-
European Journal of Sport Science Jun 2024This review and meta-analysis aimed to describe the current rugby-7s injury epidemiological literature by examining injury data from both sexes, all levels of play, and... (Review)
Review
This review and meta-analysis aimed to describe the current rugby-7s injury epidemiological literature by examining injury data from both sexes, all levels of play, and their associated risk factors. Studies published up until March 2024 were included. These studies were retrieved from six databases using search terms related to rugby-7s or sevens, tackle, collision, collision sport, injury, athlete, incidence rate, mechanism, and risk factor. Only peer-reviewed original studies using prospective or retrospective cohort designs with a clearly defined rugby-7s sample were considered. Included studies needed to report one injury outcome variable. Non-English and qualitative studies; reviews, conference papers, and abstracts were excluded. Twenty studies were included. The meta-analysis used the DerSimonian-Laird continuous random-effects method to calculate the pooled estimated means and 95% confidence interval. The estimated mean injury incidence rate for men was 108.5/1000 player-hours (95% CI: 85.9-131.0) and 76.1/1000 player-hours (95% CI: 48.7-103.5) for women. The estimated mean severity for men was 33.9 days (95% CI: 20.7-47.0) and 44.2 days (95% CI: 32.1-56.3) for women. Significantly more match injuries occurred in the second half of matches, were acute, located at the lower limb, diagnosed as joint/ligament, and resulted from being tackled. Fatigue, player fitness, and previous injuries were associated with an increased risk of injury. There were no statistically significant differences between women's and men's injury profiles. However, the inherent cultural and gendered factors which divide the two sports should not be ignored. The findings from this review will help pave the way forward beyond the foundational stages of injury prevention research in rugby-7s.
PubMed: 38935238
DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12156 -
Archivio Italiano Di Urologia,... Jun 2024Erectile dysfunction can cause self-withdrawal and decreased quality of life. Patients who do not respond to pharmacological therapy and other conservative treatments... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Erectile dysfunction can cause self-withdrawal and decreased quality of life. Patients who do not respond to pharmacological therapy and other conservative treatments are urged to undergo penile prosthesis implantation. Malleable penile prosthesis was the first prosthesis developed, but then inflatable penile prosthesis was developed to give a more natural erection. There is no meta-analysis comparing inflatable and malleable penile prostheses in terms of safety and efficacy. This study is conducted to evaluate patient and partner satisfaction, ease of use, mechanical failure, and infection rate in patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation.
METHOD
This meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocols. Five eligible studies were included from Pubmed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and SemanticScholar databases.
RESULT
In this study, patient and partner satisfaction are significantly better (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.66-6.93, p = 0.0008) (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.75-3.08, p < 0.00001). Mechanical failure is also significantly higher in inflatable penile prostheses (OR 5.60, 95% CI 2.02-15.53, p = 0.0009). There is no significant difference in terms of ease of use and infection rate in inflatable or malleable penile prostheses.
CONCLUSIONS
This study concluded that inflatable penile prosthesis is better in terms of patient and partner satisfaction, but mechanical failures occur more frequently in this type of prosthesis.
Topics: Humans; Male; Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Prosthesis; Patient Satisfaction; Prosthesis Design; Penile Implantation; Treatment Outcome; Quality of Life; Prosthesis Failure
PubMed: 38934528
DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12353 -
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Dec 2024Treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has gained increased importance in recent years due to the high mortality rate and dismal five-year survival rate. Immune... (Review)
Review
Treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has gained increased importance in recent years due to the high mortality rate and dismal five-year survival rate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a promising approach with exceptional outcomes in NSCLC thanks to the antigenic nature of cells. Conversely, immune system over-stimulation with ICI is a double-edged sword that can lead to various negative effects ranging from mild to life-threatening. This review explores current breakthroughs in nanoparticle-based ICI and their limitations. The PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were examined for relevant publications. Thirty-eight trials ( = 16,781) were included in the analyses. The mixed effects analyses on quantifying the treatment effect contributed significantly to the subgroups within studies for ICI treatment effect. Models confirmed ICI's higher impact on treatment effectivity and the decrease in respondents' mortality compared to conventional treatment regiments. ICI might be used as first-line therapy due to their proven effectiveness and safety profile.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Nanoparticles; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38932682
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2365771 -
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Jun 2024Bipolar disorder (BD) has a significant impact on global health, yet its neurophysiological basis remains poorly understood. Conventional treatments have limitations,... (Review)
Review
AIM
Bipolar disorder (BD) has a significant impact on global health, yet its neurophysiological basis remains poorly understood. Conventional treatments have limitations, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the neurophysiology of BD for early diagnosis and novel therapeutic strategies.
