-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2023Currently, gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are used to prevent premature ovulation in ART cycles. However, their costs remain high, the route of... (Review)
Review
Progestogens for prevention of luteinising hormone (LH) surge in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation as part of an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle.
BACKGROUND
Currently, gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are used to prevent premature ovulation in ART cycles. However, their costs remain high, the route of administration is invasive and has some adverse effects. Oral progestogens could be cheaper and effective to prevent a premature LH surge.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using progestogens to avoid spontaneous ovulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in Dec 2021. We contacted study authors and experts to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included progestogens for ovulation inhibition in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane, including the risk of bias (RoB) assessment. The primary review outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and oocyte pick-up cancellation rate (OPCR). Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), cumulative pregnancy, miscarriage rate (MR), multiple pregnancies, LH surge, total and MII oocytes, days of stimulation, dose of gonadotropins, and moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate. The primary analyses were restricted to studies at overall low and some concerns RoB, and sensitivity analysis included all studies. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 14 RCTs (2643 subfertile women undergoing ART, 47 women used oocyte freezing for fertility preservation and 534 oocyte donors). Progestogens versus GnRH antagonists We are very uncertain of the effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 10 mg compared with cetrorelix on the LBR in poor responders (odds ratio (OR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 2.13, one RCT, N = 340, very-low-certainty evidence), suggesting that if the chance of live birth following GnRH antagonists is assumed to be 18%, the chance following MPA would be 14% to 32%. There may be little or no difference in OPCR between progestogens and GnRH antagonists, but due to wide Cs (CIs), we are uncertain (OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.01, 3 RCTs, N = 648, I² = 0%, low-certainty evidence), changing the chance of OPCR from 4% with progestogens to 2% to 8%. Given the imprecision found, no conclusions can be retrieved on CPR and MR. Low-quality evidence suggested that using micronised progesterone in normo-responders may increase by 2 to 6 the MII oocytes in comparison to GnRH antagonists. There may be little or no differences in gonadotropin doses. Progestogens versus GnRH agonists Results were uncertain for all outcomes comparing progestogens with GnRH agonists. One progestogen versus another progestogen The analyses comparing one progestogen versus another progestogen for LBR did not meet our criteria for primary analyses. The OPCR was probably lower in the MPA 10 mg in comparison to MPA 4 mg (OR 2.27, 95%CI 0.90 to 5.74, one RCT, N = 300, moderate-certainty evidence), and MPA 4 mg may be lower than micronised progesterone 100 mg, but due to wide CI, we are uncertain of the effect (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.53, one RCT, N = 300, low-certainty evidence), changing the chance of OPCR from 5% with MPA 4 mg to 5% to22%, and from 17% with micronised progesterone 100 mg to 8% to 24%. When comparing dydrogesterone 20 mg to MPA, the OPCR is probably lower in the dydrogesterone group in comparison to MPA 10 mg (OR 1.49, 95%CI 0.80 to 2.80, one RCT, N = 520, moderate-certainty evidence), and it may be lower in dydrogesterone group in comparison to MPA 4 mg but due to wide confidence interval, we are uncertain of the effect (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.61 to 2.34, one RCT, N = 300, low-certainty evidence), changing the chance of OPCR from 7% with dydrogesterone 20 to 6-17%, and in MPA 4 mg from 12% to 8% to 24%. When comparing dydrogesterone 20 mg to micronised progesterone 100 mg, the OPCR is probably lower in the dydrogesterone group (OR 1.54, 95%CI 0.94 to 2.52, two RCTs, N=550, I² = 0%, moderate-certainty evidence), changing OPCR from 11% with dydrogesterone to 10% to 24%. We are very uncertain of the effect in normo-responders of micronised progesterone 100 mg compared with micronised progesterone 200 mg on the OPCR (OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.37, one RCT, N = 150, very-low-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in CPR and MR between MPA 10 mg and dydrogesterone 20 mg. There may be little or no differences in MII oocytes and gonadotropins doses. No cases of moderate/severe OHSS were reported in most of the groups in any of the comparisons.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Little or no differences in LBR may exist when comparing MPA 4 mg with GnRH agonists in normo-responders. OPCR may be slightly increased in the MPA 4 mg group, but MPA 4 mg reduces the doses of gonadotropins in comparison to GnRH agonists. Little or no differences in OPCR may exist between progestogens and GnRH antagonists in normo-responders and donors. However, micronised progesterone could improve by 2 to 6 MII oocytes. When comparing one progestogen to another, dydrogesterone suggested slightly lower OPCR than MPA and micronised progesterone, and MPA suggested slightly lower OPCR than the micronised progesterone 100 mg. Finally, MPA 10 mg suggests a lower OPCR than MPA 4 mg. There is uncertainty regarding the rest of the outcomes due to imprecision and no solid conclusions can be drawn.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Abortion, Spontaneous; Dydrogesterone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Gonadotropins; Live Birth; Luteinizing Hormone; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy Rate; Progesterone; Progestins; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
PubMed: 38032057
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013827.pub2 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023The delayed-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol seems effective for patients who are poor ovarian responders, but there are insufficient data on...
