-
Obstetrics and Gynecology Jun 2024To evaluate fertility outcomes based on size and number of intramural leiomyomas and outcomes after removal.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate fertility outcomes based on size and number of intramural leiomyomas and outcomes after removal.
DATA SOURCES
Online searches: MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO Library from 1994 to 2023.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
A total of 5,143 studies were identified, with inclusion of 13 study groups.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS
Outcomes for size and number of leiomyomas were reported with clinical pregnancy rates and ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates. In data sets with maximum leiomyoma diameters of less than 6 cm for study inclusion, women with leiomyomas smaller than 3 cm had lower clinical pregnancy rates than women without leiomyomas, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.38-0.76) and, for ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates, an OR of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.41-0.86). The ORs for clinical pregnancy rates in women with intermediately-sized leiomyomas (those between 3 cm and 6 cm) were lower than in women without leiomyomas, with an OR at 0.43 (95% CI, 0.29-0.63) and, for ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates, an OR at 0.38 (95% CI, 0.24-0.59). In data sets without exclusion for women with larger-sized leiomyomas, clinical pregnancy rates were lower for those with leiomyomas smaller than 5 cm compared with those without leiomyomas, with an OR of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.58-0.96). Women with leiomyomas larger than 5 cm showed no differences in clinical pregnancy rate compared with women without leiomyomas, with an OR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.32-1.58). Although women with a single leiomyoma in any location had no differences in outcomes, those with more than one leiomyoma had lower clinical pregnancy rates and ongoing pregnancy or live-birth rates, with an OR of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.44-0.86) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.36-0.88), respectively. The clinical pregnancy rate for women undergoing myomectomy for intramural leiomyomas was no different than those with intramural leiomyomas in situ, with an OR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.77-1.59).
CONCLUSION
Even small intramural leiomyomas are associated with lower fertility; removal does not confer benefit. Women with more than one leiomyoma in any location have reduced fertility.
PubMed: 38935974
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005661 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2024Leiomyosarcoma (LMS), together with smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyomas, belongs to a heterogeneous group of uterine...
INTRODUCTION
Leiomyosarcoma (LMS), together with smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and benign leiomyomas, belongs to a heterogeneous group of uterine neoplasms. According to the World Health Organization, tumors originating from uterine smooth muscle fibers are the second most frequent tumors. It is challenging to distinguish between STUMP and LMS because of an overlap of symptoms, lack of a precise definition, and unequivocal information obtained using imaging diagnostic methods. Following myomectomy or hysterectomy with laparoscopic or laparotomy surgery and a definitive histological diagnosis of STUMP, the course of treatment is determined by the need to preserve fertility. In 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration published an alert that unprotected laparoscopic morcellation is correlated with a 3-fold higher likelihood of dissemination of malignant cells and disease progression. Unprotected morcellation was independently associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence after demolition or conservative surgery, with a relative risk of 2.94.
CONCLUSION
Hematoperitoneum resulting from the spontaneous rupture of a uterine tumor is a rare gynecological emergency, with very few cases reported in the last decade.
PubMed: 38912336
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1407546 -
Journal of the Formosan Medical... Jun 2024This study aims to describe the dome-type manual morcellation technique, a modified form of C-type incision, its comparative advantages over existing morcellation...
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to describe the dome-type manual morcellation technique, a modified form of C-type incision, its comparative advantages over existing morcellation methods, the perioperative outcomes of trainees with varying experience levels, and the variables influencing morcellation speed based on our two years of experience.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy or hysterectomy using dome-type morcellation for tissue extraction at a tertiary teaching hospital between May 2020 and September 2022. Morcellation was performed by either a single surgeon or a trainee (resident). Basic patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and morcellation time and speed were compared between the surgeon and trainee group. Regression models were employed to analyze variables influencing morcellation speed.
RESULTS
A total of 41 women were enrolled. Among them, 20 procedures were performed by a surgeon alone, while the remaining 21 procedures were completed by trainees under the surgeon's supervision. The median weight of the specimens was 378 g (range 91-1345 g), and the median time for morcellation was 10 min (range 1-55 min). The median morcellation speed of surgeon and trainees was 70.25 and 31.7 g/min, respectively. Trainees' level of experience was found to be associated with morcellation speed, particularly for soft specimens. Additionally, both incision size and specimen stiffness were significantly associated with morcellation speed. No morcellation-related complications or bag ruptures were observed.
CONCLUSION
Dome-type manual morcellation is an intuitive, efficient and safe method for specimen removal and is easy to learn for beginners.
PubMed: 38890065
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2024.06.009 -
Urology Jun 2024To assess the feasibility, safety, and predictive factors for the success of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with catheter removal and hospital...
OBJECTIVE
To assess the feasibility, safety, and predictive factors for the success of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with catheter removal and hospital discharge on the same day of the procedure.
