-
World Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2023Although adhesive strapping (AS) for pediatric umbilical hernia (UH), which was once obsolete, has been reconsidered as a common practice in Japan, its efficacy is still...
BACKGROUND
Although adhesive strapping (AS) for pediatric umbilical hernia (UH), which was once obsolete, has been reconsidered as a common practice in Japan, its efficacy is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy by reviewing related articles.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi via Ichushi-Web was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Cohort studies reporting on the UH closure rate after AS compared with observation-only management were included.
RESULTS
A total of 10 cohort studies were included, and the overall UH closure rate was not statistically significant (p=0.31, risk ratio (RR)=0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.28). However, there were significant differences in the UH closure rate at the age of 6 months (p<0.01, RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.75) and the efficacy of preventing protruding umbilici with redundant skin (p=0.049, RR=0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the efficacy of AS on UH compared with observation-only management did not differ in terms of the UH closure rate, the application of AS may be effective for faster UH closure and the prevention of protruding umbilici. However, due to the high heterogeneity of the study, further large-scale studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, are warranted to reach a conclusion.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022314417.
PubMed: 37860276
DOI: 10.1136/wjps-2023-000633 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Jan 2024Coral reef aorta (CRA) is defined by the presence of heavily calcified exophytic plaques that protrude into the aortic lumen. However, the exact causes and development... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Coral reef aorta (CRA) is defined by the presence of heavily calcified exophytic plaques that protrude into the aortic lumen. However, the exact causes and development of this condition are still not fully understood. When the aortic branches are affected, it can result in various symptoms. Despite ongoing research, there is currently no established consensus on the best treatment for CRA. This review aims to examine the latest findings regarding the clinical presentation and approach to treating patients with CRA.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic electronic search of the literature using the PubMed and Embase databases. Throughout the search, we adhered to the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA framework. From the identified publications, we extracted information pertaining to patients' characteristics, symptoms, and types of treatment from a total of 124 cases reported over the past 20 years. The primary focus of our analysis was to assess the improvement of signs and symptoms, as well as to evaluate any postoperative complications. To achieve this, we performed both descriptive and inferential analyses on the collected data. Additionally, we conducted subgroup analyses based on treatment types and symptoms observed at presentation, presenting the findings in the form of odds ratios (ORs).
RESULTS
After removing duplicate articles, we carefully screened the titles of 67 retrieved articles and excluded those that did not align with the purpose of our study. Subsequently, we thoroughly analyzed the remaining 41 articles along with their references, ultimately including 29 studies that were deemed most relevant for our systematic review. We examined a total of 124 cases of patients diagnosed with CRA, comprising 77 (62.1%) females and 48 (38.7%) males, with a mean age of 59 years (range: 37-84). The predominant signs and symptoms observed were intermittent claudication, reported in 57 (46.0%) patients, followed by refractory hypertension in 45 (36.3%) patients, intestinal angina in 28 (22.6%) patients, and renal insufficiency in 15 (12.1%) patients. Among the treated patients, 110 (88.7%) underwent open surgery repair (OSR), 11 (8.9%) received endovascular treatment, and 3 (2.4%) underwent laparoscopy. Postoperatively, a significant number of patients experienced substantial relief or complete resolution of their symptoms, as well as improved control of hypertension and renal function. In the group of patients treated with OSR, the inhospital stay mortality rate was 10.9%, the morbidity rate was 28.2%, and the reintervention rate was 15.5%. The high mortality rate during hospital stays in this group may be associated with such invasive procedures performed on patients who have substantial cardiovascular burden and multiple comorbidities. Conversely, no postoperative complications were reported in the group of patients treated with endovascular procedures or laparoscopic surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
While coral reef aorta (CRA) is considered a rare condition, it is crucial for the medical community to remain vigilant about its diagnosis, particularly in patients presenting with symptoms such as intermittent claudication, refractory hypertension, renal impairment, or intestinal angina. Based on the findings of this review, both OSR and endovascular treatment have shown promise as viable therapeutic options. Although endovascular therapies may not always be feasible or may have reduced durability in these calcified bulky lesions, they should be considered in patients with multiple comorbidities, due to the high postoperative mortality rates associated with more invasive approaches. Additionally, these endoluminal procedures have demonstrated good patency rates during the 18-month follow-up period. It is essential to emphasize that the treatment strategy should be determined on a case-by-case basis, involving a multidisciplinary team to tailor it to the specific needs of each individual patient.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Intermittent Claudication; Coral Reefs; Treatment Outcome; Aorta; Postoperative Complications; Ischemia; Renal Insufficiency; Hypertension
PubMed: 37454898
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.07.087 -
Journal of Gambling Studies Dec 2023Problem gambling not only impacts gamblers but also protrudes onto several affected others who experience adverse impacts, including financial, health, relationships,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Problem gambling not only impacts gamblers but also protrudes onto several affected others who experience adverse impacts, including financial, health, relationships, and psychological problems. The aims of this systematic review were twofold; to identify the psychosocial interventions to minimise the harm caused to affected others of problem gambling and to assess their efficacy. This study was conducted as outlined in the research protocol PROSPERO (CRD42021239138). Database searches were conducted in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Social Science Database, CINHAL Complete, Academic Search Ultimate and PsycINFO. Randomised controlled trials of psychosocial interventions that aimed to minimise the harm caused to affected others of problem gambling written in English were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool. The identified interventions focused on two approaches to supporting affected others: interventions involving both the problem gambler and affected others, and interventions involving affected others only. As the interventions and outcome measures used were sufficiently similar, a meta-analysis was conducted. The quantitative synthesis revealed that generally, treatment groups were unable to show greater benefits over control groups. The goal for future interventions aimed at affected others of problem gambling should focus primarily on the wellbeing of affected others. The standardisation of outcome measures and data collection time points for better comparison of future research is needed.
Topics: Humans; Gambling; Psychosocial Intervention
PubMed: 37294395
DOI: 10.1007/s10899-023-10220-3