-
Cancers Aug 2023The nectin family comprises four proteins, nectin-1 to -4, which act as cell adhesion molecules. Nectins have various regulatory functions in the immune system and can... (Review)
Review
The nectin family comprises four proteins, nectin-1 to -4, which act as cell adhesion molecules. Nectins have various regulatory functions in the immune system and can be upregulated or decreased in different tumors. The literature research was conducted manually by the authors using the PubMed database by searching articles published before 2023 with the combination of several nectin-related keywords. A total of 43 studies were included in the main section of the review. Nectins-1-3 have different expressions in tumors. Both the loss of expression and overexpression could be negative prognostic factors. Nectin-4 is the best characterized and the most consistently overexpressed in various tumors, which generally correlates with a worse prognosis. New treatments based on targeting nectin-4 are currently being developed. Enfortumab vedotin is a potent antibody-drug conjugate approved for use in therapy against urothelial carcinoma. Few reports focus on hepatocellular carcinoma, which leaves room for further studies comparing the utility of nectins with commonly used markers.
PubMed: 37568798
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153983 -
The Oncologist Oct 2023HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may be associated with resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) may be associated with resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR therapies. Given the lack of comprehensive investigations into this association, we assessed the prognostic or predictive effect of HER2 amplification/overexpression on anti-EGFR treatment outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2001-2021) identified studies evaluating progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive vs. HER2-negative patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR treatments and whose HER2 status was known. Meta-analyses of proportions (ORR) and hazard ratios (PFS, OS) were performed using random-effect models with pre-specified sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS
Five high-quality retrospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analyses representing 594 patients with mCRC. All patients received anti-EGFR treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis of PFS demonstrated a 2.84-fold higher risk of death or progression (95% CI, 1.44-5.60) in patients with HER2-positive (vs. HER2-negative) RAS WT mCRC treated with anti-EGFR regimens. The odds of response to anti-EGFR treatment were 2-fold higher in HER2-negative vs. HER2-positive (odds ratio, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.10-3.48]). Differences in OS were not statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case estimates.
CONCLUSIONS
While this study could not account for all confounding factors, in patients with RAS WT mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy, HER2 overexpression/amplification was associated with worse PFS and ORR and may therefore predict poorer outcomes. HER2 testing is important to inform treatment decisions and could optimize outcomes for patients.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Colorectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; ErbB Receptors; Panitumumab; Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37463037
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad200 -
Pathology, Research and Practice Aug 2023Management of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) is still challenging. Despite the diagnostic ascertainment by bioptic examination, this method is poorly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Management of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) is still challenging. Despite the diagnostic ascertainment by bioptic examination, this method is poorly informative of the prognosis and subsequent malignant transformation. Prognosis is based on histological findings by grading of dysplasia. Immunohistochemical expression of p16 has been investigated in different studies, with controversial results. In this scenario, we systematically revised the current evidence about p16 immunohistochemical expression and the risk of malignization of OPMDs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
After a proper set of keywords combination, 5 databases were accessed and screened to select eligible studies. The protocol was previously registered on PROSPERO (Protocol ID: CRD42022355931). Data were obtained directly from the primary studies as a measure to determine the relationship between CDKN2A/P16 expression and the malignant transformation of OPMDs. Heterogeneity and publication bias were investigated by different tools, such as Cochran's Q test, Galbraith plot and Egger and Begg Mazumdar's rank tests.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis revealed a twofold increased risk to malignant development (RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.36-2.96 - I = 0%). Subgroup analysis did not highlight any relevant heterogeneity. Galbraith plot showed that no individual study could be considered as an important outlier.
CONCLUSION
Pooled analysis showed that p16 assessment may arise adjunct tool to dysplasia grading, leading to an optimized determination of the potential progression to cancer of OPMDs. The p16 overexpression analysis by immunohistochemistry techniques has a multitude of virtues that may facilitate its incorporation in the day-to-day prognostic study of OPMDs.
Topics: Humans; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16; Biomarkers, Tumor; Prognosis; Precancerous Conditions; Mouth Neoplasms
PubMed: 37406376
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154656 -
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory... Sep 2023To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)...
PURPOSE.—
To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer. An Update Panel is aware that a new generation of antibody-drug conjugates targeting the HER2 protein is active against breast cancers that lack protein overexpression or gene amplification.
METHODS.—
The Update Panel conducted a systematic literature review to identify signals for updating recommendations.
RESULTS.—
The search identified 173 abstracts. Of 5 potential publications reviewed, none constituted a signal for revising existing recommendations.
RECOMMENDATIONS.—
The 2018 ASCO-CAP recommendations for HER2 testing are affirmed.
