-
North American Spine Society Journal Jun 2024Chin-on-chest deformity is a rare and severely disabling condition characterized by kyphotic deformity in the cervicothoracic spine. To treat this deformity, various... (Review)
Review
Clinical and radiologic outcomes of posterior column extension, pedicle subtraction, and vertebral column resection osteotomies in adult chin on chest deformity: A systematic review.
BACKGROUND
Chin-on-chest deformity is a rare and severely disabling condition characterized by kyphotic deformity in the cervicothoracic spine. To treat this deformity, various osteotomy techniques were described.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of biomedical databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus (via Elsevier), Embase (via Elsevier), and Cochrane Library in English from 1/1/1990 to 3/31/2022 was conducted using a combination of text and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).
RESULTS
The final analysis included 16 studies. All the studies were assigned a level of evidence of four. Except for two articles, all of the articles were non-comparative studies. A total of 288 patients were included in this review. Of the 288 patients, 107 underwent posterior column extension osteotomy (PCEO), 108 underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and 33 underwent vertebral column resection osteotomy (VCRO). The most common osteotomy level in fifteen of the studies was C7/T1. The studies included in this review described several techniques for cervical sagittal balance correction. The range of preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores was 5.5-8.6 to 1.7-4.91, respectively. The range of preoperative and postoperative neck disability index (NDI) was 34.2-65.4 to 22.1-51.3, respectively. The most common complications were upper extremity paresthesia and hand numbness through the C8 dermatome distribution.
CONCLUSIONS
Corrective osteotomies provide satisfactory results in patients with chin-on-chest deformity; however, the quality of the included studies limits the evidence.
PubMed: 38765779
DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100324 -
Medicine May 2024Herpes zoster (HZ) is mainly characterized by intense pain and severe skin lesions, particularly during the acute phase, which seriously affects the patient's quality of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Herpes zoster (HZ) is mainly characterized by intense pain and severe skin lesions, particularly during the acute phase, which seriously affects the patient's quality of life. Acupuncture is a widely used and effective treatment for HZ. However, there are many types of acupuncture, which have different curative efficacy. This study employed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess and rank the clinical efficacy of different acupuncture therapies.
METHODS
The database of Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese BioMedical Database, VIP Database, and Wanfang Database were searched from inception to December 31, 2022 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture related therapies in the treatment of acute HZ. The outcome indicators measured were visual analogue scale (VAS), date of cessation of herpes increase (DCHI), effective rate (ER), postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and adverse events (AEs). Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed using the GeMTC package (version 1.0-1) and R software (version 4.2.3).
RESULTS
A total of 59 RCTs with 3930 patients were included. The results of this NMA were as follows: compared with pharmacotherapy, electroacupuncture (EA) + pricking and cupping (PC) shown the best efficacy to improve VAS score and reduce DCHI. In terms of ER, EA + fire needle (FN) had the highest results of probability ranking. PC was more effective in reducing the incidence of PHN. Furthermore, this study shown that the incidence of AEs associated with acupuncture-related therapies was acceptable.
CONCLUSIONS
This study indicated that therapies related to acupuncture were both effective and safe in treating acute HZ, and could significantly reduce patients' symptoms such as pain and skin lesions with fewer adverse events. Clinically, the selection of the appropriate therapy should be based on practical considerations. However, due to the limitations of this study, more high-quality trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture-related therapy for the treatment of acute HZ.
Topics: Humans; Herpes Zoster; Acupuncture Therapy; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Neuralgia, Postherpetic; Acute Disease
PubMed: 38758864
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038006 -
Archives of Medical Science : AMS 2024Our goal was to systematically review the current evidence comparing the relative effectiveness of two maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) approaches (internal and... (Review)
Review
Clinical evaluation of maxillary sinus floor elevation with or without bone grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Our goal was to systematically review the current evidence comparing the relative effectiveness of two maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) approaches (internal and external) without bone grafts with that of conventional/grafted MSFE in patients undergoing implantation in the posterior maxilla.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Medical databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched for randomised controlled trials published between January 1980 and May 2023. A manual search of implant-related journals was also performed. Studies published in English that reported the clinical outcomes of MSFE with or without bone material were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook Risk Assessment Tool. Meta-analyses and trial sequence analyses were performed on the included trials. Meta-regression analysis was performed using pre-selected covariates to account for substantial heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence for clinical outcomes was assessed using GRADEpro GDT online (Guideline Development Tool).
RESULTS
Seventeen studies, including 547 sinuses and 696 implants, were pooled for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between MSFE without bone grafts and conventional MSFE in terms of the implant survival rate in the short term ( = 11, = 0%, risk difference (RD): 0.03, 95% confidence intervals (CI): -0.01-0.07, = 0.17, required information size (RIS) = 307). Although conventional MSFE had a higher endo-sinus bone gain ( = 13, = 89%, weighted mean difference (WMD): -1.24, 95% CI: -1.91- -0.57, = 0.0003, RIS = 461), this was not a determining factor in implant survival. No difference in perforation ( = 13, = 0%, RD = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.02-0.09, = 0.99, RIS = 223) and marginal bone loss ( = 4, = 0%, WMD = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.14-0.23, = 0.62, no RIS) was detected between the two groups using meta-analysis. The pooled results of the implant stability quotient between the two groups were not robust on sensitivity analysis. Because of the limited studies reporting on the visual analogue scale, surgical time, treatment costs, and bone density, qualitative analysis was conducted for these outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review revealed that both non-graft and grafted MSFE had high implant survival rates. Owing to the moderate strength of the evidence and short-term follow-up, the results should be interpreted with caution.
PubMed: 38757030
DOI: 10.5114/aoms/174648 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2024There currently exists some controversy about the efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment...
Fusion rate and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
There currently exists some controversy about the efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.
AIM
This study compares the application effects of OLIF and TLIF in lumbar degenerative diseases by reviewing the literature and using meta-analysis.
METHODS
We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing TLIF and OLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. We searched for words such as "intervertebral disc degeneration," "spinal fusion," and "lumbar vertebrae" in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The search date was set from the establishment date of the database to October 2023. Two authors independently conducted document screening, data abstraction, and qualitative assessment. A meta-analysis was performed and adapted to RevMan5.3 software. The odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% CI were calculated by adopting a fixed-effect model (FEM) or a random-effect model (REM).
RESULTS
A total of 18 cohort studies were included with 1,550 patients, of whom 806 patients underwent TLIF (TLIF group) and 744 patients underwent OLIF (OLIF group). There were no significant differences found in the fusion rate [OR = 1.58 (0.95, 2.64), = 0.08], complication rate [OR = 1.25 (0.93, 1.68), = 0.14], and visual analog scale for back pain (VAS-BP) [WMD = 0.00 (-0.13, 0.14), = 0.96] between the two groups. Compared with the TLIF group, the OLIF group had a lower Oswestry disability index (ODI) [WMD = -0.62 (-1.03, -0.20), = 0.003], a higher foramen height (FH) [WMD = 2.03 (1.42, 2.46), < 0.001], a higher disc height (DH) [WMD = 1.69 (1.17, 2.22), < 0.001], and a shorter length of stay (LOS) [WMD = -1.80 (-2.55, -1.05), < 0.001].
CONCLUSION
In the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, compared with TLIF, OLIF has more advantages in terms of improving the lumbar function, restoring the FH and DH, and shortening the LOS. Both methods have comparable fusion rates, complication rates, and lumbar pain improvements. Due to the small amount of research and unclear assessment of the risk of bias, high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled studies are required to prove it.
PubMed: 38746621
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1374134 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024The effect of first-line complex decongestive therapy (CDT) for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) depending on various factors forces patients to seek additional...
BACKGROUND
The effect of first-line complex decongestive therapy (CDT) for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) depending on various factors forces patients to seek additional treatment. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of different conservative medical interventions as a complement to CDT. This is the first meta-analysis that includes various kinds of conservative treatments as adjunctive therapy to get broader knowledge and improve practical application value, which can provide recommendations to further improve BCRL patients' health status.
METHODS
RCTs published before 18 December 2023 from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. RCTs that compared the effects of conservative medical intervention were included. A random-effects or fixed-effects model was used based on the heterogeneity findings. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
RESULTS
Sixteen RCTs with 690 participants were included, comparing laser therapy, intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), electrotherapy, ultrasound, diet or diet in combination with synbiotic supplement, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), continuous passive motion (CPM), and negative pressure massage treatment (NMPT). The results revealed that conservative medical intervention as complement to CDT had benefits in improving lymphedema in volume/circumference of the upper extremity [SMD = -0.30, 95% CI = (-0.45, -0.15), < 0.05, 51%], visual analog score (VAS) for pain [SMD = -3.35, 95% CI (-5.37, -1.33), < 0.05, 96%], quality of life [SMD = 0.44, 95% CI (0.19, 0.69), < 0.05, 0], and DASH/QuickDASH [SMD = -0.42, 95% CI (-0.70, -0.14), < 0.05, 10%] compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed that laser therapy and electrotherapy are especially effective ( < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Combining conservative medical interventions with CDT appears to have a positive effect on certain BCRL symptoms, especially laser therapy and electrotherapy. It showed a better effect on patients under 60 years old, and laser therapy of low to moderate intensity (5-24 mW, 1.5-2 J/cm) and of moderate- to long-term duration (≥36-72 sessions) showed better effects.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=354824, identifier CRD42022354824.
