-
International Journal of Colorectal... Apr 2024Surgical techniques and the prognosis of posterior pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer in female patients pose challenges that need to be...
A novel classification of posterior pelvic exenteration to assess prognosis in female patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study from China PelvEx collaborative.
PURPOSE
Surgical techniques and the prognosis of posterior pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer in female patients pose challenges that need to be addressed. Therefore, we investigated the short-term and survival outcomes of posterior pelvic exenteration in female patients using a novel Peking classification.
METHODS
We retrospectively analysed a prospective database from China PelvEx Collaborative across three tertiary referral centres. A total of 172 patients who underwent combined resection for locally advanced primary rectal cancer were classified based on four subtypes (PPE-I [64/172], PPE-II [68/172], PPE-III [21/172], and PPE-IV [19/172]) according to the Peking classification; perioperative characteristics and short-term and oncological outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS
Differences were significant among the four groups regarding colorectal reconstruction (p < 0.001), perineal reconstruction (p < 0.001), in-hospital complications (p < 0.05), and urinary retention (p < 0.05). The R resection rates for PPE-I, PPE-II, PPE-III, and PPE-IV were 90.6%, 89.7%, 90.5%, and 89.5%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates of the PPE-I, PPE-II, PPE-III, and PPE-IV groups were 73.4%, 68.8%, 54.7%, and 37.3%, respectively. Correspondingly, their 5-year disease-free survival rates were 76.0%, 62.5%, 57.7%, and 43.1%, respectively. Notably, the PPE-IV group demonstrated the lowest 5-year overall survival rate (p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival rate (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The Peking classification can aid in determining suitable surgical techniques and conducting prognostic assessments in female patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pelvic Exenteration; Rectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Prognosis; China; Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Treatment Outcome; Adult; Disease-Free Survival
PubMed: 38664256
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04632-9 -
Heliyon Apr 2024Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a major surgical procedure used as a salvage therapy for patients with locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies. Urinary...
BACKGROUND
Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a major surgical procedure used as a salvage therapy for patients with locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies. Urinary reconstruction is a major part of PE and is often associated with high rates of post-operative complications. In the current study we evaluate the short and long-term urological outcomes following PE for Colo-Rectal (CR) and gyneco-oncological (GO) malignancies.
METHODS
Study included 22 patients who underwent PE for recurrent or locally advanced CR and GO malignancies in our institution between the years 2010-2018. The endpoint was post-operative freedom from urological complications.
RESULTS
Of 22 patients included, 13 (59 %) and 9 (41 %) underwent PE for CR and GO malignancies respectively. The mean age of the patients was 54 years. The median follow-up was 19 months. Seven (78 %) patients with GO malignancy and 11 (85 %) with CR malignancy underwent PE for local recurrence. Hydronephrosis prior to surgery existed in 8 (36.3 %) patients, of which, 5 patients required kidney drainage via nephrostomy tube. Two patients underwent posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE) with bladder preservation whereas the remaining 20 underwent cystectomy with urinary diversion by ileal conduit. Hydronephrosis post PE developed in 13 patients (59 %). eight (36 %) patients needed kidney drainage by nephrostomy tubes post PE, of these, 6 (75 %) had disease recurrence. The 2 years freedom from kidney drainage was 68 %, however the median time for kidney drainage was 0.5 months. The median overall survival was 12.5 months.
CONCLUSION
The rate of urological complications following PE is relatively high and associated with disease recurrence.
PubMed: 38644885
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29640 -
Journal of Medical Case Reports Apr 2024Total pelvic exenteration is the ultimate solution for rectovesicovaginal fistula caused by radiation therapy, yet total pelvic exenteration frequently causes...
The effect of physical therapy and mechanical stimulation on dysfunction of lower extremities after total pelvic exenteration in cervical carcinoma patient with rectovesicovaginal fistula induced by radiotherapy: a case report.
BACKGROUND
Total pelvic exenteration is the ultimate solution for rectovesicovaginal fistula caused by radiation therapy, yet total pelvic exenteration frequently causes intraoperative complications and postoperative complications. These complications are responsible for the dysfunction of lower extremities, impaired quality of life, and even the high long-term morbidity rate, thus multidisciplinary cooperation and early intervention for prevention of complications are necessary. Physical therapy was found to reduce the postoperative complications and promote rehabilitation, yet the effect on how physiotherapy prevents and treats complications after total pelvic exenteration and pelvic lymphadenectomy remains unclear.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 50-year-old Chinese woman gradually developed perianal and pelvic floor pain and discomfort, right lower limb numbness, and involuntary vaginal discharge owing to recurrence and metastasis of cervical cancer more than half a year ago. Diagnosed as rectovesicovaginal fistula caused by radiation, she received total pelvic exenteration and subsequently developed severe lower limb edema, swelling pain, obturator nerve injury, and motor dysfunction. The patient was referred to a physiotherapist who performed rehabilitation evaluation and found edema in both lower extremities, right inguinal region pain (numeric pain rate scale 5/10), decreased temperature sensation and light touch in the medial thigh of the right lower limb, decreased right hip adductor muscle strength (manual muscle test 1/5) and right hip flexor muscle strength (manual muscle test 1/5), inability actively to adduct and flex the right hip with knee extension, low de Morton mobility Index score (0/100), and low Modified Barthel Index score (35/100). Routine physiotherapy was performed in 2 weeks, including therapeutic exercises, mechanical stimulation and electrical stimulation as well as manual therapy. The outcomes showed that physiotherapy significantly reduced lower limb pain and swelling, and improved hip range of motion, motor function, and activities of daily living, but still did not prevent thrombosis.