DISCUSSION.—
HER2 testing guidelines have focused on identifying HER2 protein overexpression or gene amplification in breast cancer to identify patients for therapies that disrupt HER2 signaling. This update acknowledges a new indication for trastuzumab deruxtecan when HER2 is not overexpressed or amplified but is immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ without amplification by in situ hybridization. Clinical trial data on tumors that tested IHC 0 are limited (excluded from DESTINY-Breast04), and evidence is lacking that these cancers behave differently or do not respond similarly to newer HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. Although current data do not support a new IHC 0 versus 1+ prognostic or predictive threshold for response to trastuzumab deruxtecan, this threshold is now relevant because of the trial entry criteria that supported its new regulatory approval. Therefore, although it is premature to create new result categories of HER2 expression (eg, HER2-Low, HER2-Ultra-Low), best practices to distinguish IHC 0 from 1+ are now clinically relevant. This update affirms prior HER2 reporting recommendations and offers a new HER2 testing reporting comment to highlight the current relevance of IHC 0 versus 1+ results and best practice recommendations to distinguish these often subtle differences. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; Receptor, ErbB-2; In Situ Hybridization; Biomarkers, Tumor
PubMed: 37303228
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0950-SA -
Annals of Medicine Dec 2023We performed an umbrella meta-analysis to explore the factors that influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We performed an umbrella meta-analysis to explore the factors that influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We systematically searched three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) up to 20 February 2023. Extracting the effect size and 95% confidence intervals for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and the objective response rate (ORR).
RESULTS
A total of 65 articles were included. We identified the following factors that benefit ICI therapy: smoking status (PFS: 0.72 [0.62, 0.84], < .001), chemotherapy (PFS: 0.68 [0.58, 0.79], < .001), expression of programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) (≥1%, ≥5%, or ≥10%) (≥1%: 0.76 [0.71,0.82], < .001; ≥5%: 0.62 [0.52, 0.74], < .001; ≥10%: 0.42 [0.30, 0.59], < .001). We also identified three adverse factors: epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (OS: 1.57 [1.06, 2.32], = .02), with liver metastases (OS: 1.16 [1.02,1.32], = .02) and antibiotics (OS: 3.13 [1.25,7.84], < .001; PFS: 2.54 [1.38, 4.68], = .003).
CONCLUSION
The results of this umbrella meta-analysis first supported pre-existing understandings of the relationship between beneficial and adverse factors with the efficacy of ICI therapy. In addition, the overexpression of PD-L1 may adversely affect patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; B7-H1 Antigen; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37212453
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2215543 -
Revista Espanola de Enfermedades... Mar 2024colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common carcinoma worldwide, but a lack of effective prognostic markers limits clinical diagnosis and treatment. Yes-associated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common carcinoma worldwide, but a lack of effective prognostic markers limits clinical diagnosis and treatment. Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) is an effector of the HIPPO-pathway, which plays a critical role in cancer development and prognosis, including CRC. However, previous reports have suggested that it plays a dual role in CRC.
METHODS
a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 14.0 was performed to evaluate the relationship between YAP1 and clinical outcomes of CRC, after searching for eligible studies in the PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases. Online datasets GEPIA and LOGpc were also used to calculate survival results and for comparison with the meta-analysis results. Besides, "DESeq" packages were used for the expression analysis of YAP1 from the TCGA dataset.
RESULTS
YAP1 was overexpressed in the cancer tissues when compared to normal tissues in patients with CRC from the TCGA database (p = 0.000164) and GEPIA database. A total of 10 studies involving 2305 patients from the literature were selected. Pooled HR indicated that overexpression of YAP1 was associated with poor clinical outcomes (HR = 1.70, 95 % CI: 1.28-2.26, p = 0.0003). Subgroup analysis showed a clear correlation between overexpression of YAP1 and worse survival rate in Chinese patients (HR = 1.94, 95 % CI: 1.40-2.69, p = 0.0001), nuclear YAP1 overexpression (HR = 2.07, 95 % CI: 1.29-3.31, p = 0.003), 60 months of follow-up (HR = 1.89, 95 % CI: 1.30-2.73, p = 0.0008), IHC test (HR = 1.65, 95 % CI: 1.17-2.33, p = 0.005), IHC combined with other tests (HR = 1.77, 95 % CI: 1.13-2.77, p = 0.01) and multivariate analysis (HR = 1.70, 95 % CI: 1.24-2.31, p = 0.0009). Nevertheless, disease-free survival (DFS) showed no significant results in the patients with CRC in our meta-analysis (HR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 0.51-3.75, p = 0.52) as well as in the GEPIA and LOGpc databases. Meanwhile, YAP1 overexpression was also significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) in GSE17536, GSE40967, GSE29623 and GSE71187.
CONCLUSION
YAP1 overexpression is common in CRC tissues. Overexpression of YAP1 in CRC patients, particularly in the nucleus, might be related to shorter OS, maybe in the early stages. YAP1 could serve as a potential predictor of poor prognosis in CRC.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; YAP-Signaling Proteins; Carcinoma; Databases, Factual; Colorectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 36177818
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8472/2021