-
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &... Jun 2024Dopamine (D)-receptor antagonists (RAs) were the first antiemetics used in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Dopamine (D)-receptor antagonists (RAs) were the first antiemetics used in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
AREAS COVERED
Eight D-RAs, amisulpride, domperidone, droperidol, haloperidol, metoclopramide, metopimazine, olanzapine and prochlorperazine are reviewed focusing on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antiemetic effect and side effects.
EXPERT OPINION
Since the introduction of D-RAs, antiemetics such as corticosteroids, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-RAs and neurokinin (NK)-RAs have been developed. The classical D-RAs are recommended in the prophylaxis of CINV from low emetic risk chemotherapy, but not as a fixed component of an antiemetic regimen for moderately or highly (HEC) emetic risk chemotherapy. D-RAs are also used in patients with breakthrough nausea and vomiting. It should be emphasized, that most of these drugs are not selective for dopamine receptors.The multi-receptor targeting agent, olanzapine, is recommended in the prophylaxis of HEC-induced CINV as part of a four-drug antiemetic regimen, including a 5-HT-RA, dexamethasone and a NK-RA. Olanzapine is the most effective agent to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea.Side effects differ among various D-RAs. Metopimazine and domperidone possess a low risk of extrapyramidal side effects. Domperidone and metoclopramide are prokinetics, whereas metopimazine delays gastric emptying and haloperidol does not influence gastric motility. Many D-RAs increase the risk of prolonged QTc interval; other side effects include sedation and orthostatic hypotension.
Topics: Humans; Nausea; Vomiting; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Dopamine Antagonists; Animals; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Receptors, Dopamine D3
PubMed: 38878283
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2367593 -
Annals of Emergency Medicine Jun 2024United States prescribing information recommends against coadministration of injectable olanzapine with injectable benzodiazepines due to a risk of cardiorespiratory...
STUDY OBJECTIVE
United States prescribing information recommends against coadministration of injectable olanzapine with injectable benzodiazepines due to a risk of cardiorespiratory depression, whereas European prescribing information recommends the 2 drugs not be administered within 60 minutes of each other. In contrast, a recently published American College of Emergency Physicians clinical policy recommends injectable olanzapine and benzodiazepines be coadministered for treating severe agitation. We sought to compare injectable olanzapine with and without injectable benzodiazepines for evidence of cardiorespiratory depression.
METHODS
We performed a retrospective study of patients in an urban emergency department from January 2017 through November 2019 who received parenteral olanzapine with or without parenteral benzodiazepines. We included patients receiving 2 total medication doses, either olanzapine+benzodiazepine or 2 doses of olanzapine, coadministered within 60 minutes. The primary outcome was tracheal intubation in the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg) and hypoxemia (SpO less than 90%).
RESULTS
We identified 693 patients (median [alcohol]=210 mg/dL, median age=37 years [IQR 29 to 49]). In total, 549 received 2 doses of olanzapine, and 144 patients received olanzapine and a benzodiazepine. We found no difference in intubation rates between the olanzapine-only group (21/549, 3.8%) and the olanzapine+benzodiazepine group (5/144, 3.5%; difference=0.3%, 95% confidence interval -3.0% to 3.7%). Rates of hypoxemia (2% olanzapine-only and 3% olanzapine+benzodiazepine) and hypotension (9% both groups) also were not different between groups.
CONCLUSION
We found no difference in cardiorespiratory depression between patients receiving only olanzapine versus olanzapine plus a benzodiazepine.
PubMed: 38878022
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.05.006 -
EBioMedicine Jun 2024Response to antipsychotic drugs (APD) varies greatly among individuals and is affected by genetic factors. This study aims to demonstrate genome-wide associations...
BACKGROUND
Response to antipsychotic drugs (APD) varies greatly among individuals and is affected by genetic factors. This study aims to demonstrate genome-wide associations between copy number variants (CNVs) and response to APD in patients with schizophrenia.
METHODS
A total of 3030 patients of Han Chinese ethnicity randomly received APD (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, haloperidol and perphenazine) treatment for six weeks. This study is a secondary data analysis. Percentage change on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) reduction was used to assess APD efficacy, and more than 50% change was considered as APD response. Associations between CNV burden, gene set, CNV loci and CNV break-point and APD efficacy were analysed.
