-
Annals of the Academy of Medicine,... Oct 2023Hypervolemia is a prevalent comorbidity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Thiazide diuretics (THZ) are the most common treatment for volume overload and...
INTRODUCTION
Hypervolemia is a prevalent comorbidity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Thiazide diuretics (THZ) are the most common treatment for volume overload and hypertension (HTN). This study examines the association between THZ usage and clinical outcomes among CKD patients in a nationwide cohort.
METHOD
The total number of patients in the study was 24,312. After matching with one non-user randomly selected from the CKD population, we identified 8501 patients in the THZ and the comparison cohorts. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to estimate the associations of THZ on the incidence of all-cause mortality, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), congestive heart failure (CHF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), and stroke.
RESULTS
The all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in THZ users than in non-users (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.60- 0.71). The THZ usage was associated with a lower incidence of ESRD, AMI, PAOD, and stroke (P<0.05). In subgroup analysis, some significant clinical outcomes were related with CKD stages 3 and 4 (P<0.05); however, there were no clinical associations in CKD stage 5. In further THZ subtype analysis, there were clinical associations with fewer deaths, ESRD, AMI, and PAOD accompanying chlorthalidone treatment. Moreover, the indapamide prescription was linked to lower mortality, ESRD, AMI, and PAOD prevalence. However, there were significantly greater incidences of ESRD, CHF, and AMI in the metolazone users.
CONCLUSION
THZ usage is associated with lower mortality and incidence of ESRD, AMI, PAOD, and stroke s in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4.
Topics: Humans; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Male; Female; Aged; Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Middle Aged; Heart Failure; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Incidence; Proportional Hazards Models; Hypertension; Cardiovascular Diseases; Singapore
PubMed: 38920202
DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202359 -
Medicina Clinica Jun 2024
PubMed: 38839442
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2024.03.020 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... May 2024
Review
Topics: Humans; Hypertension; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure
PubMed: 38771738
DOI: 10.58347/tml.2024.1703a -
JACC. Heart Failure Apr 2024Limited evidence exists regarding efficacy and safety of diuretic regimens in ambulatory, congestion-refractory, chronic heart failure (CHF) patients.
BACKGROUND
Limited evidence exists regarding efficacy and safety of diuretic regimens in ambulatory, congestion-refractory, chronic heart failure (CHF) patients.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the potency and safety of commonly used diuretic regimens in CHF patients.
METHODS
A prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover study conducted in NYHA class II-IV CHF patients, treated in an ambulatory day-care unit. Each patient received 3 different diuretic regimens: intravenous (IV) furosemide 250mg; IV furosemide 250mg plus oral metolazone 5mg; and IV furosemide 250mg plus IV acetazolamide 500mg. Treatments were administered once a week, in one of six randomized sequences. The primary endpoint was total sodium excretion, and the secondary was total urinary volume excreted, both measured for 6 hours post-treatment initiation.
RESULTS
A total of 42 patients were recruited. Administration of furosemide plus metolazone resulted in the highest weight of sodium excreted, 4691 mg (95% CI: 4153-5229) compared to furosemide alone 3835 mg (95% CI: 3279-4392), P=0.015 and to furosemide plus acetazolamide 3584 mg (95% CI: 3020-4148), P=0.001. Furosemide plus metolazone resulted in 1.84 liters of urine (95% CI: 1.63-2.05), compared to 1.58 liters (95% CI: 1.37-1.8) P=0.039 collected following administration of furosemide plus acetazolamide and 1.71 liters (95% CI 1.49-1.93) following furosemide alone. The incidence of worsening renal function (WRF) was significantly higher when adding metolazone (41%) to furosemide compared to furosemide alone (17%) and to furosemide plus acetazolamide (2.6%), P<0.001.
CONCLUSIONS
In ambulatory CHF patients, furosemide plus metolazone resulted in a significantly higher natriuresis compared to IV furosemide alone or furosemide plus acetazolamide.
PubMed: 38739124
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.04.014 -
The Canadian Journal of Hospital... 2024Heart failure is a common condition with considerable associated costs, morbidity, and mortality. Patients often present to hospital with dyspnea and edema. Inadequate... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Heart failure is a common condition with considerable associated costs, morbidity, and mortality. Patients often present to hospital with dyspnea and edema. Inadequate inpatient decongestion is an important contributor to high readmission rates. There is little evidence concerning diuresis to guide clinicians in caring for patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Contemporary diuretic strategies have been defined by expert opinion and older landmark clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE
To present a narrative review of contemporary recommendations, along with their underlying evidence and pharmacologic rationale, for diuretic strategies in inpatients with acute decompensated heart failure.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, OVID, and Embase databases were searched from inception to December 22, 2022, with the following search terms: heart failure, acute heart failure, decompensated heart failure, furosemide, bumetanide, ethacrynic acid, hydrochlorothiazide, indapamide, metolazone, chlorthalidone, spironolactone, eplerenone, and acetazolamide.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews involving at least 100 adult patients (> 18 years) were included. Trials involving torsemide, chlorothiazide, and tolvaptan were excluded.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Early, aggressive administration of a loop diuretic has been associated with expedited symptom resolution, shorter length of stay, and possibly reduced mortality. Guidelines make recommendations about dose and frequency but do not recommend any particular loop diuretic over another; however, furosemide is most commonly used. Guidelines recommend that the initial furosemide dose (on admission) be 2-2.5 times the patient's home dose. A satisfactory diuretic response can be defined as spot urine sodium content greater than 50-70 mmol/L at 2 hours; urine output greater than 100-150 mL/h in the first 6 hours or 3-5 L in 24 hours; or a change in weight of 0.5-1.5 kg in 24 hours. If congestion persists after the maximization of loop diuretic therapy over the first 24-48 hours, an adjunctive diuretic such as thiazide or acetazolamide should be added. If decongestion targets are not met, continuous infusion of furosemide may be considered.