PubMed: 38737896
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1361128 -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024Since we aim to test new options to find medication for cognitive disorders, we have begun to assess the effect of semaglutide and to conduct a review gathering studies... (Review)
Review
Since we aim to test new options to find medication for cognitive disorders, we have begun to assess the effect of semaglutide and to conduct a review gathering studies that have attempted this purpose. This systematic review focuses on the cognitive effects of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), in the context of neurological and cognitive impairment. Semaglutide, a synthetic GLP-1 analog, showcased neuroprotective effects beyond metabolic regulation. It mitigated apoptosis and improved cognitive dysfunction in cerebrovascular disease, suggesting broader implications for neurological well-being. Also, studies highlighted GLP-1 RAs' positive impact on olfactory function in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes, on neurodegenerative disorders, multiple sclerosis, and endotoxemia. In order to analyze current studies that assess the impact of semaglutide on cognitive function, a literature search was conducted up to February 2024 on two online databases, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Web of Science Core Collection, as well as various websites. Fifteen studies on mice populations and two studies on cell lines were included, analyzed, and assessed with bias-specific tools. The neuroprotective and anti-apoptotic properties of GLP-1 and its analogs were emphasized, with animal models and cell line studies demonstrating enhanced cognitive function. While promising, limitations include fewer studies, highlighting the need for extensive research, particularly in the human population. Even though this medication seems promising, there are significant limitations, one of which is the lack of studies on human subjects. Therefore, this review aims to gather current evidence.
Topics: Animals; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Cognition; Humans; Disease Models, Animal; Neuroprotective Agents; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Mice; Cell Line; Cognitive Dysfunction
PubMed: 38732190
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094972 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders May 2024Reduction manipulation using self-reduction procedures such as Stimson, Milch, and Boss-Holtzach should be easy and effective and also require less force, pain... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Reduction manipulation using self-reduction procedures such as Stimson, Milch, and Boss-Holtzach should be easy and effective and also require less force, pain medication, and outside assistance. This technique should not cause damage to arteries, nerves, or shoulder joint components. Self-reduction is straightforward and can be done in clinics, making it ideal for people who suffer from shoulder joint dislocation frequently. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of supervised self-reduction procedures vs. physician-assisted treatments in the treatment of anterior shoulder dislocations.
METHOD
We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane up to March 22, 2023, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Relevant articles were reviewed, with a focus on studies comparing supervised self-reduction techniques to physician-assisted techniques in cases of anterior shoulder dislocation.
RESULTS
Four papers in all were included in the meta-analysis. One prospective trial, one case-control study, one randomized clinical trial, and one retrospective trial made up these studies. The studies involved 283 patients in the physician-assisted group and 180 patients in the supervised self-reduction group. They were carried out in four European countries: Italy, Germany, Portugal, and Spain. The success rate of supervised self-reduction techniques was significantly higher, with an odds ratio of 2.71 (95% CI 1.25-5.58, p-value = 0.01). Based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, the physician-assisted group reported significantly higher maximum pain, with a mean difference of 1.98 (95% CI 1.24-2.72, p-value < 0.01). The self-reduction approaches exhibit shorter reduction time in comparison to physician-assisted groups. In addition, the self-reduction groups do not document any complications. Based on the GRADE system, the level of assurance in the evidence was high.
CONCLUSION
Supervised self-reduction techniques outperform in terms of success rate and reduction-related maximum pain. These techniques could be used as an effective first-line treatment for anterior shoulder dislocation, potentially reducing the need for analgesics and emergency room visits.
Topics: Humans; Shoulder Dislocation; Treatment Outcome; Shoulder Joint; Manipulation, Orthopedic; Self Care
PubMed: 38730336
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07379-0 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2024Recurrent aphthous ulcer (RAU) had high prevalence and lacked widely recognized treatment. Total glucosides of paeony (TGP) was used in the treatment of RAU in recent...
