-
Scandinavian Journal of Urology Apr 2024To investigate national trends of surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).
PURPOSE
To investigate national trends of surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).
METHODS
The Care Register for Healthcare in Finland was used to investigate the annual numbers and types of surgical procedures, operation incidence and duration of hospital stay between 2004 and 2018 in Finland. Procedures were classified using the Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee Classification of Surgical Procedures coding. Trends in incidence were analyzed with two-sided Cochran-Armitage test. Trends in duration of hospital stay and patient age were analyzed with linear regression.
RESULTS
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was the most common operation type during the study period, covering over 70% of operations for BPO. Simultaneous with the implementation of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), the incidence of TURP, minimally invasive surgical therapies, transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP) and open prostatectomies decreased (p < 0.05). The mean operation incidence rate in the population between 2004 and 2018 was 263 per 100,000. The duration of hospital stay shortened (p < 0.05), and the average age of operated patients increased by 2 years (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
The implementation of PVP did not challenge the dominating position of TURP in Finland, but it has probably influenced the overall use of other surgical therapies, excluding transurethral incision of the prostate. The results might suggest that the conservative treatment is accentuated, patient selection is more thorough, and surgical intervention might be placed at a later stage of BPO.
Topics: Humans; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Male; Finland; Aged; Prostatectomy; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Middle Aged; Length of Stay; Incidence; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 38647246
DOI: 10.2340/sju.v59.32425 -
Central European Journal of Urology 2024The study presents the initial outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARPs) using the Versius robotic system in a urological centre with no prior robotic...
INTRODUCTION
The study presents the initial outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARPs) using the Versius robotic system in a urological centre with no prior robotic surgery experience.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A retrospective analysis of 58 RARPs was conducted, including patients' parameters as well as Versius system performance.
RESULTS
The study involved 58 patients (average age 66.9 years). Median preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 9.8 ng/ml, with 48% having ISUP grade group ≥ 3 on biopsy and 25.8% showing extraprostatic extension on MRI. Median blood loss was 437 ml, with complications (10.3% Clavien-Dindo grade II and 4 grade III cases). One conversion to open surgery occurred (0.58%). Final pathology revealed 46.5% extraprostatic disease, and 25.8% had positive margins. Post-surgery, 96.5% had undetectable PSA at 6 weeks. Continence rates were 89.7% at 6 weeks, increasing to 91.3% at 12 months. Median catheter duration was 7.9 days, and the hospital stay was 4.5 days. Console time averaged 150.9 minutes, with a median operative time of 213 minutes. The Versius system reported medium priority alarms in 24.1% of operations, including 1266 alarms related to robotic arm clashes and 43 instrument swaps. One bedside unit exchange occurred with no console or robotic system failures.
CONCLUSIONS
The Versius robotic system can be successfully introduced in a urological centre without prior robotic surgery experience. Our setup and operating room positioning are effective, safe, and reproducible. We encountered and resolved surgical and technical challenges. Further follow-up studies are needed to assess the system's performance.
PubMed: 38645822
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2023.241 -
BJUI Compass Apr 2024
PubMed: 38633826
DOI: 10.1002/bco2.320 -
European Urology Focus Apr 2024The implementation of quality assurance programs (QAPs) within urological practice has gained prominence; yet, their impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP)... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
The implementation of quality assurance programs (QAPs) within urological practice has gained prominence; yet, their impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains uncertain. This paper aims to systematically review the current literature regarding the implementation of QAPs and their impact on outcomes after robot-assisted RP, laparoscopic RP, and open prostatectomy, collectively referred to as RP.
METHODS
A systematic Embase, Medline (OvidSP), and Scopus search was conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) process, on January 12, 2024. Studies were identified and included if these covered implementation of QAPs and their impact on outcomes after RP. QAPs were defined as any intervention seeking quality improvement through critically reviewing, analyzing, and discussing outcomes. Included studies were assessed critically using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, with results summarized narratively.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS
Ten included studies revealed two methodological strategies: periodic performance feedback and surgical video assessments. Despite conceptual variability, QAPs improved outcomes consistently (ie, surgical margins, urine continence, erectile function, and hospital readmissions). Of the two strategies, video assessments better identified suboptimal surgical practice and technical errors. Although the extent of quality improvements did not appear to correlate with the frequency of QAPs, there was an apparent correlation with whether or not outcomes were evaluated collectively.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Current findings suggest that QAPs have a positive impact on outcomes after RP. Caution in interpretation due to limited data is advised. More extensive research is required to explore how conceptual differences impact the extent of quality improvements.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In this paper, we review the available scientific literature regarding the implementation of quality assurance programs and their impact on outcomes after radical prostatectomy. The included studies offered substantial support for the implementation of quality assurance programs as an incentive to improve the quality of care continuously.