Original delayed-start ovarian stimulation protocol with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and high-dose gonadotropin for poor responders and patients with poor-quality embryos.
INTRODUCTION
The delayed-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol seems effective for patients who are poor ovarian responders, but there are insufficient data on whether it is also effective for patients with poor-quality embryos and low rates of good blastocyst formation. Specifically, the effectiveness of delayed-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists with progesterone has not been adequately investigated. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of the original delayed-start gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol using medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and high-dose gonadotropin in patients with poor ovarian response.
METHODS
Overall, 156 patients with recurrent assisted reproductive technology failure who underwent the original protocol were included. They received cetrorelix acetate (3 mg) and MPA (10 mg) on cycle day 3, and high-dose gonadotropin was initiated on day 11. When the leading follicle reached 14 mm, ganirelix acetate (0.25 mg) was administered until the trigger day. The number of oocytes retrieved, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, two pronuclear (2PN) zygotes, and good blastocysts and live birth rates were compared between the previous (Cycle A) and original (Cycle B) cycles in three groups (Group A, all patients; Group B, poor responders; and Group C, patients with poor-quality embryos).
RESULTS
In Group A (n=156), the number of MII oocytes (3.6 ± 3.3 versus 4.5 ± 3.6), 2PN zygotes (2.8 ± 2.9 versus 3.8 ± 3.1), good blastocysts (0.5 ± 0.9 versus 1.2 ± 1.6), and live birth rates (0.6 versus 24.4) significantly increased in Cycle B. Similar results were obtained in Group B (n=83; 2PN zygotes [1.7 ± 1.7 versus 2.3 ± 1.8], good blastocysts [0.4 ± 0.7 versus 0.9 ± 1.3], live birth rates [0 versus 18.1]) and Group C (n=73; MII oocytes [5.1 ± 3.8 versus 6.6 ± 4.0], 2PN zygotes [4.0 ± 3.4 versus 5.4 ± 3.4], good blastocysts [0.7 ± 1.1 versus 1.6 ± 1.9], and live birth rates [1.4 versus 31.5]).
CONCLUSION
This original protocol increased the number of MII oocytes retrieved, 2PN zygotes, good blastocysts, and live birth rates in both poor responders and in patients with poor-quality embryos.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate; Pregnancy Rate; Gonadotropins; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Ovulation Induction; Hormone Antagonists
PubMed: 38027155
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1277873 -
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Nov 2023Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 is higher in men than women and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 is higher in men than women and sex hormones have immune-modulator effects during different viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2 infection. One of the essential sex hormones is progesterone (P4).
