-
Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal Jun 2024To analyze the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of unexplained conductive hearing loss (UCHL) with intact tympanic membrane. A systematic review was conducted based... (Review)
Review
To analyze the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of unexplained conductive hearing loss (UCHL) with intact tympanic membrane. A systematic review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 642 articles were retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Fifty-four research articles and 21 case reports were screened out according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis of the etiology of UCHL. Seven research articles with UCHL who underwent exploratory tympanotomy were selected for data extraction and analysis of clinical characteristics. UCHL is a common manifestation of various diseases, including congenital ossicular anomalies (COA), otosclerosis (OTS), congenital middle ear cholesteatoma (CMEC), oval window atresia, superior semicircular-canal dehiscence, congenital stapedial footplate fixation, middle ear osteoma or adenoma, congenital ossification of stapedial tendon, and so on. A total of 522 patients were included in the 7 articles; among whom OTS showed a tendency to increase with age. The main symptoms were hearing loss, followed by tinnitus, dizziness, ear fullness, ear pain, facial paralysis. A total of 87.5% to 93.0% patients with COA manifested as nonprogressive deafness that occurred since childhood, with tinnitus incidence of 15.6% to 30.2%, and 86.4% to 96.4% patients with OTS presented with progressive hearing loss, with tinnitus incidence of 60.1% to 90.9%. The diagnosis positive rate of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was 33.8% to 87.1%, and CMEC was higher than that of COA (83.3%-100% vs 28.6%-64%). All the articles reported good hearing recovery. The most common surgical complications included taste abnormalities, tinnitus, and dizziness. UCHL presents with similar clinical manifestations and poses challenges in preoperative diagnosis. Exploratory tympanotomy is the primary method for diagnosis and treatment, with good prognosis after removing the lesion and reconstructing hearing during the operation. Children can also safely undergo the surgery.
PubMed: 38895947
DOI: 10.1177/01455613241262129 -
Pain Physician Nov 2023Many patients suffer from abdominal and thoracic pain syndromes secondary to numerous underlying etiologies. Chronic abdominal and thoracic pain can be difficult to...
BACKGROUND
Many patients suffer from abdominal and thoracic pain syndromes secondary to numerous underlying etiologies. Chronic abdominal and thoracic pain can be difficult to treat and often refractory to conservative management. In this systematic literature review, we evaluate the current literature to assess radiofrequency ablation's (RFA) efficacy for treating these debilitating chronic pain conditions in the thoracic and abdominal regions.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study is to determine the pain relief efficacy of RFA on chronic thoracic and chronic abdominal disease states.
STUDY DESIGN
This study is a systematic literature review that uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) method to gather academic literature articles through a methodical approach. The numbers obtained from each academic manuscript were then used to calculate the percent efficacy of radiofrequency ablation on thoracic and abdominal pain relief.
METHODS
Articles from 1992 through 2022 were gathered using PRISMA guidelines. The search terms "Radiofrequency Ablation Thoracic Pain" and "Radiofrequency Ablation Abdominal Pain" were used to identify articles to include in our study. Our search yielded a total of 575 studies, 32 of which were included in our study. The articles were then categorized into pain causes. The efficacy of RFA for each qualitative study was then quantified. Risk of bias was also assessed for articles using the Cochran Risk of Bias tool, as well as a tool made by the National Institutes of Health.
RESULTS
The PRISMA search yielded a total of 32 articles used for our study, including 16 observational studies, one cohort study, 6 case reports, 6 case series, and 3 clinical trials. Twenty-five articles were labeled good quality and one article was labeled fair quality according to the risk of bias assessment tools. The studies examined RFA efficacy on chronic abdominal and chronic pain syndromes such as spinal lesions, postsurgical thoracic pain, abdominal cancers, and pancreatitis. Among these etiologies, RFA demonstrated notable efficacy in alleviating pain among patients with spinal osteoid osteomas or osteoblastomas, lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer. The modes of RFA used varied among the studies; they included monopolar RFA, bipolar RFA, pulsed RFA, and RFA at different temperatures. The average efficacy rate was 84% ranging from 55.8% - 100%. A total of 329 males and 291 females were included with ages ranging 4 to 90 years old.
LIMITATIONS
Limitations of this review include the RFA not being performed at the same nerve level to address the same pathology and the RFA not being performed for the same duration of time. Furthermore, the efficacy of RFA was evaluated via large case series and single cohort observational studies rather than control group observational studies and clinical trial studies.