DESIGN
Employing a systematic review approach of the PRISMA guidelines, this study assessed the usefulness and validity of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) neurophysiology in patients with BD.
METHODS
Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO, covering studies from January 1985 to January 2024.
RESULTS
Out of 6597 articles screened, nine studies met the inclusion criteria, providing neurophysiological insights into the pathophysiological basis of BD using TMS-electromyography and TMS-electroencephalography methods. Findings revealed significant neurophysiological impairments in patients with BD compared to healthy controls, specifically in cortical inhibition and excitability. In particular, short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) was consistently diminished in BD across the studies, which suggests a fundamental impairment of cortical inhibitory function in BD. This systematic review corroborates the potential utility of TMS neurophysiology in elucidating the pathophysiological basis of BD. Specifically, the reduced cortical inhibition in the SICI paradigm observed in patients with BD suggests gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptor-mediated dysfunction, but results from other TMS paradigms have been inconsistent. Thus, complex neurophysiological processes may be involved in the pathological basis underlying BD. This study demonstrated that BD has a neural basis involving impaired GABAergic function, and it is highly expected that further research on TMS neurophysiology will further elucidate the pathophysiological basis of BD.
PubMed: 38932486
DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12458 -
Vaccines Jun 2024As vaccinations against the SARS-CoV-2 virus have become a crucial tool in controlling the spread of the disease, reports of rare health complications have emerged,... (Review)
Review
As vaccinations against the SARS-CoV-2 virus have become a crucial tool in controlling the spread of the disease, reports of rare health complications have emerged, including new-onset antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). We systematically reviewed new-onset AAV following COVID-19 vaccination case reports and case series published in three databases before January 2024 following PRISMA guidelines to understand the characteristics of possible causal relationships or coincidences. In total, 404 articles were screened respectively by title, abstracts, and full-texts. Thirty-four papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria and have been analyzed, covering 44 patients with new-onset AAV after COVID-19 vaccination with no prior history of COVID-19 infection. Data regarding patients' metrics, comorbidities, vaccination characteristics, symptoms, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes were investigated and summarized. The cohort consisted predominantly of females. AAV diagnosis was confirmed via biopsy, with renal dysfunction as a prevailing manifestation. In most cases, the first symptoms of AAV developed after the second dose; moreover, Pfizer-BioNTech was the most frequently administered vaccine among the analyzed cohort. Primary treatment involved glucocorticoid therapy, with a mostly favourable response. This systematic review aims to raise awareness among clinicians in the field regarding this rare but possible complication, to promote the prompt recognition and diagnosis of de novo ANCA-positive small-vessel vasculitis in timely association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
PubMed: 38932385
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12060656 -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common problem in women and has a negative impact on their quality of life. The aim of this review was to provide a general overview of the... (Review)
Review
Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common problem in women and has a negative impact on their quality of life. The aim of this review was to provide a general overview of the current state of technology used to assess pelvic floor functionality. It also provides literature research of the physiological and anatomical factors that correlate with pelvic floor health. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and IEEE databases were searched for publications on sensor technology for the assessment of pelvic floor functionality. Anatomical and physiological parameters were identified through a manual search. In the systematic review, 114 publications were included. Twelve different sensor technologies were identified. Information on the obtained parameters, sensor position, test activities, and subject characteristics was prepared in tabular form from each publication. A total of 16 anatomical and physiological parameters influencing pelvic floor health were identified in 17 published studies and ranked for their statistical significance. Taken together, this review could serve as a basis for the development of novel sensors which could allow for quantifiable prevention and diagnosis, as well as particularized documentation of rehabilitation processes related to pelvic floor dysfunctions.
Topics: Humans; Pelvic Floor; Pelvic Floor Disorders; Female; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38931784
DOI: 10.3390/s24124001 -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024The development of non-contact techniques for monitoring human vital signs has significant potential to improve patient care in diverse settings. By facilitating easier... (Review)
Review
The development of non-contact techniques for monitoring human vital signs has significant potential to improve patient care in diverse settings. By facilitating easier and more convenient monitoring, these techniques can prevent serious health issues and improve patient outcomes, especially for those unable or unwilling to travel to traditional healthcare environments. This systematic review examines recent advancements in non-contact vital sign monitoring techniques, evaluating publicly available datasets and signal preprocessing methods. Additionally, we identified potential future research directions in this rapidly evolving field.