FINDINGS
Higher CNV losses burden decreased the odds of 6-week APD response (OR = 0.66 [0.44, 0.98]). CNV losses in synaptic pathway involved in neurotransmitters were associated with 2-week PANSS reduction rate. CNV involved in sialylation (1p31.1 losses) and cellular metabolism (19q13.32 gains) associated with 6-week PANSS reduction rate at genome-wide significant level. Additional 36 CNVs associated with PANSS factors improvement. The OR of protective CNVs for 6-week APD response was 3.10 (95% CI: 1.33-7.19) and risk CNVs was 8.47 (95% CI: 1.92-37.43). CNV interacted with genetic risk score on APD efficacy (Beta = -1.53, SE = 0.66, P = 0.021). The area under curve to differ 6-week APD response attained 80.45% (95% CI: 78.07%-82.82%).
INTERPRETATION
Copy number variants contributed to poor APD efficacy and synaptic pathway involved in neurotransmitter was highlighted.
FUNDING
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key R&D Program of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.
PubMed: 38870545
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105195 -
PCN Reports : Psychiatry and Clinical... Jun 2024Mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion (MERS) is increasingly recognized as a clinicoradiological syndrome. Its etiology is diverse,...
BACKGROUND
Mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion (MERS) is increasingly recognized as a clinicoradiological syndrome. Its etiology is diverse, encompassing a variety of triggers, including infections and metabolic abnormalities. Uniquely, MERS may present with psychiatric symptoms, such as delirium, visual hallucinations, and catatonia, posing diagnostic challenges. The variability of these neuropsychiatric symptoms necessitates early diagnosis through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to avoid prolonged antipsychotic treatment.
CASE PRESENTATION
This report details a case of MERS in a 39-year-old male. The patient initially presented with headache, sore throat, and abnormal laboratory results: leukocytosis, neutrophilia with a left shift, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and hyponatremia. On the fourth day of admission, he developed severe anxiety and restlessness, exhibited thoughts of death, and reported experiencing vivid hallucinations upon closing his eyes. MRI revealed a hyperintense lesion in the corpus callosum. A lumbar puncture showed no increase in cell count or protein. The patient showed a positive response to treatment with antibiotics and olanzapine, demonstrating rapid symptomatic improvement. A follow-up MRI on the 11th day showed complete resolution of the brain lesions. Six months later, no neurological or psychiatric sequelae were noted. The patient's clinical progression and imaging findings led to a definitive diagnosis of MERS.
CONCLUSION
The early presentation of symptoms such as restlessness, hallucinations, and death ideation played a critical role in diagnosing MERS, with early MRI examination being instrumental in both diagnosis and preventing prolonged antipsychotic medication use.
PubMed: 38868082
DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.191 -
The International Journal on Drug Policy Jun 2024Methamphetamine frequently causes substance-induced psychosis and related symptoms. There are currently no interventions to prevent or assist in self-management of these...
BACKGROUND
Methamphetamine frequently causes substance-induced psychosis and related symptoms. There are currently no interventions to prevent or assist in self-management of these symptoms.
METHODS
We evaluated a program providing "Methamphetamine Assist Packs" to patients who were seen in a psychiatric emergency services program for methamphetamine-induced psychosis. Methamphetamine Assist Packs included a small number of tablets of an antipsychotic medication (olanzapine), administration instructions, and referral information. We reviewed medical charts of patients who received Methamphetamine Assist Packs from January 2022 through May 2023 for sociodemographic and emergency visit characteristics. We assessed the changes between the number of psychiatric emergency visits before and after Methamphetamine Assist Pack receipt at two, six, and 12 months using generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS
Ninety-two patients received a Methamphetamine Assist Pack, with a mean age of 40 years; 79 % were male and 49 % Black/African American; 77 % experienced housing instability or homelessness. The most common symptoms were suicidal ideation (54 %), paranoia or delusions (45 %), and hallucinations (40 %); 55 % were on involuntary psychiatric hold, 38 % required medications for agitation, and 18 % required seclusion or physical restraints. The rate of psychiatric emergency visits after Methamphetamine Assist Pack receipt was 0.68 and 0.87 times the rate prior to receipt at two and six months, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no difference at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Methamphetamine Assist Packs were associated with fewer psychiatric emergency visits for six months after receipt, and represent a promising intervention to address acute psychiatric toxicity from methamphetamine in need of further research.
