-
Revista Peruana de Medicina... May 2024Motivation for the study. Treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer were evaluated, focusing on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) compared... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE.
Motivation for the study. Treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer were evaluated, focusing on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) compared to other anti-HER2 therapies. Main findings. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and PyroCap emerged as promising alternatives, showing substantial improvements in progression-free survival for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. T-DM1 showed superior efficacy to the other treatments. Implications. Our findings could inform healthcare decision-making processes to optimize strategies for HER2-positive breast cancer, and potentially improve health outcomes and quality of life. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) versus other anti-HER2 therapies in HER2+ breast cancer (BC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS.
We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our study focused on patients undergoing treatment for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC), which included regimens involving trastuzumab and taxanes. Additionally, we considered cases within the first 6 months of treatment for HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC).
RESULTS.
A total of 23 RCTs and 41 reports were included in our analysis. LABC and mBC showed no statistically significant difference in any of the comparisons of T-DM1 versus the other anti-HER2+ therapies. When assessing progression-free survival (PFS), trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and PyroCap demonstrated greater efficacy compared to other treatments (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.75-4.63 and HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.35-2.44; respectively), while T-DM1 alone exhibited superior effectiveness compared to LapCap (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.55-0.77), TrasCap (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.91), LapCapCitu (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.33-1.10), Nera (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.39-0.77), and Cap (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.28-0.49).
CONCLUSIONS.
NMA allows a ranking based on the comparative efficacy and safety among the interventions available. Although superior to other schemes, T-DM1 showed a lower efficacy performance in PFS and overall response rate and a trend towards worse overall survival than T-DXd.
Topics: Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Female; Receptor, ErbB-2; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Trastuzumab; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Neoplasm Metastasis; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Maytansine
PubMed: 38808848
DOI: 10.17843/rpmesp.2024.411.13351 -
Oncology Letters Jul 2024The present study compared the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus programmed death-1 inhibitors (R-P) with regorafenib monotherapy as second-line therapies for...
Regorafenib plus programmed death‑1 inhibitors vs. regorafenib monotherapy in second‑line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
The present study compared the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus programmed death-1 inhibitors (R-P) with regorafenib monotherapy as second-line therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A systematic search of relevant literature published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases until October 2023 was conducted. Two authors independently performed data extraction and screening using standardized protocols. Stata/MP 17.0 was used for the meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of R-P treatment on major outcome indicators, including overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse reactions, in patients with advanced HCC. The results indicated that five cohort studies involving 444 patients with advanced HCC were included. The results revealed that R-P treatment improved overall survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.77; I=0.0%; P=0.663] and PFS (HR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.41-0.63; I=17.5%; P=0.303). Additionally, it increased the objective response rate (risk ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.49-3.64; I=0.0%; P=0.994) and disease control rate (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.20-1.63; I=0.0%; P=0.892) compared with those of regorafenib. However, R-P treatment was associated with an increased incidence of adverse events, such as hypothyroidism, thrombocytopenia and rash, compared with that in regorafenib. In conclusion, R-P is superior to regorafenib monotherapy in terms of survival benefits and tumor response.
PubMed: 38807680
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14451 -
Yonsei Medical Journal Jun 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) compared to that of conventional radiotherapy in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) compared to that of conventional radiotherapy in patients with various types of solid tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We systematically searched eight electronic databases from inception until August 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The comparative effectiveness of the different treatment options was assessed by a random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
This review included 34 comparative studies and three treatment groups. Overall, the meta-analysis indicated comparable local control rates between the CIRT and control groups [pooled risk ratio (RR)=1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.15]. The local control rate in the CIRT group was higher than that in the photon therapy group, but slightly lower than that in the proton radiation therpy (PRT) group. Additionally, the CIRT group had significantly higher overall survival (OS) (RR=1.19, 95% CI=1.01-1.42) and progression-free survival (PFS) (RR=1.50, 95% CI=1.01-2.21) rates compared to the control group. In the subgroup analysis, survival rates were similar between the CIRT and PRT groups.
CONCLUSION
CIRT was associated with improved toxicity, local tumor control, OS, and PFS compared to conventional treatments. Therefore, CIRT was found to be a safe and effective option for achieving local control in patients with solid tumors.
Topics: Humans; Heavy Ion Radiotherapy; Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38804027
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0439 -
Laryngoscope Investigative... Jun 2024EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is used to treat recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC). This meta-analysis aims to study the efficacy and safety... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is used to treat recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC). This meta-analysis aims to study the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKI in treating patients with rmNPC.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to November 2023, and included literature that met the criteria. We extracted objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and adverse reaction-related events and performed meta-analysis using Stata 14.0.
RESULTS
A total of nine articles were included. The summary results showed that the ORR for patients treated with EGFR-TKI for rmNPC was 38% (95% CI = 27%-49%), the DCR was 71% (95% CI = 61%-80%), the mPFS was 6.29 months (95% CI = 5.22-7.35), and the mOS was 15.94 months (95% CI = 14.68-17.20). The most common grade 3-4 adverse reaction events in these patients were mucositis, nasopharyngeal necrosis, and oral ulceration. We found an incidence rate of 49% (95% CI = 38%-61%) for grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs). The anti-PD1 combined with TKI treatment method is more effective than the EGFR-TKI alone for treating rmNPC.