CONCLUSION
A systematic review of the literature supports RFA as a viable option for managing abdominal and thoracic pain. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of the various RFA modalities to ensure RFA is the source of pain relief as a large body of the current literature focuses only on observational studies.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Child, Preschool; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chronic Pain; Cohort Studies; Pain Management; Radiofrequency Ablation; Abdominal Pain; Chest Pain; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37976476
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics Oct 2023The purpose of this study is to develop an accessible step-wise management algorithm for the management of pediatric spinal osteoid osteomas (OOs) based on a systematic... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to develop an accessible step-wise management algorithm for the management of pediatric spinal osteoid osteomas (OOs) based on a systematic review of the published literature regarding the diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes following surgical resection.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted on PubMed to locate English language studies reporting on the management of pediatric spinal OOs. Data extraction of clinical presentation, management strategies and imaging, and treatment outcomes were performed.
RESULTS
Ten studies reporting on 85 patients under the age of 18 years presenting with OOs were identified. Back pain was the most common presenting symptom, and scoliosis was described in 8 out of 10 studies, and radicular pain in 7 out of 10 studies. Diagnostic, intraoperative, and postoperative assessment included radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bone scans, and frozen section. Treatment options varied, including conservative management, open surgical resection with or without intraoperative imaging, and percutaneous image-guided treatment. All included studies described partial or complete resolution of pain in the immediate postoperative period.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed algorithm provides a suggested framework for management of pediatric spinal OOs based on the available evidence (levels of evidence: 3, 4). This review of the literature indicated that a step-wise approach should be utilized in the management of pediatric spinal OOs.
PubMed: 37799321
DOI: 10.1177/18632521231192477 -
European Journal of Radiology Sep 2023Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a novel noninvasive interventional technique for osteoid osteoma (OO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a novel noninvasive interventional technique for osteoid osteoma (OO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRgFUS in the treatment of OO through a systematic review and meta-analysis of pain scores and post-treatment adverse events before and after MRgFUS treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to screen the study literature based on inclusion and exclusion criteria to extract and analyze pre- and post-treatment pain score data, success rates (complete pain relief with no recurrence until the last follow-up), recurrence rates, secondary intervention rates, and complications to evaluate the efficacy and/or safety of MRgFUS for OO.
RESULTS
A total of 113 studies published between 2012 and 2022were collected, resulting in a total sample size of 353 patients. The majority of the studies were prospective and had a follow-up period of 4 weeks or more, and overall, the quality of evidence ranged from low to high. Pain scores at 1 week and 1 month after the merger were 0.62 (9.5% CI:0.28-0.96) and 0.37 (9.5% CI:0.07-0.68), respectively. The success rate of the combination was 92.8% (95% CI: 89.8%-95.7%), the incidence of minor complications (thermal injury at the ablation site) was 0.85%, and no major complications were recorded in any of the included literature.
CONCLUSION
MRgFUS is an effective procedure that is able to treat pain for patients with OO with satisfying efficacy and safety.
PROSPERO
No.CRD42023415573.
Topics: Humans; Osteoma, Osteoid; Prospective Studies; Pain; Bone Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37523874
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111006 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Aug 2023Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a common benign bone tumor. OO is observed most frequently in the long bones, especially in the tibia and femur. When occurring in the bones of...
INTRODUCTION
Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a common benign bone tumor. OO is observed most frequently in the long bones, especially in the tibia and femur. When occurring in the bones of the hand, OO can be a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of occurrence, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment options regarding OO in hand bones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature. All studies from the online databases PubMed and SpringerLink, which reported cases of osteoid osteomas in the bones of the hand, were included. By summarizing the literature, we evaluated the localization within the hand as well as diagnostic and therapeutic options.
RESULTS
We included 133 studies reporting 401 cases. OO was mostly common in the phalanges. The diagnosis was mostly made by CT (computed tomography) scan. Most of the OO were treated surgically by open curettage or en bloc resection.
CONCLUSIONS
Osteoid osteomas in the bones of the hand are rare and a delayed diagnosis is common. In cases of pain combined with particular symptoms such as nail hypertrophy and swelling OO should be considered. Of the most used imaging methods, CT scans have the highest sensitivity.
Topics: Humans; Osteoma, Osteoid; Hand; Pain; Finger Phalanges; Bone Neoplasms
PubMed: 36939892
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04839-5