-
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics : JCO May 2024
Topics: Humans; Orthodontic Brackets; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Tooth Movement Techniques
PubMed: 38917045
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics : JCO May 2024
Topics: Humans; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures; Sphenoid Bone; Female; Tooth Movement Techniques; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Male
PubMed: 38917043
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics : JCO May 2024
Topics: Humans; Patient Care Planning; Tooth Movement Techniques; Female; Gingiva; Computer-Aided Design; Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; Orthodontic Appliance Design
PubMed: 38917042
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics : JCO May 2024
Topics: Humans; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures; Molar, Third; Malocclusion, Angle Class III; Female; Tooth Movement Techniques; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Male; Adolescent
PubMed: 38917041
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics : JCO May 2024
Topics: Humans; Orthodontic Wires; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Female; Tooth Movement Techniques; Dental Alloys; Malocclusion; Male; Adolescent
PubMed: 38917040
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics : JCO May 2024
Topics: Humans; Palatal Expansion Technique; Computer-Aided Design; Molar; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Female; Child
PubMed: 38917039
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics : JCO May 2024
Topics: Humans; Printing, Three-Dimensional; Orthodontic Brackets; Orthodontic Appliance Design; Female; Male; Adolescent; Adult
PubMed: 38917038
DOI: No ID Found -
Cureus May 2024To compare the bond strength of two types of resin cement to that of additive manufacturing (AM) or cast cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the bond strength of two types of resin cement to that of additive manufacturing (AM) or cast cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two types of resin luting cement, composite resin and methyl methacrylate (MMA), were bonded to AM or cast Co-Cr alloys, and shear bond tests were performed after seven days of storage in distilled water at 37°C. Co-Cr alloy adhesive elements AM to the enamel surface of the labial aspect of a bovine mandibular central incisor crown were bonded with two types of resin luting cement and subjected to 1,000 cycles of storage in water for one day and 28 days or thermal cycling, followed by shear bonding tests. Residual cement on the metal and enamel surfaces after the bonding tests was evaluated using an optical microscope. The normality of the results was evaluated using statistical software Statcel4, analysis of variance, or Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on normality, and multiple comparison tests were performed using the Tukey-Kramer or Steel-Dwass tests.
RESULTS
After one day, the shear bond strength (SBS) was 25.9 MPa for Panavia V5 (PV; Kuraray Noritake Dental Corporation, Niigata, Japan) and 23.5 MPa for Super-Bond (SB; Sun Medical Corporation, Shiga, Japan), with no significant difference between the two cement types (P > 0.05). After 28 days, the SBS decreased to 4.1 MPa for PV and 6.7 MPa for SB, showing a significant difference between the two cements (P < 0.05). Following 1,000 thermal cycles, the SBS was 2.0 MPa for PV and 5.6 MPa for SB, with SB exhibiting a significantly higher value (P < 0.05). The adhesive strength was significantly lower after 28 days of storage and thermal cycling compared to after one day of storage (P < 0.05). The Co-Cr alloy exhibited more residual cement on the enamel surface due to interfacial fracture with the resin cement. The Co-Cr alloy showed more residual cement on the enamel surface due to interfacial fracture with the resin cement.
CONCLUSION
MMA-based resin cement showed optimal bond strength and may be suitable for clinical use in computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) orthodontic appliances.
PubMed: 38916016
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61041 -
Cureus May 2024The tongue-thrusting habit significantly contributes to the development of the anterior open bite (AOB), particularly when an infantile swallowing pattern persists into...
The tongue-thrusting habit significantly contributes to the development of the anterior open bite (AOB), particularly when an infantile swallowing pattern persists into the later stages of childhood and adolescence. This habit results in the protrusion of the anterior teeth. Treatment typically involves addressing the underlying causes, incorporating retraining exercises, and utilizing mechanical appliances to control tongue positioning. However, commonly used devices such as palatal cribs or spurs may present challenges, including speech impediments, chewing difficulties, and the potential for unintended injuries. This paper presents a case report detailing the treatment of a patient with an AOB, dental protrusion, and spacing. The treatment approach included the application of a fixed tongue trainer, in the form of a modified bluegrass appliance. Subsequent fixed orthodontic therapy was employed to rectify proclined teeth within the dental arch.
PubMed: 38915991
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61024 -
Cureus May 2024The development of ceramic brackets in orthodontics three decades ago emerged as a response to the increasing patient demand for less visible orthodontic... (Review)
Review
The development of ceramic brackets in orthodontics three decades ago emerged as a response to the increasing patient demand for less visible orthodontic appliances. While these brackets provide superior aesthetics, they are characterized by lower fracture toughness and higher bond strength in contrast to metal brackets. These properties present challenges during the debonding step, including the risk of enamel micro-fractures and cracks. Historically, various strategies have been developed to address challenges associated with debonding, reduce patient discomfort, and ensure that the bond failure site is confined to the bracket-adhesive interface. This included the use of specially designed debonding pliers, electrothermal debonding, ultrasonic technique, and chemical agents. Recently, there has been a shift towards utilizing different types of laser irradiation for this purpose. The burgeoning strategy, however, requires diligent scientific scrutiny to establish a standardized protocol with particular laser parameters and ultimately achieve the goal of enhancing the patient experience by reducing discomfort. This article offers a narrative review of laser-aided debonding of ceramic brackets, aimed at comparing different laser types, presenting their benefits and downsides, validating the efficiency of each method, and summarizing the published literature on this subject. It also provides insights for orthodontists on reducing patient discomfort that usually accompanies debonding ceramic brackets by delving into the science behind the use of lasers for this purpose.
PubMed: 38915986
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61050