-
Frontiers in Medicine 2023Carbapenem-resistant (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment...
, and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant isolates or infections: a scoping review.
INTRODUCTION
Carbapenem-resistant (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate , and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded.
RESULTS
22 , 7 and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer or studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies.
DISCUSSION
The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.
PubMed: 37727767
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1249030 -
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious... Aug 2023Antibiotic resistance surveillance may be essential to identify patterns of antibiotic resistance and guide treatment choices. Therefore, this systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Antibiotic resistance surveillance may be essential to identify patterns of antibiotic resistance and guide treatment choices. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate amikacin resistance and susceptibility in children with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE). From inception to September 5, 2022, relevant studies were searched via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. A network meta-analysis was conducted to explore the sequencing of resistance rates in amikacin and other antibiotics. Totally, 26 studies with 2582 clusters of bacterial isolates were included. The resistance rate of amikacin in children with ESBL-PE was 10.1%, higher than the resistance rate of tigecycline (0.0%), ertapenem (0.4%), meropenem (0.7%), and imipenem (3.0%). For the drug susceptibility rate in children with ESBL-PE, the susceptibility rate of amikacin (89.7%) was lower than tigecycline (99.6%), imipenem (96.8%), meropenem (97.3%), and ertapenem (95.6%). Amikacin showed a low drug resistance and a high drug resistance in children with ESBL-PE infection, making it a good option for the treatment of the infection caused by ESBL-PE.
Topics: Child; Humans; Amikacin; Ertapenem; Meropenem; Tigecycline; Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Imipenem; beta-Lactamases; Drug Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37290259
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.115956