CONCLUSION
The study shows that EGFR-TKI has good efficacy in treating rmNPC but does not translate into survival benefits and owns a high incidence of grade 3-4 AEs. More RCT trials are needed in the future to verify the efficacy of anti-PD1 combined with TKI treatment method.
PubMed: 38803463
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1279 -
Oncology Letters Jul 2024A meta-analysis of the clinical survival indicators, adverse reactions and safety of lenvatinib combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in treating liver...
A meta-analysis of the clinical survival indicators, adverse reactions and safety of lenvatinib combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in treating liver cancer was conducted, providing objective and effective evidence for clinical use. The present study is anticipated to guide the clinical application of lenvatinib. In the current meta-analysis, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to September 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and single-arm trial studies related to the combined treatment of lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-ligand 1 (L1) inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were included, while published and unpublished literature on other study types, literature with incomplete or inadequate information, animal experiments, literature reviews and systematic studies were excluded. Data were processed using STATA 15.1. The pooled results showed that the objective response rate [ORR; odds ratio (OR), 3.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.13-5.30; P<0.001], disease control rate (DCR; OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.03-2.57; P=0.038) and partial response (PR; OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.17-6.70; P<0.001) of combined lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy were significantly higher than those of lenvatinib monotherapy. Additionally, subgroup analysis results showed that the DCR of combination therapy using lenvatinib and nivolumab was significantly higher than that of lenvatinib monotherapy (OR, 2.20; 95% CI; 1.07-4.51; P=0.032). The difference between combination therapy using lenvatinib and camrelizumab, and lenvatinib monotherapy was not significant. However, the complete response, stable disease, progression disease and incidence rate of adverse events between combination therapy and lenvatinib monotherapy were not significantly different. Compared with lenvatinib alone, lenvatinib combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improved ORR, mainly PR, and DCR in patients with HCC. At present, lenvatinib is mainly combined with nivolumab to increase the DCR of lenvatinib monotherapy for HCC. In addition, the incidence rate of adverse reactions between combination therapy and lenvatinib monotherapy was not significantly different for HCC.
PubMed: 38803443
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14445 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine May 2024Arterial hypertension is regarded as a possible biomarker of treatment efficacy in colorectal cancer. Also, extended anti-angiogenic use in the metastatic treatment of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Arterial hypertension is regarded as a possible biomarker of treatment efficacy in colorectal cancer. Also, extended anti-angiogenic use in the metastatic treatment of the colorectal neoplasm may result in elevated blood pressure. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients with concomitant hypertension (HTN).
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search on Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from inception until October 2023 for articles that addressed the relationship between HTN and progressive free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR) for the first and second line of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
RESULTS
Eligibility criteria were met by 16 articles out of 802 screened studies. Pooled analysis showed that HTN was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.507, 95% CI: 0.460-0.558, ≤ 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.677, 95% CI: 0.592-0.774, ≤ 0.001) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, the pooled RR of HTN for the ORR (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.108-1.495, = 0.001) suggests that HTN could be a predictive factor of ORR in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
Elevated blood pressure is associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
PubMed: 38793102
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050520 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Apr 2024The impact of positive peritoneal cytology has been a matter of controversy in early-stage endometrial cancer for several years. The latest staging systems do not take... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The impact of positive peritoneal cytology has been a matter of controversy in early-stage endometrial cancer for several years. The latest staging systems do not take into consideration its presence; however, emerging evidence about its potential harmful effect on patient survival outcomes suggests otherwise. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to accumulate current evidence. Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Google Scholar and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for relevant articles. Effect sizes were calculated in Rstudio using the meta function. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the possibility of small-study effects and p-hacking. Trial sequential analysis was used to evaluate the adequacy of the sample size. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Fifteen articles were finally included in the present systematic review that involved 19,255 women with early-stage endometrial cancer. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale indicated that the majority of included studies had a moderate risk of bias in their selection of participants, a moderate risk of bias in terms of the comparability of groups (positive peritoneal cytology vs. negative peritoneal cytology) and a low risk of bias concerning the assessment of the outcome. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that women with early-stage endometrial cancer and positive peritoneal cytology had significantly lower 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazards ratio (HR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.09, 0.71). As a result of the decreased recurrence-free survival, patients with positive peritoneal cytology also exhibited reduced 5-year overall survival outcomes (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27, 0.92). The overall survival of the included patients was considerably higher among those that did not have positive peritoneal cytology (HR 12.76, 95% CI 2.78, 58.51). Positive peritoneal cytology seems to be a negative prognostic indicator of survival outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer. Considering the absence of data related to the molecular profile of patients, further research is needed to evaluate if this factor should be reinstituted in future staging systems.
