleep time ( =0.007), decreased sleep efficiency ( =0.002), shortening of sleep onset latency ( <0.001), elevated wake after sleep onset ( =0.002), increased N1% ( =0.006), and reduced N2%, N3%, and REM% ( =0.007, <0.001, =0.013). Thirty-seven percent of patients had moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. And sixty percent of patients were complicated with REM sleep without atonia. Patients with NT1 displayed increased anxiety propensity ( <0.001), and increased brain fatigue ( =0.020) in brain function state monitoring. FSS scores were positively correlated with brain fatigue ( <0.001) and mean sleep latency was inversely correlated with FSS scores and brain fatigue ( =0.013, =0.029). Additionally, ESS scores and brain fatigue decreased after 3 months of therapy (=0.012, =0.030).
CONCLUSION
NT1 patients had abnormal nocturnal sleep structures, who showed increased anxiety, depression, and fatigue. Excessive daytime sleepiness and fatigue improved after 3 months of treatment with methylphenidate hydrochloride prolonged-release tablets in combination with venlafaxine.
PubMed: 38873239
DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S452665 -
International Journal of Geriatric... Jun 2024To examine clinically important adverse events (AEs) associated with methylphenidate (MPH) treatment of apathy in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) versus placebo, including... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
To examine clinically important adverse events (AEs) associated with methylphenidate (MPH) treatment of apathy in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) versus placebo, including weight loss, vital signs, falls, and insomnia.
METHODS
The Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET2) trial was a multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MPH to treat apathy in individuals with apathy and AD. Participants in ADMET2 had vital signs and weight measured at monthly visits through 6 months. AEs, including insomnia, falls, and cardiovascular events, were reported at every visit by participants and families using a symptom checklist.
RESULTS
The study included 98 participants in the MPH group and 101 in the placebo group. Participants in the MPH group experienced greater weight loss on average than the placebo through the 6-month follow-up, with a difference in change between MPH and placebo of 2.8 lb (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.7, 4.9 lb). No treatment group differences in change during the trial were found in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. More participants in the MPH group reported falls during the follow-up, 10 versus 6 in MPH and placebo groups, respectively. No differences in post-baseline insomnia were observed between the treatment groups. No participants reported instances of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, stroke, or cardiomyopathy throughout the study period.
CONCLUSIONS
MPH use in AD patients for treating apathy is relatively safe, particularly notable given the many medical comorbidities in this population. There was a statistically significant but modest weight loss associated with MPH use, and clinicians are thus advised to monitor weight during MPH treatment.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Methylphenidate; Female; Male; Apathy; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Aged, 80 and over; Weight Loss; Accidental Falls; Double-Blind Method; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
PubMed: 38858522
DOI: 10.1002/gps.6108 -
Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin Jun 2024
PubMed: 38857950
DOI: 10.1136/dtb.2024.e255187rep -
Frontiers in Neurology 2024Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently experience visual and oculomotor symptoms that may impact and confound neuropsychological assessments of information...
INTRODUCTION
Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently experience visual and oculomotor symptoms that may impact and confound neuropsychological assessments of information processing speed (IPS). In this study, we examined the effect of the psychostimulant methylphenidate on oculomotor function and the association between change in oculomotor speed and change in information processing speed.
METHODS
We used a repeated measures crossover design in which a sample of 11 participants with MS were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: one that received methylphenidate for 4 weeks and another that received a placebo for 4 weeks. After a 7-day washout period, the treatments were crossed over. The King Devick test, the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test were administered at baseline and after each of the two study arms.
RESULTS
We found a significant improvement in oculomotor speed in the methylphenidate condition as compared to placebo. This improvement was significantly correlated with improvement on a visuomotor assessment of IPS (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), but no such association was found for an auditory-verbal assessment of IPS (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test).
DISCUSSION
These findings suggest that individuals with MS experience improved oculomotor speed while taking methylphenidate, which may, in turn, improve performance on assessments of IPS with visuomotor demands.
