-
Scientific Reports Apr 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the impact of presurgical waiting times on pre-/post-operative joint specific pain and function,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the impact of presurgical waiting times on pre-/post-operative joint specific pain and function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and perspectives of patients awaiting primary elective total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacements. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception until 30th January 2023 (CRD42022288128). Secondary literature and unpublished datasets containing paediatric, non-elective, partial, or revision replacement populations were excluded. PRISMA 2020 reporting and GRADE certainty of evidence guidelines were followed. Residual maximum likelihood meta-analysis and linear meta-regression was performed to elucidate the influence of presurgical waiting time. Twenty-six studies were eligible for systematic review and sixteen for meta-analysis, capturing 89,996 patients (60.6% female, mean age 67.4 years) between 2001 and 2022. A significant deterioration in joint function (mean difference (MD):0.0575%; 95% CI 0.0064, 0.1086; p = 0.028(4d.p.); I2 = 73.1%) and HRQOL (MD: 0.05%; 95% CI - 0.0001.0009; p = 0.011(4 d.p.); I2 = 80.6%) was identified per additional day of waiting. Despite qualitative evidence, meta-analysis could not observe a relationship with postoperative outcome data. Patient responses to delayed THR and TKR surgery were unanimously negative. Immediate action should seek to reduce the increased patient anxiety and significant reductions in pre-operative joint functionality and HRQOL associated with prolonged pre-surgical waiting time, whilst mitigating any potential deleterious post-operative effects.
Topics: Humans; Female; Child; Aged; Male; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Quality of Life; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Knee Joint; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 38580681
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58050-6 -
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery 2024The medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury is one of the possible complications of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can lead to coronal-plane instability... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury is one of the possible complications of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can lead to coronal-plane instability that requires surgical revision. Injured MCL can result in joint instability and polyethylene wear. Different strategies have been proposed for MCL reconstruction based on the location of the injury. However, there is a lack of clarity regarding the optimal method for handling an iatrogenic MCL injury throughout a TKA.
METHODS
A PRISMA flow diagram was used to guide the systematic literature review. An extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Newcastle Ottawa scale checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of the articles.
RESULTS
A total of 19 qualitative studies, including non-cadaveric patients with MCL injury during TKA, were identified after analyzing the full text of the articles. All included studies were either retrospective, observational cohort or case series. A total of 486 patients were studied to gather information on the methods used to repair the MCL and their results. Most injuries arose in the tibial attachment, which surgeons mostly realized during the final stages of surgery. Used techniques can be categorized into three main groups: Primary repair, Repair with augmentation, and changing prosthesis characteristics.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review demonstrated that the most popular management of iatrogenic MCL injury was using suture anchors, staples, screws and washers, and more constrained prostheses. The proper method should be decided considering the site of the MCL injury.
PubMed: 38577515
DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.73563.3406 -
JBJS Reviews Apr 2024Vitamin D deficiency is increasingly identified as a predictor of poorer outcomes in musculoskeletal disease affecting as many as 1 in 4 people. This study aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Vitamin D Deficiency Leads to Poorer Health Outcomes and Greater Length of Stay After Total Knee Arthroplasty and Supplementation Improves Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Vitamin D deficiency is increasingly identified as a predictor of poorer outcomes in musculoskeletal disease affecting as many as 1 in 4 people. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS
A targeted search of terms related to vitamin D and TKA outcomes was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and British Orthopaedic Association databases. The results were analyzed using forest plots with I2 heterogeneity statistics and pooled effects with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p values. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 146,054 patients with 150,107 TKRs were analyzed in 10 studies that complied with the inclusion criteria, of which 3 were suitable for meta-analysis. Of these, 4 of the 10 studies showed that vitamin D deficiency resulted in poorer functional outcome scores (Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Society Scoring System, and American Knee Society scores), as well as increased risk of revision surgery, incidence of joint infection, and postoperative stiffness. Meta-analysis of length of hospital stay (LOS) demonstrated a significant increase in LOS in patients with vitamin D deficiency (standardized mean difference, -0.54, 95% CI, -0.69 to -0.38, p < 0.00001). Furthermore, outcomes were improved with vitamin D supplementation in 6 of 10 studies.
CONCLUSION
Vitamin D deficiency results in poorer outcomes of primary TKA, with improved outcomes after supplementation. Further studies should examine the role of preoperative vitamin D screening and/or perioperative supplementation in primary TKA and standardize outcome measures to assess their effect.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level I/II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Dietary Supplements; Length of Stay; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency
PubMed: 38574186
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00150 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... May 2024This study aimed to meta-analyze epidemiological data, revision rates, and incidences of different designs of a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System and compare these... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
Comparison of revision rates and epidemiological data of a single total knee arthroplasty system of different designs (cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, mobile bearing, and fixed bearing): a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials and national arthroplasty registries.