CONCLUSION
Standardized physical therapy demonstrates the effect on postoperative complications after total pelvic exenteration and pelvic lymphadenectomy. This supports the necessity of multidisciplinary cooperation and early physiotherapy intervention. Further research is needed to determine the causes of thrombosis after standardized intervention, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of physical therapy after total pelvic exenteration.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Activities of Daily Living; Pelvic Exenteration; Quality of Life; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Lower Extremity; Physical Therapy Modalities; Pelvic Pain; Edema; Postoperative Complications; Thrombosis
PubMed: 38610054
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04516-0 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2024Innovation in surgery and pelvic oncology have redefined the boundaries of pelvic exenteration for CRC. However, surgical approaches and outcomes following repeat... (Review)
Review
Innovation in surgery and pelvic oncology have redefined the boundaries of pelvic exenteration for CRC. However, surgical approaches and outcomes following repeat exenteration and reconstruction are not well described. The resulting defect from a second beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) presents a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. The aim of this study was to explore reconstructive options for patients undergoing repeat beyond TME for recurrent CRC following previous beyond TME and regional reconstruction. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for relevant articles, yielding 2353 studies. However, following full text review and the application of the inclusion criteria, all the studies were excluded. This study demonstrated the lack of reporting on re-do reconstruction techniques following repeat exenteration for recurrent CRC. Based on this finding, we conducted a point-by-point discussion of certain key aspects that should be taken into consideration when approaching this patient cohort.
PubMed: 38592018
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051228 -
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sep 2024This study assessed the feasibility of using three-dimensional (3D) models of intrapelvic vascular patterns constructed using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic...
PURPOSE
This study assessed the feasibility of using three-dimensional (3D) models of intrapelvic vascular patterns constructed using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion data for preoperative planning in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.
METHODS
Eleven patients scheduled for pelvic exenteration were included. The 3D fusion data of the intrapelvic vessels constructed using CT and MRI with true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence (True FISP) were evaluated preoperatively. Contrast ratios (CR) between the piriformis muscle and the intrapelvic vessels were calculated to identify a valid modality for 3D modeling and creating CT/MRI fusion-reconstructed volume-rendered images.
RESULTS
The CR values of the internal and external iliac arteries were significantly higher on CT images than MR images (CT vs. MRI; 0.63 vs. 0.45, p < 0.01). However, the CR value of the internal iliac vein was significantly higher on MR than CT images (CT vs. MRI; 0.23 vs. 0.55, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
MRI with True FISP yielded high signal-to-noise ratios and aided in delineating the internal iliac vein around the piriformis muscle. More precise 3D models can be constructed using this technique in the future to aid in the resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer.
Topics: Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Female; Pilot Projects; Middle Aged; Male; Iliac Vein; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Aged; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Adult; Multimodal Imaging; Feasibility Studies; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 38588961
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.04.006 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Jun 2024Around 20% of rectal tumors are locally advanced with invasion into adjacent structures at presentation. These may require surgical resections beyond boundaries of total...
BACKGROUND
Around 20% of rectal tumors are locally advanced with invasion into adjacent structures at presentation. These may require surgical resections beyond boundaries of total mesorectal excision (bTME) for radicality. Robotic bTME is under investigation. This study reports perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic bTME for locally advanced rectal cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A multicentre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected robotic bTME resections (July 2015-November 2020). Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated.
RESULTS
One-hundred-sixty-eight patients (eight centres) were included. Median age and BMI were 60.0 (50.0-68.7) years and 24.0 (24.4-27.7) kg/m. Female sex was prevalent (n = 95, 56.8%). Fifty patients (29.6%) were ASA III-IV. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was given to 125 (74.4%) patients. Median operative time was 314.0 (260.0-450.0) minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 150.0 (27.5-500.0) ml. Conversion to laparotomy was seen in 4.8%. Postoperative complications occurred in 77 (45.8%) patients; 27.3% and 3.9% were Clavien-Dindo III and IV, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.2% (n = 2). R0 rate was 92.9%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to 72 (42.9%) patients. Median follow-up was 34.0 (10.0-65.7) months. Distant and local recurrences were seen in 35 (20.8%) and 15 patients (8.9%), respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5-years was 91.7, 82.1, and 76.8%. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 3, and 5-years was 84.0, 74.5, and 69.2%.
