-
Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 2024Standard dosages of analgesic and sedative drugs are given to intensive care patients. The resulting range of blood concentrations and corresponding clinical responses...
BACKGROUND
Standard dosages of analgesic and sedative drugs are given to intensive care patients. The resulting range of blood concentrations and corresponding clinical responses need to be better examined. The purpose of this study was to describe daily dosages, measured blood concentrations, and clinical responses in critically ill patients. The purpose was also to contribute to establishing whole blood concentration reference values of the drugs investigated.
METHODS
A descriptive study of prospectively collected data from 302 admissions to a general intensive care unit (ICU) at a university hospital. Ten drugs (clonidine, fentanyl, morphine, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, ketobemidone, midazolam, paracetamol, propofol, and thiopental) were investigated, and daily dosages recorded. Blood samples were collected twice daily, and drug concentrations were measured. Clinical responses were registered using Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) and Numeric rating scale (NRS).
RESULTS
Drug dosages were within recommended dose ranges. Blood concentrations for all 10 drugs showed a wide variation within the cohort, but only 3% were above therapeutic interval where clonidine (57 of 122) and midazolam (38 of 122) dominated. RASS and NRS were not correlated to drug concentrations.
CONCLUSION
Using recommended dose intervals for analgesic and sedative drugs in the ICU setting combined with regular monitoring of clinical responses such as RASS and NRS leads to 97% of concentrations being below the upper limit in the therapeutic interval. This study contributes to whole blood drug concentration reference values regarding these 10 drugs.
Topics: Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Analgesics; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Intensive Care Units; Prospective Studies; Adult; Midazolam; Critical Care; Dexmedetomidine; Fentanyl; Critical Illness; Propofol; Clonidine; Ketamine; Morphine; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Thiopental; Acetaminophen
PubMed: 38863729
DOI: 10.48101/ujms.v129.10560 -
Acute and Critical Care May 2024In this study, we compare the effects of ketamine and the combination of midazolam and morphine on the severity of depression and anxiety in mechanically ventilated...
BACKGROUND
In this study, we compare the effects of ketamine and the combination of midazolam and morphine on the severity of depression and anxiety in mechanically ventilated patients after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS
This randomized single-blind clinical trial included 50 patients who were candidates for craniotomy and postoperative mechanical ventilation in the ICU of 5 Azar Teaching Hospital in Gorgan City, North Iran, from 2021 to 2022. Patients were allocated to two groups by quadruple block randomization. In group A, 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine was infused over 15 minutes after craniotomy and then continued at a dose of 5 µ/kg/min during mechanical ventilation. In group B, midazolam was infused at a dose of 2-3 mg/hr and morphine at a dose of 3-5 mg/hr. After patients were discharged from the ICU, if their Glasgow Coma Scale scores were ≥14, Beck's anxiety and depression inventories were completed by a psychologist within 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months after discharge.
RESULTS
The mean scores of depression at 2 months (P=0.01) and 6 months (P=0.03) after discharge were significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the midazolam and morphine group. The mean anxiety scores were significantly lower in the ketamine group 2 weeks (P=0.006) and 6 months (P=0.002) after discharge.
CONCLUSIONS
Ketamine is an effective drug for preventing and treating anxiety and depression over the long term in patients discharged from the ICU. However, further larger volume studies are required to validate these results.
PubMed: 38863354
DOI: 10.4266/acc.2023.01186 -
Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2024To compare the cardiopulmonary effects of apneustic anesthesia ventilation (AAV) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in anesthetized pigs and to describe a new...
OBJECTIVE
To compare the cardiopulmonary effects of apneustic anesthesia ventilation (AAV) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in anesthetized pigs and to describe a new mode of ventilation for anesthetized veterinary species.
STUDY DESIGN
Randomized, crossover design without washout.
ANIMALS
Twelve healthy, female white Landrace pigs.
METHODS
Following ketamine-midazolam premedication and anesthetic induction with propofol, the trachea was intubated, and each pig was positioned in dorsal recumbency. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol and sufentanil infusions. Pigs were instrumented and their lungs were sequentially ventilated with each mode, in random order, for 1 h according to predefined criteria [fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) = 0.21, 10 mL kg tidal volume (V), and arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO) within 40-45 mmHg]. Cardiopulmonary data were collected at baseline, 30 and 60 min. In 8 pigs, thoracic computed tomography (CT) was performed following the 60 min time point for each mode of ventilation and images were analyzed to quantify lung aeration. The effects of ventilation mode, time, and order were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Paired -tests were used to compare lung aeration between modes. Significance was defined as < 0.05.
