-
Belitung Nursing Journal 2024Late antenatal care (ANC) has significant implications for maternal and infant morbidity and mortality among Muslim pregnant women in Indonesia. Existing literature has...
BACKGROUND
Late antenatal care (ANC) has significant implications for maternal and infant morbidity and mortality among Muslim pregnant women in Indonesia. Existing literature has primarily focused on gestational weeks at the first ANC contact, with limited attention to the total number of ANC visits.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to explore the factors predicting late antenatal care contact among Muslim pregnant women, including the gestational weeks of the first ANC contact and the total number of ANC visits in Aceh, Indonesia.
METHODS
A predictive correlational study design was utilized. Eighty postpartum women who received late ANC were purposively sampled and included in the study. Data were collected in May 2023 using ANC knowledge, beliefs, and social support questionnaires. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlation, Chi-Square tests, and binary logistic regression with the enter method.
RESULTS
Pregnant women residing farther from home to ANC services were more likely to have their first ANC contact after 20 weeks than those with a shorter distance (AOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10; = 0.007). Additionally, women with a history of multiple abortions were more inclined to have four or more ANC visits compared to those with fewer abortions (AOR = 6.78; 95% CI: 1.64-28.09; = 0.008).
CONCLUSION
Distance from home to healthcare services emerged as a significant barrier to ANC contact, while a history of abortion appeared to motivate pregnant women to seek ANC more frequently. To address these issues effectively, nurses should consider implementing telemedicine services for ANC provision, integrating information on pregnancy complications to better support pregnant women in their care journey.
PubMed: 38947307
DOI: 10.33546/bnj.3339 -
Research Square Jun 2024Little research has examined early life risk for symptoms of cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) despite a well-established literature regarding co-occurring outcomes...
BACKGROUND
Little research has examined early life risk for symptoms of cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) despite a well-established literature regarding co-occurring outcomes (e.g., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). The current study estimated bivariate associations between early life risk factors and CDS in a large and representative sample of U.S. children.
METHODS
We conducted secondary analyses of baseline data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (N = 8,096 children, 9-10 years old). Birthing parents reported early life risk factors on a developmental history questionnaire, including parental, prenatal, delivery and birth, and developmental milestone information. They also completed the Child Behavior Checklist, which includes a CDS subscale that was dichotomized to estimate the odds of elevated CDS symptoms (i.e., score > 70) in children related to risk indices.
RESULTS
We observed significantly elevated odds of CDS related to parental risk factors (i.e., unplanned pregnancy, pregnancy awareness after 6 weeks, teenage parenthood), birthing parent illnesses in pregnancy (i.e., severe nausea, proteinuria, pre-eclampsia/toxemia, severe anemia, urinary tract infection), pregnancy complications (i.e., bleeding), prenatal substance exposures (i.e., prescription medication, tobacco, illicit drugs), delivery and birth risk factors (i.e., child blue at delivery, child not breathing, jaundice, incubation after delivery), and late motor and speech milestones in children.
CONCLUSIONS
Several early-life risk factors were associated with elevated odds of CDS at ages 9-10 years; study design prevents the determination of causality. Further investigation is warranted regarding early life origins of CDS with priority given to risk indices that have upstream commonalities (i.e., that restrict fetal growth, nutrients, and oxygen).
PubMed: 38947040
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4468007/v1 -
European Journal of Public Health Jul 2024Despite concerns about worsening pregnancy outcomes resulting from healthcare restrictions, economic difficulties and increased stress during the COVID-19 pandemic,...
BACKGROUND
Despite concerns about worsening pregnancy outcomes resulting from healthcare restrictions, economic difficulties and increased stress during the COVID-19 pandemic, preterm birth (PTB) rates declined in some countries in 2020, while stillbirth rates appeared stable. Like other shocks, the pandemic may have exacerbated existing socioeconomic disparities in pregnancy, but this remains to be established. Our objective was to investigate changes in PTB and stillbirth by socioeconomic status (SES) in European countries.
METHODS
The Euro-Peristat network implemented this study within the Population Health Information Research Infrastructure (PHIRI) project. A common data model was developed to collect aggregated tables from routine birth data for 2015-2020. SES was based on mother's educational level or area-level deprivation/maternal occupation if education was unavailable and harmonized into low, medium and high SES. Country-specific relative risks (RRs) of PTB and stillbirth for March to December 2020, adjusted for linear trends from 2015 to 2019, by SES group were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twenty-one countries provided data on perinatal outcomes by SES. PTB declined by an average 4% in 2020 {pooled RR: 0.96 [95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.94-0.97]} with similar estimates across all SES groups. Stillbirths rose by 5% [RR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.99-1.10)], with increases of between 3 and 6% across the three SES groups, with overlapping confidence limits.
CONCLUSIONS
PTB decreases were similar regardless of SES group, while stillbirth rates rose without marked differences between groups.
Topics: Humans; Stillbirth; COVID-19; Europe; Premature Birth; Female; Pregnancy; SARS-CoV-2; Adult; Socioeconomic Factors; Pandemics; Social Class; Health Status Disparities; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy Outcome; Socioeconomic Disparities in Health
PubMed: 38946450
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad186 -
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &... Jul 2024
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Female; Substance-Related Disorders; Child; Pregnancy; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Mothers
PubMed: 38946319
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0480 -
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &... Jul 2024
Topics: Humans; Female; Neoplasms; Substance-Related Disorders; Child; Pregnancy; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects
PubMed: 38946317
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0243 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Jul 2024To compare neonatal, obstetrical, and maternal outcomes associated with outpatient versus inpatient management of pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
To compare neonatal, obstetrical, and maternal outcomes associated with outpatient versus inpatient management of pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database and Central Register from January 1, 1990 to July 31, 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing outpatient with inpatient management for pregnant persons diagnosed with PPROM before 37 weeks' gestation. No language restriction was applied. We applied a random effects model for meta-analysis. Trustworthiness was assessed using recently published guidance and Risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for cohort studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence (COE). Outcomes of interest included perinatal mortality, neonatal morbidities, latency and gestational age at delivery, and maternal morbidities. RCTs and cohort studies were analyzed separately. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviewsr: CRD42022295275.
