-
BMC Geriatrics Nov 2023Different treatment options are discussed for geriatric odontoid fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment options for geriatric odontoid fractures.
BACKGROUND
Different treatment options are discussed for geriatric odontoid fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment options for geriatric odontoid fractures.
METHODS
Included were patients with the following criteria: age ≥ 65 years, identification of seniors at risk (ISAR score ≥ 2), and odontoid fracture type A/B according to Eysel and Roosen. Three groups were compared: conservative treatment, surgical therapy with ventral screw osteosynthesis or dorsal instrumentation. At a follow-up examination, the range of motion and the trabecular bone fracture healing rate were evaluated. Furthermore, demographic patient data, neurological status, length of stay at the hospital and at the intensive care unit (ICU) as well as the duration of surgery and occurring complications were analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 72 patients were included and 43 patients could be re-examined (range: 2.7 ± 2.1 months). Patients with dorsal instrumentation had a better rotation. Other directions of motion were not significantly different. The trabecular bone fracture healing rate was 78.6%. The patients with dorsal instrumentation were hospitalized significantly longer; however, their duration at the ICU was shortest. There was no significant difference in complications.
CONCLUSION
Geriatric patients with odontoid fracture require individual treatment planning. Dorsal instrumentation may offer some advantages.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Spinal Fractures; Conservative Treatment; Odontoid Process; Fractures, Bone; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37968595
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04472-2 -
Scientific Reports Oct 2023The aim of this study was to compare in-hospital mortality of three procedures -halo-vest immobilization, anterior spinal fixation (ASF), and posterior spinal...
The aim of this study was to compare in-hospital mortality of three procedures -halo-vest immobilization, anterior spinal fixation (ASF), and posterior spinal fixation (PSF)- in the treatment of elderly patients with isolated C2 odontoid fracture. We extracted data for elderly patients who were admitted with C2 odontoid fracture and treated with at least one of the three procedures (halo-vest immobilization, ASF, or PSF) during hospitalization. We conducted a generalized propensity score-based matching weight analysis to compare in-hospital mortality among the three procedures. We further investigated independent risk factors for in-hospital death. The study involved 891 patients (halo-vest, n = 463; ASF, n = 74; and PSF, n = 354) with a mean age of 78 years. In-hospital death occurred in 45 (5.1%) patients. Treatment type was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Male sex (odds ratio 2.98; 95% confidence interval 1.32-6.73; p = 0.009) and a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥ 3 (odds ratio 9.18; 95% confidence interval 3.25-25.92; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, treatment type was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with isolated C2 odontoid fracture. Halo-vest immobilization can help to avoid adverse events in patients with C2 odontoid fracture who are considered less suitable for surgical treatment.
Topics: Humans; Male; Aged; Hospital Mortality; Odontoid Process; Spinal Fractures; Spinal Fusion; Fractures, Bone; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37864100
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45180-6 -
World Neurosurgery Dec 2023Odontoid fractures in association with a C1-C2 rotatory luxation reports are seldom found in the literature. The fusion between the lateral mass of C1 and C2 could be of...
BACKGROUND
Odontoid fractures in association with a C1-C2 rotatory luxation reports are seldom found in the literature. The fusion between the lateral mass of C1 and C2 could be of interest to ensure adequate treatment in these particular cases. We report 23 cases where there was coexistence of an odontoid fracture and rotatory subluxation, which were treated surgically using cages between C1 and C2 or just traditional Goel-Harms technique. We evaluated the radiologic fusion rate, reoperation rate, and complications.
METHODS
This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of patients with C2 fractures (mixed type and C1-C2 rotatory luxation according to the Fielding classification) who were treated surgically. Radiologic computed tomography scans were used to assess fusion (presence of bridging trabecular bone end plate or pseudoarthrosis) between 6 months and 1.5 years after the surgery.
RESULTS
Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with C2 fractures and C1-C2 rotatory luxation that were treated surgically and were suitable for the analysis; 11 patients underwent C1-C2 fusion with intra-articular cages, and 12 underwent a classical Goel-Harms technique. The fusion rate at the C1-C2 joint was higher in the cages group. Only 12 patients exhibited fusion at the level of the odontoid fracture.
