-
Renal Failure Jan 2024Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal timing for the initiation of peritoneal dialysis (PD) after catheter placement. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal timing for the initiation of peritoneal dialysis (PD) after catheter placement.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
EXACT DATE OF DATA COLLECTION
From inception till July 31, 2023.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
To assess the outcomes and safety of unplanned PD initiation (<14/7 days after catheter insertion) in cohort studies.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies involving 3054 participants were included. (1) The risk of unplanned initiation of leakage and Obstruction was no difference in both the break-in period (BI) <14 and BI < 7 groups. (2) Catheter displacement was more likely to occur in the emergency initiation group with BI < 7. (3) No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding infectious complications. (4) There was no difference in transition to HD between patients with BI < 7 and BI < 14 d.
CONCLUSION
Infectious complications of unplanned initiation of peritoneal dialysis did not differ from planned initiation. Emergency initiation in the BI < 7 group had higher catheter displacement, but heterogeneity was higher. There were no differences in leakage or obstruction in either group. Catheter survival was the same for emergency initiation of peritoneal dialysis compared with planned initiation of peritoneal dialysis and did not increase the risk of conversion to hemodialysis.
REGISTRATION
This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, number: CRD42023431369).
Topics: Humans; Cohort Studies; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Peritoneal Dialysis; Prognosis; Renal Dialysis
PubMed: 38391179
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2312533 -
Archivio Italiano Di Urologia,... Dec 2023The role of the omentectomy procedure on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) catheter placement in pediatric patients has been differently evaluated in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The role of the omentectomy procedure on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) catheter placement in pediatric patients has been differently evaluated in the literature, with some studies showing improvement while others showing no difference. Our study aims to define the advantages of omentectomy compared to a procedure without omentectomy.
METHODS
The literature searching in online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.gov) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023412846). The protocol was performed through April 2023 and focused on pediatric patients treated with an omentectomy procedure and related complications. The risk of bias in each study was assessed using the risk of bias for the non-randomized control trials (ROBINS-I). The effect estimates were extracted as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The heterogeneity of the studies was considered as high heterogeneity if I2 values above 50% or p < 0.05.
RESULTS
In the total of 676 articles identified in the database searching for screening, nine studies with 775 patients met the criteria for inclusion. The omentectomy procedure significantly showed a lower incidence of catheter obstruction compared to the control group, (OR 0.24 [95% CI, 0.12-0.49], p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). Moreover, omentectomy demonstrated a similar trend in the rate of removal or reinsertion of the catheter with high heterogeneity, OR 0.25 [95% CI, 0.12-0.51), p = 0.0002, I2 = 70%).
CONCLUSIONS
The omentectomy procedure showed a lower incidence of catheter obstruction and complications leading to removal or reinsertion of the catheter.
Topics: Humans; Child; Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory; Omentum; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Incidence
PubMed: 38059270
DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2023.12049 -
Journal of Pediatric Urology Feb 2024Pop-off mechanisms are potential pressure-relieving mediators in patients diagnosed with posterior urethral valves (PUV). This systematic review aimed to synthesize the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Pop-off mechanisms are potential pressure-relieving mediators in patients diagnosed with posterior urethral valves (PUV). This systematic review aimed to synthesize the existing evidence regarding the protective effect of pop-off mechanisms on renal function in children with PUV.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature that involved an extensive search in the main databases of the medical bibliography. Three independent reviewers selected the relevant articles. Methodological quality was rated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale index. We used random meta-analyses to compare different outcomes (serum creatine, Nadir serum creatinine, and Chronic Kidney Disease) between children with PUV and pop-off mechanisms and those with PUV without pop-off mechanisms.
RESULTS
10 studies with data from 896 participants were included in this review. Seven articles reported serum creatinine values for each group and 3 of them found significant differences between groups. The random-effects meta-analysis for serum creatinine showed significant lower mean (diff = -52.88 μmol/L [95 % CI -73.65 to -32.11]) in the group of children with pop-off mechanisms, and the random-effects meta-analysis for Nadir serum creatinine showed a marginally significantly lower mean in the group of children with pop-off mechanisms (diff = -12.00 μmol/L [95 % CI -24.04 to 0.04]). The random-effect meta-analysis for Chronic Kidney Disease resulted in a significant risk reduction for the group of children with pop-off mechanisms (odds ratio = 0.48 [95 % CI 0.23 to 0.98]).
CONCLUSIONS
Children with PUV and pop-off mechanisms show better renal function and lower risk of Chronic Kidney Disease than those with PUV without pop-off mechanisms suggesting these mechanisms may act as renoprotective mediators. The high heterogeneity between studies in the assessment of renal function and long-term outcomes calls for a cautious interpretation of these findings. Future studies that stratify by different types of pop-off mechanisms and use standardized metrics, such as Nadir creatinine, are needed.
Topics: Child; Humans; Urethra; Creatinine; Urethral Obstruction; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37852807
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.003 -
Archivio Italiano Di Urologia,... Oct 2023Renal artery infarction (RI) is the presence of blood clot in the main renal artery or its branches causing complete or partial obstruction of the blood supply. Its...
AIM
Renal artery infarction (RI) is the presence of blood clot in the main renal artery or its branches causing complete or partial obstruction of the blood supply. Its etiology is either related with disorders of the renal vasculature or with cardiovascular diseases. Recently, the SARSCoV- 2 virus is an emerging cause of thromboembolic events and the incidence of RI is anticipated to increase after the pandemic.