PubMed: 38861841
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104480 -
Drugs & Aging Jun 2024International guidelines discourage antipsychotic use for delirium; however, concerns persist about their continued use in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND
International guidelines discourage antipsychotic use for delirium; however, concerns persist about their continued use in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to describe the prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use in delirium management with regard to best-practice recommendations. Primary outcomes investigated were prevalence of use, antipsychotic type, dosage and clinical indication.
METHODS
Eligibility criteria: studies of any design that examined antipsychotic use to manage delirium in adults in critical care, acute care, palliative care, rehabilitation, and aged care were included. Studies of patients in acute psychiatric care, with psychiatric illness or pre-existing antipsychotic use were excluded.
INFORMATION SOURCES
we searched five health databases on 16 August, 2023 (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsycInfo, ProQuest Health and Medical Collection) using MeSH terms and relevant keywords, including 'delirium' and 'antipsychotic'. Risk of bias: as no included studies were randomised controlled trials, all studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS
descriptive data were extracted in Covidence and synthesised in Microsoft Excel.
RESULTS
Included studies: 39 studies published between March 2004 and August 2023 from 13 countries (n = 1,359,519 patients). Most study designs were retrospective medical record audits (n = 16).
SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS
in 18 studies, participants' mean age was ≥65 years (77.79, ±5.20). Palliative care had the highest average proportion of patients with delirium managed with antipsychotics (70.87%, ±33.81%); it was lower and varied little between intensive care unit (53.53%, ±19.73%) and non-intensive care unit settings [medical, surgical and any acute care wards] (56.93%, ±26.44%) and was lowest in in-patient rehabilitation (17.8%). Seventeen different antipsychotics were reported on. In patients aged ≥65 years, haloperidol was the most frequently used and at higher than recommended mean daily doses (2.75 mg, ±2.21 mg). Other antipsychotics commonly administered were olanzapine (mean 11 mg, ±8.54 mg), quetiapine (mean 64.23 mg, ±43.20 mg) and risperidone (mean 0.97 mg, ±0.64 mg).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of antipsychotics to manage delirium is strongly discouraged in international guidelines. Antipsychotic use in delirium care is a risk for adverse health outcomes and a longer duration of delirium, especially in older people. However, this study has provided evidence that clinicians continue to use antipsychotics for delirium management, the dose, frequency and duration of which are often outside evidence-based guideline recommendations. Clinicians continue to choose antipsychotics to manage delirium symptoms to settle agitation and maintain patient and staff safety, particularly in situations where workload pressures are high. Sustained efforts are needed at the individual, team and organisational levels to educate, train and support clinicians to prioritise non-pharmacological interventions early before deciding to use antipsychotics. This could prevent delirium and avert escalation in behavioural symptoms that often lead to antipsychotic use.
Topics: Humans; Delirium; Antipsychotic Agents; Aged; Adult; Hospitals
PubMed: 38856874
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01122-z -
Palliative Care and Social Practice 2024Nausea and vomiting are common experiences and are often dreaded more than pain. This review discusses blonanserin, mirtazapine, and isopropyl alcohol as antiemetics.... (Review)
Review
Nausea and vomiting are common experiences and are often dreaded more than pain. This review discusses blonanserin, mirtazapine, and isopropyl alcohol as antiemetics. Blonanserin, an atypical antipsychotic with a high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors and serotonin receptor 5-HT2A, has less of a risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Transdermal blonanserin, available in Korea, Japan, and China in a small number of trials, has improved nausea in patients not responding to standard antiemetics. Mirtazapine is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant that has been used for multiple symptoms besides depression. There is little evidence that mirtazapine improves anorexia or nausea in advanced cancer but is as effective as olanzapine in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Isopropyl alcohol aromatherapy has been successfully used in the emergency department for nausea and vomiting with an onset to benefit more rapidly than standard antiemetics. Isopropyl alcohol prep pads can be used for home-going antiemetic therapy and as a bridge to treating acute nausea until standard antiemetics take effect.
PubMed: 38855566
DOI: 10.1177/26323524241257701 -
Industrial Psychiatry Journal 2024Antipsychotics are the mainstay treatment for the majority of severe mental illnesses. Such patients are also more prone to develop medical comorbidities, which...
