-
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open 2024The decision to undertake a surgical intervention for an emergency general surgery (EGS) condition (appendicitis, diverticulitis, cholecystitis, hernia, peptic ulcer,...
BACKGROUND
The decision to undertake a surgical intervention for an emergency general surgery (EGS) condition (appendicitis, diverticulitis, cholecystitis, hernia, peptic ulcer, bowel obstruction, ischemic bowel) involves a complex consideration of factors, particularly in older adults. We hypothesized that identifying variability in the application of operative management could highlight a potential pathway to improve patient survival and outcomes.
METHODS
We included adults aged 65+ years with an EGS condition from the 2016-2017 National Inpatient Sample. Operative management was determined from procedure codes. Each patient was assigned a propensity score (PS) for the likelihood of undergoing an operation, modeled from patient and hospital factors: EGS diagnosis, age, gender, race, presence of shock, comorbidities, and hospital EGS volumes. Low and high probability for surgery was defined using a PS cut-off of 0.5. We identified two model-concordant groups (no surgery-low probability, surgery-high probability) and two model-discordant groups (no surgery-high probability, surgery-low probability). Logistic regression estimated the adjusted OR (AOR) of in-hospital mortality for each group.
RESULTS
Of 375 546 admissions, 21.2% underwent surgery. Model-discordant care occurred in 14.6%; 5.9% had no surgery despite a high PS and 8.7% received surgery with low PS. In the adjusted regression, model-discordant care was associated with significantly increased mortality: no surgery-high probability AOR 2.06 (1.86 to 2.27), surgery-low probability AOR 1.57 (1.49 to 1.65). Model-concordant care showed a protective effect against mortality (AOR 0.83, 0.74 to 0.92).
CONCLUSIONS
Nearly one in seven EGS patients received model-discordant care, which was associated with higher mortality. Our study suggests that streamlined treatment protocols can be applied in EGS patients as a means to save lives.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III.
PubMed: 38933602
DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001288 -
The Tohoku Journal of Experimental... Jun 2024
PubMed: 38925948
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.2024.J054 -
Journal of Medical Case Reports Jun 2024Acute hepatitis A infection is common among children in developing nations. The clinical presentation in children is usually asymptomatic and anicteric, and it is a...
BACKGROUND
Acute hepatitis A infection is common among children in developing nations. The clinical presentation in children is usually asymptomatic and anicteric, and it is a self-limiting infection. Rarely, it can be associated with extrahepatic complications such as pleural effusion, acalculous cholecystitis, and ascites.
CASE PRESENTATION
An 8-year-old middle eastern child presented with abdominal pain, jaundice in the sclera, yellowish color of urine, and poor appetite. In the last two days, abdominal distension developed. After conducting diagnostic investigations, the child was diagnosed with HAV hepatitis associated with bilateral pleural effusion, acalculous cholecystitis, and ascites. He was managed conservatively with vitamin K supplementation and supportive parenteral fluids. After 4 days, clinical improvement was observed.
CONCLUSION
Hepatitis A infections presented with extrahepatic manifestations like pleural effusion, acalculous cholecystitis, and ascites are very rare, especially in children. There have been some reports of these manifestations occurring in isolation, but for them to co-exist to our knowledge, this has only been reported in two cases in the literature, and this is the third case with all these three rare complications being presented simultaneously in a single child. Although HAV infection is an asymptomatic and self-limiting viral disease in childhood, it can manifest with rare extrahepatic complications, so pediatricians should be aware of this rare association to avoid unnecessary investigations.
Topics: Humans; Acalculous Cholecystitis; Hepatitis A; Ascites; Child; Pleural Effusion; Male; Vitamin K; Abdominal Pain
PubMed: 38918800
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04627-8 -
Cureus May 2024After encountering a unique patient case, we revisit the updated literature on stress ulcer prophylaxis with more updated studies. A 47-year-old male came to the...
After encountering a unique patient case, we revisit the updated literature on stress ulcer prophylaxis with more updated studies. A 47-year-old male came to the hospital and was found to have acute cholecystitis. After undergoing urgent cholecystectomy, the patient developed melena and a 6 mg/dL drop from 12.5 g/dL to 6.5 g/dL in hemoglobin. He was found to have a gastric ulcer and was started on a proton pump inhibitor, which posed the question of whether or not stress ulcer prophylaxis was indicated. Therefore, the pathophysiology of stress ulcer prophylaxis is refreshed, discussing the various mechanisms through which stress ulcers form in a clinical context. Then, the main risk factors and indications for stress ulcer prophylaxis are defined based on current literature, further investigating whether or not stress ulcer prophylaxis has shown benefit and protection in various patient groups. Additionally, this review discusses the adverse effects of stress ulcer prophylaxis, including dysbiosis, community-acquired pneumonia, nutritional deficiencies, drug interactions, and fractures. Finally, inappropriate stress ulcer prophylaxis and contributing factors to overutilization are discussed, and alternative approaches to prevent stress ulcer formation are covered, including early enteral nutrition. Overall, there are mixed conclusions on the effectiveness of stress ulcer prophylaxis in noncritical patients. There are many adverse effects and unnecessary costs associated with inappropriate administration, and many studies have found that it should be reserved for specific clinical indications.