RESULTS
Data from 12 pigs were analyzed. A significant effect of mode was found for heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index, systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary vascular resistance, oxygen delivery index (DOI), oxygen extraction ratio (OER), V, arterial oxygen tension, arterial hemoglobin saturation, PaCO, end-tidal carbon dioxide tension, alveolar dead space (V/V), venous admixture ( ), mean airway pressure, and dynamic compliance index (CI). Order effects were also observed for some cardiovascular and respiratory variables. For the eight pigs that underwent thoracic CT, AAV resulted in significantly larger proportions of normally and hyperaerated lung while CMV resulted in larger proportions of hypoaerated and atelectatic lung.
CONCLUSIONS
In dorsally recumbent anesthetized pigs, ventilated with FiO = 0.21, both modes of ventilation supported adequate oxygenation while AAV resulted in higher CI, and lower V/V and , compared with CMV. AAV was also associated with lower MAP, CI, and DOI and higher OER compared with CMV. Further investigation of AAV in anesthetized animals is warranted.
PubMed: 38855412
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1378617 -
BMC Veterinary Research Jun 2024When inhalant anesthetic equipment is not available or during upper airway surgery, intravenous infusion of one or more drugs are commonly used to induce and/or maintain... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
When inhalant anesthetic equipment is not available or during upper airway surgery, intravenous infusion of one or more drugs are commonly used to induce and/or maintain general anesthesia. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) does not require endotracheal intubation, which may be more difficult to achieve in rabbits. A range of different injectable drug combinations have been used as continuous infusion rate in animals. Recently, a combination of ketamine and propofol (ketofol) has been used for TIVA in both human patients and animals. The purpose of this prospective, blinded, randomized, crossover study was to evaluate anesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of ketofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in combination with constant rate infusion (CRI) of midazolam, fentanyl or dexmedetomidine in eight New Zealand White rabbits. Following IV induction with ketofol and endotracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with ketofol infusion in combination with CRIs of midazolam (loading dose [LD]: 0.3 mg/kg; CRI: 0.3 mg/kg/hr; KPM), fentanyl (LD: 6 µg/kg; CRI: 6 µg/kg/hr; KPF) or dexmedetomidine (LD: 3 µg/kg; CRI: 3 µg/kg/hr; KPD). Rabbits in the control treatment (KPS) were administered the same volume of saline for LD and CRI. Ketofol infusion rate (initially 0.6 mg kg minute [0.3 mg kg minute of each drug]) was adjusted to suppress the pedal withdrawal reflex. Ketofol dose and physiologic variables were recorded every 5 min.
RESULTS
Ketofol induction doses were 14.9 ± 1.8 (KPM), 15.0 ± 1.9 (KPF), 15.5 ± 2.4 (KPD) and 14.7 ± 3.4 (KPS) mg kg and did not differ among treatments (p > 0.05). Ketofol infusion rate decreased significantly in rabbits in treatments KPM and KPD as compared with saline. Ketofol maintenance dose in rabbits in treatments KPM (1.0 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) and KPD (1.0 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) was significantly lower as compared to KPS (1.3 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min) treatment (p < 0.05). Ketofol maintenance dose did not differ significantly between treatments KPF (1.1 ± 0.3 mg/kg/min) and KPS (1.3 ± 0.1 mg/kg/min). Cardiovascular variables remained at clinically acceptable values but ketofol infusion in combination with fentanyl CRI was associated with severe respiratory depression.
CONCLUSIONS
At the studied doses, CRIs of midazolam and dexmedetomidine, but not fentanyl, produced ketofol-sparing effect in rabbits. Mechanical ventilation should be considered during ketofol anesthesia, particularly when fentanyl CRI is used.
