-
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024: The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) on functional ability, pain-related outcomes, and respiratory function... (Review)
Review
Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training on Functional Ability, Pain-Related Outcomes, and Respiratory Function in Individuals with Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
: The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) on functional ability, pain-related outcomes, and respiratory function in individuals with sub-acute and chronic low back pain (LBP). : The study selection was as follows: (participants) adult individuals with >4 weeks of LBP; (intervention) RMT; (comparison) any comparison RMT (inspiratory or expiratory or mixed) versus control; (outcomes) postural control, lumbar disability, pain-related outcomes, pain-related fear-avoidance beliefs, respiratory muscle function, and pulmonary function; and (study design) randomized controlled trials. : 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis showing that RMT produces a statistically significant increase in postural control (mean difference (MD) = 21.71 [12.22; 31.21]; decrease in lumbar disability (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.55 [0.001; 1.09]); decrease in lumbar pain intensity (SMD = 0.77 [0.15; 1.38]; increase in expiratory muscle strength (MD = 8.05 [5.34; 10.76]); and increase in forced vital capacity (FVC) (MD = 0.30 [0.03; 0.58]) compared with a control group. However, RMT does not produce an increase in inspiratory muscle strength (MD = 18.36 [-1.61; 38.34]) and in forced expiratory volume at the first second (FEV1) (MD = 0.36 [-0.02; 0.75]; and in the FEV1/FVC ratio (MD = 1.55 [-5.87; 8.96]) compared with the control group. : RMT could improve expiratory muscle strength and FVC, with a moderate quality of evidence, whereas a low quality of evidence suggests that RMT could improve postural control, lumbar disability, and pain intensity in individuals with sub-acute and chronic LBP. However, more studies of high methodological quality are needed to strengthen the results of this meta-analysis.
PubMed: 38892764
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113053 -
Respiratory Research Jun 2024The term "post-COVID-19 condition" refers to the symptomatology that appears between four to twelve weeks after Covid-19 infection. These symptoms can persist for weeks... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The term "post-COVID-19 condition" refers to the symptomatology that appears between four to twelve weeks after Covid-19 infection. These symptoms can persist for weeks or even months, significantly diminishing the quality of life for affected individuals. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation programs and/or respiratory muscle training on respiratory sequelae in patients with post-COVID condition.
METHODS
The literature search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, PEDro, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science. Randomized clinical trials were included in which participants were aged 18 years or older. Articles were excluded if at least one of the therapies did not involve pulmonary rehabilitation or respiratory muscle training, if the participants were COVID positive, if studies lacked results, and finally, if interventions were conducted without supervision or at home. This review only encompasses supervised non-virtual interventions. This study adheres to the PRISMA statement and has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023433843).
RESULTS
The outcomes obtained in the included studies are assessed across the following variables: Exercise capacity using the 6-minute walk test, Dyspnea, fatigue, Pulmonary function, Maximum inspiratory pressure, and Quality of life.
CONCLUSION
Despite the absence of a specific treatment at present, it was evident from this review that a well-structured pulmonary rehabilitation program that incorporates both aerobic and muscular strength exercises along with techniques and inspiratory muscle exercises was the most effective form of treatment.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Breathing Exercises; Treatment Outcome; Respiratory Muscles; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Exercise Tolerance; Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
PubMed: 38890699
DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-02857-4 -
Cardio-oncology (London, England) Jun 2024The effects of exercise in patients with breast cancer (BC), has shown some profit, but consistency and magnitude of benefit remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The effects of exercise in patients with breast cancer (BC), has shown some profit, but consistency and magnitude of benefit remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the benefits of varying types of exercises in patients with BC.
METHODS
Literature search was conducted across five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane) from 1st January 2000 through 19th January 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of different types of exercise on outcomes related to fitness and quality of life (QOL) in patients with BC were considered for inclusion. Outcomes of interest included cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), muscle strength, fatigue and physical function. Evaluations were reported as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled using random effects model. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Thirty-one relevant articles were included in the final analysis. Exercise intervention did not significantly improved the CRF in patients with BC when compared with control according to treadmill ergometer scale (MD: 4.96; 95%Cl [-2.79, 12.70]; P = 0.21), however exercise significantly improved CRF according to cycle ergometer scales (MD 2.07; 95% Cl [1.03, 3.11]; P = 0.0001). Physical function was significantly improved as well in exercise group reported by 6-MWT scale (MD 80.72; 95% Cl [55.67, 105.77]; P < 0.00001). However, exercise did not significantly improve muscle strength assessed using the hand grip dynamometer (MD 0.55; 95% CI [-1.61, 2.71]; P = 0.62), and fatigue assessed using the MFI-20 (MD -0.09; 95% CI [-5.92, 5.74]; P = 0.98) and Revised Piper scales (MD -0.26; 95% CI [-1.06, 0.55] P = 0.53). Interestingly, exercise was found to improve HRQOL when assessed using the FACT-B scale (MD 8.57; 95% CI [4.53, 12.61]; P < 0.0001) but no significant improvements were noted with the EORTIC QLQ-C30 scale (MD 1.98; 95% CI [-1.43, 5.40]; P = 0.25).
