-
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Jun 2024Our study investigates vertebral fractures in individuals with distal radius fractures. Among 512 patients, 41.21% had vertebral fractures, predominantly in the lumbar...
Undiagnosed vertebral fragility fractures in patients with distal radius fragility fractures: an opportunity for prevention of morbimortality in osteoporotic patients in developing countries.
UNLABELLED
Our study investigates vertebral fractures in individuals with distal radius fractures. Among 512 patients, 41.21% had vertebral fractures, predominantly in the lumbar spine. These findings highlight the importance of screening for vertebral fractures in this population, informing early intervention strategies to mitigate risks associated with osteoporosis.
PURPOSE
This study's main goal was to look into the frequency, location, kind, and severity of asymptomatic vertebral fragility fractures (VFF) in people who had fractures of the fragility of the distal radius. Although VFF is frequently misdiagnosed, it is linked to higher mortality, morbidity, and hip fracture risk. The study also attempted to investigate the relationship between VFF and certain demographic and lifestyle factors, as well as FRAX data, in this patient population.
METHODS
Between January, 2021, and January, 2022, individuals with low-energy distal radial fractures who presented to the emergency room of tertiary care hospital of Karachi, Pakistan, were the subject of a cross-sectional study and were 45 years of age or older except those who fitted the exclusion criteria (n = 208). The thoracic and/or lumbar spine was imaged using radiology, and information on demographics, way of life, and FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) was gathered. Using the Genant semiquantitative approach, an impartial and blinded orthopaedist identified VF in the images and determined their severity. SPSS version 20 was used to analyse the data.
RESULTS
Two hundred eleven (41.21%) of them were found to have radiographic VFF and only 12 (2.34%) of the 512 patients who were tested were getting osteoporotic therapy. The thoracic spine (32.7%), followed by the lumbar spine (43.12%), was the area most frequently afflicted. In 24.17% of the patients, multiple fractures of the thoracolumbar spine were found. The wedge form (54.5%), followed by biconcave (30.81%) and crush (14.7%), was the most prevalent VFF type. The majority of detected VFF were rated as having a 25-40% height loss (64.9%) then severe (> 40%) fractures (35.1%), according to the Genant grading method. Notably, there were no variations in smoking, drinking, BMI, or FRAX score between patients with and without VFF that were statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
Based on our study's findings, it is clear that osteoporotic vertebral fragility fractures occur in almost half of individuals with distal radius fractures. The lumbar spine is notably the most affected region, predominantly with wedge fractures. Given the high prevalence of asymptomatic vertebral fragility fractures (VFF), proactive measures are necessary to mitigate associated risks. Prioritising comprehensive fall risk assessments for these patients and interventions to enhance bone mineral density and strength are crucial. Early identification of asymptomatic VFF enables timely intervention, optimising patient care and minimising the risk of complications in this vulnerable population.
PubMed: 38900165
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07149-7 -
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.... Jun 2024Periprosthetic fractures can be devastating complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The management of periprosthetic fractures is complex, spanning expertise...
BACKGROUND
Periprosthetic fractures can be devastating complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The management of periprosthetic fractures is complex, spanning expertise in arthroplasty and trauma. The purpose of this study was to examine and project trends in the operative treatment of periprosthetic fractures in the United States.
METHODS
A large, public and private payer database was queried to capture all International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes for periprosthetic femoral and tibial fractures. Statistical models were created to assess trends in treatment for periprosthetic fractures and to predict future surgical rates. An alpha value of 0.05 was used to assess significance. A Bonferroni correction was applied where applicable to account for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS
In this study, from 2016 to 2021, 121,298 patients underwent surgical treatment for periprosthetic fractures. There was a significant increase in the total number of periprosthetic fractures. The incidence of periprosthetic hip fractures rose by 38% and that for periprosthetic knee fractures rose by 73%. The number of periprosthetic fractures is predicted to rise 212% from 2016 to 2032. There was a relative increase in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) compared with revision arthroplasty for both periprosthetic hip fractures and periprosthetic knee fractures.
CONCLUSIONS
Periprosthetic fractures are anticipated to impose a substantial health-care burden in the coming decades. Periprosthetic knee fractures are predominantly treated with ORIF rather than revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whereas periprosthetic hip fractures are predominantly treated with revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rather than ORIF. Both periprosthetic knee fractures and periprosthetic hip fractures demonstrated increasing trends in this study. The proportion of periprosthetic hip fractures treated with ORIF relative to revision THA has been increasing.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Periprosthetic Fractures; United States; Reoperation; Female; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Male; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Aged; Incidence; Middle Aged; Femoral Fractures; Tibial Fractures
PubMed: 38900013
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00868 -
European Journal of Radiology Jun 2024The trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint is a complex joint, whose anatomy and function are different from the metacarpophalangeal joints of the long fingers. The stability of... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint is a complex joint, whose anatomy and function are different from the metacarpophalangeal joints of the long fingers. The stability of this joint is ensured at three levels by multiple structures: osteochondral, capsulo-ligamentous, and musculo-tendinous. The anatomical and biomechanical structures ensuring the stability of the TMC joint are perfectly evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with a high degree of confidence. All described ligaments are anatomically visible and perfectly assessed on MRI and ultrasound (US): the dorsoradial ligament, the posterior oblique ligament, the intermetacarpal ligament, the ulnar collateral ligament, the two bundles of the anterior oblique ligament (break ligament), as well as the superficial anterior oblique and deep anterior oblique ligaments.
