-
Orthopedic Reviews 2024To rigorously derive easy to use formulae for the inclination angle for single cut rotation osteotomy that can be used for tibia deformity correction.
BACKGROUND
To rigorously derive easy to use formulae for the inclination angle for single cut rotation osteotomy that can be used for tibia deformity correction.
METHOD
Three theorems were proven using trigonometric identities and concepts of linear algebra. These were rigorously shown. The three concepts were how to convert deformities in an AP/Lateral plane to an oblique plane deformity with a true angular magnitude of deformity; how to project an angular quantity from one plane to another; and the calculation of the inclination angle for the oblique osteotomy plane. All figures in this article were created by the authors of this paper.
RESULTS
From the formula derived, a statistical t-test was performed that showed no significant difference between the formula derived in this paper and the original Sangeorzan paper charts (p=0.8782).
CONCLUSIONS
The formulae described in this article are a method to accurately calculate the inclination angle of the osteotomy for a single cut rotational osteotomy for tibial deformity correction.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The article gives a deeper understanding of fundamental concepts behind deformity correction and provides an easy-to-use mathematical formula to calculate the osteotomy inclination for single cut rotational osteotomies.
PubMed: 38957746
DOI: 10.52965/001c.120302 -
Orthopedic Reviews 2024Dega osteotomy is becoming more widely used for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
BACKGROUND
Dega osteotomy is becoming more widely used for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
OBJECTIVE
A thorough description of this procedure is needed as many of the technical aspects are not fully defined. Moreover, more follow-up series are also needed to evaluate its outcomes.
METHODS
In this study, we gave a detailed anatomic description for this procedure and also presented our experience as a retrospective radiographic and case-note study. We examined the clinical and radiographic records of 44 patients (48 hips) with varying degrees of DDH.
RESULTS
The average age of the patients was 2 months and 7 months while the average follow up period was 41 months. Clinical and radiographic assessment including CT with 3D reconstruction to examine the anatomic characteristics of the osteotomy were undertaken. We found that concentric reduction was achieved in 93.7% with excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes. Only 3 cases needed revision of the Dega osteotomy. The re-operation rate was 12.5%. CT scan revealed that the arcuate line was crossed by the osteotomy in the majority of cases. In 20.7% of cases, a bone cut that was intended to be a Dega osteotomy was found to have been inadvertently implemented as another osteotomy variant. However, this bore no significant effect on the outcome.
CONCLUSION
We found that a well-implemented Dega osteotomy is a reliable tool to cope with the acetabular changes in DDH.
PubMed: 38957743
DOI: 10.52965/001c.120304 -
The Journal of Contemporary Dental... Apr 2024To assess the implant stability and amount of marginal bone loss in immediate implant placement (IIP) in mandibular molars by using pre-extractive interradicular implant... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
AIM
To assess the implant stability and amount of marginal bone loss in immediate implant placement (IIP) in mandibular molars by using pre-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation vs conventional post-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This randomized clinical trial was conducted on fourteen patients who had an immediate dental implant at the mandibular molar area by two different techniques. All patients were divided randomly into two equal groups: Group I (control) was treated with conventional post-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation, and group II (test) was treated by pre-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. All patients were followed up clinically at immediate post-surgery (T0), 7 days (T1), 3 weeks (T2), 90 days (T3), and 3 months after loading (T6) for healing and to evaluate the marginal bone loss radiographically at T0, T3 and T6. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed using the SPSS version (SPSS, IBM Inc., Chicago, IL), and ≤ 0.05 was considered an indicator of statistical significance.
RESULTS
A total of 7 female and 7 male patients with a mean age of 32.07 ± 5.87 years. Radiographically, there is no significant statistical difference in comparing between two groups for the marginal bone loss. However, there was a highly significant statistical difference ( < 0.001) in each group between different interval periods (T0, T3, T6) with mean start 5.27 ± 0.53, and 5.19 ± 0.72 at (T0) reaching 7.60 ± 0.89 and 7.09 ± 0.96 at (T3) and slightly decrease of 7.52 ± 0.79 and 7.02 ± 0.79 in (T6) with radiographic evaluation, and it represented clinically in each group with mean 3.57 ± 0.313 and 4.0 ± 0.58 at (T0) increase to 6.55 ± 0.395 and 6.52 ± 0.45 at (T6) for both group respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in soft tissue healing with an average mean of 4.57 ± 0.24 and 3.57 ± 0.509 ( = 0.001) when comparing between both groups respectively.
CONCLUSION
Both techniques seem useful for dental implant placement in badly decayed mandibular molars. However, pre-extracted interradicular implant bed preparation for IIP might offer advantages in terms of primary implant stability and bone preservation. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Both techniques are alternative methods for the treatment of badly decayed mandibular molars by immediate dental implant except for minor complications that do not interfere with dental implant placement. How to cite this article: Alzaibak LMA, Abdel-Monem TM, Elgohary NM, . Immediate Implant Placement with Different Interradicular Osteotomies in the Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):303-312.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Mandible; Alveolar Bone Loss; Molar; Immediate Dental Implant Loading; Osteotomy; Dental Implantation, Endosseous
PubMed: 38956843
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3674 -
Pain Practice : the Official Journal of... Jul 2024In the randomized, phase 3, SUSA-301 trial, celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal (CTC) provided significantly greater analgesia compared with celecoxib, tramadol, or placebo in...
Celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal in patients with moderate-to-severe pain following bunionectomy with osteotomy: Secondary analyses by baseline pain intensity and use of rescue medication of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, factorial, active- and placebo-controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
In the randomized, phase 3, SUSA-301 trial, celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal (CTC) provided significantly greater analgesia compared with celecoxib, tramadol, or placebo in adults with acute, moderate-to-severe, postoperative pain. This post hoc, secondary analysis further evaluated the use of rescue medication and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
METHODS
Patients (N = 637) were randomized 2:2:2:1 to receive oral CTC 200 mg twice daily (BID; n = 184), tramadol 50 mg four times daily (QID; n = 183), celecoxib 100 mg BID (n = 181), or placebo QID (n = 89). Post hoc analyses were conducted on the use of rescue medications up to 4 and 48 h post-study drug dose, stratified by baseline pain intensity (moderate/severe), and on the incidence of TEAEs, stratified by rescue medication use.
RESULTS
A significantly lower proportion of patients received any rescue medication within 4 h post-study dose with CTC (49.5%) versus tramadol (61.7%, p = 0.0178), celecoxib (65.2%, p = 0.0024), and placebo (75.3%, p = 0.0001); this was also seen for oxycodone use. Fewer patients in the CTC group received ≥3 doses of rescue medication compared with the other groups, irrespective of baseline pain intensity. In patients who did not receive opioid rescue medication, CTC was associated with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting TEAEs versus tramadol alone. In patients who received rescue oxycodone, the incidence of nausea was similar in the CTC and tramadol groups, and higher versus celecoxib and placebo.
CONCLUSION
Celecoxib-tramadol co-crystal was associated with reduced rescue medication use and an acceptable tolerability profile compared with tramadol or celecoxib alone in adults with acute, moderate-to-severe, postoperative pain.
PubMed: 38956758
DOI: 10.1111/papr.13399 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Jul 2024Spinal tuberculosis, if not promptly treated, can lead to kyphotic deformity, causing persistent neurological abnormalities and discomfort. Spinal cord compression can...
PURPOSE
Spinal tuberculosis, if not promptly treated, can lead to kyphotic deformity, causing persistent neurological abnormalities and discomfort. Spinal cord compression can occur due to ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) at the apex of kyphosis. Traditional surgical interventions, including osteotomy and fixation, pose challenges and risks. We present a case of thoracic myelopathy in a patient with post-tuberculosis kyphosis, successfully treated with biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS).
METHOD
A 73-year-old female with a history of untreated kyphosis presented with walking difficulties and lower limb pain. Imaging revealed a kyphotic deformity of 120° and OLF-induced cord compression at T8-9. UBE was performed under spinal anesthesia. Using the BESS technique, OLF was successfully removed with minimal damage to the stabilizing structures.
RESULTS
The patient exhibited neurological improvement after surgery, walking on the first day without gait instability. Follow-up at 1 year showed no kyphosis progression or recurrence of symptoms. BESS successfully resolved the cord compression lesion with minimal blood loss and damage.
CONCLUSION
In spinal tuberculosis-related OLF, conventional open surgery poses challenges. BESS emerges as an excellent alternative, providing effective decompression with reduced instrumentation needs, minimal blood loss, and preservation of surrounding structures. Careful patient selection and surgical planning are crucial for optimal outcomes in endoscopic procedures.
PubMed: 38955867
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08308-4 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Jul 2024This study was a retrospective multi-center comparative cohort study.
STUDY DESIGN
This study was a retrospective multi-center comparative cohort study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective institutional database of operative adult spinal deformity patients was utilized. All fusions > 5 vertebral levels and including the sacrum/pelvis were eligible for inclusion. Revisions, 3 column osteotomies, and patients with < 2-year clinical follow-up were excluded. Patients were separated into 3 groups based on surgical approach: 1) posterior spinal fusion without interbody (PSF), 2) PSF with interbody (PSF-IB), and 3) anteroposterior (AP) fusion (anterior lumbar interbody fusion or lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior screw fixation). Intraoperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes, as well as complications, were compared between groups with ANOVA and χ tests.
RESULTS
One-hundred and thirty-eight patients were included for study (PSF, n = 37; PSF-IB, n = 44; AP, n = 57). Intraoperatively, estimated blood loss was similar between groups (p = 0.171). However, the AP group had longer operative times (547.5 min) compared to PSF (385.1) and PSF-IB (370.7) (p < 0.001). Additionally, fusion length was shorter in PSF-IB (11.4) compared to AP (13.6) and PSF (12.9) (p = 0.004). There were no differences between the groups in terms of change in alignment from preoperative to 2 years postoperative. There were no differences in clinical outcomes. While postoperative complications were largely similar between groups, operative complications were higher in the AP group (31.6%) compared to the PSF (5.4%) and PSF-IB (9.1) groups (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
While there were differences in intraoperative outcomes (operative time and fusion length), there were no differences in postoperative clinical or radiographic outcomes. AP fusion was associated with a higher rate of operative complications.