PubMed: 38631992
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.03.004 -
Urology Journal May 2024To compare 90-day perioperative complications and pathological outcomes between laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and extraperitoneal radical cystectomy (EORC)... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
PURPOSE
To compare 90-day perioperative complications and pathological outcomes between laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and extraperitoneal radical cystectomy (EORC) approaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All operations were performed in a single high-volume tertiary referee center by the same surgical team.Males ≥ 18 years with pre-cystectomy clinical T1-T3 disease and having undergone an ileal conduit were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with inflammatory bowel disease, previous pelvic and/or abdominal irradiation, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or clinical T4 disease. Perioperative outcomes such as operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, and 90-day complications were evaluated. The recovery duration of regular bowel activity, mean stool passage,and ileus rates were recorded.
RESULTS
A total of 221 patients met the inclusion criteria(81 LRC and 130 EORC). Demographics and preoperative parameters were comparable. Intraoperative estimated blood lossfavored LRC by a median of 450 mL (200-900) P=.021) vs. a median of 700 mL (300-2900) for EORC. The transfusion rate did not differ between the two groups; %14.8 (N=12) for the LRC and %20.8 (N=27) for EORC (P=.37). The median hospital stay was 9 (4-49) days for EORC and 8 (4-29) days for LRC (P=.011). The need for analgesics to control pain through an epidural catheter was higher for EORC (P=.042). There was no difference in overall complication rates (P=.47).
CONCLUSION
Although LRC appears to have a slight advantage over EORC, both techniques yield satisfactory results in regard to ileus rates and 90-day perioperative complications.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Male; Cystectomy; Middle Aged; Prostatectomy; Aged; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Length of Stay; Blood Loss, Surgical; Operative Time
PubMed: 38629198
DOI: 10.22037/uj.v21i03.7937 -
Archives of Sexual Behavior Jun 2024Sexual concerns after prostate cancer (PCa) treatment are high. Flexible coping is a crucial element to maintaining sexual activity after PCa and improves adaptation...
Sexual concerns after prostate cancer (PCa) treatment are high. Flexible coping is a crucial element to maintaining sexual activity after PCa and improves adaptation outcomes. We aimed to identify potential sexual adaptation styles reported by men following PCa treatment, and to assess relationships among associated variables and outcomes. Individuals (n = 223) with PCa treatment history (e.g., radical prostatectomy [n = 165, 74.0%], external beam radiation [n = 83, 37.2%], hormone/androgen deprivation therapy [n = 83, 37.2%]), completed an online survey assessing sexual variables and processes of sexual adaptation. Using a combination of inductive and deductive coding, open-ended responses were thematically analyzed and grouped into sexual adaptation styles. Factors potentially associated with sexual adaptation styles (e.g., age, perceived partner involvement, co-morbidities, relationship duration, time since PCa treatment, desire for physical affection, depression, relationship adjustment) were tested using multinomial logistic regression. Outcomes of sexual well-being (sexual distress, sexual bother, sexual satisfaction) and relationship adjustment were compared against each sexual adaptation style using a multivariate analysis of variance. Sexual activity status and satisfaction with the adaptation process was assessed across the sexual adaptation styles using a chi-square analysis and post-hoc tests. Two distinct categories were identified: those who had Adapted (n = 185) and those who had Not Adapted (n = 38). Four sexual adaptation styles emerged in the adapted category: Relationship Renegotiation (n = 53) and Sexual Renegotiation (n = 47), which were couples-focused styles, and Acceptance/Resignation (n = 34) and Masturbation/Erection (n = 48), which were individual-focused styles. Participants who could not be categorized as one style, but rather met several, were identified as Mixed (n = 3). Higher rates of depression, lower relationship adjustment, lack of sexual activity, and greater dissatisfaction with the adaptation process were observed for Not Adapted participants. Participants engaged in any type of adaptation style fared better than those who had Not Adapted. Couples-focused styles tended to emphasize renegotiation, including a changed perspective on the expression of the relationship. Perceived direct engagement of the partner facilitated adaptation and emphasized engagement with flexible coping, either through redefining priorities or ways of being sexual. Individual-focused styles emphasized pre-cancer erectile function, and either aimed to return to capacity for penetrative sexual activity or accepted its inaccessibility and largely an abandonment of partnered sexual activity.
