-
JAMA Network Open Mar 2024There are concerns about the safety of medications for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with mixed evidence on possible cardiovascular risk.
IMPORTANCE
There are concerns about the safety of medications for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with mixed evidence on possible cardiovascular risk.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether short-term methylphenidate use is associated with risk of cardiovascular events.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This retrospective, population-based cohort study was based on national Swedish registry data. Participants were individuals with ADHD aged 12 to 60 years with dispensed prescriptions of methylphenidate between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2012. Each person receiving methylphenidate (n = 26 710) was matched on birth date, sex, and county to up to 10 nonusers without ADHD (n = 225 672). Statistical analyses were performed from September 13, 2022, to May 16, 2023.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Rates of cardiovascular events, including ischemic heart disease, venous thromboembolism, heart failure, or tachyarrhythmias, 1 year before methylphenidate treatment and 6 months after treatment initiation were compared between individuals receiving methylphenidate and matched controls using a bayesian within-individual design. Analyses were stratified by history of cardiovascular events.
RESULTS
The cohort included 252 382 individuals (15 442 [57.8% men]; median age, 20 (IQR, 15-31) years). The overall incidence of cardiovascular events was 1.51 per 10 000 person-weeks (95% highest density interval [HDI], 1.35-1.69) for individuals receiving methylphenidate and 0.77 (95% HDI, 0.73-0.82) for the matched controls. Individuals treated with methylphenidate had an 87% posterior probability of having a higher rate of cardiovascular events after treatment initiation (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.41; 95% HDI, 1.09-1.88) compared with matched controls (IRR, 1.18; 95% HDI, 1.02-1.37). The posterior probabilities were 70% for at least a 10% increased risk of cardiovascular events in individuals receiving methylphenidate vs 49% in matched controls. No difference was found in this risk between individuals with and without a history of cardiovascular disease (IRR, 1.11; 95% HDI, 0.58-2.13).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cohort study, individuals receiving methylphenidate had a small increased cardiovascular risk vs matched controls in the 6 months after treatment initiation. However, there was little evidence for an increased risk of 20% or higher and for differences in risk increase between people with and without a history of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, before treatment initiation, careful consideration of the risk-benefit trade-off of methylphenidate would be useful, regardless of cardiovascular history.
Topics: Male; Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Female; Methylphenidate; Cardiovascular Diseases; Bayes Theorem; Cohort Studies; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Heart Disease Risk Factors
PubMed: 38446477
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1349 -
Annals of Thoracic Medicine 2024A man who is 38 years old and diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder was prescribed methylphenidate. Three weeks later, he began experiencing...
A man who is 38 years old and diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder was prescribed methylphenidate. Three weeks later, he began experiencing progressive shortness of breath and coughing. Imaging of his chest showed patchy bilateral ground-glass opacities, and bronchoscopy revealed a 15% eosinophil count in his bronchoalveolar lavage. A transbronchial biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of eosinophilic pneumonia. The patient's condition improved when he was given steroids and stopped taking methylphenidate. However, he developed the same symptoms again a few days after restarting the medication, along with a skin rash. This strongly suggests that methylphenidate was the cause of his eosinophilic pneumonia.
PubMed: 38444994
DOI: 10.4103/atm.atm_260_23 -
JMIR Research Protocols Mar 2024Cerebral palsy (CP) is a prevalent nonprogressive disorder that leads to impaired movement (ie, spasticity), posture, and balance, which affects functions such as...
BACKGROUND
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a prevalent nonprogressive disorder that leads to impaired movement (ie, spasticity), posture, and balance, which affects functions such as walking and upper extremity tasks. Current medical treatments show efficacy in improving motor performance but have considerable side effects. Emerging off-label use of central nervous system (CNS) medications for improving motor performance has shown promising results in children with CP and other populations.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to describe a protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of methylphenidate (MPH) and modafinil on spasticity and motor performance in children with CP.
METHODS
This will be a protocol study for a pilot, triple-masked, placebo-controlled RCT (a class I trial following the American Academy of Neurology criteria) with blinded patients, outcome assessors, and intervention delivery team. Eligible children should be diagnosed with CP levels I or II based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System and be aged between 7 and 12 years. Thirty-six children with CP will be randomized into 3 groups to receive (1) MPH (2.5 mg of MPH + 100 mg placebo), (2) modafinil (100 mg modafinil + 2.5 mg placebo), or (3) a placebo (2.5 mg placebo + 100 mg placebo), in addition to physical therapy for 12 weeks. Primary outcomes include the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 and the Modified Ashworth Scale. Secondary outcomes include the Timed Up and Go test, 5 Time Sit to Stand test, Modified Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction of Balance, and 10-Meter Walk Test.