CONCLUSION
Overall exercise significantly improves the HRQOL, CRF and physical function in patients with BC. HRQOL was improved with all exercise types but the effects on CRF vary with cycle versus treadmill ergometer. Exercise failed to improve fatigue-related symptoms and muscle strength. Large RCTs are required to evaluate the effects of exercise in patients with BC in more detail.
PubMed: 38890692
DOI: 10.1186/s40959-024-00235-z -
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 2024Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common among physically active individuals, often requiring ACL reconstruction (ACLR) for recovery. Rehabilitating these...
Effect of open vs. closed kinetic chain exercises in ACL rehabilitation on knee joint pain, laxity, extensor muscles strength, and function: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
UNLABELLED
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common among physically active individuals, often requiring ACL reconstruction (ACLR) for recovery. Rehabilitating these injuries involves determining the appropriate timing for initiating open kinetic chain (OKC) exercises. Although OKC exercises are effective post-ACLR, their use in rehabilitation remains a subject of debate. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a systematic review to determine whether OKC or closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises result in differences in laxity, strength of the knee extensor muscle group, function, and functional performance in ACL rehabilitation. Five electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled between-group trials (RCTs). Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias using the PEDro scale. We performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model or calculated mean differences (fixed-effect) where appropriate. Certainty of evidence was judged using the GRADE approach. The systematic literature search yielded 480 articles, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. The evidence for all outcomes ranged from very low to low certainty. Across all comparisons, inconsistent results were found in outcome measures related to knee function between OKC and CKC exercises post-ACLR. A significant increase in quadriceps isokinetic strength was found in post-ACLR and ACL-deficient knees in favor of OKC exercises at 3 ( = 0.03) and 4 ( = 0.008) months, respectively. A significant decrease in knee laxity was observed in ACL-deficient knees in favor of OKC at 10 weeks ( = 0.01), although inconsistency was noted at 4 months. Finally, a significant decrease in pain was found in favor of early OKC compared to late OKC ( < 0.003). Additionally, in ACL-deficient knees, low load resistance training (LLRT) OKC showed no significant laxity difference compared to controls ( > 0.05). In contrast, high load resistance training (HLRT) OKC had less laxity than controls at 6 weeks ( = 0.02) but not at 12 weeks ( > 0.05). OKC exercises appear to be superior to CKC for improving quadriceps strength 3-4 months post-injury, whether as a part of conservative or post-surgery rehabilitation. On the other hand, OKC exercises seem to be either superior or equally effective to CKC for improving knee laxity, thus presenting their importance in being included in a rehabilitation protocol from the initial phase.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO [CRD42023475230].
PubMed: 38887689
DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1416690 -
Journal of Bodywork and Movement... Jul 2024The upper quarter y-balance test (YBT-UQ) is a functional screening tool used to detect musculoskeletal injury risk, aid rehabilitation, and monitor dynamic function,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The upper quarter y-balance test (YBT-UQ) is a functional screening tool used to detect musculoskeletal injury risk, aid rehabilitation, and monitor dynamic function, strength and control, yet little is currently known about intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence reach scores.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review aimed to determine if age, sex, or interventions influenced reach scores and whether between-limb differences were common in non-injured sporting populations, with a secondary aim to identify if sport impacted YBT-UQ reach.
METHODS
Web of Science, PubMed, and SportDiscus were systematically searched from January 2012 to November 16, 2023, revealing twenty-three studies satisfying inclusion criteria of published in English between 2012 and 2023, healthy participants of any age including both males and females, athletic populations, YBT-UQ use to assess upper limb mobility/stability, report normalised reach scores, and peer-reviewed full-texts. Methodological quality was evaluated via National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tools for controlled interventions, observational cohort and cross-sectional designs, and pre-post with no control group.
RESULTS
Age, sex, sport, and fatigue were influencing factors; greater reach scores were achieved in older athletes (i.e. >18 years), males, and in a well-rested state. Between-limb differences were not common in sporting populations; therefore, asymmetries may be useful for practitioners to aid injury risk identification.
CONCLUSION
This is the first systematic review investigating YBT-UQ influencing factors and thereby provides context for clinicians regarding characteristics that impact reach scores in sporting populations, from which normative values could be determined and further aid clinical decisions or areas to improve regarding injury risk.