AIMS
This review aimed to reveal the association between P4 and Covid-19.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The possible role of P4 in COVID-19 could be beneficial through the modulation of inflammatory signaling pathways, induction of the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and inhibition release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. P4 stimulates skew of naïve T cells from inflammatory Th1 toward anti-inflammatory Th2 with activation release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and activation of regulatory T cells (Treg) with decreased interferon-gamma production that increased during SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, P4 is regarded as a potent antagonist of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), it could reduce MRs that were activated by stimulated aldosterone from high AngII during SARS-CoV-2. P4 active metabolite allopregnanolone is regarded as a neurosteroid that acts as a positive modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA ) so it may reduce neuropsychiatric manifestations and dysautonomia in COVID-19 patients.
CONCLUSION
Taken together, the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of P4 may improve central and peripheral complications in COVID-19.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; COVID-19; Progesterone; SARS-CoV-2; Cytokines; Anti-Inflammatory Agents
PubMed: 38018575
DOI: 10.1002/iid3.1100 -
West African Journal of Medicine Nov 2023Meningiomas are the most common neoplasm of the central nervous system. According to the WHO 2020 classification, there are fifteen subtypes that have been grouped into...
INTRODUCTION
Meningiomas are the most common neoplasm of the central nervous system. According to the WHO 2020 classification, there are fifteen subtypes that have been grouped into grades 1, 2, and 3. The WHO grade 1 meningiomas are generally grouped as benign while the WHO grade 2 and 3 tumours are grouped as malignant. Progesterone receptors and P63 are common immunohistochemical markers reported useful in the diagnosis, grading, and prognosis of meningiomas. This study seeks to determine the usefulness of these findings in our population.
METHODOLOGY
A 10-year retrospective review of histologically diagnosed cases of meningioma. Immunostaining for progesterone receptors and P63 were performed and the results were correlated with the histologic grades and sex of the patients.
RESULTS
The three WHO grades of meningioma were assessed in this study. The M:F ratio was 1:1.4 and peak age incidence was seen in the 41 - 50 years age range. The majority of the cases were WHO grade 1 (86.1%) while WHO grades 2 and 3 tumours were 8% and 5.9%. There was no correlation between Progesterone receptor and P63 immunopositivity to the WHO grades or sex.
CONCLUSION
This study concluded that Progesterone receptors and P63 immunopositivity did not correlate with the WHO grades of meningiomas. This may be due to the predominant variant of meningioma seen in this study. Thus, progesterone receptor antagonists may not be an effective alternative for treatment in patients with inoperable meningiomas. Also, P63 immunopositivity may not be a sufficient grading tool in the management of meningiomas in our population.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Meningioma; Meningeal Neoplasms; Receptors, Progesterone; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37976251
DOI: No ID Found -
Endocrine-related Cancer Feb 2024Progesterone receptors (PRs) are biomarkers used as prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer, but they are still not used as therapeutic targets. We have...
Progesterone receptors (PRs) are biomarkers used as prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer, but they are still not used as therapeutic targets. We have proposed that the ratio between PR isoforms A and B (PRA and PRB) predicts antiprogestin responsiveness. The MIPRA trial confirmed the benefit of 200 mg mifepristone, administered to patients with tumors with a high PRA/PRB ratio, but dose-ranging has not been conducted. The aim of this study was to establish the plasma mifepristone levels of patients from the MIPRA trial, along with the resultant steroid profiles, and compare these with those observed in mifepristone-treated mice using therapeutic schemes able to induce the regression of experimental mammary carcinomas with high PRA/PRB ratios: 6 mg pellets implanted subcutaneously, or daily doses of 12 mg/kg body weight. The plasma levels of mifepristone and other 19 plasma steroids were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectometry. In mifepristone-treated mice, plasma levels were lower than those registered in mifepristone-treated patients (i.e. day 7 after treatment initiation, pellet-treated mice: 8.4 ± 3.9 ng/mL; mifepristone-treated patients: 300.3 ± 31.7 ng/mL (mean ± s.d.; P < 0.001)). The increase in corticoid related steroids observed in patients was not observed in mifepristone-treated mice. The increase in progesterone levels was the most significant side effect detected in mifepristone-treated mice after 14 or 21 days of treatment, probably due to an ovarian compensatory effect not observed in postmenopausal patients. We conclude that in future clinical trials using mifepristone, the possibility of lowering the standard daily dose of 200 mg should be considered.