RESULTS
The protocol has been accepted by Kuwait University (VDR/EC-225) and the Ministry of Health of Kuwait (2022/2157). The inclusion of participants will start in June 2024.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of CNS stimulant medications and controlling for rehabilitation has not been studied yet. The findings of this study may determine if using CNS stimulant medications is beneficial for the reduction of spasticity and improvement of physical function in children with spastic CP.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05675098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05675098.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
PRR1-10.2196/53728.
PubMed: 38441919
DOI: 10.2196/53728 -
European Review For Medical and... Feb 2024Aripiprazole, risperidone, atomoxetine, and methylphenidate are drugs commonly prescribed for many psychiatric conditions and can be used alone or in combination in...
OBJECTIVE
Aripiprazole, risperidone, atomoxetine, and methylphenidate are drugs commonly prescribed for many psychiatric conditions and can be used alone or in combination in children and adolescents. This study aimed to investigate comparatively the possible genotoxic effects or genoprotective potentials of these drugs on human lymphocytes and HepG2 cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cytotoxicity analysis was performed with the cell viability test on human lymphocytes and HepG2 cells, and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of the drugs were determined, and three different doses (¼ IC50, ½ IC50, and IC50) were applied for genetic analysis. For the determined doses, cells with and without DNA damage were examined by comet analysis.
RESULTS
In lymphocytes, aripiprazole and risperidone increased DNA damage at moderate and maximum doses, whereas atomoxetine increased DNA damage only at the maximum dose. In HepG2 cells, risperidone reduced DNA damage at all doses, while atomoxetine increased DNA damage at all doses. On the other hand, in the DNA-damaged cells induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), DNA damage decreased at all concentrations of all drugs in both lymphocytes and HepG2 cells.
CONCLUSIONS
As a result, the genotoxicity of the drugs was found to be dose-dependent, and all drugs showed a genoprotective effect on DNA-damaged cells.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Risperidone; Aripiprazole; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Methylphenidate; Hep G2 Cells; Hydrogen Peroxide; DNA Damage; Lymphocytes; DNA
PubMed: 38436168
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202402_35456 -
Cureus Jan 2024Individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often experience a higher occurrence of comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Stimulant...
Individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often experience a higher occurrence of comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Stimulant medications are frequently prescribed to manage ADHD. In rare instances, the use of stimulant medications has been linked to the development of psychotic symptoms. This is a case of a 13-year-old male diagnosed with ASD and comorbid ADHD, anxiety, and depression, who presented with an abrupt onset of psychosis, which manifested about a week after the initiation of lisdexamfetamine. The psychotic symptoms subsided upon discontinuation of lisdexamfetamine; however, there was a re-emergence of severe ADHD symptoms that proved resistant to non-stimulant medications. The patient experienced significant improvement without any recurrence of psychosis after being prescribed extended-release methylphenidate. Notably, there are no established clinical guidelines to assist in selecting one stimulant over another in the treatment of ADHD comorbid with ASD. The authors recommend considering the methylphenidate class of stimulants as a first-line treatment for ADHD in individuals with ASD, citing better tolerability compared to amphetamines.
PubMed: 38435908
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53349 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jul 2024Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder that frequently persists into adulthood with 3% of adult women having a... (Review)
Review
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder that frequently persists into adulthood with 3% of adult women having a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Many women are diagnosed and treated during their reproductive years, which leads to management implications during pregnancy and the postpartum period. We know from clinical practice that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms frequently become challenging to manage during the perinatal period and require additional support and attention. There is often uncertainty among healthcare providers about the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the perinatal period, particularly the safety of pharmacotherapy for the developing fetus. This guideline is focused on best practices in managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the perinatal period. We recommend (1) mitigating the risks associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder that worsen during the perinatal period via individualized treatment planning; (2) providing psychoeducation, self-management strategies or coaching, and psychotherapies; and, for those with moderate or severe attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, (3) considering pharmacotherapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, which largely has reassuring safety data. Specifically, providers should work collaboratively with patients and their support networks to balance the risks of perinatal attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication with the risks of inadequately treated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during pregnancy. The risks and impacts of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in pregnancy can be successfully managed through preconception counselling and appropriate perinatal planning, management, and support.
Topics: Humans; Female; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Postpartum Period; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Methylphenidate; Psychotherapy; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 38432409
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.297 -
Cureus Jan 2024We describe a 32-year-old Japanese female with hypersomnia and bipolar disorder. She had developed hypersomnia and sleep attacks in her teens. She was misdiagnosed with...