Antipsychotics are the mainstay treatment for the majority of severe mental illnesses. Such patients are also more prone to develop medical comorbidities, which complicate the treatment decisions. It is estimated that up to 40% of individuals with schizophrenia have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or diabetes, which can be attributed to a combination of genetic, lifestyle, and medication-related factors. Some widely used antipsychotic medications like olanzapine, risperidone, and clozapine have been associated with an increased risk of weight gain, insulin resistance, and other metabolic abnormalities, which can worsen IGT and increase the risk of developing diabetes. Among second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), amisulpride, aripirazole, and ziprasidone have a fairly low potency to cause obesity and hyperglycemia. In this context, clinicians must balance the benefits and risks of different antipsychotic medications and consider the individual's specific needs and preferences. Here, we shall discuss three cases, to ascertain how the use of amisulpride helped in glycemic control, and also reflect on probable etiologies leading to deranged glucose levels.
PubMed: 38853806
DOI: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_133_23 -
Industrial Psychiatry Journal 2024Psychotropic medications are commonly prescribed for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Various studies have reported QT interval (QTc) prolongation with the use of...
BACKGROUND
Psychotropic medications are commonly prescribed for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Various studies have reported QT interval (QTc) prolongation with the use of psychotropics. However, some studies have found no significant risk of QTc changes with these medications.
AIM
To assess the effect of psychotropics on QTc in drug-naive psychiatric patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Our study was a prospective observational study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Patients aged 18-45 years, drug-naïve, with no medical comorbidity or substance use history, were recruited for the study. ECG to assess QTc was recorded at baseline, second and fourth week after the starting of psychotropic medications.
RESULTS
N=8 (4%) patients had QTc prolongation at baseline and were excluded. No clinically significant QTc prolongation was noticed, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of treatment with any of the psychotropic medications. However, among patients on escitalopram, a significant effect on QTc was noted ( = 0.001) as compared to those on sertraline, risperidone, and olanzapine ( > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The short-term risk of QTc prolongation with the use of newer psychotropics at optimal doses appears low among young patients with normal baseline QTc and no significant medical or substance use comorbidity.
PubMed: 38853785
DOI: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_149_23 -
Schizophrenia Research Jun 2024Despite the high prevalence of anxiety in schizophrenia, no established guideline exists for the management of these symptoms. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Despite the high prevalence of anxiety in schizophrenia, no established guideline exists for the management of these symptoms. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the effect of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) on anxiety in patients with schizophrenia.
METHODS
We systematically searched Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane library to identify randomized controlled trials of SGAs that reporting anxiety measures in schizophrenia. The search was limited to English-language articles published before February 2024. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Among 48 eligible studies, 29 (n = 7712) were included in the meta-analyses comparing SGAs to placebo, haloperidol, or another SGAs for their effect on anxiety/depression. SGAs had a small effect on anxiety/depression versus placebo (SMD = -0.28 (95 % CI [-0.34, -0.21], p < .00001, I = 47 %, n = 5576)) associated with efficacy for positive (z = 5.679, p < .001) and negative symptoms (z = 4.490, p < .001). Furthermore, SGAs were superior to haloperidol (SMD = -0.44, 95 % CI [-0.75, -0.13], p = .005, n = 1068) with substantial study-level heterogeneity (I = 85 %). Excluding one study of quetiapine in first-episode patients (SMD = -3.05, n = 73), SGAs showed a small effect on anxiety/depression versus haloperidol without heterogeneity (SMD = -0.23, 95 % CI [-0.35, -0.12], p = 01; I = %0). Risperidone's effect on anxiety/depression was comparable to olanzapine (SMD = -0.02, 95 % CI [-0.24,0.20], p = .87, I = 45 %, n = 753) and amisulpride (SMD = 0.27, 95 % CI [-1.08,0.61], p = .13, I = 50 %, n = 315).
CONCLUSION
While SGAs showed a small effect on anxiety/depression, the findings are inconclusive due to scarcity of research on comorbid anxiety in schizophrenia, heterogeneity of anxiety symptoms, and the scales used to measure anxiety. Further studies employing specific anxiety scales are required to explore antipsychotics, considering their receptor affinity and augmentation with serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or benzodiazepines for managing anxiety in schizophrenia.
PubMed: 38843584
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.05.020