METHODOLOGY
This educational review assesses the TMC joint anatomy using high-field MRI and US compared with cadaveric specimens as well the biomechanics of this joint. In addition, it highlights pathological patterns of traumatic (sprain, dislocation, and fractures) and degenerative diseases.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
Knowledge of TMC joint anatomy is crucial to the radiologists' understanding and assessment of various traumatic and degenerative pathologies, and thus helps clinicians and surgeons choose the appropriate treatment.
PubMed: 38897054
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111561 -
JBJS Reviews Jun 2024Multiple hemiarthroplasty (HA) approaches exist for femoral neck fracture (FNF) treatment. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of one approach for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
A Comparison of Surgical Approaches for Hip Hemiarthroplasty Performed for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
BACKGROUND
Multiple hemiarthroplasty (HA) approaches exist for femoral neck fracture (FNF) treatment. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of one approach for postoperative outcomes. This study assessed outcomes among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the posterior approach (PA), direct lateral approach (DLA), anterolateral approach (ALA), and the direct anterior approach (DAA) in HA for FNF.
METHODS
PubMed, Ovid/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried in February 2024. A frequentist model network meta-analysis of eligible prospective RCTs compared outcomes among approaches using P-scores.
RESULTS
Of 1,481 retrieved studies, 11 RCTs totaling 1,513 FNF patients who underwent HA through a PA (n = 446; 29.5%), DLA (n = 481; 31.8%), ALA (n = 296; 19.6%), or DAA (n = 290; 19.2%) with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 6 (4.5-12.0) months were included for meta-analysis. DAA was associated with statistically increased operative duration (mean difference [MD], 1.89 minutes; 95% CI, 0.08 to 3.69 minutes; p < 0.001) compared with a PA, whereas an ALA was associated with statistically greater blood loss compared with a PA (MD, 5.81 mL; 95% CI, 4.11 to 7.50 mL; p < 0.001). There were no differences in the incidence of fracture, dislocation, infection, complications, revision, nor 1-year mortality among approaches. There were also no differences in hip nor pain score improvement at latest follow-up, although with high heterogeneity (I2 = 85.7% and 94.2%, respectively).
CONCLUSION
This study found no clinical difference in improvement in pain, function, nor in revision outcomes and operative characteristics among HA approaches for FNF, and each approach had a similar adverse event profile. Despite limited randomized evidence, these findings suggest comparable short-term efficacy and safety of all approaches.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Femoral Neck Fractures; Hemiarthroplasty; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 38889234
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00067 -
BioMed Research International 2024Diabetes has a significant global prevalence. Chronic hyperglycemia affects multiple organs and tissues, including bones. A large number of diabetic patients develop... (Review)
Review
Diabetes has a significant global prevalence. Chronic hyperglycemia affects multiple organs and tissues, including bones. A large number of diabetic patients develop osteoporosis; however, the precise relationship between diabetes and osteoporosis remains incompletely elucidated. The activation of the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway hinders the differentiation of osteoblasts and weakens the process of bone formation due to the presence of advanced glycation end products. High glucose environment can induce ferroptosis of osteoblasts and then develop osteoporosis. Hyperglycemia also suppresses the secretion of sex hormones, and the reduction of testosterone is difficult to effectively maintain bone mineral density. As diabetes therapy, thiazolidinediones control blood glucose by activating PPAR-. Activated PPAR- can promote osteoclast differentiation and regulate osteoblast function, triggering osteoporosis. The effects of metformin and insulin on bone are currently controversial. Currently, there are no appropriate tools available for assessing the risk of fractures in diabetic patients, despite the fact that the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures is considerably greater in diabetic individuals compared to those without diabetes. Further improving the inclusion criteria of FRAX risk factors and clarifying the early occurrence of osteoporosis sites unique to diabetic patients may be an effective way to diagnose and treat diabetic osteoporosis and reduce the risk of fracture occurrence.
Topics: Humans; Osteoporosis; Risk Factors; Osteoporotic Fractures; Fractures, Bone; Metabolic Networks and Pathways; Diabetes Mellitus; Bone Density; Osteoblasts; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 38884020
DOI: 10.1155/2024/6640796 -
Clinical Case Reports Jun 2024We report a patient with nonimmune fetal hydrops and multiple pathologic fractures. RNA analysis revealed a novel variant. This report is the first to elucidate...