We describe a 32-year-old Japanese female with hypersomnia and bipolar disorder. She had developed hypersomnia and sleep attacks in her teens. She was misdiagnosed with narcolepsy at a neurology department and then received methylphenidate (MPH) for many years. After giving birth, she developed postpartum depression and suffered from mood swings and irritability. Following 10-year treatment with methylphenidate, she experienced MPH-induced psychosis when she was in a manic state. Her psychosis improved rapidly with the cessation of methylphenidate. Furthermore, brexpiprazole treatment ameliorated her manic symptoms and hypersomnolence. Post-discharge, she was diagnosed with idiopathic hypersomnia based on nocturnal polysomnography and a multiple sleep latency test. This case indicates that brexpiprazole as a serotonin dopamine activity modulator might provide therapeutic effects against not only the patient's manic symptoms but also idiopathic hypersomnia.
PubMed: 38420100
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53182 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2024Fatigue is the most commonly reported post-COVID symptom. A minority of patients also report excessive daytime sleepiness, which could be a target for treatment.
INTRODUCTION
Fatigue is the most commonly reported post-COVID symptom. A minority of patients also report excessive daytime sleepiness, which could be a target for treatment.
METHODS
Among 530 patients with a post-COVID condition, those with excessive daytime sleepiness were systematically assessed for objective central hypersomnia, with exclusion of all cases not clearly attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
RESULTS
Four cases of post-COVID central hypersomnia were identified, three fulfilling the criteria of the 3rd International Classification of Sleep Disorders for idiopathic hypersomnia, and one for type II narcolepsy. We report here their clinical history, sleep examination data and treatment, with a favorable response to methylphenidate in three cases and spontaneous resolution in one case.
CONCLUSION
We highlight the importance of identifying cases of post-COVID central hypersomnia, as it may be a treatable trait of a post-COVID condition.
PubMed: 38419710
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1349486 -
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2024This study investigated the age-dependent effects of methylphenidate (MPH) on brain metabolites including choline (Cho), N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) and creatine (Cr)...
PURPOSE
This study investigated the age-dependent effects of methylphenidate (MPH) on brain metabolites including choline (Cho), N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) and creatine (Cr) levels in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), striatum, cerebellum, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) regions of the brain in adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The study was included 60 patients with ADHD between the ages of 18 and 60 years. The patients were grouped with respect to their ages as follows: 18-24 years, 25-30 years, and 31 and over years. Levels of NAA, Cr and Cho in DLPFC, ACC, cerebellum and striatum were measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Subjects were then given 10 mg of oral MPH and the same metabolite levels were measured 30 minutes apart.
RESULTS
Twelve (20%) of the cases were female and 48 (80%) were male. The age distribution of the cases is as follows: 15 subjects between the ages of 18-24, 26 subjects between the ages of 25-30 and 19 subjects over the age of 30. NAA levels were higher after MPH in the DLPFC of the 18-24 age group (p = 0.016) and in the cerebellum of the 25-30 age group (p = 0.041). No increase in Cho and Cr levels was observed after treatment compared to before (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
It is thought that treatment of MPH can be effective on metabolites in different brain regions and this effect can vary upon age adult ADHD patients. After MPH treatment, both the 18-24 age group (in the DLPFC) and the 25-30 age group (in the cerebellum) was detected significantly higher NAA levels compared to pre-treatment levels. This increase in NAA levels suggested that pharmacotherapy, especially at early ages, may be effective on neuronal damage.
PubMed: 38405424
DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S442655 -
Journal of Attention Disorders Apr 2024To compare PRC-063 (multilayer-release methylphenidate) and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) on the driving performance of young adults with attention deficit... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
A Randomized, Phase 3, Double-Blind, Crossover Comparison of Multilayer, Extended-Release Methylphenidate (PRC-063), and Lisdexamfetamine in the Driving Performance of Young Adults With ADHD.
OBJECTIVE
To compare PRC-063 (multilayer-release methylphenidate) and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) on the driving performance of young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.
METHOD
Following up to 21 days of each treatment in each treatment course (PRC-063/LDX or LDX/PRC-063), subjects completed a 15-hour driving simulator laboratory assessment. The primary outcome measure was the Tactical Driving Quotient (TDQ) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale was a secondary outcome measure.
RESULTS
Forty-four subjects completed the study. PRC-063 and LDX had equivalent effects on driving performance through a 15-hour time period (least square mean difference -0.3 [standard error 1.08], 95% confidence interval [-2.4, 1.8], = .793). Consistent improvement in CGI-I was observed. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for each treatment sequence.
CONCLUSIONS
PRC-063 and LDX had comparable effects on driving performance, from 1 through 15 hours, the last time point measured.
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate; Methylphenidate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38404033
DOI: 10.1177/10870547241226634