-
HeartRhythm Case Reports Mar 2024
PubMed: 38496741
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.12.009 -
BMC Geriatrics Mar 2024Fast-conducting atrial fibrillation misinterpreted as ventricular tachycardia is the leading cause for inappropriate shocks in patients with implantable cardiac...
BACKGROUND
Fast-conducting atrial fibrillation misinterpreted as ventricular tachycardia is the leading cause for inappropriate shocks in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD). These inappropriate shocks are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and cause great discomfort and stress.
CASE PRESENTATION
We report the case of a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy, permanent atrial fibrillation, and a single-chamber DF-1 ICD implanted for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, who presented for multiple inappropriate internal shocks due to very fast-conducting atrial fibrillation, which was mislabeled as ventricular fibrillation by the ICD. Since the patient was under maximal atrioventricular nodal blocking medical therapy (beta-blockers and digitalis) and we didn`t find any reversible causes for the heart rate acceleration, we opted for rate control with atrioventricular node ablation. To counteract the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in this patient who would become totally pacemaker-dependent, we successfully performed left bundle branch area pacing. Because the patient`s ICD had a DF-1 connection and the battery had a long life remaining, we connected the physiological pacing lead to the IS-1 sense-pace port of the ICD. The 6-month follow-up showed an improvement in left ventricular function with no more inappropriate shocks.
CONCLUSIONS
Left bundle branch area pacing and atrioventricular node ablation in patients with an implantable single-chamber DF-1 defibrillator and fast-conducting permanent atrial fibrillation is a cost-efficient and very effective method to prevent and treat inappropriate shocks, avoiding the use of an additional dual-chamber or CRT-D device.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Treatment Outcome; Heart Rate; Ventricular Function, Left; Defibrillators, Implantable; Cardiomyopathies
PubMed: 38475737
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04862-0 -
Cureus Jan 2024Left vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an advanced therapeutic option for refractory, drug-resistant epilepsy. A 45-year-old woman with a history of refractory catamenial...
Left vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an advanced therapeutic option for refractory, drug-resistant epilepsy. A 45-year-old woman with a history of refractory catamenial focal epilepsy since age 16, treated with a five-drug antiepileptic regimen and VNS (implanted eight and one-half years prior), presented with dyspnea, chest discomfort, and lightheadedness. During observation, symptoms recurred and were associated with bradycardia (<20 bpm) and a complete atrioventricular node (AVN) block. Following admission, she continued to experience recurrent symptomatic AVN block and transient ventricular asystole, temporally correlated with her baseline seizure activity and resultant activation of her VNS. Deactivation of VNS resolved her bradyarrhythmia, and she experienced no recurrence over 14 months of follow-up. This case highlights a therapeutic dilemma in cases of refractory epilepsy, with limited therapeutic options if seizure activity requires VNS to be controlled.
PubMed: 38435952
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53314 -
Heart Rhythm Feb 2024Bradyarrhythmias including sinus bradycardia and atrioventricular (AV) block are frequently encountered in endurance athletes especially at night. While these are well... (Review)
Review
Bradyarrhythmias including sinus bradycardia and atrioventricular (AV) block are frequently encountered in endurance athletes especially at night. While these are well tolerated by the young athlete, there is evidence that generally from the fifth decade of life onward, such arrhythmias can degenerate into pathological symptomatic bradycardia requiring pacemaker therapy. For many years, athletic bradycardia and AV block have been attributed to high vagal tone, but work from our group has questioned this widely held assumption and demonstrated a role for intrinsic electrophysiological remodeling of the sinus node and the AV node. In this article, we argue that bradyarrhythmias in the veteran athlete arise from the cumulative effects of exercise training, the circadian rhythm and aging on the electrical activity of the nodes. We consider contemporary strategies for the treatment of symptomatic bradyarrhythmias in athletes and highlight potential therapies resulting from our evolving mechanistic understanding of this phenomenon.
PubMed: 38428449
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.050 -
Herzschrittmachertherapie &... Mar 2024Direct current (DC) catheter ablation in 5 patients aiming to interrupt rapid atrioventricular (AV) conduction with atrial fibrillation and subsequent pacemaker... (Review)
Review
Direct current (DC) catheter ablation in 5 patients aiming to interrupt rapid atrioventricular (AV) conduction with atrial fibrillation and subsequent pacemaker implantation was first published by M. M. Scheinman et al. (San Francisco, CA, USA) in 1982. In Germany, L. Seipel, G. Breithardt, and M. Borggrefe reported their first experience with DC catheter ablation in 1984, followed by the group in Bonn (M. Manz and B. Lüderitz) in 1985. The first international DC catheter ablation registry, which also included four German centers, reported DC catheter ablation results of 127 patients in 24 centers in 1984. Complete AV block was achieved in 71% patients. In 1992, the Hannover group (H‑J. Trappe, H. Klein and J. Huang) reported results of DC catheter ablation of AV conduction performed between 1983 and 1990 in 100 patients (86% with rapid atrial fibrillation, 14% with AV-node reentry tachycardias). The first successful DC catheter ablation in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome was reported in 1985 by F. Morady et al. (San Francisco, CA, USA). In 1987, M. Borggrefe et al. were the first to report a switch from DC catheter ablation to a high-frequency (HF) catheter ablation procedure in a patient with WPW syndrome. The use of DC catheter ablation to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT) was described by G. O. Hartzler (Kansas City, MO, USA) in 3 patients in 1983. M. Borggrefe et al. (1989) reported on 24 patients who underwent DC catheter ablation for VT. Of those, 17 patients did not have VT recurrence within the following 14 months. In 1994, the Hannover group (H-J Trappe, H. Klein) published their 5‑year long-term results of DC catheter ablation of VT in 51 patients. VT recurrence occurred in 57% patients and overall mortality was also high (16%). A comparison of DC catheter ablation with HF catheter ablation for recurrent VT was reported in 1994 by G. Gonska et al. (Göttingen, Germany). After 2 years follow-up, success rates were not found to be significantly different.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Catheter Ablation; Catheters
PubMed: 38421400
DOI: 10.1007/s00399-024-01011-3