-
Translational Lung Cancer Research Jul 2023This review will provide an overview of and mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a focus on recent clinical approvals. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
This review will provide an overview of and mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a focus on recent clinical approvals.
METHODS
We obtained data from the literature in accordance with narrative review reporting guidelines.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS
mutations are present in up to 15-20% of all NSCLCs; amongst these, 10% correspond to kinase domain insertions in exon 20. Structurally similar, () mutations occurs in 1-4% of NSCLCs, mostly consisting of insertions or point mutations. The majority of exon 20 insertions occur within the loop following the regulatory C-helix and activate the kinase domain of EGFR without generating a therapeutic window to gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib or osimertinib. Mobocertinib represents a novel class of covalent EGFR inhibitors with a modest therapeutic window to these mutants and induces anti-tumor responses in a portion of patients [at 160 mg/day: response rate of <30% with duration of response (DoR) >17 months and progression-free survival (PFS) of >7 months] albeit with mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal toxicities. The bi-specific EGFR-MET antibody amivantamab-vmjw has modest but broad preclinical activity in EGFR-driven cancers and specifically for exon 20 insertion-mutated NSCLC has response rates <40% and PFS of <8.5 months at the cost of both infusion-related plus on-target toxicities. Both drugs were approved in 2021. The clinical development of kinase inhibitors for -mutated NSCLC has been thwarted by mucocutaneous/gastrointestinal toxicities that preclude a pathway for drug approval, as the case of poziotinib. However, the activation of ERBB2 has allowed for repurposing of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that target ERBB2 with cytotoxic payloads. The FDA approved fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki in 2022 for NSCLC based on response rate of >55%, DoR >9 months, PFS >8 months and manageable adverse events (including cytopenias, nausea and less commonly pneumonitis). Other therapies in clinical development include sunvozertinib and zipalertinib, among others. In addition, traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy has some activity in these tumors.
CONCLUSIONS
The approvals of mobocertinib, amivantamab, and trastuzumab deruxtecan represent the first examples of precision oncology for exon 20 insertion-mutated and -mutated NSCLCs.
PubMed: 37577308
DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-23-98 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023According to the 2023 guidelines for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line treatment and recently developed agents for the treatment of epidermal...
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
According to the 2023 guidelines for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line treatment and recently developed agents for the treatment of epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were compared in this meta-analysis. Treatment regimens involved in the included studies included first, second, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), TKIs plus chemotherapy, TKIs plus angiogenesis inhibitors, and platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Considering the varying efficacy and safety of drugs in people of different ethnic origins, the optimal regimen should be determined, and the safety of first-line treatments should be assessed in the Asian population specifically. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched to retrieve reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with research data published from inception to 1 February 2023. Adopting Asian patient populations as the target (including studies in which Asian patients accounted for more than 50% of the sample), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for comparison of treatment regimens and treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 19 RCTs involving 5,824 patients and covering 14 treatment regimens were included. The primary outcome measure examined in this study was progression-free survival (PFS); other outcome measures examined were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), occurrence of any adverse events (AE), occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or above (≥3AE), and occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE). In terms of PFS, all regimens including TKIs (as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies), as well as bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy (Ch) were found to be significantly superior to basic chemotherapy (HRs: 0.09-0.61, < 0.05 in all cases compared with Ch alone). The highest-ranking therapies were erlotinib (Erl) plus Bev (SUCRA: 0.94) and Erl plus ramucirumab (Ram) (SUCRA: 0.93). Regarding OS, no significant differences was observed between first-line treatment strategies; the top four treatments based on SUCRA, in rank order, were Bev + Ch (0.87), gefitinib (Gef) plus Ch (0.81), dacomitinib (Dac) (0.79), and osimertinib (Osi) (0.69). Additionally, there were no significant differences between first-line treatment strategies in terms of DCR. Regarding ORR, the top three treatments based on SUCRA were Erl + Bev (0.85), Erl + Ram (0.76), and Gef + Ch (0.74). No significant difference between first-line treatment strategies was observed in terms of the risk of AE. However, based on SUCRA, Erl ranked highest on avoidance of ≥ 3AE (0.97), and Osi ranked highest on avoidance of SAE (0.91). Based on these analyses of survival benefits, tumor burden response, and safety, furmonertinib (Fur), Osi, and aumolertinib (Aum) may represent the best treatment regimen options for Asian patients, significantly prolonging survival (as measured by median PFS/OS), eliciting a greater tumor burden response, and exposing patients to a lower risk of adverse events. Although Erl + Bev and Erl + Ram are associated with the best survival benefits in terms of PFS, further clinical studies are still needed to identify ways to reduce the risk of adverse events. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42023407994, identifier CRD42023407994.