CONCLUSIONS
C2 fractures associated with C1-C2 rotatory dislocation are rare. The fusion rate at the level of the odontoid in these patients appears to be lower than that reported in patients without rotatory dislocation. It may be of special interest to obtain a clear fusion at the C1-C2 joint, where this type of implant seems to offer an advantage.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Odontoid Process; Spinal Fractures; Cohort Studies; Fractures, Bone; Spinal Fusion; Joint Dislocations; Atlanto-Axial Joint
PubMed: 37777174
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.089 -
Clinical Spine Surgery Feb 2024National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) review and propensity-matched analysis.
STUDY DESIGN
National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) review and propensity-matched analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate differences in clinical outcomes by operative management.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Odontoid type II fractures are the most prevalent cervical fracture. Operative intervention on these fractures is frequently debated; surgical risks are compounded by clinical severity, patient age, and comorbidities.
METHODS
This registry review included index admissions for odontoid type II fractures [International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes beginning with S12.11] from 1/1/2017 to 1/1/2020; patients who died in the emergency department (ED) were excluded. Propensity score techniques were used to match patients 1:1 by surgical management, using a caliper distance of 0.05, after matching on the following covariates that differed significantly between surgical and nonsurgical patients: age, sex, race, cause of injury, transfer status, injury severity score, ED Glasgow coma score, ED systolic blood pressure, presence of transverse ligamentous injury, cervical dislocation, and 8 comorbidities. The following outcomes were analyzed with McNemar tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests: near-term survival (discharged from the hospital to locations other than morgue or hospice), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital complications, median hospital length of stay (LOS), and median ICU LOS.
RESULTS
There were 16,607 patients, 2916 (17.6%) were operatively managed and 13,691 were nonoperatively managed. Before matching, survival was greater for patients managed operatively compared with nonoperatively (95.0% vs. 88.2%). The matched population consisted of 5334 patients: 2667 patients in the operative group (91.5% of this population) and 2667 well-matched patients in the nonoperative group. After matching, there was a survival benefit for patients who were operatively managed compared with nonoperative management (94.8% vs. 91.4% P <0.001). However, operative management was associated with greater development of complications, ICU admission, and longer hospital and ICU LOS.
CONCLUSION
Compared with nonoperative management, operative management demonstrated a significant near-term survival benefit for patients with odontoid type II fractures in select patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Odontoid Process; Spinal Fractures; Comorbidity; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37651564
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001511 -
American Journal of Veterinary Research Nov 2023To investigate the feasibility of using shape memory alloy (SMA) implants for atlantoaxial joint stabilization using a rabbit model as a substitute for canines.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the feasibility of using shape memory alloy (SMA) implants for atlantoaxial joint stabilization using a rabbit model as a substitute for canines.
ANIMALS
20 rabbit cadavers.
METHODS
We prepared rabbit cadavers from the middle of the skull to the third cervical vertebra. The vertebral body and canal sizes of the atlas and axis were compared using CT data from rabbits, normal dogs, and dogs with atlantoaxial instability (AAI) to assess the feasibility of using rabbits as substitutes for toy-breed dogs. The shape memory alloy (SMA) implants were designed to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint without compromising the spinal canal passage for safety and were classified into SMA-1 and SMA-2 based on their design. To evaluate the strength, the ventrodorsal force was measured with atlantoaxial ligaments intact, after removing the ligaments, and after applying conventional wire or SMA implants to stabilize the atlantoaxial joint. The time taken for implant application was measured.
RESULTS
No significant difference in vertebral body size of the atlas and axis was observed. A significant difference in vertebral canal size was observed between the animals. In biomechanical testing, the SMA-2 implant provided more stabilization, while the SMA-1 implant had lower strength than the conventional method using wires. The application time of wire was the longest, while that of SMA-1 was the shortest.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
SMA implants provide comparable strength and demonstrate superior efficacy compared to conventional dorsal wire fixation of atlantoaxial stabilization. Therefore, SMA implants can be an effective surgical option for AAI.
Topics: Rabbits; Dogs; Animals; Shape Memory Alloys; Atlanto-Axial Joint; Joint Instability; Ligaments; Cadaver; Dog Diseases
PubMed: 37591491
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.23.07.0158 -
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal Jul 2023To investigate the use of a tubular retractor to provide access to the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) sparing the soft palate with the aim of reducing complications...
INTRODUCTION
To investigate the use of a tubular retractor to provide access to the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) sparing the soft palate with the aim of reducing complications associated with traditional transoral approach but yet allowing adequate decompression of the CVJ.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twelve consecutive patients with severe myelopathy (JOA-score less than 11) from ventral CVJ compression were operated between 2014-2020 using a tubular retractor assisted transoral decompression.