CONCLUSIONS
Heart failure with congestion can be managed with careful administration of high-dose loop diuretics, supported by thiazides and acetazolamide when necessary. Clinical trials are underway to further evaluate this strategy.
PubMed: 38204501
DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3323 -
Cureus Sep 2023Heart failure (HF) is a notable public health issue, and intravenous loop diuretics are frequently employed to address acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and... (Review)
Review
Heart failure (HF) is a notable public health issue, and intravenous loop diuretics are frequently employed to address acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and alleviate symptoms of congestion. However, prolonged use of loop diuretics can lead to drug resistance, and some patients experience refractory volume overload that does not respond to treatment. Sequential nephron blockade, which involves combining loop and thiazide diuretics, has been proposed as a strategy to overcome diuretic resistance and improve fluid overload management. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this combination diuretic therapy. Following the directives detailed in the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted. Eligibility criteria were established to select relevant studies, including the requirement for studies to be conducted on human subjects and published as free full-text papers in English within the last 10 years. Several databases were searched using a combination of Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) phrases and keywords related to heart failure, loop diuretics, and thiazide diuretics. The search yielded 948 references, and after screening titles, abstracts, and full-text papers, eight final studies (five observational studies and three randomized control trials) were included in the review. Based on the findings of this systematic review, there is substantial evidence to endorse the efficacy of combination diuretic therapy of loop and thiazide diuretics in augmenting diuresis and enhancing outcomes for patients who exhibit insufficient responses to single-agent diuretics. Additionally, the review provides valuable insights about the timing and type of diuretics to use, helping clinicians make informed therapeutic decisions. However, to ensure patient safety and well-being, it is imperative to take into account the potential for electrolyte disturbances and impacts on renal function, necessitating diligent and vigilant monitoring as well as effective management strategies. In light of these findings, further research is warranted to optimize the dosing regimens and to delve deeper into the long-term safety and efficacy of combination therapy. Such research endeavors will undoubtedly contribute to refining treatment approaches and advancing patient care in the field of HF management.
PubMed: 37720125
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44624 -
European Heart Journal Aug 2023
Topics: Humans; Diuretics; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Metolazone; Heart Failure
PubMed: 37572039
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad463 -
European Heart Journal Aug 2023To examine the decongestive effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin compared to the thiazide-like diuretic metolazone in patients... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
To examine the decongestive effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin compared to the thiazide-like diuretic metolazone in patients hospitalized for heart failure and resistant to treatment with intravenous furosemide.
METHODS AND RESULTS
A multi-centre, open-label, randomized, and active-comparator trial. Patients were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or metolazone 5-10 mg once daily for a 3-day treatment period, with follow-up for primary and secondary endpoints until day 5 (96 h). The primary endpoint was a diuretic effect, assessed by change in weight (kg). Secondary endpoints included a change in pulmonary congestion (lung ultrasound), loop diuretic efficiency (weight change per 40 mg of furosemide), and a volume assessment score. 61 patients were randomized. The mean (±standard deviation) cumulative dose of furosemide at 96 h was 977 (±492) mg in the dapagliflozin group and 704 (±428) mg in patients assigned to metolazone. The mean (±standard deviation) decrease in weight at 96 h was 3.0 (2.5) kg with dapagliflozin compared to 3.6 (2.0) kg with metolazone [mean difference 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12,1.41 kg; P = 0.11]. Loop diuretic efficiency was less with dapagliflozin than with metolazone [mean 0.15 (0.12) vs. 0.25 (0.19); difference -0.08, 95% CI -0.17,0.01 kg; P = 0.10]. Changes in pulmonary congestion and volume assessment score were similar between treatments. Decreases in plasma sodium and potassium and increases in urea and creatinine were smaller with dapagliflozin than with metolazone. Serious adverse events were similar between treatments.
CONCLUSION
In patients with heart failure and loop diuretic resistance, dapagliflozin was not more effective at relieving congestion than metolazone. Patients assigned to dapagliflozin received a larger cumulative dose of furosemide but experienced less biochemical upset than those assigned to metolazone.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04860011.
Topics: Humans; Metolazone; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Diuretics; Sodium
PubMed: 37210742
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad341