-
Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 2023We report on a systematic review of the efficacy of turmeric derivatives for the in vivo treatment of peripheral neuropathies. Our review protocol followed the PRISMA...
We report on a systematic review of the efficacy of turmeric derivatives for the in vivo treatment of peripheral neuropathies. Our review protocol followed the PRISMA Statement. The Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Scielo databases were used. The search strategy was ("neuropathy" OR "neuropathies" OR "nerve injury" OR "nerve injuries") AND ("curcumin" OR "turmeric yellow" OR "yellow, turmeric" OR "diferuloylmethane"). Eligibility criteria were in vivo animal models, published in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French, evaluating the efficacy of turmeric derivatives in the treatment of peripheral neuropathies. We have included 30 papers, and all consisted of pre-clinical trials with good methodological quality. Animals treated with turmeric derivatives (i.e., curcumin, curcumin by-products and curcumin loaded delivery systems) demonstrated remarkable amelioration in the injuries caused by diabetic and sciatic neuropathy, as well as for vincristine, cisplatin, and alcohol-induced neuropathy, especially with regards to the functional recovery of the affected nerve. Turmeric has great potential for the treatment of peripheral neuropathies, including those associated with diabetes mellitus. Clinical trials still need to be performed to assess the feasibility of human treatment as an alternative or adjuvant to existing pharmacological therapy.
Topics: Animals; Curcuma; Curcumin; Models, Animal; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Disease Models, Animal
PubMed: 37937613
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202320200447 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2023Mecobalamin is a commonly used drug in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of...
OBJECTIVE
Mecobalamin is a commonly used drug in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupoint injection of mecobalamin for DPN.
METHODS
Relevant clinical trials on acupoint injection of mecobalamin for DPN published before 31 January 2023 were searched in eight commonly used databases. After screening and confirming the included studies, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed.
RESULTS
A total of 10 relevant studies were confirmed, and the total sample size was 927 cases. On the efficacy endpoints, meta-analysis showed that compared with other administration methods, acupoint injection of mecobalamin significantly increased the clinical effective rate by 27% [RR = 1.27, 95% CI = (1.19, 1.36), < 0.00001], motor nerve conduction velocity (median nerve) by 5.93 m/s [MD = 5.93, 95% CI = (4.79, 7.07), < 0.00001], motor nerve conduction velocity (common peroneal nerve) by 5.66 m/s [MD = 5.66, 95% CI = (2.89, 8.43), < 0.0001], sensory nerve conduction velocity (median nerve) by 4.83 m/s [MD = 4.83, 95% CI = (3.75, 5.90), < 0.00001], and sensory nerve conduction velocity (common peroneal nerve) by 3.60 m/s [MD = 3.60, 95% CI = (2.49, 4.71), < 0.00001], and trial sequential analysis showed these benefits were conclusive. In terms of safety endpoints, meta-analysis indicated that the total adverse events for acupoint injection were comparable to other methods of administration, and trial sequential analysis suggested that the results needed to be validated by more studies. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the benefits of acupoint injections of mecobalamin were not limited by the dose, duration of treatment, or number of acupoints reported in the included studies. Harbord's test showed no significant publication bias ( = 0.106).
CONCLUSION
The efficacy of acupoint injection of mecobalamin for DPN was significantly better than other administrations, and its safety was comparable to other administrations. Therefore, acupoint injection may be the optimal method of mecobalamin for DPN.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=454120, identifier: CRD42023454120.
PubMed: 37920836
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1186420 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2023High-resolution ultrasound of the tibial nerve has been used for screening of several neurologic disorders, but normative reference values of tibial nerve...
BACKGROUND
High-resolution ultrasound of the tibial nerve has been used for screening of several neurologic disorders, but normative reference values of tibial nerve cross-sectional areas (CSA) have not been well established. Thus, the present meta-analysis was performed to generate normative estimates of tibial nerve CSA at various sites of the lower limb based on ultrasonography.
METHODS
Google Scholar, Scopus and PubMed were searched for potential studies. Studies were required to report tibial nerve CSA in healthy individuals to be included. A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to calculate tibial nerve CSA values. Subgroup and statistical analyses were performed to study covariates.
RESULTS
Forty-eight eligible articles consisting of 2695 limbs were included. The average tibial nerve CSA was found to be 10.9 mm at the ankle (95% CI: 9.9-11.8) and should not exceed 11.8 mm in healthy adults. At the popliteal fossa, the overall CSA was 21.7 mm (95% CI: 17.5-25.8) in healthy adults. At both sites, the average tibial nerve CSA was significantly larger in adults than in children, and the differences by geographical region were not statistically significant. At the ankle, tibial nerve CSA increased with age and body mass index, while at the popliteal fossa it increased with age and weight.