Topics: Humans; Mice; Animals; Female; Mifepristone; Breast Neoplasms; Receptors, Progesterone; Hormone Antagonists; Prognosis
PubMed: 37962553
DOI: 10.1530/ERC-23-0238 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Apr 2024The aim of this meta-analysis was comparing the efficacy of GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) in polycystic ovarian... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this meta-analysis was comparing the efficacy of GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) women.
METHODS
A search was conducted from PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to collect clinical papers regarding GnRH-ant protocol and PPOS protocol from inception to September 2023. Subsequently, the retrieved documents were screened, and the content of the documents that conformed to the requirements was extracted. Moreover, statistical meta-analyses were conducted using the RevMan 5.4 software. Furthermore, with the use of a star-based system and the Cochrane handbook, the methodological quality of the covered papers was evaluated on the Ottawa-Newcastle scale.
RESULTS
A total of eight papers were covered in the meta-analysis, with 2156 PCOS women enrolled (i.e., 1085 patients in the GnRH-ant protocol group and 1071 patients in the PPOS group). As indicated by the meta-analysis results, the PPOS group was correlated with a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (SMD = 9.24, [95% CI: (2.50, 34.21)], P = 0.0009), more gonadotropin (Gn) dose (SMD = - 0.34, [95% CI: (- 0.56, - 0.13)], P = 0.002) compared with GnRH-ant group. No statistical difference was identified on the oocytes condition and pregnancy outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
As revealed by the data of this study, the progesterone protocol is comparable with the GnRH-ant protocol in oocytes condition and clinical outcomes. The progestin-primed ovarian stimulation could serve as an alternative for polycystic ovarian syndrome women who have failed in GnRH antagonist protocol. The above-described conclusions should be verified by more high-quality papers due to the limitation of the number and quality of included papers.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO registration: CRD42023411284.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Progestins; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Ovulation Induction; Steroids; Hormone Antagonists; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 37957365
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07269-1 -
The Journal of Organic Chemistry Dec 2023An efficient route for the copper(II)-catalyzed synthesis of substituted pyrazolines from readily accessible -propargyl hydrazones has been reported under open flask...
An efficient route for the copper(II)-catalyzed synthesis of substituted pyrazolines from readily accessible -propargyl hydrazones has been reported under open flask conditions via intramolecular C-N bond formation. -acyl and -tosyl-substituted pyrazolines have been prepared in moderate to excellent yields. Mechanistic investigations using NMR, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), and Hammett analyses suggest that the Cu(II) catalyst generally acts as a Lewis acid to form an iminium-ion intermediate via cyclization, which afforded the desired pyrazolines upon hydrolysis. One progesterone receptor antagonist has also been synthesized utilizing this reaction methodology.
PubMed: 37947756
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01848 -
Breastfeeding Medicine : the Official... Nov 2023A growing number of diverse familial structures wish to colactate their infant. For transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals, chestfeeding or breastfeeding may...
A growing number of diverse familial structures wish to colactate their infant. For transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals, chestfeeding or breastfeeding may be within their goals of parenthood. There is limited evidence on how to induce lactation for a nongestational parent on gender affirming estrogen treatment. We report the case of a transgender woman who successfully underwent lactation induction following a protocol using the galactogue domperidone plus use of a breast pump. The patient had modifications to her hormone therapy with estrogen and progesterone while remaining on antiandrogen therapy with spironolactone. A description of the protocol, medications, laboratory monitoring, human milk analysis including macronutrients, oligosaccharides, and hormones is presented. This is the fourth case to date known in the literature of a transgender woman with successful lactation induction, and the third case to remain on antiandrogen therapy during this process. Our report is the second to demonstrate comparable macronutrients, and the first to report on human milk oligosaccharides and hormones in induced milk compared with term human milk of a gestational parent. The opportunity to chestfeed or breastfeed an infant can be profound for many parents. Further research is needed to meet the needs of TGD individuals who wish to induce lactation as part of their parental goals.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant; Androgen Antagonists; Breast Feeding; Estrogens; Lactation; Milk, Human; Oligosaccharides; Transgender Persons; Male
PubMed: 37910800
DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2023.0197 -
Journal of Nanobiotechnology Oct 2023Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a formidable challenge due to the absence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal...