PubMed: 38955866
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08354-y -
Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und... Jul 2024The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological results of dorsal metatarsal closed wedge osteotomy and headless screw fixation in the...
The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological results of dorsal metatarsal closed wedge osteotomy and headless screw fixation in the surgical treatment of Freiberg's disease.Thirty-four patients who were treated with dorsal metatarsal closed wedge osteotomy (DMCWO) for Freiberg's disease between February 2018 and March 2022 were included in the study. Patients were staged according to the classification system described by Smillie. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society's (AOFAS) lesser metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale, the visual analog scale (VAS), the range of motion (ROM) of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, and a subjective patient satisfaction questionnaire. For radiological evaluation, the amount of preoperative shortening of the involved metatarsal, the amount of metatarsal shortening developed after osteotomy, and radiological recovery times were recorded.Thirty-two (94.1%) of the patients were female, and two (5.9%) were male. The average postoperative follow-up period for patients was 33.7 months (range: 24 months to 41 months). The mean AOFAS scores increased from 53.24 to 86.26 (p < 0.01). The mean VAS scores decreased from 8.59 to 1.79, and it was observed that the patients' pain improved significantly (p < 0.01). The mean ROM of the MTP joint increased from 48.76 degrees to 70.76 degrees (p < 0.01). An average of 2.5 mm (range 1 mm to 4.1 mm) of shortening of the metatarsal length developed postoperatively (p < 0.01). Arthrosis developed in 1 case (2.9%), and transfer metatarsalgia developed in 2 cases (5.8%).DMCWO is an effective treatment for both the early and advanced stages of symptomatic Freiberg's disease, leading to high patient satisfaction.
PubMed: 38955205
DOI: 10.1055/a-2343-4161 -
EFORT Open Reviews Jul 2024Over the years, with a better understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics, superior implant designs, advanced surgical techniques, and the availability of precision... (Review)
Review
Over the years, with a better understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics, superior implant designs, advanced surgical techniques, and the availability of precision tools such as robotics and navigation, a more personalized approach to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has emerged. In the presence of extra-articular deformities, performing personalized TKA can be more challenging and specific considerations are required, since one has to deal with an acquired pathological anatomy. Performing personalized TKA surgery in patients with extra-articular deformities, the surgeon can: (1) resurface the joint, omitting the extra-articular deformity; (2) partially compensate the extra-articular deformity with intra-articular correction (hybrid technique), or (3) correct the extra-articular deformity combined with a joint resurfacing TKA (single stage or two-stage procedure). Omitting the acquired lower limb malalignment by resurfacing the knee has the advantages of respecting the joint surface anatomy and preserving soft tissue laxities. On the other hand, it maintains pathological joint load and lower limb kinematics with potentially detrimental outcomes. The hybrid technique can be performed in most cases. It circumvents complications associated with osteotomies and brings lower limb axes closer to native alignment. On the other hand, it creates some intra-articular imbalances, which may require soft tissue releases and/or constrained implants. Correcting the extra-articular deformity (through an osteotomy) in conjunction with joint resurfacing TKA represents the only true kinematic alignment technique, as it aims to reproduce native knee laxity and overall lower limb axis.
PubMed: 38949174
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0215 -
EFORT Open Reviews Jul 2024The present narrative review provides a summary of postoperative therapy modalities and their effectiveness following osteotomies around the knee. The topics that are... (Review)
Review
The present narrative review provides a summary of postoperative therapy modalities and their effectiveness following osteotomies around the knee. The topics that are discussed in the scientific discourse include support of cartilage cell regeneration, pain management, drainage insertion, tourniquet use, pharmacological and mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis, weight-bearing protocols and bone consolidation. There is evidence for the use of pharmacological thromboembolism prophylaxis and weight-bearing protocols. A standardized postoperative treatment concept following osteotomies around the knee cannot be derived due to lack of evidence for the other topics in current literature.
PubMed: 38949151
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0153 -
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi =... Jul 2024In combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment, the maxillary palatine suture is closed in most patients with insufficient maxillary width, and bony expansion of the...
In combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment, the maxillary palatine suture is closed in most patients with insufficient maxillary width, and bony expansion of the maxilla cannot be achieved by dental expansion or rapid palatal expansion (RPE) which causes buccal inclination of the maxillary posterior teeth leading to unstable results. Therefore, segmental LeFort Ⅰ osteotomy and surgically assisted RPE are often used in clinical practice. In recent years, with the application of implant anchorage technology, implant anchorage assisted RPE has been gradually applied in orthognathic treatment. This article reviewed the indications, contraindications, complications, efficacy and long-term stability in different treatment approaches including segmental Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy, surgically assisted RPE and implant-supported maxillary skeletal expansion.
PubMed: 38949142
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240307-00102