We report a patient with nonimmune fetal hydrops and multiple pathologic fractures. RNA analysis revealed a novel variant. This report is the first to elucidate PIEZO1's role as a critical regulator of bone mass and strength.
PubMed: 38883227
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.9082 -
Cureus May 2024The patient, a 69-year-old female, presented one year after receiving a total elbow arthroplasty with a nonunion periprosthetic fracture of the humerus. Due to the...
The patient, a 69-year-old female, presented one year after receiving a total elbow arthroplasty with a nonunion periprosthetic fracture of the humerus. Due to the patient's severe osteoarthritis of the ipsilateral shoulder and significant humeral deformity, a procedure linking the total elbow arthroplasty to the reverse shoulder implant via a cemented allograft-composite linkage sleeve was performed. Previous literature suggests upper extremity salvage surgery using large-scale allografts is successful in treating large tumor or infection-derived defects, though data is lacking as to whether this treatment is effective in periprosthetic fractures in patients with significant comorbidities. This patient's success in the postoperative year supports the use of allograft-composite reconstruction followed by linkage to a reverse shoulder implant as a salvage treatment for periprosthetic fractures under certain conditions, such as multiple adjacent implants, bone deformity, and severe osteoarthritis.
PubMed: 38883071
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60491 -
Cureus May 2024Introduction Managing open lower extremity fractures is challenging, with potential complications such as amputation and infection. The aim of the study was to determine...
Introduction Managing open lower extremity fractures is challenging, with potential complications such as amputation and infection. The aim of the study was to determine whether the time delay and initial treatment of the patients treated in a non-specialized hospital before being transferred to a dedicated level I trauma center led to a worse outcome. Methods Retrospective data from 44 patients (37 males and seven females) undergoing free tissue transfer for lower extremity open fractures from January 2017 to December 2022 were analyzed. Group A received primary care externally and was later transferred for definitive treatment (n=17, 38.6%), while group B received initial care at a level I trauma center (n=27, 61.4%). Surgical outcomes, complications, the duration of the hospital stay, and assessment times were compared. Various demographic variables, co-morbidities, prior interventions, and flap types were analyzed. Results Average age (A: 55.1±16.7; B: 38.7±19.8 years; p=0.041), overall hospitalization (A: 55.7±22.8; B: 42.8±21.3 days; p=0.041), and time to soft tissue reconstruction differed significantly between groups (A: 30.7±12.2; B: 18.9±9.3 days; p=0.013). Overall, 31.8% had multiple injuries without statistical differences between groups A and B (29.4% vs. 33.3%; p>0.05). There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of major and minor complications and bone healing characteristics. Limb salvage was successful overall in 93.2% (A: 94.1%; B: 92.6%; P>0.05). Major complications occurred in 9.1%; three patients underwent major amputation (A: n=2; B: n=1). Minor complications were observed in 43.2% of patients (partial flap necrosis, wound dehiscence and non-union; A: 41.2%; B: 44.4%; p>0.05). Overall, 65.9% of patients (A: 64.7%; B: 66.7%; p>0.05) experienced uneventful bone healing, while 18.2% of patients (A: 23.5%; B: 14.8%; p>0.05) experienced delayed healing. Flaps used were mostly musculocutaneous (71.7%). Various assessed demographic characteristics, including age and presence of polytrauma, showed no significant influence on complications (p>0.05). Conclusion Although there is a significant difference in the time course of externally treated patients with open fractures, prolonged treatment is not associated with a higher complication rate or compromised bone healing outcome. Despite the findings, it is important to avoid delays and strive for interdisciplinary collaboration.
PubMed: 38883017
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60380 -
Heliyon Jun 2024The present case report is aimed to highlight the difficulty and the reason for the delayed diagnosis of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors, emphasizing the need of...
The present case report is aimed to highlight the difficulty and the reason for the delayed diagnosis of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors, emphasizing the need of standardized protocols for diagnosis, surgery and follow-up in high-volume hospitals. The clinical signs and symptoms, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, immunohistological features were analyzed. Delayed diagnosis of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor was primarily due to non-specific clinical symptoms such as fatigue, muscular and bone pain, and multiple fractures. This cryptic clinical picture made the diagnosis tricky that led to treatment of patient for non-specific pain and stress fractures before to consider the tumor-induced osteomalacia syndrome. Some well-documented studies were found in the literature in which the history of trauma is a critical trigger of glomus tumors. Extra-subungual tumors most frequently occur in the knee and ankle regions, particularly among young adults, and the diagnosis is typically made approximately 7.2 years after initial symptom onset. The difficult tumor localization represented an additional obstacle to the prompt treatment, leading to delayed curative surgery.
PubMed: 38882375
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31949