-
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023The medicines information service, SafeMotherMedicine, regularly receives inquiries from breastfeeding women asking about antiemetics for nausea and vomiting during...
The medicines information service, SafeMotherMedicine, regularly receives inquiries from breastfeeding women asking about antiemetics for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) or hyperemesis gravidarum (HG). However, treatment guidelines for NVP or HG do not address the use of antiemetics in women who are breastfeeding while becoming pregnant again. Our objective was to characterize inquiries to describe the need for lactation risk information among women with NVP or HG and also to raise awareness of this topic. We conducted a review of inquiries to the Norwegian web-based medicines information service, SafeMotherMedicine. In total, 97 inquiries addressing the use of antiemetics for NVP or HG during breastfeeding were identified. The following medications were addressed in the inquiries ( = 97): meclizine (51%), metoclopramide (33%), promethazine (16%), ondansetron (9%), and others (6%). The breastfed child was older than 6 months and 1 year in 96% and 71% of the inquiries, respectively. There was a preponderance of general inquiries (unclear motivation/double checking) (64%); however, one-third of the inquiries were generated by restrictive information from sources such as product information. Based on our small review of spontaneous inquiries, there seems to be an information need about the use of antiemetics during lactation among women breastfeeding an older infant whilst suffering from NVP or HG. Addressing such use in guidelines for NVP and HG and/or other easily available information sources may be considered in order to balance out the restrictive information provided by the manufacturers. This could avoid potential unnecessary weaning of breastfeeding in an otherwise challenging situation.
PubMed: 38094894
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1238875 -
The Lancet Regional Health. Europe Jan 2024Infections and fever after stroke are associated with poor functional outcome or death. We assessed whether prophylactic treatment with anti-emetic, antibiotic, or...
Prevention of infections and fever to improve outcome in older patients with acute stroke (PRECIOUS): a randomised, open, phase III, multifactorial, clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment.
BACKGROUND
Infections and fever after stroke are associated with poor functional outcome or death. We assessed whether prophylactic treatment with anti-emetic, antibiotic, or antipyretic medication would improve functional outcome in older patients with acute stroke.
METHODS
We conducted an international, 2∗2∗2-factorial, randomised, controlled, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment in patients aged 66 years or older with acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage and a score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥ 6. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to metoclopramide (oral, rectal, or intravenous; 10 mg thrice daily) vs. no metoclopramide, ceftriaxone (intravenous; 2000 mg once daily) vs. no ceftriaxone, and paracetamol (oral, rectal, or intravenous; 1000 mg four times daily) vs. no paracetamol, started within 24 h after symptom onset and continued for four days. All participants received standard of care. The target sample size was 3800 patients. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days analysed with ordinal logistic regression and reported as an adjusted common odds ratio (an acOR < 1 suggests benefit and an acOR > 1 harm). This trial is registered (ISRCTN82217627).
FINDINGS
From April 2016 through June 2022, 1493 patients from 67 European sites were randomised to metoclopramide (n = 704) or no metoclopramide (n = 709), ceftriaxone (n = 594) or no ceftriaxone (n = 482), and paracetamol (n = 706) or no paracetamol (n = 739), of whom 1471 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Prophylactic use of study medication did not significantly alter the primary outcome at 90 days: metoclopramide vs. no metoclopramide (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR], 1.01; 95% CI 0.81-1.25), ceftriaxone vs. no ceftriaxone (acOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.77-1.27), paracetamol vs. no paracetamol (acOR 1.19; 95% CI 0.96-1.47). The study drugs were safe and not associated with an increased incidence of serious adverse events.
INTERPRETATION
We observed no sign of benefit of prophylactic use of metoclopramide, ceftriaxone, or paracetamol during four days in older patients with a moderately severe to severe acute stroke.
FUNDING
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No: 634809.
PubMed: 38074444
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100782 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology May 2024The 2021 American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines suggested using of intravenous erythromycin before endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION
The 2021 American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines suggested using of intravenous erythromycin before endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) to enhance endoscopic view and reduce the need for repeat endoscopy. Evidence on intravenous metoclopramide, which is more accessible, is scant, especially in patients with active UGIB. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of metoclopramide for gastric visualization in patients with active UGIB.
METHODS
Between April 10, 2021, and October 8, 2022, this double-blind, double-center randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with active UGIB (hematemesis or presence of fresh blood in the nasogastric tube). The eligible patients were randomly assigned in a concealed 1:1 allocation to metoclopramide or placebo. The primary outcome was adequate visualization by objective endoscopic visualized gastroduodenal scores (EVS). Secondary outcomes included mean difference in EVS, duration of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), immediate hemostasis, need for a second look EGD, units of blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and 30-day rebleeding rate.