PubMed: 38846035
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1393877 -
Reviews in the Neurosciences Jun 2024The prevalence of stroke and traumatic brain injury is increasing worldwide. However, current treatments do not fully cure or stop their progression, acting mostly on... (Review)
Review
The prevalence of stroke and traumatic brain injury is increasing worldwide. However, current treatments do not fully cure or stop their progression, acting mostly on symptoms. Amphetamine and methylphenidate are stimulants already approved for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy treatment, with neuroprotective potential and benefits when used in appropriate doses. This review aimed to summarize pre-clinical and clinical trials testing either amphetamine or methylphenidate for the treatment of stroke and traumatic brain injury. We used PubMed as a database and included the following keywords ((methylphenidate) OR (Ritalin) OR (Concerta) OR (Biphentin) OR (amphetamine) OR (Adderall)) AND ((stroke) OR (brain injury) OR (neuroplasticity)). Overall, studies provided inconsistent results regarding cognitive and motor function. Neurite outgrowth, synaptic proteins, dendritic complexity, and synaptic plasticity increases were reported in pre-clinical studies along with function improvement. Clinical trials have demonstrated that, depending on the brain region, there is an increase in motor activity, attention, and memory due to the stimulation of the functionally depressed catecholamine system and the activation of neuronal remodeling proteins. Nevertheless, more clinical trials and pre-clinical studies are needed to understand the drugs' full potential for their use in these brain diseases namely, to ascertain the treatment time window, ideal dosage, long-term effects, and mechanisms, while avoiding their addictive potential.
PubMed: 38843463
DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2024-0016 -
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Jun 2024Methylphenidate (MPH) is a common treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Concern has been raised regarding its cardiovascular safety, partly in...
INTRODUCTION
Methylphenidate (MPH) is a common treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Concern has been raised regarding its cardiovascular safety, partly in relation with its micromolar affinity for the 5-HT receptor, whose activation may result in valvular heart disease (VHD).
METHODS
To explore the association between the use of MPH and VHD reporting, we performed a disproportionality analysis within the WHO global safety database (VigiBase) using data, since inception until March 6th 2024, from: (i) the full database and (ii) different age groups (children/adolescents 6-17 years; adults 18-64 years). To avoid competition bias, safety reports with amphetamine-like appetite suppressants were excluded. Disproportionality was expressed using reporting odds-ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Of 29 129 spontaneous reports with MPH, 23 VHD cases (7.9 per 10 000 reports) were identified, including 13 adults and 10 children. Most cases concerned injury on the mitral valve. A disproportionate reporting was observed overall (ROR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4). Analysis according to age group found that disproportionality in VHD reporting was found in adults only (ROR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.7) but not in children/adolescents (ROR 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-3.2). Furthermore, amongst MPH users only, VHD reporting was higher in adults compared to children (ROR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.3).
CONCLUSION
VHD reporting appears rare with MPH compared to other adverse events and is increased in adults only. Our findings support a potential safety signal of VHD in adults exposed to MPH. A risk in that population cannot be excluded and requires further assessment.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Child; Pharmacovigilance; Heart Valve Diseases; Adult; Young Adult; Methylphenidate; Male; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Middle Aged; Female; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Databases, Factual; Age Factors
PubMed: 38837561
DOI: 10.1002/pds.5814 -
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2024[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1251144.].
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1251144.].
PubMed: 38835839
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1431914 -
Journal of the American Academy of... May 2024We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effect of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication on quality of life (QoL), and to...
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effect of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication on quality of life (QoL), and to understand whether this effect differs between stimulants and non-stimulants.
METHOD
From the dataset of a published network meta-analysis (Cortese et al., 2018), updated on 27 February 2023 (https://med-adhd.org/), we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADHD medications for individuals aged 6 years or more with a diagnosis of ADHD based on the DSM (from third to fifth editions) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD; ninth or tenth revision), reporting data on QoL (measured with a validated scale). The risk of bias for each RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. Multi-level meta-analytic models were conducted with R 4.3.1.
RESULTS
We included 17 RCTs (5,388 participants in total; 56% randomized to active medication) in the meta-analyses. We found that amphetamines (Hedges g = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.08, 0.94), methylphenidate (0.38; 0.23, 0.54), and atomoxetine (0.30; 0.19, 0.40) were significantly more efficacious than placebo in improving QoL in people with ADHD, with moderate effect size. For atomoxetine, these effects were not moderated by the length of intervention, and did not differ between children/adolescents and adults.
CONCLUSION
In addition to being efficacious in reducing ADHD core symptom severity, both stimulant and non-stimulant medications are efficacious in improving QoL in people with ADHD, albeit with lower effect sizes. Future research should explore whether, and to what degree, combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions is likely to further improve QoL in people with ADHD.
STUDY PREREGISTRATION INFORMATION
Effects of pharmacological treatment for ADHD on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis; https://osf.io/;qvgps.
PubMed: 38823477
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.05.023