PubMed: 37484016
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1212313 -
BMC Medicine Jul 2023In addition to improving survival outcomes, new oncology treatments should lead to amelioration of patients' quality of life (QoL). Herein, we examined whether QoL...
BACKGROUND
In addition to improving survival outcomes, new oncology treatments should lead to amelioration of patients' quality of life (QoL). Herein, we examined whether QoL results correlated with PFS and OS outcomes in phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating new systemic treatments in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
The systematic search of PubMed was conducted in October 2022. We identified 81 RCTs testing novel drugs in metastatic NSCLC and published in the English language in a PubMed-indexed journal between 2012 and 2021. Only trials reporting QoL results and at least one survival outcome between OS and PFS were selected. For each RCT, we assessed whether global QoL was "superior," "inferior," or with "non-statistically significant difference" in the experimental arm compared to the control arm.
RESULTS
Experimental treatments led to superior QoL in 30 (37.0%) RCTs and inferior QoL in 3 (3.7%) RCTs. In the remaining 48 (59.3%) RCTs, a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control arms was not found. Of note, we found a statistically significant association between QoL and PFS improvements (X = 3.93, p = 0.0473). In more detail, this association was not significant in trials testing immunotherapy or chemotherapy. On the contrary, in RCTs testing target therapies, QoL results positively correlated with PFS outcomes (p = 0.0196). This association was even stronger in the 32 trials testing EGFR or ALK inhibitors (p = 0.0077). On the other hand, QoL results did not positively correlate with OS outcomes (X = 0.81, p = 0.368). Furthermore, we found that experimental treatments led to superior QoL in 27/57 (47.4%) trials with positive results and in 3/24 (12.5%) RCTs with negative results (p = 0.0028). Finally, we analyzed how QoL data were described in publications of RCTs in which QoL outcomes were not improved (n = 51). We found that a favorable description of QoL results was associated with sponsorship by industries (p = 0.0232).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study reveals a positive association of QoL results with PFS outcomes in RCTs testing novel treatments in metastatic NSCLC. This association is particularly evident for target therapies. These findings further emphasize the relevance of an accurate assessment of QoL in RCTs in NSCLC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Lung Neoplasms; Quality of Life
PubMed: 37400832
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02953-0 -
Cancer Medicine Jul 2023Dacomitinib significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)...
BACKGROUND
Dacomitinib significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations. However, dacomitinib often causes skin toxicities, resulting in treatment discontinuation. We aimed to evaluate a prophylactic strategy for skin toxicity induced by dacomitinib.
METHODS
We performed a single-arm, prospective, open-label, multi-institutional phase II trial for comprehensive skin toxicity prophylaxis. Patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations were enrolled and received dacomitinib with comprehensive prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of skin toxicity (Grade ≥2) in the initial 8 weeks.