PubMed: 38910681
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60811 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Jun 2024Emergencies and emergency surgeries are a central part of everyday surgical care in Germany. However, it is unclear how emergency surgery is practically trained in...
BACKGROUND
Emergencies and emergency surgeries are a central part of everyday surgical care in Germany. However, it is unclear how emergency surgery is practically trained in clinics on a daily basis and what training concept is underlying. Therefore, the aim of this survey study was to capture the status quo of emergency surgical training of German general and visceral surgeons.
METHODS
The members of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery were surveyed online (n = 5281). The questionnaire included demographic data and expertise in surgery and assistance in emergency surgery regarding common emergency surgical operations. In addition, further training measures in emergency surgery and their support by employers were queried.
RESULTS
Only complete questionnaires (n = 184, response rate 3.5%) were included in the analysis. Most participants were in training (n = 69; 38%), followed by senior physicians (n = 52; 29%), specialists (n = 31; 17%) and chief physicians (n = 30; 17%). 64% of the participants were employed at university hospitals or maximum care hospitals. Regarding further training opportunities, in-clinic shock room training was most frequently used. Outside of their own clinic, the ATLS course was most frequently mentioned. Operations for cholecystitis and appendicitis as well as emergency stoma procedures are the most common emergency procedures. There was a strong difference in the frequency of operated cases depending on the level of training. For operations to treat acute abdominal traumas (hemostasis of liver and spleen, packing) as well as outside of visceral surgery, only low competence was reported. Over 90% of survey participants consider emergency surgery to be an indispensable core competence. Neither in the old (76%) nor in the new training regulations (47%) is emergency surgery adequately represented according to the participants' assessment. There was a significantly lower prevalence of the "sub-steps concept" in emergency surgery at 38% compared to elective surgery (44%). Important elements of imparting skills in emergency surgery are simulation and courses as well as operative sub-steps, according to the majority of survey participants.
CONCLUSION
The results show that general and visceral surgeons in Germany are introduced to emergency surgery too little structured during further training and at specialist level. The survey participants had, as expected, hardly any experience in emergency surgery outside of visceral surgery but surprisingly also little experience in visceral surgical trauma care. There is a need to discuss the future organization of emergency surgical training. Adequate simulation structures and extracurricular courses could contribute to an improvement in this respect.
Topics: Humans; Germany; Surveys and Questionnaires; Female; Male; Clinical Competence; Adult; Emergencies; Middle Aged; General Surgery
PubMed: 38900254
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03360-6 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2024Gallstones are common in Western countries and increasing in developing countries through adoption of western lifestyle. Gallstones may cause life-threatening... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Gallstones are common in Western countries and increasing in developing countries through adoption of western lifestyle. Gallstones may cause life-threatening complications, including acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic gallstones. Presentation of symptomatic gallstones may be indistinguishable from that of other upper gastro-intestinal tract (UGI) pathologies. Some surgeons routinely perform preoperative UGI endoscopy to diagnose and treat concomitant UGI pathology. A prospective cross-sectional observational study was undertaken at University of Pretoria teaching hospitals to evaluate this practice. Patients aged 18 years and older, with symptomatic gallstones but did not satisfy Tokyo guidelines for acute cholecystitis were recruited. UGI endoscopy was performed before cholecystectomy. There were 124 patients, 110 (88.7%) females and 14 (11.3%) males, mean age 44.0 (13.2) (range: 22-78) years. Most common symptoms were right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain (87%), epigastric pain (59.7%), nausea (58.1%) and vomiting (47.9%). Clinically, 80% had RUQ tenderness and 52.4% epigastric tenderness. UGI endoscopy found 35.4% pathology, 28.2% were active, and comprised acute gastritis (27.4%), peptic ulcers (4.8%), duodenitis (3.2%) and oesophagitis (2.4%). Twelve patients had more than one pathology. This warranted treatment before elective cholecystectomy and justifies the practice of routine preoperative UGI endoscopy.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Gallstones; Cholecystectomy; Cross-Sectional Studies; Prospective Studies; Young Adult; Elective Surgical Procedures; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Preoperative Care
PubMed: 38890422
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64019-2 -
Cureus May 2024Hemorrhagic cholecystitis is an uncommon presentation of acute cholecystitis. Due to its etiology and unspecific clinical data, it is an entity that represents a...