Topics: Animals; Rabbits; Fentanyl; Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Ketamine; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Propofol; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Cross-Over Studies; Male; Female; Heart Rate; Prospective Studies; Blood Pressure; Anesthetics, Combined; Infusions, Intravenous; Hypnotics and Sedatives
PubMed: 38851722
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-04112-w -
BMC Anesthesiology Jun 2024Remimazolam is a recently developed, ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that is used as a general anesthetic. Some cases of remimazolam anaphylaxis have been reported, but... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Remimazolam is a recently developed, ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that is used as a general anesthetic. Some cases of remimazolam anaphylaxis have been reported, but its characteristics are not fully understood. We present an interesting case report and review of the literature to better understand remimazolam anaphylaxis.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 75-year-old man scheduled for robot-assisted gastrectomy was administered remimazolam for the induction of general anesthesia. After intubation, low end-expiratory CO, high airway pressure and concurrent circulatory collapse were observed. Bronchoscopy revealed marked tracheal and bronchial edema, which we diagnosed as anaphylaxis. The patient suffered cardiac arrest after bronchoscopy but recovered immediately with intravenous adrenaline administration and chest compressions. We performed skin prick tests for the drugs used during induction except for remimazolam, considering the high risk of systemic adverse reactions to remimazolam. We diagnosed remimazolam anaphylaxis because the skin prick test results for the other drugs used during anesthesia were negative, and these drugs could have been used without allergic reactions during the subsequent surgery. Furthermore, this patient had experienced severe anaphylactic-like reactions when he underwent cardiac surgery a year earlier, in which midazolam had been used, but it was not thought to be the allergen at that time. Based on these findings, cross-reactivity to remimazolam and midazolam was suspected. However, the patient had previously received another benzodiazepine, brotizolam, to which he was not allergic, suggesting that cross-reactivity of remimazolam may vary among benzodiazepines. In this article, we reviewed the 11 cases of remimazolam anaphylaxis that have been described in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS
Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting sedative; however, it can cause life-threatening anaphylaxis. In addition, its cross-reactivity with other benzodiazepines is not fully understood. To increase the safety of this drug, further research and more experience in its use are needed.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Anaphylaxis; Benzodiazepines; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Drug Hypersensitivity; Skin Tests; Anesthesia, General
PubMed: 38851690
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02591-w -
BMC Neurology Jun 2024Dexmedetomidine (Dex), midazolam, and propofol are three distinct sedatives characterized by varying pharmacological properties. Previous literature has indicated the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Dexmedetomidine (Dex), midazolam, and propofol are three distinct sedatives characterized by varying pharmacological properties. Previous literature has indicated the positive impact of each of these sedatives on ICU patients. However, there is a scarcity of clinical evidence comparing the efficacy of Dex, midazolam, and propofol in reducing mortality among people with epilepsy (PWE). This study aimed to assess the impact of Dex, midazolam, and propofol on the survival of PWE.
METHODS
The data were retrospectively retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database (version 2.0). PWE were categorized into Dex, midazolam, and propofol groups based on the intravenously administered sedatives. PWE without standard drug therapy were included in the control group. Comparative analyses were performed on the data among the groups.
RESULTS
The Dex group exhibited a significantly lower proportion of in-hospital deaths and a markedly higher in-hospital survival time compared to the midazolam and propofol groups (p < 0.01) after propensity score matching. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a significant improvement in survival rates for the Dex group compared to the control group (p = 0.025). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant differences in survival rates among the Dex, midazolam, and propofol groups (F = 1.949, p = 0.143). The nomogram indicated that compared to midazolam and propofol groups, Dex was more effective in improving the survival rate of PWE.
CONCLUSION
Dex might improve the survival rate of PWE in the ICU compared to no standard drug intervention. However, Dex did not exhibit superiority in improving survival rates compared to midazolam and propofol.
Topics: Humans; Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Propofol; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Retrospective Studies; Intensive Care Units; Epilepsy; Adult; Aged; Databases, Factual; Hospital Mortality
PubMed: 38849716
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03693-1 -
Drug Metabolism and Disposition: the... Jun 2024Arsenite is an important heavy metal. Some Chinese traditional medicines contain significant amounts of arsenite. The aim of this study was to investigate subacute...
