-
Muscle & Nerve Jun 2024The impact of treatment expectations on active treatment outcomes has not been specifically investigated in neuromuscular disorders. We thus explored in myasthenia...
INTRODUCTION/AIMS
The impact of treatment expectations on active treatment outcomes has not been specifically investigated in neuromuscular disorders. We thus explored in myasthenia gravis (MG) the contribution of patients' pre-treatment expectations combined with an immunosuppressant drug on treatment outcomes.
METHODS
This pilot correlational study involved 17 patients with generalized MG, scheduled to start immunosuppressant azathioprine. At baseline, a healthcare professional administered: (i) the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale; (ii) a structured checklist paper form asking patients which side-effects they expected to develop after starting azathioprine, coupled with a standardized framing of statements. Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score and daily dose of concomitant drugs were assessed by neurologists as clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes and side-effects were re-assessed at 3 and 6 months, and clinical outcomes were monitored at 18 months.
RESULTS
Clinically significant improvement in the QMG scores was achieved at 3 or 6 months. The level of state anxiety appeared to act as moderator of pre-treatment negative expectations (strong, positive, indicative correlation, rs = .733, p = .001). The latter were, in turn, associated with the fulfillment of side-effects that patients expected to develop with the new treatment (moderate, positive, indicative correlation, rs = .699, p = .002). No significant correlation emerged between positive and negative expectations.
DISCUSSION
Our findings show a very quick clinical response and also suggest that patients' expectations and anxiety contributed to treatment outcomes, highlighting the importance of promoting safety messages and education strategies around newly introduced treatments. Future goals include evaluating a larger cohort that includes a matched control group.
PubMed: 38940302
DOI: 10.1002/mus.28189 -
Case Reports in Neurological Medicine 2024Myasthenic crises (MC) are potentially life-threatening acute exacerbations of myasthenia gravis (MG) characterized by profound muscle weakness, bulbar symptoms, and...
Myasthenic crises (MC) are potentially life-threatening acute exacerbations of myasthenia gravis (MG) characterized by profound muscle weakness, bulbar symptoms, and potential for respiratory failure. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and plasma exchange (PLEX) are conventional treatments for myasthenic exacerbations. Recently, new therapeutic options for generalized acetylcholine-receptor antibody positive (AchR+) MG were approved as an add-on therapy. They mainly consist of complement C5 inhibitors such as eculizumab and ravulizumab and neonatal Fc receptor antagonists such as efgartigimod with the approval of more options pending, e.g., zilucoplan and rozanolixizumab. More therapeutic options are in the pipeline. Although the data show a quick and reliable treatment response, these medications have not been studied for the therapy of myasthenic crisis. We present the case of a 57-year-old male with his first episode of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) and positive acetylcholine-receptor antibodies (AchR+) who was transferred to our neurological intensive care unit with worsening generalized weakness, dysphagia, and respiratory distress. The crisis was triggered by pneumonia due to dysphagia. He was diagnosed with myasthenic crisis and treated with intravenous pyridostigmine, plasmapheresis (PLEX), and continued prednisone. Initial improvement was followed by deterioration, requiring readmission and additional PLEX. After a further decline, efgartigimod was administered, leading to significant improvement within 48 hours, as evidenced by reduced MG-ADL and QMG scores. The patient continued to improve and was stable enough for transfer to a rehabilitation facility. This case illustrates the potential of efgartigimod as a novel treatment for refractory myasthenic crises.
PubMed: 38939234
DOI: 10.1155/2024/9455237 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Jun 2024
PubMed: 38937071
DOI: 10.1136/ard-2024-226017 -
Neurologia I Neurochirurgia Polska Jun 2024Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is an ultrarare neuromuscular disease with a triad of symptoms: muscle paresis, dysautonomy, and areflexia. Amifampridine is the...
INTRODUCTION
Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is an ultrarare neuromuscular disease with a triad of symptoms: muscle paresis, dysautonomy, and areflexia. Amifampridine is the symptomatic treatment of LEMS.
AIM OF STUDY
To assess the effectiveness and safety of treatment in the real world.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
14 patients with non-neoplastic LEMS treated with amifampridine were enrolled in the study (female 42.9%, mean age 48.8 ± 11.4 years). The patients were assessed using the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scale, QMG limb domain (LD) score, spirometry, Hand Grip Strength (GRIP) test, and repetitive nerve stimulation study (RNS) at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Diagnostic delay since first symptoms was from seven months up to 22 years. Treatment delay ranged from one to 26 years. The patients were treated and reevaluated after 21.1 ± 12.0 weeks (range 13-48).
RESULTS
All of the patients improved in QMG score. Mean improvement was 5.1 ± 2.0 (range 1-8) points (p < 0.001) and this showed no correlation with the duration of the disease before treatment (p = 0.477). 85.7% of patients (N = 12) improved ≥ 3 points (clinically meaningful) in QMG. 78.6% of the patients improved in QMG LD (mean 2.2 ± 1.6 points (p < 0.001)). Also, forced vital capacity (FVC) improved after treatment (p = 0.031). Mean improvement in GRIP test was 7.0 ± 7.1 kg in the right hand and 5.2 ± 7.5 kg in the left hand (p < 0.001). In RNS before treatment, facilitation ( > 100%) was observed in 78.6% (N = 11) of patients, and was higher before treatment (p < 0.001). Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude was higher after treatment (p < 0.001). Mean increase of CMAP amplitude was 2.1 ± 1.6 times. In 64.3% (N = 9) of patients lowering of corticosteroid dose was achieved.