Hemorrhagic cholecystitis is an uncommon presentation of acute cholecystitis. Due to its etiology and unspecific clinical data, it is an entity that represents a diagnostic challenge. We present a case of a 70-year-old male with diabetes type 2, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease with hemodialysis, who attended the emergency department with sudden-onset abdominal pain in the epigastrium. The patient presented no additional symptoms, a normal electrocardiogram, but due to the characteristics of the pain and elevated troponin I, emergency medicine specialists considered an acute coronary syndrome and initiated antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Due to persistent abdominal pain, a decrease in hemoglobin, and the onset of arterial hypotension, a computed tomography (CT) scan was performed, which revealed perforation of the gallbladder, apparent hemorrhagic cholecystitis, and hemoperitoneum. The patient underwent emergent surgery, where CT findings were confirmed. In our case, the suspicion of hemorrhagic cholecystitis arose until the clinical case was advanced, after receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, and it was confirmed during surgery and with histopathology. This concludes that hemorrhagic cholecystitis is a rare disease and difficult to diagnose. Therefore, studies should focus on clinical presentation and risk factors (e.g., trauma, malignancy, renal failure, cirrhosis, and anticoagulation therapy) to promote early diagnosis and avoid complications.
PubMed: 38883025
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60378 -
Cureus May 2024Gallbladder perforation is a rare complication of acute cholecystitis that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Many cases of gallbladder perforation...
Gallbladder perforation is a rare complication of acute cholecystitis that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Many cases of gallbladder perforation are not diagnosed until surgery, as the physical symptoms closely mimic acute cholecystitis. Gallbladder perforation is most common among older males with associated comorbidities, and preoperative assessment of comorbidities, particularly cardiac, is critical to determine the appropriate clinical course. We report a case of a 77-year-old male who presented initially with low blood pressure and right upper quadrant pain (RUQ) after not feeling well for five days. CT of the abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast demonstrated acute perforated cholecystitis, and general surgery was consulted for a cholecystectomy. Due to the patient's past medical history of severe aortic stenosis (AS), cholecystectomy was deferred and a cholecystostomy tube was placed by interventional radiology. This report aims to provide an example of a case of perforated cholecystitis with sepsis and how it can be diagnosed and managed non-surgically in the presence of pre-existing severe AS.
PubMed: 38882954
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60382 -
International Journal of Surgery Case... Jul 2024
PubMed: 38878732
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109900 -
Surgery Open Science Aug 2024Obesity is a known risk factor for cholecystitis and is associated with technical complications during laparoscopic procedures. The present study seeks to assess the...
BACKGROUND
Obesity is a known risk factor for cholecystitis and is associated with technical complications during laparoscopic procedures. The present study seeks to assess the association between obesity class and conversion to open (CTO) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
METHODS
Adult acute cholecystitis patients with obesity undergoing non-elective LC were identified in the 2017-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified by obesity class; class 1 (Body Mass Index [BMI] = 30.0-34.9), class 2 (BMI = 35.0-39.9), and class 3 (BMI ≥ 40.0). Multivariable regression models were developed to assess factors associated with CTO and its association with perioperative complications and resource utilization.
RESULTS
Of 89,476 patients undergoing LC, 40.6 % had BMI ≥ 40.0. Before adjustment, class 3 obesity was associated with increased rates of CTO compared to class 1-2 (4.6 vs 3.8 %; < 0.001). Following adjustment, class 3 remained associated with an increased likelihood of CTO (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.45, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 1.31-1.61; ref.: class 1-2). Patients undergoing CTO had increased risk of blood transfusion (AOR 3.27, 95 % CI 2.54-4.22) and respiratory complications (AOR 1.36, 95 % CI 1.01-1.85). Finally, CTO was associated with incremental increases in hospitalization costs (β + $719, 95 % CI 538-899) and length of stay (LOS; β +2.20 days, 95 % CI 2.05-2.34).
CONCLUSIONS
Class 3 obesity is a significant risk factor for CTO. Moreover, CTO is associated with increased hospitalization costs and LOS. As the prevalence of obesity grows, improved understanding of operative risk by approach is required to optimize clinical outcomes. Our findings are relevant to shared decision-making and informed consent.
PubMed: 38873329
DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.005