METHODS
A systematic review based on COVID-19 associated RI was conducted.
PROTOCOL
A systematic review of the Medline/Pubmed and Scopus databases was conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (the PRISMA statement). Search strategy and information sources: A hand-search was performed using the terms "SARS-Cov-2" OR "COVID-19" AND "renal thrombosis" OR "renal infarction" OR "renal "thromboembolism".
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
all types of publications (case reports, case series, letters to the editor, short communications) were evaluated for relevance. Inclusion criteria were: confirmed SARS-Cov-2 infection irrespectively of the age, diagnosis of RI during or after the onset of viral infection, and exclusion of other potential causes of thromboembolic event except of SARS-Cov-2. Patients with renal transplantation were also considered. Study criteria selection: after checking for relevance based on the title and the abstract, the full texts of the selected papers were retrieved and were further evaluated. Duplicated and irrelevant cases were excluded. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus with the involvement of a third reviewer. Quality of studies: The assessment of the quality case reports was based on four different domains: selection, ascertainment, casualty and reporting. Each paper was classified as "Good", "Moderate" and "Poor" for any of the four domains. Data extractions: Crucial data for the conduct of the study were extracted including: age, sex, time from SARS-Cov-2 infection till RI development, medical history, previous or current antithrombotic protection or treatment, laterality and degree of obstruction, other sites of thromboembolism, treatment for thromboembolism and SARS-Cov-2 and final outcome.
DATA ANALYSIS
methods of descriptive statistics were implicated for analysis and presentation of the data.
RESULTS
The systematic review retrieved 35 cases in 33 reports. In most cases, RI was diagnosed within a month from the SARSCov- 2 infection albeit 17 out of 35 patients were receiving or had recently received thromboprophylaxis. Right, left, bilateral and allograft obstruction was diagnosed in 7, 15, 8 and 5 patients respectively. 17 cases experienced additional extrarenal thromboembolism primarily in aorta, spleen, brain and lower limbs. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) (usually 60-80 mg enoxaparine bid) was the primary treatment, followed by combinations of unfractionated heparin and salicylic acid, apixaban and rivaraxaban, warfarin, acenocoumarol or clopidogrel. Kidney replacement therapy was offered to five patients while invasive therapies with thrombus aspiration or catheter directed thrombolysis were performed in two. Regarding the outcomes, five of the patients died. The total renal function was preserved in 17 cases and renal impairment with or without hemodialysis was recorded in 5 patients, two of them having lost their kidney allografts.
LIMITATIONS
The majority of included studies are of moderate quality. The results and the conclusions are based on case-reports only and crucial data are dissimilarly presented or missing through the relevant publications.
CONCLUSIONS
Thromboprophylaxis may not offer adequate protection against SARS-Cov-2 induced thrombosis. Most patients could be effectively treated with conservative measures, while in more severe cases aggressive treatment could be recommended.
IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS
Therapeutic doses of LMWH could be considered for protection against RI in SARS-Cov-2 cases. Interventional treatment could be offered in a minority of more severe cases after carful balancing the risks and benefits.
Topics: Humans; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Anticoagulants; Heparin; Renal Artery; Venous Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Infarction
PubMed: 37791549
DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2023.11625 -
Infection Oct 2023Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for the diagnosis or management of the complications of urogenital schistosomiasis (UGS). This systematic review of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for the diagnosis or management of the complications of urogenital schistosomiasis (UGS). This systematic review of the literature aims to investigate the state of the art in reference to diagnostic approaches and the clinical management of this condition.
METHODS
A systematic review of literature published between January 1990 and January 2021 was conducted in the MEDLINE database, scoping for articles regarding diagnostic means or therapeutic options for the complications of UGS, namely obstructive uropathy, bladder cancer, abortion, ectopic pregnancy, infertility, kidney failure, urolithiasis and the need for invasive procedures. Relevant data were then extracted from the articles deemed eligible according to the inclusion criteria.
MAIN RESULTS
In total, 3052 articles were identified by the research query, of which 167 articles fulfilling inclusion criteria after title/abstract screening and full-text evaluation were included, 35% on both diagnostic and therapeutic aspects, and 51% on diagnosis and 14% on therapy. Ultrasound was the most frequently tool employed for the diagnosis of UGS complications showing a good performance. Concerning the management of hydronephrosis, the majority of available evidences came from community-based studies where universal treatment with praziquantel was used leading to decrease of prevalence of obstructive uropathy. Concerning studies on surgical procedures, laser endoureterotomy followed by stenting was mostly employed in adult patients leading to a crude cure rate of 60% (43 of 71 patients). In the case of severe hydronephrosis, surgery consisting of ureteral re-implantation showed excellent results with a crude cure rate of 98% (157 cured patients of 160 treated). Concerning bladder cancer, data on 93 patients with a clear diagnosis of UGS-related bladder were available reporting a variable and sometime combined approach based on disease stage. Available data on diagnosis and management of abortion, ectopic pregnancy, infertility, kidney failure, urolithiasis and the need for invasive procedures due to UGS are also presented.
CONCLUSIONS
The review produced a complete picture of the diagnostic and therapeutic options currently available for complicated UGS. These results can be useful both for guiding clinicians towards correct management and for tracing the direction of future research.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Adult; Humans; Schistosomiasis haematobia; Hydronephrosis; Infertility; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Renal Insufficiency; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Urolithiasis
PubMed: 37466786
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-023-02060-5