RESULTS
Of the 68 eligible patients, 3 of each group were excluded by protocol violation. Finally, 62 patients (31 metoclopramide and 31 placebo) were analyzed. The percentage of patients with adequate visualization in metoclopramide and placebo group was 77.4% and 61.6% (odds ratio [OR] 2.16 [0.71-6.58], P = 0.16). The need for a second look EGD in the 72 hours was lower in the metoclopramide group (3.2% vs 22.6%, OR 0.11 [0.01-0.99], P = 0.02), whereas the other secondary outcomes were not different. However, in gastric lesions subgroup analysis, metoclopramide improved the adequate visualization rate (92.9% vs 50%, OR 13 [1.32-128.10], P = 0.03) and mean EVS at fundus (1.79 ± 0.42 vs 1.29 ± 0.72; P = 0.03).
DISCUSSION
Metoclopramide did not improve endoscopic visualization but decreased the need for second look EGD in patients with overall active UGIB. It improved gastric visualization in those with UGIB due to gastric lesions, primarily by improving visualization in the fundus ( ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04771481).
Topics: Humans; Metoclopramide; Double-Blind Method; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Aged; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
PubMed: 38059896
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002620 -
Medicine Dec 2023This case report presents a unique acute dystonic reaction (ADR) induced by metoclopramide in a 6-year-old male patient with pertussis-associated vomiting. The rarity of...
INTRODUCTION
This case report presents a unique acute dystonic reaction (ADR) induced by metoclopramide in a 6-year-old male patient with pertussis-associated vomiting. The rarity of such a reaction in pediatric patients underscores the significance of this case in contributing to the scientific literature. This report highlights the need for heightened awareness of the potential adverse effects of medications commonly used in pediatrics and emphasizes the importance of tailored interventions for this population.
MAIN SYMPTOMS AND IMPORTANT CLINICAL FINDINGS
Following the administration of metoclopramide for vomiting associated with pertussis cough, the patient exhibited distressing symptoms, including torticollis, facial grimacing, and tongue protrusion. These involuntary movements were promptly recognized, leading to the suspicion of an ADR. The clinical findings underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring for extrapyramidal symptoms following medication administration, especially in children.
THE MAIN DIAGNOSES, THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOMES
The primary diagnosis of ADR induced by metoclopramide was confirmed, prompting the cessation of the medication and the initiation of anticholinergic therapy with benztropine. This intervention rapidly resolved the patient's symptoms, highlighting the importance of tailored and swift therapeutic strategies. The outcome demonstrated the efficacy of timely intervention in managing ADR in pediatric patients.
CONCLUSION
The main takeaway lesson from this case lies in the critical need for healthcare practitioners to remain vigilant for potential adverse reactions in pediatric patients, even when prescribing commonly used medications. The successful management of this case underscores the importance of prompt recognition, appropriate interventions, and continuous monitoring. Ultimately, this case contributes to the scientific literature by highlighting the unique manifestation of ADR in a pediatric patient, reinforcing the significance of individualized patient care and medication safety.
Topics: Male; Humans; Child; Metoclopramide; Whooping Cough; Vomiting; Dyskinesias; Torticollis
PubMed: 38050314
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036140 -
Cureus Oct 2023Background Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a major health concern in pediatric populations because of its associated vomiting, which worsens dehydration and the severity...
Background Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a major health concern in pediatric populations because of its associated vomiting, which worsens dehydration and the severity of illness. Objective The purpose of the research was to compare the relative effectiveness of oral ondansetron in treating AGE in children's vomiting when compared to oral domperidone and oral metoclopramide. Methodology A clinical investigation involving 120 pediatric patients diagnosed with AGE was conducted in Pakistan from November 2022 to April 2023 using a single-blind randomized design and convenience sampling. The participants received oral suspensions of ondansetron, metoclopramide, and domperidone, with doses of 0.15 mg/kg, 0.1-0.2 mg/kg, and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, adjusted according to their body weight. The outcome in different groups was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 20.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). Results At six hours, vomiting cessation rates were 80.0% for ondansetron (n=32), 72.5% for domperidone (n=29), and 67.5% for metoclopramide (n=27; p=0.29). By 24 hours, ondansetron exhibited significantly higher efficacy (92.5%; n=37) compared to domperidone (82.5%; n=33) and metoclopramide (77.5%; n=31; p=0.03). Adverse effects were minimal and comparable across groups. Conclusion Oral ondansetron demonstrated superior efficacy in managing AGE-related vomiting in children within 24 hours compared to metoclopramide and domperidone.
PubMed: 38022212
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47611 -
Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin... May 2024The presence of gastrointestinal dysfunction is an outcome-relevant complication in critically ill ICU patients. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The presence of gastrointestinal dysfunction is an outcome-relevant complication in critically ill ICU patients.
AIMS, MATERIALS AND METHODS
The following review aims to show the importance of gastrointestinal dysfunction. Multimodal therapy for gastroparesis and paralytic ileus is discussed.
CONCLUSION
Erythromycin and metoclopramide are options for gastroparesis, while neostigmine is commonly used for paralytic ileus.
Topics: Humans; Gastroparesis; Metoclopramide; Combined Modality Therapy; Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction; Neostigmine; Erythromycin; Enteral Nutrition; Critical Care; Gastrointestinal Agents
PubMed: 37985511
DOI: 10.1007/s00063-023-01082-z -
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and... Nov 2023Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different...