RESULTS
In total, 41 Japanese patients participated between May 2019 and April 2021 from 14 institutions (median age 70 years; range: 32-83 years), 20 were male, and 36 had a performance status of 0-1. Nineteen patients had exon 19 deletions and L858R mutation. More than 90% of patients were perfectly compliant with prophylactic minocycline administration. Skin toxicities (Grade ≥2) occurred in 43.9% of patients (90% confidence interval [CI], 31.2%-56.7%). The most frequent skin toxicity was acneiform rash in 11 patients (26.8%), followed by paronychia in five patients (12.2%). Due to skin toxicities, eight patients (19.5%) received reduced doses of dacomitinib. The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0-8.6 months) and median OS was 21.6 months (95% CI, 17.0 months-not reached).
CONCLUSION
Although the prophylactic strategy was ineffective, the adherence to prophylactic medication was quite good. Patient education regarding prophylaxis is important and can lead to improved treatment continuity.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Female; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; ErbB Receptors; Mutation
PubMed: 37269194
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6184 -
Chinese Medical Journal Nov 2023The brain is a common metastatic site in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in a relatively poor prognosis. Systemic therapy with epidermal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The brain is a common metastatic site in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in a relatively poor prognosis. Systemic therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is recommended as the first-line treatment for EGFR -mutated, advanced NSCLC patients. However, intracranial activity varies in different drugs. Thus, brain metastasis (BM) should be considered when choosing the treatment regimens. We conducted this network meta-analysis to explore the optimal first-line therapeutic schedule for advanced EGFR -mutated NSCLC patients with different BM statuses.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials focusing on EGFR-TKIs (alone or in combination) in advanced and EGFR -mutant NSCLC patients, who have not received systematic treatment, were systematically searched up to December 2021. We extracted and analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A network meta-analysis was performed with the Bayesian statistical model to determine the survival outcomes of all included therapy regimens using the R software. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare intervention measures, and overall rankings of therapies were estimated under the Bayesian framework.
RESULTS
This analysis included 17 RCTs with 5077 patients and 12 therapies, including osimertinib + bevacizumab, aumolertinib, osimertinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, standards of care (SoC, including gefitinib, erlotinib, or icotinib), SoC + apatinib, SoC + bevacizumab, SoC + ramucirumab, SoC + pemetrexed based chemotherapy (PbCT), PbCT, and pemetrexed free chemotherapy (PfCT). For patients with BM, SoC + PbCT improved PFS compared with SoC (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.17-0.95), and osimertinib + bevacizumab was most likely to rank first in PFS, with a cumulative probability of 34.5%, followed by aumolertinib, with a cumulative probability of 28.3%. For patients without BM, osimertinib + bevacizumab, osimertinib, aumolertinib, SoC + PbCT, dacomitinib, SoC + ramucirumab, SoC + bevacizumab, and afatinib showed superior efficacy compared with SoC (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90; HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-0.68; HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.77; HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.66; HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.89; HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94; HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76; HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50-1.00), PbCT (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.74; HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.62; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17-0.69; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18-0.64; HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.82; HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22-0.87; HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74; HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.75), and PfCT (HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.32; HR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09-0.26; HR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09-0.29; HR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.35; HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.39; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.31; HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.34) in terms of PFS. And, SoC + apatinib showed relatively superior PFS when compared with PbCT (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.92) and PfCT (HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.39), but similar PFS to SoC (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.42-1.03). No statistical differences were observed for PFS in patients without BM between PbCT and SoC (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.84-2.64), but both showed favorable PFS when compared with PfCT (PfCT vs. SoC, HR = 3.09, 95% CI: 2.06-4.55; PbCT vs. PfCT, HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.32). For patients without BM, osimertinib + bevacizumab was most likely to rank the first, with cumulative probabilities of 47.1%. For OS, SoC + PbCT was most likely to rank first in patients with and without BM, with cumulative probabilities of 46.8%, and 37.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Osimertinib + bevacizumab is most likely to rank first in PFS in advanced EGFR -mutated NSCLC patients with or without BM, and SoC + PbCT is most likely to rank first in OS.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Afatinib; Lung Neoplasms; Bevacizumab; Bayes Theorem; Network Meta-Analysis; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pemetrexed; ErbB Receptors; Brain Neoplasms; Mutation
PubMed: 37160733
DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002468