CONCLUSIONS
Amifampridine is an effective treatment in non-neoplastic LEMS patients, regardless of disease duration. The treatment is well-tolerated and allows to reduce dose of corticosteroids in the majority of patients.
PubMed: 38935421
DOI: 10.5603/pjnns.99335 -
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024This paper presents an eye image segmentation-based computer-aided system for automatic diagnosis of ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), called OMGMed. It provides great...
This paper presents an eye image segmentation-based computer-aided system for automatic diagnosis of ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), called OMGMed. It provides great potential to effectively liberate the diagnostic efficiency of expert doctors (the scarce resources) and reduces the cost of healthcare treatment for diagnosed patients, making it possible to disseminate high-quality myasthenia gravis healthcare to under-developed areas. The system is composed of data pre-processing, indicator calculation, and automatic OMG scoring. Building upon this framework, an empirical study on the eye segmentation algorithm is conducted. It further optimizes the algorithm from the perspectives of "network structure" and "loss function", and experimentally verifies the effectiveness of the hybrid loss function. The results show that the combination of "nnUNet" network structure and "Cross-Entropy + Iou + Boundary" hybrid loss function can achieve the best segmentation performance, and its MIOU on the public and private myasthenia gravis datasets reaches 82.1% and 83.7%, respectively. The research has been used in expert centers. The pilot study demonstrates that our research on eye image segmentation for OMG diagnosis is very helpful in improving the healthcare quality of expert doctors. We believe that this work can serve as an important reference for the development of a similar auxiliary diagnosis system and contribute to the healthy development of proactive healthcare services.
PubMed: 38927831
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11060595 -
Biomedicines May 2024Myasthenia gravis (MG), an immune disorder affecting nerve-muscle transmission, often necessitates tailored therapies to alleviate longitudinal symptom fluctuations....
INTRODUCTION
Myasthenia gravis (MG), an immune disorder affecting nerve-muscle transmission, often necessitates tailored therapies to alleviate longitudinal symptom fluctuations. Here, we aimed to examine and compare the treatment cycle intervals and efficacy of efgartigimod in four patients. This case series mainly offers insights into personalized treatment cycle intervals and the efficacy of efgartigimod for patients with MG in our facility in Japan.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed four patients with MG (2 patients with early-onset, 1 with late-onset, and 1 with seronegative MG, mainly managed with oral immunosuppressants as prior treatments) who completed four or more cycles of efgartigimod treatment from January 2022 to September 2023. We focused on changes in serum immunoglobulin (IgG) level, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab) titer, and quantitative MG (QMG) score.
RESULTS
Efgartigimod, administered at a median of 5.0 [IQR 5.0, 7.5] weeks between cycles, led to decreased serum IgG levels in all patients and reduced AChR-Ab titers in seropositive patients. All patients showed sustained MG symptom improvement, with considerably reduced QMG scores before efgartigimod treatment. None of the patients required rescue medications or developed treatment-related adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Customized efgartigimod administration intervals effectively enhanced clinical outcomes in patients with MG without notable symptom fluctuations, demonstrating the benefits of individualized treatment approaches and validating the safety of efgartigimod during the study period.
PubMed: 38927421
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061214 -
Neurological Sciences : Official... Jun 2024
PubMed: 38926246
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07663-w -
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Jun 2024
PubMed: 38923295
DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.14144 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2024
PubMed: 38919972
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1418631 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2024To describe the early experience of ravulizumab use in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ve gMG).
PURPOSE
To describe the early experience of ravulizumab use in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ve gMG).
METHODS
This multicenter retrospective study included AChR+ve gMG patients who were treated with ravulizumab and had both pre- and post-ravulizumab myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scores. Clinical information regarding MG history, concomitant treatment(s), MG-ADL, other MG-specific measures, and adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS
A total of 18 patients with mean age of 61.83 (±16.08, = 18) years were included in this cohort. In 10 complement inhibitor naive patients, a clinically meaningful reduction in mean Mg-ADL (baseline: 6.6 (±3.58) vs. 4.4 (±2.28), post ravulizumab) was seen. 6 out of 10 patients (60%) had clinically meaningful reduction post ravulizumab and two achieved minimum symptom expression (MSE). In 8 patients switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab, further reduction was noted in post ravulizumab mean MG-ADL (Baseline: 3.25 (±3.34) vs. 1.5 (±2.34) post ravulizumab). None of the patients who switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab experienced worsening symptoms. Eleven out of 14 (78.5%) patients on prednisone therapy were able to reduce their prednisone dose post-ravulizumab. None of the patients experienced any major side effects.
CONCLUSION
In our clinical practice, 60% of AChR+ve gMG complement inhibitor naive patients experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in MG-ADL scores with ravulizumab. Patients were safely switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab and had further improvement in their mean MG-ADL scores. Of those on prednisone therapy, the majority were able to reduce their prednisone dosage.
PubMed: 38919970
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1378080