RESULTS
From 2825 records, two RCTs and 10 cohort studies involving 1876 patients were included in the review and meta-analysis. Outpatient management protocols varied but generally included brief initial hospitalization, strict eligibility criteria, and surveillance with laboratory and ultrasound investigations. Outpatient management showed lower rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (cohort: RR 0.63 [0.52-0.77, very low COE]), longer latency to delivery (RCT: MD 7.43 days [1.14-13.72 days, moderate COE], cohort: MD 8.78 days [2.29-15.26 days, low COE]), higher gestational age at birth (cohort: MD 7.70 days [2.02-13.38 days, low COE]), lower rates of Apgar scores <7 at 5 min of life (cohort: RR 0.66 [0.50-0.89, very low COE]), and lower rates of histological chorioamnionitis (cohort: RR 0.74 [0.62-0.89, low COE]) without increased risks of adverse neonatal, obstetrical, or maternal outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Meta-analysis of data from RCTs and cohort studies with very low-to-moderate certainty of evidence indicates that further high-quality research is needed to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of outpatient management for selected PPROM cases, given the moderate-to-high risk of bias in the included studies.
PubMed: 38946314
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14903 -
The American Journal of Psychiatry Jul 2024
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Mental Disorders; Mental Health; Pregnancy Complications; Perinatal Care
PubMed: 38946268
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20231024 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Jul 2024The prevalence of congenital heart disease (CHD) among women of reproductive age is rising. We aimed to investigate the risk of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal...
INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of congenital heart disease (CHD) among women of reproductive age is rising. We aimed to investigate the risk of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies of mothers with CHD compared to pregnancies of mothers without heart disease.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
In a nationwide cohort of pregnancies in Norway 1994-2014, we retrieved information on maternal heart disease, the course of pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes from national registries. Comparing pregnancies with maternal CHD to pregnancies without maternal heart disease, we used Cox regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for preeclampsia and log-binomial regression to estimate the adjusted risk ratio (aRR) for adverse neonatal outcomes. The estimates were adjusted for maternal age and year of childbirth and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Among 1 218 452 pregnancies, 2425 had mild maternal CHD, and 603 had moderate/severe CHD. Compared to pregnancies without maternal heart disease, the risk of preeclampsia was increased in pregnancies with mild and moderate/severe maternal CHD (aHR1.37, 95% CI 1.14-1.65 and aHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.13-2.32). The risk of preterm birth was increased in pregnancies with mild maternal CHD (aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.54) and further increased with moderate/severe CHD (aRR 2.49, 95% CI 2.03-3.07). Maternal CHD was associated with elevated risks of both spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth. The risk of infants small-for-gestational-age was slightly increased with mild maternal CHD (aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.26) and increased with moderate/severe CHD (aRR 1.63, 95% CI 1.36-1.95). The prevalence of stillbirth was 3.9 per 1000 pregnancies without maternal heart disease, 5.6 per 1000 with mild maternal CHD, and 6.8 per 1000 with moderate/severe maternal CHD. Still, there were too few cases to report a significant difference. There were no maternal deaths in women with CHD.
CONCLUSIONS
Moderate/severe maternal CHD in pregnancy was associated with increased risks of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and infants small-for-gestational-age. Mild maternal CHD was associated with less increased risks. For women with moderate/severe CHD, their risk of preeclampsia and adverse neonatal outcomes should be evaluated together with their cardiac risk in pregnancy, and follow-up in pregnancy should be ascertained.
PubMed: 38946266
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14902 -
Birth Defects Research Jul 2024Gastroschisis is a congenital anomaly of the umbilical ring with increasing prevalence, especially amongst younger mothers. There is increasing evidence that exposure to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Gastroschisis is a congenital anomaly of the umbilical ring with increasing prevalence, especially amongst younger mothers. There is increasing evidence that exposure to genitourinary infections (GUTI) may play an important role in the etiology of gastroschisis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify, appraise, and summarize the literature on exposure to GUTI and gastroschisis.
METHODS
Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library electronic databases, and Prospero) were searched using a comprehensive search strategy. Citations and cited articles for all included studies were searched. Peer-reviewed, quantitative studies reporting an association of urinary tract infections (UTI) and/or sexually transmitted infections (STI) with gastroschisis were included. Prospero registration CRD42022377420.
RESULTS
A total of 2392 papers were identified via the searches of which 15 met our inclusion criteria and were included after title and abstract and full text screening. The study period for included studies ranged from 1995 to 2016, most were from the USA. Four studies considering exposure to STIs and five to UTIs were eligible to progress to meta-analysis. Meta-analysis identified a significantly increased risk of gastroschisis in association with periconceptional exposure to UTI [OR 1.54 (95% CI 1.29, 1.8)], STI [OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.01, 1.79)].
CONCLUSIONS
Periconceptional exposure to GUTI is associated with an increased risk of gastroschisis. The prevention and timely treatment of GUTI amongst women of childbearing age may help to reduce the occurrence of gastroschisis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Gastroschisis; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Urinary Tract Infections
PubMed: 38946111
DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.2377 -
NeoReviews Jul 2024
Topics: Humans; Graves Disease; Female; Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy Complications; Thyroid Diseases
PubMed: 38945965
DOI: 10.1542/neo.25-7-e447