METHODS
This prospective study included 34 patients who underwent HoLEP using a 60-W holmium laser device and the Wolf Piranha morcellation system. Surgeries began at 10:30 am and the patients were expected to be discharged by 5 pm on the same day. The patients underwent a voiding trial to remove the urinary catheter before hospital discharge. Functional outcomes were assessed 90 days after the procedure.
RESULTS
Mean (range) age, prostate-specific antigen value, and prostate weight were as follows: 63.4 (50-80) years, 4.81 (0.19-14) ng/mL, and 89.3 (33-258) g, respectively. The mean (range) enucleation and morcellation times were 56.2 (29-91) minutes and 14.67 (3-45) minutes, respectively. Thirty-one patients (91.1%) were discharged on the same day of the procedure after urinary catheter removal.
CONCLUSION
The performance of HoLEP is safe on an outpatient basis. Same-day catheter removal is feasible and does not affect hospital discharge.
PubMed: 38871305
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.06.001 -
Urology Annals 2024We aimed to study whether using 30 W versus 60 W thulium enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) would affect postoperative outcomes in patients with benign prostatic...
INTRODUCTION
We aimed to study whether using 30 W versus 60 W thulium enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) would affect postoperative outcomes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We prospectively identified male patients with moderate or severe lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH. We randomized patients into 30 W (Group 1) or 60 W (Group 2) thulium yag laser with a 550 μm laser fiber and a 26 Fr continuous flow resectoscope. We collected data related to prostate size, enucleation time, morcellation time, laser time, perioperative complications, and 1-year functional outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 120 patients were included, with a mean age of 67 years and a mean prostate size of 105 g. The preoperative characteristics were similar across both groups. The mean operative time was shorter in the 60 W group, 74 ± 27 vs. 91 ± 33 min in the 30 W group ( = 0.001), and the mean laser time was 55 ± 20 in 60 W versus 71 ± 25 in 30 W ( = 0.0001). The mean hospital stay was 1 day in both groups and at 1-year follow-up; there was a similar improvement in mean Qmax and International Prostate Symptom Score symptom scores.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION
Both 30 and 60 W ThuLEP provided a safe and comparable outcome with a relatively shorter operative time for the 60 W groups. Perhaps using a 30-W setting would be beneficial in the early learning curve or cases with more bleeding capsular perforators; besides, the financial benefit of manufacturing low-cost low-power devices that may help in the widespread of AEEP.
PubMed: 38818432
DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_159_22 -
Arab Journal of Urology 2024Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) provides durable management for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to large-sized...
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) provides durable management for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to large-sized prostate over other surgical modalities. We aimed to assess the early outcomes of Collins knife-assisted bipolar enucleation (BipolEP) versus Thulium-Yag enucleation (ThuLEP) in a group of patients with LUTS secondary to a prostate larger than 80 grams.
METHODS
We included patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) having a prostate volume > 80 grams, international prostate symptom score (IPSS) >7, urine flow (Q-max) <15, and post-void residual (PVR)>150 ml. We excluded those with a history of previous prostatic surgery, stone, or neurogenic bladder. Bipolar enucleation with early apical release was performed using Collins knife at an 80/100-watt setting (Lamidey Noury), while ThuLEP was conducted using 550- micron fiber and 40/15-watt energy (Lisa Laser). Patients were evaluated before then 2 weeks and 3, 6,12 months postoperatively for changes in IPSS, Q- max, PVR, and the incidence of stress incontinence.
RESULT
One hundred and twenty patients were equally randomized with a mean prostate size of 104 ± 25 gram. The mean IPSS score was 25 ± 6, Qmax 7.6 ± 1.3 mL/S, and PVR 225 ± 39. There was no significant difference regarding enucleation time, morcellation time, and enucleated tissue volume. Irrigation volume and post-operative hemoglobin drop were significantly lower in the bipolar group ( = 0.008, = 0.0002), respectively. At the third-month follow-up, IPSS, Q-max, and PVR were comparable across both groups, with stress incontinence at 3.3% in the bipolar group versus 1.6% in the thulium group, showing an insignificant difference ( = 0.5)."
CONCLUSION
Both BipolEP and ThuLEP, with early apical release, provide a safe and effective management of large-size prostate resulting in significant decrease in post-operative stress incontinence incidence during early follow-up. Intraoperative irrigation saline volume, and post-operative hemoglobin drop favored the bipolar group.
PubMed: 38818261
DOI: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2321737 -
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology May 2024
PubMed: 38761916
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.014 -
Lasers in Medical Science May 2024Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) is a highly effective approach to the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. We present here a description of the...
Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) is a highly effective approach to the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. We present here a description of the "ARTh Technique" and the benefits it offers in terms of improved visualization, short operation times, and easy recognition of the dissection plane, describing specifically the anterior release (AR) technique using ThuLEP(Th). Included in this retrospective study were 32 consecutive patients operated on between January 2022-November 2022. Parameters were measured before and after the procedure: the International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS), maximum flow rate(Qmax), post-void residual urine(PVR) prostate-specific antigen(PSA), prostate volume, operation-time, morcellation-time, catheterization-time and presence of transient urinary incontinence, and compared. The median age of patients undergoing enucleation of the prostate using the ARTh technique was 64 years (range: 44-83). The median prostate volume of the patients was 83.5 ml(50-128 ml), preoperative-IPSS was 24.8(15-33), postoperative-IPSS was 7(5-11), preoperative-Qmax was 8.1 ml/Sects. (5-11.5 ml/sec), postoperative-Qmax was 26.9 ml/Sect. (20.8-34 ml/sec), preoperative-PVR was 145 ml(75-258 ml), postoperative-PVR was 36.2 ml(0-66 ml), total operation time was 51.4 min(28-82 min), enucleation time was 36.9 min(19-51 min) and morcellation time was 15.3 min(8-27 min). The ARTh technique is a safe procedure that allows the surgeon to easily recognize and adhere to the defined dissection plane, thus decreasing operation times, significantly reducing the rate of postoperative transient urinary incontinence (TUI).
Topics: Humans; Male; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Thulium; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Lasers, Solid-State; Adult; Laser Therapy; Prostate; Prostatectomy; Operative Time; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38714553
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-024-04071-6 -
World Journal of Urology May 2024The primary aim of the study was to evaluate if en-bloc vs. non en-bloc made a difference to intra-, peri- and post-operative surgical outcomes of anatomical endoscopic... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Real world propensity score matched analysis evaluating the influence of en-bloc vs. non en-bloc techniques, energy and instrumentation on enucleation outcomes for large and very large prostates.
PURPOSE
The primary aim of the study was to evaluate if en-bloc vs. non en-bloc made a difference to intra-, peri- and post-operative surgical outcomes of anatomical endoscopic enucleation (AEEP) in large (> 80 cc) and very large prostates (> 200 cc). The secondary aim was to determine the influence of energy and instruments used.
METHODS
Data of patients with > 80 cc prostate who underwent surgery between 2019 and 2022 were obtained from 16 surgeons across 13 centres in 9 countries. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors associated with postoperative urinary incontinence (UI).
RESULTS
2512 patients were included with 991 patients undergoing en-bloc and 1521 patients undergoing non-en-bloc. PSM resulted in 481 patients in both groups. Total operation time was longer in the en-bloc group (p < 0.001), enucleation time was longer in the non en-bloc group (p < 0.001) but morcellation times were similar (p = 0.054). Overall, 30 day complication rate was higher in the non en-bloc group (16.4% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.032). Rate of late complications (> 30 days) was similar (2.3% vs. 2.5%; p > 0.99). There were no differences in rates of UI between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, Qmax, pre-operative, post-void residual urine (PVRU) and total operative time were predictors of UI.
CONCLUSIONS
In experienced hands, AEEP in large prostates by the en-bloc technique yields a lower rate of complication and a slightly shorter operative time compared to the non en-bloc approach. However, it does not have an effect on rates of post-operative UI.
Topics: Humans; Male; Propensity Score; Aged; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Organ Size; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Prostate; Urinary Incontinence
PubMed: 38710824
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04959-6 -
Cureus Mar 2024Acquired urethral diverticula (UD) in males is an uncommon entity, and it is rarely reported after an open simple prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the...
Acquired urethral diverticula (UD) in males is an uncommon entity, and it is rarely reported after an open simple prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate. Here, we report a unique case of a UD presenting after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in a 69-year-old male with a prostate of 372 g who had five episodes of urine retention over one year despite combined medical treatment with tamsulosin 0.8 mg and finasteride 5 mg. The patient also has elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with five negative prostate biopsies over the last few years. The procedure lasted six hours with difficult morcellation due to beach balls that took 3.5 hours. There were no intraoperative complications. However, he continued to have mixed urine incontinence and recurrent (six) episodes of urinary tract infection (UTI) in the first postoperative year. On evaluation, his urodynamic study did not reproduce stress urinary incontinence (SUI); however, cystoscopy and retrograde urethrogram diagnosed a 6-cm UD in the bulbar penile urethra with penoscrotal mass. The patient underwent urethral diverticulectomy and urethroplasty with a buccal mucosa graft to correct the defect. Six months after his urethral reconstruction, he continued to have mixed urine incontinence needing two pads/day. Although male UD is a rare condition, our case report seeks to heighten awareness of such a potential rare complication in men with recurrent UTIs and refractory urinary incontinence after prolonged HoLEP for extremely large prostates.
PubMed: 38681310
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57068