Topics: Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Adaptation, Psychological; Middle Aged; Sexual Behavior; Aged; Prostatectomy; Personal Satisfaction; Surveys and Questionnaires; Sexual Partners
PubMed: 38609584
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-02855-z -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2024Radical prostatectomy is increasingly performed laparoscopically with robot assistance (RALRP). RALRP, as with all laparoscopic procedures, requires a pneumoperitoneum,...
Radical prostatectomy is increasingly performed laparoscopically with robot assistance (RALRP). RALRP, as with all laparoscopic procedures, requires a pneumoperitoneum, which might result in peritoneal inflammatory response reactions and postoperative pain. The aim of this retrospective single-centre study was to analyse the effects of a pneumoperitoneum during RARLP on clinical outcomes. All patients who underwent robot-guided prostatectomy in our clinic were included, with the exception of patients who were converted to open prostatectomy. C-reactive protein was used as a marker for the primary outcome, namely the postoperative inflammatory response. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was evaluated as a potential factor influencing inflammation. In addition, the waist-hip ratio was used to estimate the amount of visceral adipose tissue, and the administration of dexamethasone was considered as a factor influencing inflammation. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to determine postoperative pain. Patients were consecutively recruited between 1 September 2020 and 31 March 2022. A total of 135 consecutive patients were included. The median waist-hip ratio was 0.55. The median duration of the pneumoperitoneum was 143 min. The median values of the average and maximum IAP values were 10 mmHg and 15 mmHg, respectively. The mean CRP of the first postoperative day was 6.2 mg/dL. The median VAS pain level decreased from 2 to 1 from the first to the third postoperative day. On the first postoperative day, 16 patients complained of shoulder pain. In addition, 134 patients were given some form of opioid pain treatment following surgery. We could not identify any relevant associations between the duration and IAP of the pneumoperitoneum and the indirect markers of inflammation or indicators of pain, or between the latter and the amount of visceral adipose tissue. In addition, we found no significant effect of the administration of dexamethasone on postoperative inflammation. The results point to a noninferior tolerability of moderate pressure during the procedure compared to the commonly utilised higher pressure, yet this must be confirmed in randomised controlled trials.
PubMed: 38592056
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051202 -
European Urology Open Science May 2024The Hugo RAS and DaVinci Xi systems are used for performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aims to compare these two platforms providing...
Intraoperative Performance of DaVinci Versus Hugo RAS During Radical Prostatectomy: Focus on Timing, Malfunctioning, Complications, and User Satisfaction in 100 Consecutive Cases (the COMPAR-P Trial).
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
The Hugo RAS and DaVinci Xi systems are used for performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study aims to compare these two platforms providing granular and comprehensive data on their intraoperative performance.
METHODS
The Comparison of Outcomes of Multiple Platforms for Assisted Robotic surgery-Prostate (COMPAR-P) trial is a prospective post-market study (clinicaltrials.org NCT05766163). Enrollment began in March 2023, allocating patients to DaVinci or Hugo RAS for RARP, without selection criteria, for up to 50 consecutive cases. Two experienced console surgeons performed the procedures, following the same technique. Evaluation focused on timing, learning curves, malfunctioning events, complications, and users' satisfaction, using standard statistical methods, including the cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM) for the learning curve assessment.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS
Fifty patients each were enrolled for DaVinci (DV-RARP) and Hugo RAS (H-RARP) RARP. Baseline features were balanced. DV-RARP showed significantly shorter "setup" and "console" phase durations than H-RARP (37 vs 55 min and 97 vs 126 min, respectively, < 0.001). A longitudinal timing analysis revealed DV-RARP's flat line, while H-RARP showed a modest decline with breakpoints at 22 and 17 procedures by CUSUM for the setup and console phases. The numbers of malfunctioning events were 4 (DV-RARP) and 20 (H-RARP). DV-RARP had high user satisfaction, while the user satisfaction of H-RARP varied. The comparison was between the first 50 H-RARP and the last 50 DV-RARP cases performed at our institution. This likely accounts for the observed differences in setup and console times between the cohorts. The specialized expertise of the surgeons involved could limit the generalizability of our findings.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
This prospective study compared unselected patients who underwent DV-RARP and H-RARP. More malfunctioning events occurred in case of Hugo RAS, but surgical outcomes were similar. Longer operative times for Hugo RAS were attributed to meticulous care with the novel platform. Improvement potential was evident within a few procedures, providing valuable insights for adopting this new platform.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This study compared two advanced robotic systems, DaVinci and Hugo RAS, used to remove the prostate in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. While both systems showed similar surgical outcomes, the newer Hugo RAS system required more meticulous movements, leading to slightly longer operation times. The findings suggest that, with further experience, both systems can provide effective treatment options for patients undergoing prostate surgery.