Topics: Humans; Vital Signs; Monitoring, Physiologic; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
PubMed: 38931747
DOI: 10.3390/s24123963 -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024Beach variants of popular sports like soccer and handball have grown in participation over the last decade. However, the characterization of the workload demands in... (Review)
Review
Beach variants of popular sports like soccer and handball have grown in participation over the last decade. However, the characterization of the workload demands in beach sports remains limited compared to their indoor equivalents. This systematic review aimed to: (1) characterize internal and external loads during beach invasion sports match-play; (2) identify technologies and metrics used for monitoring; (3) compare the demands of indoor sports; and (4) explore differences by competition level, age, sex, and beach sport. Fifteen studies ultimately met the inclusion criteria. The locomotive volumes averaged 929 ± 269 m (average) and 16.5 ± 3.3 km/h (peak) alongside 368 ± 103 accelerations and 8 ± 4 jumps per session. The impacts approached 700 per session. The heart rates reached 166-192 beats per minute (maximal) eliciting 60-95% intensity. The player load was 12.5 ± 2.9 to 125 ± 30 units. Males showed 10-15% higher external but equivalent internal loads versus females. Earlier studies relied solely on a time-motion analysis, while recent works integrate electronic performance and tracking systems, enabling a more holistic quantification. However, substantial metric intensity zone variability persists. Beach sports entail intermittent high-intensity activity with a lower-intensity recovery. Unstable surface likely explains the heightened internal strain despite moderately lower running volumes than indoor sports. The continued integration of technology together with the standardization of workload intensity zones is needed to inform a beach-specific training prescription.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Sports; Heart Rate; Athletic Performance; Bathing Beaches
PubMed: 38931522
DOI: 10.3390/s24123738 -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024Measuring pilot mental workload (MWL) is crucial for enhancing aviation safety. However, MWL is a multi-dimensional construct that could be affected by multiple factors.... (Review)
Review
Measuring pilot mental workload (MWL) is crucial for enhancing aviation safety. However, MWL is a multi-dimensional construct that could be affected by multiple factors. Particularly, in the context of a more automated cockpit setting, the traditional methods of assessing pilot MWL may face challenges. Heart rate variability (HRV) has emerged as a potential tool for detecting pilot MWL during real-flight operations. This review aims to investigate the relationship between HRV and pilot MWL and to assess the performance of machine-learning-based MWL detection systems using HRV parameters. A total of 29 relevant papers were extracted from three databases for review based on rigorous eligibility criteria. We observed significant variability across the reviewed studies, including study designs and measurement methods, as well as machine-learning techniques. Inconsistent results were observed regarding the differences in HRV measures between pilots under varying levels of MWL. Furthermore, for studies that developed HRV-based MWL detection systems, we examined the diverse model settings and discovered that several advanced techniques could be used to address specific challenges. This review serves as a practical guide for researchers and practitioners who are interested in employing HRV indicators for evaluating MWL and wish to incorporate cutting-edge techniques into their MWL measurement approaches.
Topics: Humans; Heart Rate; Workload; Machine Learning; Pilots; Aviation
PubMed: 38931507
DOI: 10.3390/s24123723 -
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling condition that usually affects the extremities after trauma or surgery. At present, there is no FDA-approved... (Review)
Review
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling condition that usually affects the extremities after trauma or surgery. At present, there is no FDA-approved pharmacological treatment for patients with CRPS. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies and determine the best strategy for CRPS. We searched the databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov, for published eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological treatment with placebo in CRPS patients. Target patients were diagnosed with CRPS according to Budapest Criteria in 2012 or the 1994 consensus-based IASP CRPS criteria. Finally, 23 RCTs comprising 1029 patients were included. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate certainty (confidence in evidence and quality of evidence). Direct meta-analysis showed that using bisphosphonates (BPs) (mean difference [MD] -2.21, 95% CI -4.36--0.06, = 0.04, moderate certainty) or ketamine (mean difference [MD] -0.78, 95% CI -1.51--0.05, = 0.04, low certainty) could provide long-term (beyond one month) pain relief. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of short-term pain relief. Ketamine (rank = 0.55) and BPs (rank = 0.61) appeared to be the best strategies for CRPS pain relief. Additionally, BPs (risk ratio [RR] = 1.86, 95% CI 1.34-2.57, 0.01, moderate certainty) and ketamine (risk ratio [RR] = 3.45, 95% CI 1.79-6.65, 0.01, moderate certainty) caused more adverse events, which were mild, and no special intervention was required. In summary, among pharmacological interventions, ketamine and bisphosphonate injection seemed to be the best treatment for CRPS without severe adverse events.
PubMed: 38931478
DOI: 10.3390/ph17060811