CONCLUSIONS
our findings indicate that the tibial nerve varied not only along its course but also among sub-variables. Establishing normal references values of tibial nerve CSA is helpful to differentiate healthy from diseased tibial nerves such as in diabetic peripheral neuropathy or tarsal tunnel syndrome.
PubMed: 37834829
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196186 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2023Diabetic neuropathy, including autonomic neuropathy, is a severe complication in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Specifically, cardiovascular autonomic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Diabetic neuropathy, including autonomic neuropathy, is a severe complication in patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Specifically, cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) plays a significant prognostic role in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Exercise, an essential component of diabetes treatment, may have a therapeutic effect on patients with diabetes complicated by CAN. However, it remains unclear whether exercise has a therapeutic or protective effect in diabetes patients with CAN.
METHODS
The author conducted a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library, resulting in the identification of eight eligible randomized controlled trials for this review.
RESULTS
Exercise, including aerobic exercise combined with resistance training (RT), high-intensity interval training, and progressive RT, has shown a beneficial effect on cardiac autonomic function (CAF) in patients with type 2 diabetes, as measured by heart rate variability, heart rate recovery, and baroreflex sensitivity. However, most studies had low quality. Moreover, there were no relevant studies examining the effect of exercise on CAF in older patients, patients with poorly controlled diabetes, and patients with type 1 diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS
Exercise has the potential to manage patients with CAN by balancing sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system functions; however, further studies are warranted in the future.
PubMed: 37830705
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11192668 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCCs) versus removable offloading interventions among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCCs) versus removable offloading interventions among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).
METHODS
A comprehensive search was done in databases Embase, Cochrane Library, and, PubMed. The references of retrieved articles were reviewed, up until February 2023. Controlled trials comparing the effects of TCCs with removable offloading interventions (removable walking casts and footwear) in patients with DFUs were eligible for review.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 591 patients with DFUs. Among them, 269 patients were in the intervention group (TCC), and 322 in the control group (removable walking casts/footwear). The analysis revealed that the TCC group had higher healing rates (Risk Ratio(RR)=1.22; 95% confidence interval(CI):1.11 to 1.34, p<0.001), shorter healing time (Standard Mean Difference(SMD)=-0.57; 95%CI: -1.01 to -0.13, P=0.010), and elevated occurrence of device-related complications (RR=1.70; 95%CI:1.01 to 2.88, P=0.047), compared with the control group. Subgroup analysis illustrated patients using TCCs had higher healing rates than those using removable walking casts (RR=1.20; 95%CI:1.08 to 1.34, p=0.001) and footwear (RR=1.25; 95%CI:1.04 to 1.51, p=0.019), but they required comparable time for ulcer healing compared with those using removable walking casts (SMD=-0.60; 95%CI: -1.22 to 0.02, P=0.058) or footwear group (SMD=-0.52; 95%CI: -1.17 to 0.12, P=0.110). Although patients using TCCs had significantly higher incidence of device-related complications than those using footwear (RR=4.81; 95%CI:1.30 to 17.74, p=0.018), they had similar one compared with those using the removable walking casts (RR=1.27; 95%CI:0.70 to 2.29, p=0.438).
CONCLUSION
The use of TCCs in patients with DFUs resulted in improved rates of ulcer healing and shorter healing time compared to removable walking casts and footwear. However, it is important to note that TCCs were found to be associated with increased prevalence of complications.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; Casts, Surgical; Wound Healing; Walking; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37822605
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1234761 -
Complementary Therapies in Medicine Nov 2023To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in relieving diabetic neuropathic pain and to establish a more reliable and efficient foundation for acupuncture practice in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in relieving diabetic neuropathic pain and to establish a more reliable and efficient foundation for acupuncture practice in diabetes care.
METHODS
The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, Chongqing Weipu, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were all searched for a randomized controlled trial research of acupuncture for DNP. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, quality evaluation, and data extraction. After selecting studies and extracting data, we conducted the data analysis using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0. The quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.
RESULTS
An extensive review of 19 studies involving 1276 patients up to April 29, 2023, found that acupuncture was successful in improving pain intensity [MD= -1.09; 95% CI (-1.28, -0.89), P < 0.00001], clinical efficacy indicating pain changes [RR= 1.22; 95% CI (1.15, 1.29), P < 0.00001], and clinical neuropathy [MD= -1.55; 95% CI ( -3.00, -0.09), P = 0.04] in DNP patients. Quality of life was also improved, with few side effects reported.