PubMed: 38591096
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.03.013 -
Deep Learning Model for Real‑time Semantic Segmentation During Intraoperative Robotic Prostatectomy.European Urology Open Science Apr 2024Recently, deep learning algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown remarkable progress in medical imaging analysis. Semantic segmentation,...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Recently, deep learning algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown remarkable progress in medical imaging analysis. Semantic segmentation, which segments an unknown image into different parts and objects, has potential applications in robotic surgery in areas where artificial intelligence (AI) can be applied, such as in AI-assisted surgery, surgeon training, and skill assessment. We aimed to investigate the performance of a CNN-based deep learning model in real-time segmentation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP).
METHODS
Intraoperative videos of RALP procedures were obtained. The reinforcement U-Net model was used for segmentation. Segmentation of the images of instruments, bladder, prostate, and seminal vesicle-vas deferens was performed. The dataset was preprocessed and split randomly into training, validation, and test data in a 7:2:1 ratio. Dice coefficient, intersection over union (IoU), and accuracy by class, which are commonly used in medical image segmentation, were calculated to evaluate the performance of the model.
KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS
From 120 patient videos, 2400 images were selected for RALP procedures. The mean Dice scores for the identification of the instruments, bladder, prostate, and seminal vesicle-vas deferens were 0.96, 0.74, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively. Overall, when applied to the test data, the model had a mean Dice coefficient value of 0.85, IoU of 0.77, and accuracy of 0.85. Limitations included the sample size, lack of diversity in the methods of surgery, incomplete surgical processes, and lack of external validation.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
The CNN-based segmentation provides accurate real-time recognition of surgical instruments and anatomy in RALP. Deep learning algorithms can be used to identify anatomy within the surgical field and could potentially be used to provide real-time guidance in robotic surgery.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of deep learning segmentation in robotic prostatectomy procedures. Deep learning algorithms could be used to identify anatomical structures within the surgical field and may provide real-time guidance in robotic surgery.
PubMed: 38585210
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.005 -
International Journal of Surgery Case... May 2024Benign prostate hyperplasia is common condition among elderly men, but giant intravesical prostatic protrusion is rare and may be confused with bladder carcinoma.
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE
Benign prostate hyperplasia is common condition among elderly men, but giant intravesical prostatic protrusion is rare and may be confused with bladder carcinoma.
CASE PRESENTATION
We report an unusual case of giant intravesical prostatic protrusion mimicking bladder carcinoma. A diagnosis of giant intravesical prostatic protrusion was confirmed with the assistance of cystoscopy and patient was managed by transvesical simple open prostatectomy where he had uneventfully recovery.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION
Both bladder carcinoma and benign prostate hyperplasia are more prevalent in elderly men and they all present with lower urinary tract symptoms. Ultrasound and computer tomography may all suggest bladder carcinoma. The two conditions are treated differently, and therefore having correct diagnosis is mandatory. Cystoscopy is an important investigation that can act as a tiebreaker in differentiating giant intravesical prostatic protrusion from bladder carcinoma. Transvesical simple open prostatectomy is the preferred surgical approach with good postoperative outcome.
CONCLUSION
This case report reminds urology surgeons on the possibility of having giant intravesical prostate mimicking bladder carcinoma and the importance of cystoscopy in differentiating the two. Transvesical simple open prostatectomy has promising result.
PubMed: 38581945
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109590