Topics: Humans; Upper Extremity; Postural Balance; Male; Age Factors; Sex Factors; Female; Athletic Injuries; Adult; Athletes; Muscle Strength; Fatigue; Sports
PubMed: 38876624
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.02.043 -
European Journal of Sport Science Jun 2024To assess the evidence for the effect of strength and conditioning on physical qualities and aesthetic competence in dance populations, three electronic databases... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To assess the evidence for the effect of strength and conditioning on physical qualities and aesthetic competence in dance populations, three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus) were searched (until September 2022) for studies that met the following criteria: (i) dancers aged >16 years; (ii) structured strength and conditioning intervention; and (iii) with physical qualities and aesthetic competence as outcome measures. Methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed through the systematic review tool "QualSyst". Meta-analyses of effect sizes (Hedges' g) with forest plots explored the effects of the strength and conditioning interventions. Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Meta-analysis indicated strength and conditioning significantly (p < 0.05) improved lower body power (g = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.53-1.27), upper body strength (g = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.39-1.57), lower body strength (g = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.97-2.22), and flexibility (g = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.05-1.66). Strength and conditioning interventions were found to be effective at improving physical qualities in dancers, recommending their participation in additional sessions to enhance overall fitness and ultimately dance performance. It is recommended that future strength and conditioning intervention research should include sample size calculations, with participants recruited from a specific dance genre and skill level in order to evaluate how strength and conditioning influences dance performance.
Topics: Humans; Dancing; Muscle Strength; Resistance Training; Esthetics
PubMed: 38874993
DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12111 -
European Journal of Sport Science Jun 2024We aimed to assess the effects of muscle disuse on muscle strength (MS), muscle mass (MM) and cardiovascular fitness. Databases were scrutinized to identify human... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We aimed to assess the effects of muscle disuse on muscle strength (MS), muscle mass (MM) and cardiovascular fitness. Databases were scrutinized to identify human studies assessing the effects of muscle disuse on both (1) MM and (2) maximal oxygen uptake (VO) and/or MS. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression with initial physical fitness and length of the protocol as a priori determined moderators were performed. We quantitatively analyzed 51 different studies, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Data from the participants in 14 studies showed a decline in both VO (SMD: -0.93; 95% CI: -1.27 to -0.58) and MM (SMD: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.10). Data from 47 studies showed a decline in strength (-0.88; 95% CI: -1.04 to -0.73) and mass (SMD: -0.47; 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.36). MS loss was twice as high as MM loss, but differences existed between anatomical regions. Notably, meta-regression analysis revealed that initial MS was inversely associated with MS decline. VO and MS decline to a higher extent than MM during muscle disuse. We reported a more profound strength loss in subjects with high muscular strength. This is physiologically relevant for athletes because their required muscular strength can profoundly decline during a period of muscle disuse. It should however be noted that a period of muscle disuse can have devastating consequences in old subjects with low muscular strength.
Topics: Humans; Muscle, Skeletal; Muscle Strength; Oxygen Consumption; Cardiorespiratory Fitness
PubMed: 38874988
DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12093 -
PloS One 2024Core strength training (CST) has been shown to improve performance in several sports disciplines. CST is recognized as one of the crucial elements that enhance athletic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Core strength training (CST) has been shown to improve performance in several sports disciplines. CST is recognized as one of the crucial elements that enhance athletic performance, particularly impacting badminton skills. Despite its popularity as a strength training method among badminton players, there is a lack of comprehensive studies examining the effectiveness of CST on the performance of these athletes.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to ascertain CST's effects on badminton players' performance.
METHOD
This study followed PRISMA principles and conducted comprehensive searches in well-known academic databases (SCOPUS, Pubmed, CNKI, Web of Science, Core Collection, and EBSCOhost) up to August 2023. The inclusive criteria were established using the PICOS framework. Following their inclusion based on PICOS criteria, the selected studies underwent literature review and meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the assessments was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tools bias risk tools and recommendations for a graded assessment, development, and evaluation.
RESULTS
The analysis included participants aged 10-19 years from 13 studies of moderate quality, totaling 208 individuals. The CST intervention s lasted between 4 to 16 weeks, with a frequency of 1 to 4 sessions per week and each session lasting 20 to 120 minutes. Sample sizes across these studies ranged from 8 to 34 participants. According to the meta-analysis, CST significantly influenced badminton performance, particularly in areas of explosive power (ES = 0.03 P = 0.04), front-court skill (ES = 2.53, P = 0.003), and back-court skill (ES = 2.33, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION
CST enhances badminton players' fitness (strength, power, balance, and stability), in situ (front/back-court) skills, and movement position hitting. However, its effects on speed, endurance, agility, flexibility, and coordination are unclear, revealing a research gap. The precise benefits of CST, especially on flexibility and specific hitting skills (smashes, clears, drives, net shots, crosscourt, push, and lift shots), need more investigation. Additionally, research on CST's impact on female athletes is significantly lacking.