Topics: Humans; Female; Endometrial Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Neoplasm Staging; Peritoneum; Cytodiagnosis; Cytology
PubMed: 38792916
DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050733 -
Biomedicines May 2024This systematic review evaluates the clinical outcomes and molecular predictors of response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer. We... (Review)
Review
Clinical Outcomes and Molecular Predictors of Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) as a PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Advanced and Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
This systematic review evaluates the clinical outcomes and molecular predictors of response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer. We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, conducting a database search in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The eligibility criteria centered on clinical outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and immune-related biomarkers post-pembrolizumab therapy. We included both prospective and retrospective studies that detailed clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics predictive of therapeutic response. Our search yielded six studies involving 846 patients treated with pembrolizumab from 2017 to 2022. The meta-analysis of these studies showed that pembrolizumab, used as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, extended the OS by a weighted median of 10.35 months and the PFS by 8.50 months. The treatment demonstrated a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 22.39%, although the I test result of 67.49% showed a high heterogeneity among the studies. Notably, patients with high PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 10) experienced improved outcomes in terms of the PFS and OS. The most common complications were fatigue, diarrhea, and immune-related adverse events. Pembrolizumab significantly enhances clinical outcomes in metastatic cervical cancer, particularly among patients with high PD-L1 expression. The drug maintains a good safety profile, reinforcing its treatment potential for patients with advanced and metastatic cervical cancer. Future studies should explore long-term effects and strategies to integrate pembrolizumab optimally into current treatment regimens, aiming to maximize patient benefits and effectively manage side effects.
PubMed: 38791070
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051109 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology May 2024Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are generally derived from the craniopharyngeal duct epithelium, accounting for 38% and 24.5% of mortality in pediatric and adult patients,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach improves endocrine function and surgical outcome in primary craniopharyngioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are generally derived from the craniopharyngeal duct epithelium, accounting for 38% and 24.5% of mortality in pediatric and adult patients, respectively. At present, the widespread application of the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EEA) has led to controversy between the traditional microscopic transcranial approach (TCA) and EEA in relation to the surgical management of CPs.
OBJECT AND METHOD
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the complications, surgical outcomes, and endocrine functions of patients with CPs to provide evidence-based decision-making in their surgical management.
RESULT
Overall, 11 observational studies with 12,212 participants were included in the meta-analysis, in which five of them only included an adult population, three of them only included a child population, and the other three studies included a mixed population (adult and child). In pediatric patients, the EEA achieved a higher gross total resection (GTR) rate (odds ratio (OR) = 5.25, 95%CI: 1.21-22.74), lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.31-0.94, p = 0.030), and less hypopituitarism (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.12-0.97, p = 0.043). In adult patients, EEA significantly improved mortality (OR = 0.09, 95%CI: 0.06-0.15, p < 0.001) and visual outcomes (visual improvement: OR = 3.42, 95%CI: 1.24-9.40, p = 0.017; visual deficit: OR = 0.30, 95%CI: 0.26-0.35) with decreases in postoperative stroke (OR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.51-0.66, p < 0.001), hydrocephalus, and infections (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.24-0.42, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Compared with the traditional TCA in primary CP resection, the development and wide application of EEA optimistically decreased the recurrence rate of CP, alleviated hypopituitarism with improvement in the GTR rate of pediatric patients, and significantly improved the visual outcomes, hydrocephalus, postoperative stroke, survival, and infection rates of the patients. Therefore, EEA is an optimal approach for primary CP resection.
Topics: Humans; Craniopharyngioma; Pituitary Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Endoscopy
PubMed: 38790064
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03411-8 -
Medicine May 2024Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that does not respond to first-line therapy poses a challenge to clinical management. The objective of this study was to compare the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that does not respond to first-line therapy poses a challenge to clinical management. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 in second-line and above treatment of AGC.
METHODS
Cochrane Library, Science Direct, EMBASE, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trial until August 2023. Only patients who met "Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment Guide for Gastric Cancer" were included in the study. The accurate data and distinguishing between follow-up time and drug dose were extracted to reduce heterogeneity and the risk of bias of the included trials was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook. Finally, the survival benefit of the treatment was evaluated based on clinical response rate, survival period, biochemical index, and adverse event occurrence in the trial.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 29 randomized controlled trials involving 2149 participants. Statistically significant increases in clinical effective rate (odds ratios = 2.61, 95% confidence interval [2.13-3.20], P < .00001) and disease control rate (odds ratios = 3.16, 95% confidence interval [2.54-3.94], P < .00001) were found when apatinib combined with S-1, and also had obvious advantages in reducing tumor markers and regulating immune factors. In addition, apatinib combined with S-1 significantly increased the risk of hypertension but reduced damage to liver function, while the improvement of other adverse events was not pronounced.
DISCUSSION
Apatinib combined with S-1 is more effective and safe for second-line and above treatment of AGC. This study minimized the conclusion bias caused by the basic data sources, but more high-quality studies are still needed to validate these conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Tegafur; Drug Combinations; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Antineoplastic Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38787998
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038272