-
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Apr 2024To describe hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone from the DILIN and the US FDA's surveillance database.
OBJECTIVE
To describe hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone from the DILIN and the US FDA's surveillance database.
METHODS
Hepatotoxicity due to amiodarone and dronedarone enrolled in the U.S. Drug Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) from 2004 to 2020 are described. Dronedarone hepatotoxicity cases associated with liver biopsy results were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2009 to 2020.
RESULTS
Among DILIN's 10 amiodarone and 3 dronedarone DILIN cases, the latency for amiodarone was longer than with dronedarone (388 vs 119 days, p = 0.50) and the median ALT at DILI onset was significantly lower with amiodarone (118 vs 1191 U/L, p = 0.05). Liver biopsies in five amiodarone cases showed fibrosis, steatosis, and numerous Mallory-Denk bodies. Five patients died although only one from liver failure. One patient with dronedarone induced liver injury died of a non-liver related cause. Nine additional cases of DILI due to dronedarone requiring hospitalization were identified in the FAERS database. Three patients developed liver injury within a month of starting the medication. Two developed acute liver failure and underwent urgent liver transplant, one was evaluated for liver transplant but then recovered spontaneously, while one patient with cirrhosis died of liver related causes.
CONCLUSION
Amiodarone hepatotoxicity resembles that seen in alcohol related liver injury, with fatty infiltration and inflammation. Dronedarone is less predictable, typically without fat and with a shorter latency of use before presentation. These differences may be explained, in part, by the differing pharmacokinetics of the two drugs leading to different mechanisms of hepatotoxicity.
Topics: Humans; Dronedarone; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Dyphylline; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury
PubMed: 38416280
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08251-2 -
Biomolecules Dec 2023Gout is characterized by the formation of monosodium urate crystals in peripheral joints. We carried out laboratory studies to investigate the effect of adding nine...
Gout is characterized by the formation of monosodium urate crystals in peripheral joints. We carried out laboratory studies to investigate the effect of adding nine different methylxanthines and two different methylated uric acid derivatives on the development of these crystals over the course of 96 h in a medium whose composition was similar to that of synovial fluid. Our results showed that 7-methylxanthine reduced or totally prevented crystal formation; 1-methylxanthine, 3-methylxanthine, 7-methyluric acid, and 1,3-dimethyluric acid had weaker effects, and the other molecules had no apparent effect. The presented results indicate that a 7-methylxanthine concentration of about 6 × 10 M (10 mg/L) prevented the formation of crystals for an initial urate concentration of 1.78 × 10 M (300 mg/L) in the presence of 0.4 M of Na for 96 h at 25 °C and a pH of 7.4. We attribute these results to alterations in thermodynamics, not kinetics. Our results suggest that prevention of crystallization in vivo could be achieved by direct oral administration of 7-methylxanthine or other methylxanthines that are metabolized to 7-methylxanthine. For example, the hepatic metabolism of theobromine leads to significant plasma levels of 7-methylxanthine (14% of the initial theobromine concentration) and 3-methylxanthine (6% of the initial theobromine concentration); however, 7-methyluric acid is present at very low concentrations in the plasma. It is important to consider that several of the specific molecules we examined (theobromine, caffeine, theophylline, dyphylline, etophylline, and pentoxifylline) did not directly affect crystallization.
Topics: Uric Acid; Theobromine; Solubility; Caffeine
PubMed: 38136640
DOI: 10.3390/biom13121769