CONCLUSION
Robotic bTME is technically safe with relatively low conversion rate, good OS, and acceptable DFS in the hands of experienced surgeons in high volume centres. In selected cases robotic approach allows for high R0 rates during bTME.
Topics: Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Operative Time; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Blood Loss, Surgical; Survival Rate; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Conversion to Open Surgery; Disease-Free Survival; Postoperative Complications; Proctectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38583214
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108308 -
World Journal of Gastrointestinal... Mar 2024Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second highest cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. About 5%-10% of patients are diagnosed with locally...
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second highest cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. About 5%-10% of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) on presentation. For LARC invading into other structures ( T4b), multivisceral resection (MVR) and/or pelvic exenteration (PE) remains the only potential curative surgical treatment. MVR and/or PE is a major and complex surgery with high post-operative morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been shown to improve short-term post-operative outcomes in other gastrointestinal malignancies, but there is little evidence on its use in MVR, especially so for robotic MVR.
AIM
To assess the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive MVR (miMVR), and compare post-operative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic MVR.
METHODS
This is a single-center retrospective cohort study from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2023. Inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with cT4b rectal cancer and underwent MVR, or stage 4 disease with resectable systemic metastases. Patients who underwent curative MVR for locally recurrent rectal cancer, or metachronous rectal cancer were also included. Exclusion criteria were patients with systemic metastases with non-resectable disease. All patients planned for elective surgery were enrolled into the standard enhanced recovery after surgery pathway with standard peri-operative management for colorectal surgery. Complex surgery was defined based on technical difficulty of surgery ( total PE, bladder-sparing prostatectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection or need for flap creation). Our primary outcomes were the margin status, and complication rates. Categorical values were described as percentages and analysed by the chi-square test. Continuous variables were expressed as median (range) and analysed by Mann-Whitney test. Cumulative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates with life table analysis. Log-rank test was performed to determine statistical significance between cumulative estimates. Statistical significance was defined as < 0.05.
RESULTS
A total of 46 patients were included in this study [open MVR (oMVR): 12 (26.1%), miMVR: 36 (73.9%)]. Patients' American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index and co-morbidities were comparable between oMVR and miMVR. There is an increasing trend towards robotic MVR from 2015 to 2023. MiMVR was associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (median 450 1200 mL, = 0.008), major morbidity (14.7% 50.0%, = 0.014), post-operative intra-abdominal collections (11.8% 50.0%, = 0.006), post-operative ileus (32.4% 66.7%, = 0.04) and surgical site infection (11.8% 50.0%, = 0.006) compared with oMVR. Length of stay was also shorter for miMVR compared with oMVR (median 10 30 d, = 0.001). Oncological outcomes-R0 resection, recurrence, OS and RFS were comparable between miMVR and oMVR. There was no 30-d mortality. More patients underwent robotic compared with laparoscopic MVR for complex cases (robotic 57.1% laparoscopic 7.7%, = 0.004). The operating time was longer for robotic compared with laparoscopic MVR [robotic: 602 (400-900) min, laparoscopic: Median 455 (275-675) min, < 0.001]. Incidence of R0 resection was similar (laparoscopic: 84.6% robotic: 76.2%, = 0.555). Overall complication rates, major morbidity rates and 30-d readmission rates were similar between laparoscopic and robotic MVR. Interestingly, 3-year OS (robotic 83.1% 58.6%, = 0.008) and RFS (robotic 72.9% 34.3%, = 0.002) was superior for robotic compared with laparoscopic MVR.
CONCLUSION
MiMVR had lower post-operative complications compared to oMVR. Robotic MVR was also safe, with acceptable post-operative complication rates. Prospective studies should be conducted to compare short-term and long-term outcomes between robotic laparoscopic MVR.
PubMed: 38577068
DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.777 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... May 2024The PelvEx Collaborative collates global data on outcomes following exenterative surgery for locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LARC and LRRC,...
AIM
The PelvEx Collaborative collates global data on outcomes following exenterative surgery for locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LARC and LRRC, respectively). The aim of this study is to report contemporary data from within the collaborative and benchmark it against previous PelvEx publications.
METHOD
Anonymized data from 45 units that performed pelvic exenteration for LARC or LRRC between 2017 and 2021 were reviewed. The primary endpoints were surgical outcomes, including resection margin status, radicality of surgery, rates of reconstruction and associated morbidity and/or mortality.