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a formidable challenge due to the absence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, rendering it unresponsive to conventional hormonal and targeted therapies. This study introduces the development of mesoporous nanoreactors (NRs), specifically mPDA@CuO NRs, as acid-triggered agents capable of self-supplying HO for chemodynamic therapy (CDT). To enhance therapeutic efficacy, these NRs were further modified with immune checkpoint antagonists, specifically anti-PD-L1 and anti-CD24 antibodies, resulting in the formation of dual antibody-aided mesoporous nanoreactors (dAb-mPDA@CuO NRs). These NRs were designed to combine CDT and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBIT) for precise targeting of 4T1 TNBC cells. Remarkably, dAb-mPDA@CuO NRs exhibited tumor-targeted CDT triggered by HO and successfully activated immune cells including T cells and macrophages. This integrated approach led to a remarkable inhibition of tumor growth by leveraging the collaborative effects of the therapies. The findings of this study introduce a novel and promising strategy for the integrative and collaborative treatment of refractory cancers, providing valuable insights into addressing the challenges posed by aggressive breast cancer, particularly TNBC.
Topics: Humans; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; B7-H1 Antigen; Hydrogen Peroxide; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Nanotechnology
PubMed: 37875918
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-023-02154-0 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Dec 2023Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are promising agents in the treatment of endometriosis-related pain. Here we assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of SHR7280, a Non-peptide GnRH Antagonist in Premenopausal Women with Endometriosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study.
BACKGROUND
Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are promising agents in the treatment of endometriosis-related pain. Here we assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of SHR7280, an oral non-peptide GnRH antagonist in premenopausal women with endometriosis.
METHODS
In the Phase 1 part of the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ascending, Phase 1/2 trial, premenopausal women with endometriosis were randomized (4:1) to receive SHR7280 or placebo treatment for 21 consecutive days. The treatment dose started from 200 mg QD, and then increased to 300 mg QD and 200 mg BID. Safety, PK, and PD parameters were assessed.
RESULTS
In total, 30 patients received assigned treatment, 24 with SHR7280 and 6 with placebo. SHR7280 was well tolerated. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 19 (79.2%, 19/24) patients in the SHR7280 group and 5 (83.3%, 5/6) patients in the placebo group. Most AEs were mild and no severe AEs occurred. SHR7280 showed a rapid absorption, with a time to maximum plasma concentration (T) of 1.0 h, 1.0 h, and 0.8 h for the 200 mg QD, 300 mg QD, and 200 mg BID regimens, respectively. Plasma concentration of SHR7280 was dose dependent. The mean half-life (t) at steady state was 6.9 h, 7.4 h, and 2.8 h, respectively, and little or no accumulation was observed. Pharmacodynamic analysis showed that SHR7280 could effectively suppress estradiol and luteinizing hormone concentrations and prevent progesterone increase in a dose-dependent manner. SHR7280 at doses of 300 mg QD and 200 mg BID could suppress estradiol levels within the desired therapeutic window of 20-50 pg/mL throughout the treatment period.
CONCLUSIONS
SHR7280 showed favorable safety, PK, and PD profiles in the doses of 200 mg QD, 300 mg QD, and 200 mg BID. The results of this study provide evidence to support the further development of SHR7280 as a GnRH antagonist for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain in the subsequent Phase 2 trial.
TRIAL REGISTRY
Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04417972. Trial registration date: 5 June 2020.
Topics: Humans; Female; Endometriosis; Hormone Antagonists; Estradiol; Pain; Double-Blind Method; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
PubMed: 37838623
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01315-6