Arsenite is an important heavy metal. Some Chinese traditional medicines contain significant amounts of arsenite. The aim of this study was to investigate subacute exposure of arsenite on activities of cytochrome P450 enzymes and pharmacokinetic behaviors of drugs in rats. Midazolam, tolbutamide, metoprolol, omeprazole, caffeine, and chlorzoxazone, the probe substrates for CYPs3A2, 2C6, 2D2, 2C11, 1A2, and 2E1, were selected as model drugs for the pharmacokinetic study. Significant decreases in AUCs of probe substrates were observed in rats after consecutive 30 day exposure at 12 mg/kg. Microsomal incubation study showed that the subacute exposure to arsenite resulted in little changes in effects on the activities of P450 enzymes examined. However, everted gut sac study demonstrated that such exposure induced significant decreases in intestinal absorption of these drugs by both passive diffusion and carrier-mediated transport. In addition, study showed that the arsenite exposure decreased the rate of peristaltic propulsion. The decreases in intestinal permeability of the probe drugs and peristaltic propulsion rate most likely resulted in the observed decreases in the internal exposure of the probe drugs. Exposure to arsenite may lead to the reduction of the efficiencies of pharmaceutical agents co-administered resulting from the observed drug-drug interactions. Exposure to arsenite may lead to the reduction of the efficiencies of pharmaceutical agents co-administered resulting from the observed drug-drug interactions. In this study, we found that P450 enzyme probe drug exposure was reduced in arsenic-exposed animals (AUCs) and the intestinal absorption of the drug was reduced in the animals. Subacute arsenic exposure tends to cause damage to intestinal function, which leads to reduced drug absorption.
PubMed: 38849209
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.124.001772 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Jun 2024Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening intestinal illness mostly affecting preterm infants, which commonly requires surgery. Anesthetic care for these...
STUDY OBJECTIVE
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a life-threatening intestinal illness mostly affecting preterm infants, which commonly requires surgery. Anesthetic care for these patients is challenging, due to their prematurity and critical illness with hemodynamic instability. Currently, there are no guidelines for anesthetic care for these vulnerable patients. Therefore, this study aimed to describe current anesthesia practices across Europe for infants undergoing surgery for NEC.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional survey study.
PARTICIPANTS
Anesthesiologists working in centers where surgery for NEC is performed across Europe.
MEASUREMENTS
A 46-item questionnaire assessing protocols for anesthesia practice, preoperative care, intraoperative care, postoperative care, and the respondent's opinion on the adequacy of anesthetic care for patients with NEC in their center.
MAIN RESULTS
Out of the 173 responding anesthesiologists from 31 countries, approximately a third had a written standard protocol for anesthetic care in infants. Three quarters of the respondents screened all patients with NEC preoperatively, and a third structurally performed preoperative multidisciplinary consultation. For induction of general anesthesia, most respondents opted for intravenous anesthesia (n = 73, 43%) or a combination of intravenous and inhalation anesthesia (n = 57, 33%). For intravenous induction, they mostly used propofol (n = 58, 44%), followed by midazolam (n = 43, 33%) and esketamine (n = 42, 32%). For maintenance of anesthesia, inhalation anesthetic agents were more commonly used (solely: n = 71, 41%; in combination: n = 37, 22%), almost exclusively with sevoflurane. Postoperative analgesics mainly included paracetamol and/or morphine. Sixty percent of the respondents (n = 104) considered their anesthetic care for patients with NEC adequate. Suggestions for further improvement mainly revolved around monitoring, protocols, and collaboration.
CONCLUSIONS
Anesthesia practice for infants undergoing surgery for NEC was highly variable. Most respondents considered the provided anesthetic care for patients with NEC adequate, but also recognized opportunities for further improvement, especially with regards to monitoring, protocols, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
PubMed: 38843649
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111508 -
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Jun 2024This study aimed to compare the direct medication costs and clinical effectiveness of using remimazolam versus midazolam for goal-guided sedation therapy in the ICU...
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare the direct medication costs and clinical effectiveness of using remimazolam versus midazolam for goal-guided sedation therapy in the ICU patients.
METHODS
This randomized controlled study was conducted in the ICU of People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University. Eighty adult patients admitted to the ICU and requiring sedation were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either remimazolam-based sedation (study group, n=40) or midazolam-based sedation (control group, n=40). The inclusion criteria for patient selection were age 18-80 years, requirement for mechanical ventilation, and an expected ICU stay of at least 24 hours. Patients with significant liver or kidney dysfunction, neurological disorders, or contraindications to the study drugs were excluded. The target sedation depth for both groups was a Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 3-4, which was maintained by titrating the infusion rates of remimazolam or midazolam as needed. Vital signs, sedation scores, and respiratory parameters were closely monitored throughout the sedation period.