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to meta-analyze epidemiological data, revision rates, and incidences of different designs of a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System and compare these factors across different countries.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted on clinical studies and arthroplasty registries of ATTUNE TKA from 1999 to 2020. The main endpoints analyzed were revision rates and epidemiological data.
RESULTS
The average age of patients was 67.8 years, with a gender distribution of 60% female and 40% male. The pooled average BMI was 29.4 kg/m. Eight clinical studies showed a pooled revision rate per 100 observed CY of 0.5 (n = 1343 cases). Cumulative revision rates after 1, 3, and 5 years varied among registries, with the Swiss registry having the highest revision data (after 5 years: 6.3%) and the American registry having the lowest revision data (after 5 years: 1.7%). A comparison of the revision rates of mobile bearing and fixed bearing (41,200 cases) as well as cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized (n = 123,361 cases) showed no significant advantage in the first 5 years after implantation.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, pooled data from 41,200 cases of TKA with a single Total Knee Arthroplasty System in two arthroplasty registries revealed that there was no significant difference in revision rates between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing design within the first 5 years after implantation. In addition, a comparison of the revision rates in n = 123,361 cases showed no significant advantage for cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized in the first 5 years after implantation.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Reoperation; Registries; Knee Prosthesis; Prosthesis Design; Male; Female; Prosthesis Failure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Aged
PubMed: 38570357
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05286-6 -
European Review For Medical and... Mar 2024Robotic-assisted surgery is increasingly being utilized in hip and knee reconstruction. However, the relative efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted total knee... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Robotic-assisted surgery is increasingly being utilized in hip and knee reconstruction. However, the relative efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted total knee replacement (RATKR) compared to traditional surgery remained uncertain. This study aimed to systematically review the current literature comparing the outcomes of RATKR to traditional procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in major databases to identify studies comparing RATKR with traditional surgeries. The primary outcomes were functional scores and post-operative complications. Pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies were considered for inclusion. The pooled functional scores of The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS), hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, visual analogue score (VAS) pain score showed no significant differences between the two groups (MD = -0.99, 95% CI -2.32 to 0.34, p-value = 0.14). The subgroup analysis for hip and knee reconstructions also revealed no significant difference in terms of functional scores. However, for post-operative complications, while there was no significant difference in terms of blood loss (MD = -1.62, 95% CI -4.42 to 1.17, p-value = 0.25), the readmission rates were significantly higher in the RATKR group (MD = 0.94, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11, p-value < 0.00001). The overall heterogeneity was extremely high (I² = 93%), particularly in the analyses of post-operative complications.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggested that robotic-assisted knee reconstruction did not significantly improve functional outcomes compared to traditional surgery. The safety profile was similar except for a higher readmission rate following RATKR. Given the high heterogeneity, further large-scale, well-designed, randomized controlled trials are needed to conclusively determine the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted hip and knee reconstruction.
Topics: Humans; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Postoperative Complications; Knee Joint
PubMed: 38567588
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202403_35729 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Apr 2024Obesity represents an epidemic of rising numbers worldwide year after year. In the Orthopedic field, obesity is one of the major causes leading to osteoarthritis needing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Obesity represents an epidemic of rising numbers worldwide year after year. In the Orthopedic field, obesity is one of the major causes leading to osteoarthritis needing Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA). Still, contextually, it represents one of the most significant risk factors for joint replacement complications and failures. So, bariatric Surgery (BS) is becoming a valuable option for weight control and mitigating obesity-related risk factors. This review of the literature and meta-analysis aims to evaluate periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates in patients who underwent TKA after BS compared to obese patients without BS.
METHODS
Systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines up to October 2023. We included longitudinal studies comparing obese patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty after bariatric surgery (study group) and obese patients who underwent TKA (control group). The surgical site infection and Periprosthetic joint infection rate were compared among groups using a meta-analytical approach.
RESULTS
The online database and references investigation identified one hundred and twenty-five studies. PJI rate differed significantly among groups, (z = -21.8928, p < 0.0001), with a lower risk in the BS group (z = -10.3114, p < 0.0001), for SSI, instead, not statistically significance were recorded (z = -0.6784, p = 0.4975).
CONCLUSIONS
The current Literature suggests that Bariatric Surgery can reduce infectious complications in TKA, leading to better outcomes and less related costs treating of knee osteoarthritis in obese patients.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Surgical Wound Infection; Bariatric Surgery; Obesity; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Arthritis, Infectious; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Retrospective Studies; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
PubMed: 38561717
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07288-2 -
Application of digital technology in rehabilitation of total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.Journal of Orthopaedics Aug 2024Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) aids in reducing pain and improving knee mobility, function, and quality of life in osteoarthritis knee (OA Knee). Techology-based... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) aids in reducing pain and improving knee mobility, function, and quality of life in osteoarthritis knee (OA Knee). Techology-based rehabiliation has proved to be promising post-TKA. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the digital technology after TKA.
METHODS
The PRISMA Checklist was used for the present systematic review. Randomized and non-randomized studies were included. Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess risk of bias by two independent reviewers. The data was summarized narratively for the digital technologies utilized.