Topics: Humans; Athletes; Athletic Performance; Muscle Strength; Racquet Sports; Resistance Training; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult
PubMed: 38865415
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305116 -
European Journal of Physical and... Jun 2024Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain accompanied by reduced levels of physical activity and associated comorbidities such as overweight and obesity...
INTRODUCTION
Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain accompanied by reduced levels of physical activity and associated comorbidities such as overweight and obesity which have been associated to sarcopenia development. The aim of this systematic review is to ascertain whether Europeans with fibromyalgia show a reduction in sarcopenia determinants compared to apparently-healthy controls and to determine the risk of sarcopenia and its possible risk factors (PROSPERO: CRD42023439839).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Systematic searches were conducted on six databases (Academic-Search-Ultimate, CENTRAL, PubMed, SciELO, WOS-Core Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov last-search February-2024) looking for original studies developed in European countries which assessed any of the sarcopenia determinants proposed by the EWGSOP2-guidelines (handgrip strength, five sit-to-stand, appendicular skeletal mass [ASM], skeletal muscle index [SMI]) and included fibromyalgia and healthy-control individuals. Studies mixing fibromyalgia with other diagnoses were excluded. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to analyze possible differences and associated risk factors. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane-Rob tool and the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Studies, and the certainty of the evidence using GRADE-approach.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 25 studies (6393 individuals; 97% women; 20-65 years) were included. Fibromyalgia individuals showed reduced muscle strength ([handgrip] SMD: -1.16 [-1.29, -1.03]; high-certainty; [five sit-to-stand] not-assessed) and muscle quantity ([ASM] mean-difference: -0.83 kg [-1.41, -0.37]; [SMI] mean-difference: -0.26 kg/m [-0.41, -0.10]; both low-certainty) compared to healthy-controls. Fibromyalgia individuals had nine-times greater risk for probable sarcopenia (OR: 9.23 [6.85, 12.45]; high-certainty), but not for confirmed sarcopenia ([ASM] OR: 0.91 [0.49, 1.67]; [SMI] OR: 0.67 [0.19, 2.33]; both low-certainty) according to the EWGSOP2 cut-off points. Reduced muscle strength was strongly associated to fibromyalgia-severity (β=-0.953 [-0.069, -0.038]). Studies were rated as high-risk of bias overall because did not account for some potential confounders (physical activity, sedentary time, Body Mass Index) which could influence the estimated effect.
CONCLUSIONS
Europeans with fibromyalgia have a large reduction in muscle strength and may have a reduction in muscle quantity. The risk of probable sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP2 cut-off points was nine-times higher, but may have no difference in risk of reduced muscle quantity relative to healthy-controls. Muscle strength was strongly associated to disease severity.
PubMed: 38860694
DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08348-5 -
Frontiers in Nutrition 2024Coaches and athletes are increasingly interested in understanding athletes' serum vitamin D levels, their impact on strength, physical performance, and athletic...
Effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on strength of lower and upper extremities in athletes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Coaches and athletes are increasingly interested in understanding athletes' serum vitamin D levels, their impact on strength, physical performance, and athletic outcomes. Previous meta-analyses were reported with limited sample size and no significant overall effect was found. Hence, it is crucial to conduct a thorough and up-to-date systematic examination and meta-analysis to elucidate the potential advantages of supplementing with vitamin D3 in enhancing muscle strength for athletes.
METHODS
We performed a thorough investigation, spanning three databases (PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library), seeking randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in all languages. These trials delved into the influence of vitamin D3 supplementation on the changes of pre- and post-intervention muscle strength in healthy athletes. Our systematic examination and meta-analysis took into account serum 25(OH)D levels exceeding 30 ng/mL as a marker of adequacy.
RESULTS
Ten RCTs, comprising 354 athletes (185 in the vitamin D3 group and 169 in the placebo group), fulfilled the inclusion criteria. During the study, 36 athletes were lost to follow-up, leaving 318 athletes (166 in the vitamin D3 group and 152 in the placebo group) with documented complete results. In comparison with the placebo group, there is a significant increase between the changes of pre- and post-intervention serum 25(OH)D levels among athletes following a period of vitamin D3 supplementation (MD 14.76, 95% CI: 8.74 to 20.77, < 0.0001). Overall effect of four strength measurements including handgrip, one repetition maximum Bench Press (1-RM BP), vertical jump, and quadriceps contraction was not significantly improved (SMD 0.18, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.37, = 0.08), but there was a significant increase in quadriceps contraction (SMD 0.57, 95% CI: 0.04 to 1.11, = 0.04).
CONCLUSION
This updated meta-analysis indicates the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation for enhancing muscle strength in athletes when analyzing its quantitatively synthesized effects. With limited available studies for the quantitative synthesis, it cannot warrant significant overall enhancements in muscle strength when athletes attain adequate serum 25(OH)D levels through supplementation.
PubMed: 38860160
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1381301