BACKGROUND
Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.
METHODS
We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.
RESULTS
Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.
CONCLUSIONS
Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.
PubMed: 37974241
DOI: 10.1186/s44158-023-00134-2 -
The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology... Nov 2023The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for the incidence of gastroscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy and the small bowel transit time in pediatric patients...
BACKGROUND/AIMS
The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for the incidence of gastroscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy and the small bowel transit time in pediatric patients who underwent capsule endoscopy examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective analysis was performed to analyze the clinical data collected from pediatric patients who underwent capsule endoscopy examination.
RESULTS
A total of 239 pediatric patients were enrolled in this study. About 196 (82.0%) patients completed the entire small bowel capsule endoscopy examination, while 3 (1.3%) patients were subjected to capsule retention. Only age, not gender, height, body weight, body mass index, chief complaint, and intestinal preparation medications, has been identified as a risk factor for the incidence of gastroscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy (P < .05) by multivariate logistic regression. Further analysis showed that the small bowel transit time in the self-swallowed group was shorter than that in the gastroscopy-assisted group, while no significant difference was obtained in other factors, including intestinal preparation medications, metoclopramide, and lesions in the small intestine, which did not significantly affect small bowel transit time compared with the corresponding control group (P > .05).
CONCLUSION
A comprehensive assessment is required before performing capsule endoscopy, because age has been identified as a critical risk factor for the incidence of gastroscopy-assisted capsule endoscopy in pediatric patients.
PubMed: 37966265
DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22428 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023To identify modifiable risk factors associated with prolonged clearance of methotrexate in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) oncology patients receiving high...
PURPOSE
To identify modifiable risk factors associated with prolonged clearance of methotrexate in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) oncology patients receiving high dose methotrexate (HDMTX).
DESIGN/METHOD
A single institution, retrospective chart review of patients receiving HDMTX between 2010-2017. Patients had a diagnosis of either leukemia or osteosarcoma. Data included demographics, concurrent intravenous (IV) medications, IV fluids (IVF) administered, urine output (UO), and rises in serum creatinine (RSC) reflective of renal toxicity (RT). Outcome measures included 1) delayed targeted MTX clearance (DC), 2) actual time to clearance (TTC) and 3) length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS
Data from 447 HDMTX administrations were analyzed. The sample consisted of 241 (54%) osteosarcoma encounters, and 206 (46%) leukemia encounters, with an average patient age of 12.7 years. Multivariate analysis showed that DC was associated with the diagnosis of leukemia (OR 7.64, p <.0001), and less UO on day 1 (OR 0.76, p=0.005). Increased TTC was associated with increasing age (RR 1.02, p<0.0001), higher 24-hour MTX levels (RR 1.001, p=0.012) and 48-hour MTX levels (RR 1.02, p<0.0001), RT (RR 1.004, p<0.0001), use of IV lorazepam (RR 1.08, p=0.001) and IV metoclopramide (RR 1.08, p<0.001) both on day 3. Like TTC, LOS was affected by MTX levels at 24 (RR 1.001, p=0.025) and 48 hours (RR 1.03, p<0.0001), RT (RR 1.006, p<0.0001), total IV medications on day 3 (RR 1.042, p<0.0001), and the use of leucovorin on day 2 (RR 0.93, p=0.002).
CONCLUSION
Multiple modifiable risk factors were identified which can be leveraged to improve HDMTX clearance. Subsequent efforts will assess whether acting on such risk factors can improve MTX clearance and shorten LOS.
PubMed: 37965460
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1280587 -
Clinical NeuropharmacologyNeuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a life-threatening condition that occurs as an adverse reaction to antipsychotic and antiemetic agents or sudden withdrawal of...
OBJECTIVES
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a life-threatening condition that occurs as an adverse reaction to antipsychotic and antiemetic agents or sudden withdrawal of dopaminergic medications. Given the metabolic and functional reserves and the comorbidities in older adults, NMS may show an atypical course.
METHODS
The medical records of patients with neurodegenerative diseases leading to dementia between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed for the diagnosis of NMS. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were obtained from the records of laboratory parameters, management, and length of stay.
RESULTS
Fifteen older adults (19 episodes) diagnosed with NMS were included. The median age was 76 years, and 5 were female. Ten of 15 NMS patients were atypical. Most of them had an infection accompanying NMS. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome was caused by antidopaminergic agents (5 antipsychotics, 1 metoclopramide) in 6 episodes and discontinuation of a dopaminergic agent, l -DOPA, in 12 episodes. In 1 patient, it was associated with simultaneous use of domperidone and amantadine withdrawal. Rigidity in NMS due to l -DOPA discontinuation was higher than in those due to antipsychotic use ( P = 0.027). Two of our patients needed intensive care, and 1 died.
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights the high frequency of atypical NMS and the importance of early recognition of this potentially fatal syndrome, which can accompany neurodegenerative diseases and infections in older adults.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aged; Male; Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome; Antipsychotic Agents; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Dementia; Dihydroxyphenylalanine
PubMed: 37962307
DOI: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000570