RESULTS
177 studies were screened from the databases, and 14 studies were included. The risk of bias assessment showed low to moderate-quality evidence. The technologies were divided into 2 broad categories-mobile-based and web-based- although the individual studies had unique technologies utilizing sensors, motion trackers, and game-based and video-based.
CONCLUSION
Various digital technologies focus on providing exercise intervention post-TKA. Clinicians can use face-to-face and technology-based approaches for TKA rehabilitation for a comprehensive subjective and objective assessment post-TKA based on low to moderate quality studies.
PubMed: 38560586
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.008 -
Journal of the American Academy of... Apr 2024The primary objective of this review was to determine whether the attenuation of the postoperative inflammatory response (PIR) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leads...
The primary objective of this review was to determine whether the attenuation of the postoperative inflammatory response (PIR) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) leads to a notable improvement in clinical outcome scores. The secondary objective of this review was to determine the optimal approach in using inflammatory biomarkers, clinical inflammatory assessments, and imaging to quantify the PIR. A systematic literature search of eight major databases was conducted using a predetermined search strategy. C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), knee surface temperature (KST), and clinical outcome data were collected and graphically displayed. Eighty-six percent of the studies that reported a statistically significant decrease in inflammatory biomarkers in their treatment group demonstrated a concordant notable improvement in clinical outcome scores. Mean CRP, IL-6, ESR, and KST values peaked on postoperative day (POD) 2, POD1, POD7, and POD 1-3, respectively. The PIR is correlated with early pain and function recovery outcomes. Future studies comparing TKA surgical methodologies and perioperative protocols should assess PIR by incorporating inflammatory biomarkers, such as CRP and IL-6, and clinical inflammatory assessment adjuncts, to provide a more comprehensive comparison.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Interleukin-6; Treatment Outcome; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein
PubMed: 38547046
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00202 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2024Postoperative pain after knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reality that continues to be experienced today. Recently, virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated effectiveness in... (Review)
Review
Postoperative pain after knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reality that continues to be experienced today. Recently, virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated effectiveness in the management of pain. Our aim was to review the original controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of VR for pain management and quality of life after TKA. Six databases were searched for articles published from inception to September 2023, following (PRISMA) guidelines. The methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool for Randomized Trials (ROB2). Five RCTs were included in the systematic review, and four of them in the meta-analysis. The effectiveness of VR for short term pain relief was superior compared to the control (MD = -0.8 cm; CI 95%: -1.3 to -0.4; < 0.001). VR showed a greater effect on the secondary outcomes of WOMAC (MD = -4.6 points; CI 95%: -6.5 to -2.6, < 0.001) and the HSS scale (MD = 6.5 points; CI 95%: 0.04 to 13.0, = 0.049). However, no differences were found in the effect on the ROM between groups (MD = 3.4 grades; CI 95%: -6.0 to 12.8, = 0.48). Our findings suggest that the use of virtual reality during the postoperative period could be an effective non-pharmacological therapy in relieving acute pain, compared to a control intervention, with a very low degree of certainty according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). However, the low methodological quality of the articles limits our findings.
PubMed: 38541615
DOI: 10.3390/life14030289 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Mar 2024There are many consequences of lower limb amputation, including altered biomechanics of gait. It has previously been shown that these can lead to increased rates of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There are many consequences of lower limb amputation, including altered biomechanics of gait. It has previously been shown that these can lead to increased rates of osteoarthritis (OA). A common and successful treatment for severe OA is joint replacement. However, it is unclear whether amputees undergoing this surgery can expect the same outcomes or complication profile compared with non-amputees. Furthermore, there are key technical challenges associated with hip or knee replacement in lower limb amputees. This scoping review aimed to identify and summarise the existing evidence base.
METHODS
This was a systematic scoping review performed according to PRISMA guidelines. An electronic database search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE and CINAHL was completed from the date of inception to 1 April 2023. All peer reviewed literature related to hip or knee replacement among lower limb amputees was included.
RESULTS
Of the 931 records identified, 40 studies were included in this study. The available literature consisted primarily of case reports and case series, with generally low level of evidence. In total, there were 265 patients of which 195 received total hip replacement (THR), 51 received total knee replacement (TKR) and 21 received hip hemiarthroplasty. The most common reason for amputation was trauma (34.2%), and the main indication for joint replacement was OA (77.1%), occurring more frequently in the contralateral limb (66.7%). The outcomes reported varied widely between studies, with most suggesting good functional status post-operatively. A variety of technical tips were reported, primarily concerned with intra-operative control of the residual limb.
CONCLUSION
There is a need for more observational studies to clearly define the association between amputation and subsequent need for joint replacement. Furthermore, comparative studies are needed to identify whether amputees can be expected to achieve similar functional outcomes after surgery, and if they are at higher risk of certain complications.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Amputees; Lower Extremity; Osteoarthritis; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
PubMed: 38539152
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07342-z