Recurrent aphthous ulcer (RAU) had high prevalence and lacked widely recognized treatment. Total glucosides of paeony (TGP) was used in the treatment of RAU in recent years. This study was to summarize the efficacy and safety of TGP in the treatment of RAU. We searched eight commonly used databases for relevant studies that published before 1 November 2023. Primary outcome was visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included overall response rate, significant response rate, ulcer healing time, interval, number of ulcers, and serum inflammatory factors. We conducted the meta-analysis, assessed risk of bias and the confidence of the evidence, by using Stata 15.0, Review Manager 5.4, and Gradepro. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 883 patients with RAU were included in the final analysis. The VAS in the TGP group was lower than that in the control group ( = -1.18, = -1.58 to -0.78, < 0.001, moderate-certainty evidence), subgroup analysis suggested longer (>8 weeks) medication and observation led to a more significant reduction in pain ( = 0.02). Moreover, TGP had higher overall response rate ( = 1.18, = 1.04 to 1.33, = 0.008, very low-certainty evidence) and significant response rate ( = 1.72, = 1.38 to 2.14, < 0.001, very low-certainty evidence), accelerated ulcer healing ( = -1.79, = -2.67 to -0.91, < 0.001, low-certainty evidence), and extended intervals ( = 23.60, = 14.17 to 33.03, < 0.001, very low-certainty evidence). The efficacy of TGP in reducing the number of ulcers showed no significant difference compared to the control group ( = -1.66, = -3.60 to 0.28, = 0.09, low-certainty evidence). Moreover, TGP treatment was associated with a higher incidence of abdominal symptoms ( = 3.27, = 1.62 to 6.60, < 0.001). TGP appears to hold promise as a widely-used clinical therapeutic option for treating RAU. Nevertheless, further rigorous studies of high quality are required to validate its effectiveness. : https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=471154, Identifier CRD42023471154.
PubMed: 38716235
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1378782 -
PloS One 2024Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability. Neuromobilization (NM) as a physical therapy technique, offers some degree of symptom improvement. However, some... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability. Neuromobilization (NM) as a physical therapy technique, offers some degree of symptom improvement. However, some studies have shown that NM can significantly reduce the symptoms of LBP, while others have failed to find similar positive effects.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of NM for LBP.
DATA SOURCES
A literature search was conducted across five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) from their inception to December 2023. Study main measures assessed pain, disability, and straight leg raise angle to determine the degree of improvement in patients.
RESULTS
Seven randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The findings indicated that NM interventions in patients with LBP were more effective than control groups in improving Visual Analog Scale scores (mean difference = 0.62, 95% CI (0.03, 1.21)) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (mean difference = 7.54, 95% CI (4.98, 10.10)). There was no significant difference in straight leg raise results (mean difference = 0.18, 95% CI (-0.08, 0.44)).
CONCLUSIONS
NM demonstrated effectiveness in improving Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in patients with LBP, but straight leg raise outcomes are still uncertain and until more high-quality studies are included, the effectiveness of NM for SLR remains unknown.
Topics: Low Back Pain; Humans; Treatment Outcome; Physical Therapy Modalities; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pain Measurement
PubMed: 38713706
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302930 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine May 2024Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain. When nonoperative treatment fails, 1 of the 3 surgical approaches-open, percutaneous,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain. When nonoperative treatment fails, 1 of the 3 surgical approaches-open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic-is used. However, determining which approach has the superior clinical outcome remains controversial.
PURPOSE
To review the outcomes of different operative modalities for LE qualitatively and quantitatively.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
This review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies published in PubMed, Medline (via EBSCO), and ScienceDirect databases that treated LE with open, percutaneous, or arthroscopic approaches with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies score. The primary outcome was the success rate of each operative treatment approach-open, percutaneous, and arthroscopic.
RESULTS
From an initial search result of 603 studies, 43 studies (n = 1941 elbows) were ultimately included. The arthroscopic approach had the highest success rate (91.9% [95% CI, 89.2%-94.7%]) compared with the percutaneous (91% [95% CI, 87.3%-94.6%]) and open (82.7% [95% CI, 75.6%-89.8%]) approaches for LE surgery with changes in the mean visual analog scale pain score of 5.54, 4.90, and 3.63, respectively. According to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, the functional outcome improved in the arthroscopic group (from 54.11 to 15.47), the percutaneous group (from 44.90 to 10.47), and the open group (from 53.55 to 16.13). The overall improvement was also found in the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the arthroscopic group (from 55.12 to 90.97), the percutaneous group (from 56.31 to 87.65), and the open group (from 64 to 93.37).
CONCLUSION
Arthroscopic surgery had the highest rate of success and the best improvement in functional outcomes among the 3 approaches of LE surgery.
PubMed: 38708009
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241230291