CONCLUSION
According to this meta-analysis, acupuncture therapy significantly improved the clinical efficacy of pain intensity, pain changes, and clinical neuropathy in patients with DNP, improved the quality of life of patients to a certain extent, and had lower side effects. This discovery provides evidence-based and practical recommendations for the treatment of DNP patients.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Acupuncture Therapy; Diabetic Neuropathies; Treatment Outcome; Neuralgia; Diabetes Mellitus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37805054
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102992 -
Journal of Medical Internet Research Oct 2023Globally, diabetes affects approximately 500 million people and is predicted to affect up to 700 million people by 2045. In Australia, the ongoing impact of colonization... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Globally, diabetes affects approximately 500 million people and is predicted to affect up to 700 million people by 2045. In Australia, the ongoing impact of colonization produces inequity in health care delivery and inequality in health care outcomes for First Nations Peoples, with diabetes rates 4 times those of non-Indigenous Australians. Evidence-based clinical practice has been shown to reduce complications of diabetes-related foot disease, including ulceration and amputation, by 50%. However, factors such as a lack of access to culturally safe care, geographical remoteness, and high costs associated with in-person care are key barriers for First Nations Peoples in accessing evidence-based care, leading to the development of innovative mobile health (mHealth) apps as a way to increase access to health services and improve knowledge and self-care management for people with diabetes.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to evaluate studies investigating the use of mHealth apps for the assessment and management of diabetes-related foot health in First Nations Peoples in Australia and non-Indigenous populations globally.
METHODS
PubMed, Informit's Indigenous Collection database, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and Scopus were searched from inception to September 8, 2022. Hand searches of gray literature and reference lists of included studies were conducted. Studies describing mHealth apps developed for the assessment and management of diabetes-related foot health were eligible. Studies must include an evaluation (qualitative or quantitative) of the mHealth app. No language, publication date, or publication status restrictions were used. Quality appraisal was performed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and the Health Evidence Bulletins Wales checklists for observational, cohort, and qualitative studies.
RESULTS
No studies specifically including First Nations Peoples in Australia were identified. Six studies in non-Indigenous populations with 361 participants were included. Foot care education was the main component of all mHealth apps. Of the 6 mHealth apps, 2 (33%) provided functionality for participants to enter health-related data; 1 (17%) included a messaging interface. The length of follow-up ranged from 1-6 months. Of the 6 studies, 1 (17%) reported high levels of acceptability of the mHealth app content for self-care by people with diabetes and diabetes specialists; the remaining 5 (83%) reported that participants had improved diabetes-related knowledge and self-management skills after using their mHealth app.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings from this systematic review provide an overview of the features deployed in mHealth apps and indicate that this type of intervention can improve knowledge and self-care management skills in non-Indigenous people with diabetes. Future research needs to focus on mHealth apps for populations where there is inadequate or ineffective service delivery, including for First Nations Peoples and those living in geographically remote areas, as well as evaluate direct effects on diabetes-related foot disease outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42022349087; https://tinyurl.com/35u6mmzd.
Topics: Humans; Mobile Applications; Australia; Telemedicine; Diabetic Foot; Foot Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37792467
DOI: 10.2196/47608 -
International Wound Journal Jan 2024This analysis systematically reviewed the efficacy of evidence-based care on diabetic foot ulcers. A computerised literature search was conducted for randomised... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This analysis systematically reviewed the efficacy of evidence-based care on diabetic foot ulcers. A computerised literature search was conducted for randomised controlled studies (RCTs) of evidence-based care interventions for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and Wanfang databases from the date of inception of each database to June 2023. The articles were independently screened, data were extracted by two researchers, and the quality of each study was assessed using the Cochrane bias assessment tool. Meta-analysis of the data was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Twenty-five RCTs with a total of 2272 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that, compared with other care methods, evidence-based care significantly improved the treatment efficacy of diabetic foot ulcers (odds ratio: 3.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.76 to 5.53, p < 0.001) and significantly reduced their fasting plasma glucose (mean difference [MD]: -1.10, 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.96, p < 0.001), 2-h postprandial glucose (2hPG) (MD: -1.69, 95% CI: -2.07 to -1.31, p < 0.001) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD: -0.71, 95% CI: -0.94 to -0.48, p < 0.001). Evidence-based care intervention is effective at reducing FPG, 2hPG and HbA1c levels and improving treatment efficacy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