RESULTS
Of 2186 patients who underwent an exenteration for either LARC or LRRC, 1386 (63.4%) had LARC and 800 (36.6%) had LRRC. The proportion of males to females was 1232:954. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range 52-71 years) compared with a median age of 63 in both historical LARC and LRRC cohorts. Compared with the original reported PelvEx data (2004-2014), there has been an increase in negative margin (R0) rates from 79.8% to 84.8% and from 55.4% to 71.7% in the LARC and LRRC cohorts, respectively. Bone resection and flap reconstruction rates have increased accordingly in both cohorts (8.2%-19.6% and 22.6%-32% for LARC and 20.3%-41.9% and 17.4%-32.1% in LRRC, respectively). Despite this, major morbidity has not increased.
CONCLUSION
In the modern era, patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for advanced rectal cancer are undergoing more radical surgery and are more likely to achieve a negative resection margin (R0) with no increase in major morbidity.
Topics: Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Female; Male; Aged; Pelvic Exenteration; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Margins of Excision; Treatment Outcome; Benchmarking; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38566456
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16948 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Jun 2024Despite advancements in colorectal cancer care, one-year post-operative mortality rates remain high for elderly patients who have undergone curative surgery for primary...
INTRODUCTION
Despite advancements in colorectal cancer care, one-year post-operative mortality rates remain high for elderly patients who have undergone curative surgery for primary clinical T4 rectal cancer (cT4RC) or locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). This study aimed to identify factors associated with one-year mortality and to evaluate the causes of death.
MATERIALS & METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥70 years who underwent surgery with curative intent for cT4RC or LRRC between January 2013 and December 2020. Clinical and follow-up data were collected and analyzed to determine survival rates and investigate factors associated with mortality within one year after surgery.
RESULTS
A total of 183 patients (94 cT4RC, 89 LRRC) were included. One-year mortality rates were 16.0% for cT4RC and 28.1% for LRRC (P = 0.064). In cT4RC patients, factors associated with one-year mortality were preoperative anemia (OR 3.83, P = 0.032), total pelvic exenteration (TPE) (OR 7.18, P = 0.018), multivisceral resections (OR 5.73, P = 0.028), pulmonary complications (OR 13.31, P < 0.001) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications (OR 5.19, P = 0.025). In LRRC patients, factors associated with one-year mortality were TPE (OR 27.00, P = 0.008), the need for supported care after discharge (OR 3.93, P = 0.041) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications (OR 3.95, P = 0.006). The main causes of death in cT4RC and LRRC patients were failure to recover (cT4RC 26.6%, LRRC 28.0%) and disease recurrence (cT4RC 26.6%, LRRC 60.0%).
CONCLUSION
In order to tailor treatment in elderly with cT4RC and LRRC, factors associated with increased one-year mortality (e.g. pre-operative anemia, TPE) should be incorporated in the decision-making process.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
Not applicable.
Topics: Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Male; Female; Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies; Aged, 80 and over; Neoplasm Staging; Survival Rate; Pelvic Exenteration; Risk Factors; Cause of Death; Anemia
PubMed: 38552415
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108259 -
Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology Mar 2024Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgery that is indicated in cases of recurrent advanced gynecological cancer with curative and sometimes palliative intent. The...
BACKGROUND
Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgery that is indicated in cases of recurrent advanced gynecological cancer with curative and sometimes palliative intent. The procedure is associated with both high morbidity and mortality and as such is considered a highly specialist procedure. The aim of the study was to analyze surgical outcomes in women who underwent PE for advanced gynecological malignancy in a tertiary cancer referral center over 11 years.
METHODS
This is an observational retrospective single-center study. There were 17 patients included who underwent PE in Hull Royal Infirmary Hospital (Hull, UK) between 2010 and 2021. The main outcome measures were the perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and recurrence free survival (RFS). Cumulative survival rates were reported at 1, 3 and 5 years. Univariate Cox regression analysis was undertaken to analyze factors that are prognostic for OS and RFS. Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed from the results of the Cox regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to visually display estimates of OS and RFS over the follow-up period.
RESULTS
The median age at the time of surgery was 63.0 (IQR: 48.0-71.0). All patients received surgery with curative intent and complete tumor resection (R0) was achieved in 94.1% of cases. An overall 5-year survival was achieved in 63.7% of patients. Mean overall survival (OS) was 8.4 years (95% CI: 7.78-9.02). The RFS was 5.0 years (95% CI: 4.13-5.87). Both OS and RFS were significantly negatively affected by the hospital stay (P=0.020 and P=0.035, respectively), but not by the type of surgery (P=0.263 and P=0.826, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the study demonstrated stable and comparable outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration.
PubMed: 38536026
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05337-5