-
BMC Cancer Aug 2023HeberFERON is a co-formulation of α2b and γ interferons, based on their synergism, which has shown its clinical superiority over individual interferons in basal cell...
BACKGROUND
HeberFERON is a co-formulation of α2b and γ interferons, based on their synergism, which has shown its clinical superiority over individual interferons in basal cell carcinomas. In glioblastoma (GBM), HeberFERON has displayed promising preclinical and clinical results. This led us to design a microarray experiment aimed at identifying the molecular mechanisms involved in the distinctive effect of HeberFERON compared to the individual interferons in U-87MG model.
METHODS
Transcriptional expression profiling including a control (untreated) and three groups receiving α2b-interferon, γ-interferon and HeberFERON was performed using an Illumina HT-12 microarray platform. Unsupervised methods for gene and sample grouping, identification of differentially expressed genes, functional enrichment and network analysis computational biology methods were applied to identify distinctive transcription patterns of HeberFERON. Validation of most representative genes was performed by qPCR. For the cell cycle analysis of cells treated with HeberFERON for 24 h, 48 and 72 h we used flow cytometry.
RESULTS
The three treatments show different behavior based on the gene expression profiles. The enrichment analysis identified several mitotic cell cycle related events, in particular from prometaphase to anaphase, which are exclusively targeted by HeberFERON. The FOXM1 transcription factor network that is involved in several cell cycle phases and is highly expressed in GBMs, is significantly down regulated. Flow cytometry experiments corroborated the action of HeberFERON on the cell cycle in a dose and time dependent manner with a clear cellular arrest as of 24 h post-treatment. Despite the fact that p53 was not down-regulated, several genes involved in its regulatory activity were functionally enriched. Network analysis also revealed a strong relationship of p53 with genes targeted by HeberFERON. We propose a mechanistic model to explain this distinctive action, based on the simultaneous activation of PKR and ATF3, p53 phosphorylation changes, as well as its reduced MDM2 mediated ubiquitination and export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. PLK1, AURKB, BIRC5 and CCNB1 genes, all regulated by FOXM1, also play central roles in this model. These and other interactions could explain a G2/M arrest and the effect of HeberFERON on the proliferation of U-87MG.
CONCLUSIONS
We proposed molecular mechanisms underlying the distinctive behavior of HeberFERON compared to the treatments with the individual interferons in U-87MG model, where cell cycle related events were highly relevant.
Topics: Humans; Glioblastoma; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Interferon-alpha; Anaphase; Interferon-gamma; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 37644431
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11330-2 -
Cell Reports Aug 2023Centromere localization of the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) is paramount for achieving accurate sister chromosome segregation in mitosis. Although it has been...
Centromere localization of the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) is paramount for achieving accurate sister chromosome segregation in mitosis. Although it has been widely recognized that the recruitment of CPC is directly regulated by two histone codes, phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 3 (H3T3ph) and phosphorylation of histone H2A at threonine 120 (H2AT120ph), the regulation of CPC localization by other histone codes remains elusive. We show that dysfunction of disruptor of telomeric silencing 1 like (DOT1L) leads to mislocation of the CPC in prometaphase, caused by disturbing the level of H3T3ph and its reader Survivin. This cascade is initiated by over-dephosphorylation of H3T3ph mediated by the phosphatase RepoMan-PP1, whose scaffold RepoMan translocalizes to chromosomes, while the level of H3K79me2/3 is diminished. Together, our findings uncover a biological function of DOT1L and H3K79 methylation in mitosis and give insight into how genomic stability is coordinated by different histone codes.
Topics: Histones; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Methylation; Centromere; Mitosis; Aurora Kinase B; Phosphorylation; Threonine
PubMed: 37494186
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112885 -
Cellular Signalling Sep 2023c-Src tyrosine kinase plays roles in a wide range of signaling events and its increased activity is frequently observed in a variety of epithelial and non-epithelial...
c-Src tyrosine kinase plays roles in a wide range of signaling events and its increased activity is frequently observed in a variety of epithelial and non-epithelial cancers. v-Src, an oncogene first identified in the Rous sarcoma virus, is an oncogenic version of c-Src and has constitutively active tyrosine kinase activity. We previously showed that v-Src induces Aurora B delocalization, resulting in cytokinesis failure and binucleated cell formation. In the present study, we explored the mechanism underlying v-Src-induced Aurora B delocalization. Treatment with the Eg5 inhibitor (+)-S-trityl-L-cysteine (STLC) arrested cells in a prometaphase-like state with a monopolar spindle; upon further inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK1) by RO-3306, cells underwent monopolar cytokinesis with bleb-like protrusions. Aurora B was localized to the protruding furrow region or the polarized plasma membrane 30 min after RO-3306 addition, whereas inducible v-Src expression caused Aurora B delocalization in cells undergoing monopolar cytokinesis. Delocalization was similarly observed in monopolar cytokinesis induced by inhibiting Mps1, instead of CDK1, in the STLC-arrested mitotic cells. Importantly, western blotting analysis and in vitro kinase assay revealed that v-Src decreased the levels of Aurora B autophosphorylation and its kinase activity. Furthermore, like v-Src, treatment with the Aurora B inhibitor ZM447439 also caused Aurora B delocalization at concentrations that partially inhibited Aurora B autophosphorylation. Given that phosphorylation of Aurora B by v-Src was not observed, these results suggest that v-Src causes Aurora B delocalization by indirectly suppressing Aurora B kinase activity.
Topics: Humans; Cytokinesis; Aurora Kinase B; Quinolines; Phosphorylation; Oncogenes; Mitosis; HeLa Cells
PubMed: 37315749
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2023.110764