Topics: Humans; China; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Foot; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37735819
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14403 -
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine... Oct 2023To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Buyang Huanwu decoction (BYHWD) in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Buyang Huanwu decoction (BYHWD) in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
METHODS
Eight electronic databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of BYHWD to treat DPN. We identified all RCTs related to BYHWD and those on the treatment of DPN with the combination of mecobalamin. RevMan software was used for the statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Twentyone RCTs with a total of 1945 patients were included. The methodological quality of the literature included was low. Metaanalysis showed that the efficacy of the treatment group was significantly better than that of the control group in the treatment of DPN with BYHWD [risk ratio () = 0.33, 95% (0.27, 0.40), 11.25, 0.000 01]. The median nerve of median motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) [mean difference () = 4.16, 95% (1.35, 6.98)] and median sensory NCV (SNCV) [(= 3.28, 95% (2.35, 4.22)] were improved in the treatment group. The MNCV in the common peroneal nerve [(= 1.63, 95% (0.39, 2.87)] and SNCV [(= 4.56, 95% (3.16, 5.97)] were significantly higher than those in the control group ( 0.01). Plasma viscosity [(= -0.15, 95% (-0.20, -0.09), 5.17, 0.01)], whole blood high shear [(= 0.83, 95% (1.56, -0.11), 2.26, 0.02)]and whole blood low shear [(= 1.61, 95% (2.28, 0.94), 4.68, 0.01)] decreased significantly after treatment. There was no significant difference in fasting blood glucose [(= 0.42, 95% ( 0.89, 0.05), 1.76, 0.08)] between the treatment and control groups; postprandial blood glucose [(= 0.62, 95% ( 1.19, 0.05), 2.12, 0.03)] decreased significantly. No significant difference was found in the blood lipid levels between the treatment and control groups, including triglycerides [(= 0.21, 95% (0.52, 0.10), 1.34, 0.18)] and cholesterol [(= 0.13, 95% ( 0.27, 0.00), 1.92, 0.06)]. Of the 21 RCTs, only five reported adverse reactions, and four studies reported the length of followup. No serious adverse events were reported. None of the studies reported the quality of life and economic conditions.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggests that BYHWD has a significant therapeutic effect on DPN. Highquality, largescale RCTs are needed to provide more reliable evidence.
Topics: Humans; Blood Glucose; Diabetic Neuropathies; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; China; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37679971
DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20230802.002 -
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Sep 2023Lower limb oedema is a common co-morbidity in those with diabetes and foot ulceration and is linked with increased amputation risk. There is no current guidance for the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Lower limb oedema is a common co-morbidity in those with diabetes and foot ulceration and is linked with increased amputation risk. There is no current guidance for the treatment of concurrent diabetic foot ulcers and lower limb oedema, leading to uncertainty around the safety and efficacy of combination approaches incorporating offloading and compression therapies. To determine indications and contraindications for such strategies and identify any other supplementary treatment approaches, a scoping review was undertaken to map the evidence relating to off-loading and compression therapy strategies to treat both diabetic foot ulcers and lower limb oedema in combination.
METHODS
Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PRISMA - Scoping Review (ScR) guidance, this review included published and unpublished literature from inception to April 2022. Literature was sourced using electronic databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, AMED; websites; professional journals and reference lists of included literature. Eligible literature discussed the management of both diabetic foot ulceration and lower limb oedema and included at least one of the treatment strategies of interest. Data extraction involved recording any suggested off-loading, compression therapy or supplementary treatment strategies and any suggested indications, contraindications and cautions for their use.
RESULTS
Five hundred twenty-two publications were found relating to the management of diabetic foot ulcers with an off-loading strategy or the management of lower limb oedema with compression therapy. 51 publications were eligible for inclusion in the review. The majority of the excluded publications did not discuss the situation where diabetic foot ulceration and lower limb oedema present concurrently.
CONCLUSIONS
Most literature, focused on oedema management with compression therapy to conclude that compression therapy should be avoided in the presence of severe peripheral arterial disease. Less literature was found regarding off-loading strategies, but it was recommended that knee-high devices should be used with caution when off-loading diabetic foot ulcers in those with lower limb oedema. Treatment options to manage both conditions concurrently was identified as a research gap. Integrated working between specialist healthcare teams, was the supplementary strategy most frequently recommended. In the absence of a definitive treatment solution, clinicians are encouraged to use clinical reasoning along with support from specialist peers to establish the best, individualised treatment approach for their patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Open Science Framework (osf.io/crb78).
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; Amputation, Surgical; Databases, Factual; Edema; Evidence Gaps; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37674176
DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00659-3