RESULTS
The time to onset of sedation, time to reach the target sedation depth, time to awakening, and length of ICU stay were all significantly shorter in the remimazolam group compared to the midazolam group (P < .05 for all). The remimazolam group had a mean time to onset of 5.2 ± 1.8 minutes versus 8.9 ± 2.4 minutes in the midazolam group. The mean time to reach the target Ramsay Sedation Scale score of 3-4 was 12.6 ± 3.1 minutes in the remimazolam group compared to 18.4 ± 4.2 minutes in the midazolam group. The mean time to awakening was 10.2 ± 2.7 minutes in the remimazolam group versus 16.5 ± 3.9 minutes in the midazolam group. The remimazolam group also had a significantly shorter mean ICU length of stay of 5.1 ± 1.3 days compared to 7.8 ± 2.1 days in the midazolam group (P < .01). The remimazolam group had a significantly higher metabolic clearance rate compared to the midazolam group (P < .001). The Ramsay sedation scores and Wong-Baker FACES pain scores were also significantly lower in the remimazolam group throughout the sedation period (P < .01). There were no significant differences in heart rate between the two groups at any timepoint. However, the overall incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the remimazolam group compared to the midazolam group (P < .05).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated that the use of remimazolam-based goal-directed sedation in the ICU setting resulted in significantly faster onset of action, quicker achievement of the target sedation depth, shorter time to awakening, and shorter ICU length of stay compared to midazolam-based sedation. The remimazolam group also had a higher metabolic clearance rate, lower sedation and pain scores, and a lower incidence of adverse events.These findings suggest that remimazolam may provide advantages over midazolam for ICU sedation, potentially leading to improved patient comfort, more efficient utilization of ICU resources, and potentially better clinical outcomes. The rapid onset, titratability, and favorable safety profile of remimazolam make it a promising sedative agent that could help optimize sedation practices in the critical care setting. Further research is warranted to fully evaluate the impact of remimazolam on long-term patient-centered outcomes and overall healthcare costs in the ICU.
PubMed: 38843423
DOI: No ID Found -
Open Medicine (Warsaw, Poland) 2024Understanding the intricate relationship between cancer clinicopathological features and anesthetics dosage is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and safety during...
Understanding the intricate relationship between cancer clinicopathological features and anesthetics dosage is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and safety during surgery. This retrospective study investigates this relationship in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). A comprehensive analysis of medical records was undertaken for NSCLC patients who underwent VATS with intravenous compound inhalation general anesthesia. Patients were categorized based on histological, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and epidural anesthesia factors. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the differences between the groups. The results revealed compelling insights. Specifically, patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) undergoing VATS exhibited higher dosages of rocuronium bromide and midazolam during general anesthesia, coupled with a shorter post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay compared to those with squamous cell carcinoma (sqCL). Furthermore, chemotherapy patients undergoing VATS demonstrated diminished requirements for phenylephrine and remifentanil in contrast to their non-chemotherapy counterparts. Similarly, radiotherapy patients undergoing VATS demonstrated a decreased necessity for rocuronium bromide compared to non-radiotherapy patients. Notably, patients who received epidural anesthesia in combination with general anesthesia manifested reduced hydromorphone requirements and prolonged hospital stays compared to those subjected to general anesthesia alone. In conclusion, the findings from this study indicate several important observations in diverse patient groups undergoing VATS. The higher dosages of rocuronium bromide and midazolam in LUAD patients point to potential differences in drug requirements among varying lung cancer types. Additionally, the observed shorter PACU stay in LUAD patients suggests a potentially expedited recovery process. The reduced anesthetic requirements of phenylephrine and remifentanilin chemotherapy patients indicate distinct responses to anesthesia and pain management. Radiotherapy patients requiring lower doses of rocuronium bromide imply a potential impact of prior radiotherapy on muscle relaxation. Finally, the combination of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia resulted in reduced hydromorphone requirements and longer hospital stays, suggesting the potential benefits of this combined approach in terms of pain management and postoperative recovery. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring anesthesia strategies for specific patient populations to optimize outcomes in VATS procedures.
PubMed: 38841176
DOI: 10.1515/med-2024-0961