RESULTS
All patients improved neurologically statistically (p=0.02). There were no posterior pharynx wound infections or rhinolalia. There was one case with incomplete removal of the lateral wall of odontoid and one incidental durotomy.
CONCLUSIONS
A Tubular retractor provides adequate access for decompression of the ventral compression of CVJ. As the tubular retractor pushed away the uvula, soft palate and pillars of the tonsils as it docked on the posterior pharyngeal wall, the traditional complications associated with traditional transoral procedures is completely avoided.
PubMed: 37583520
DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.2307.006 -
Qatar Medical Journal 2023We describe the case of a 44-year-old gentleman with hypertension and asthma presenting to the emergency department after noticing right upper-extremity weakness upon...
We describe the case of a 44-year-old gentleman with hypertension and asthma presenting to the emergency department after noticing right upper-extremity weakness upon awakening. Brain imaging did not reveal a stroke. Initial neurological examination pointed to cervical myelopathy with radiculopathy as well as possible underlying length-dependent peripheral neuropathy as there was right arm strength of 4/5 and there were brisker (3+) reflexes all over except at the right biceps reflex and both ankle reflexes. Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed myelomalacia at the C2 level and an os odontoideum (OO). Os odontoideum is a chronic condition that occurs due to the failure of the center of ossification of the dens to fuse with the body of C2. By the next day after a few hours of sustaining a fall, weakness progressed to quadriparesis, without a sensory level on examination, followed by urinary retention. This situation was attributed to a possible cervical cord contusion due to the fall in the presence of OO, with other possibilities being spinal cord hemorrhage, infarct and transverse myelitis. However, repeat scanning of the cervical spine (MRI) did not reveal any acute cord changes. The initial examination for common causes of peripheral neuropathy did not reveal any findings. Finally, the diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) was considered, and treatment was initiated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis was normal. The diagnosis was confirmed using electromyography. Our patient's initial presentation of monoparesis and progression in an asymmetric descending manner was unusual for GBS. His initial presentation mimicked a stroke, and the later progression masqueraded as cervical myelopathy secondary to a chronic cervical cord lesion. The presence of a cervical cord lesion (upper motor neuron) concealed the expected areflexia in GBS. The presence of OO on spine imaging, absence of expected areflexia in GBS, and progression to paraparesis after the fall sidetracked the direction of the initial investigation and led to a relative delay in diagnosis. Nonetheless, appraising the diagnostic data in the clinical context led to an appropriate diagnosis. We emphasize the importance of reconciling the available clinical and diagnostic information to reach the correct diagnosis.
PubMed: 37565047
DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2023.16 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2023Some older adults with spinal deformity maintain standing posture via pelvic compensation when their center of gravity moves forward. Therefore, evaluations of global...
Some older adults with spinal deformity maintain standing posture via pelvic compensation when their center of gravity moves forward. Therefore, evaluations of global alignment should include both pelvic tilt (PT) and seventh cervical vertebra-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA). Here, we evaluate standing postures of older adults using C7-SVA with PT and investigate factors related to postural abnormality. This cross-sectional study used an established population-based cohort in Japan wherein 1121 participants underwent sagittal whole-spine radiography in a standing position and bioelectrical impedance analysis for muscle mass measurements. Presence of low back pain (LBP), visual analog scale (VAS) of LBP, and LBP-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) were evaluated. Based on the PT and C7-SVA, the participants were divided into four groups: normal, compensated, non-compensated, and decompensated. We defined the latter three categories as "malalignment" and examined group characteristics and factors. There were significant differences in ODI%, VAS and prevalence of LBP, and sarcopenia among the four groups, although these were non-significant between non-compensated and decompensated groups on stratified analysis. Moreover, the decompensated group was significantly associated with sarcopenia. Individuals with pelvic compensation are at increased risk for LBP and related disorders even with the C7-SVA maintained within normal range.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Sarcopenia; Back Pain; Low Back Pain; Cervical Vertebrae
PubMed: 37481604
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39044-2 -
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society Jan 2024The integrity of the high cervical spine, the transition zone from the brainstem to the spinal cord, is crucial for survival and daily life. The region protects the...
The integrity of the high cervical spine, the transition zone from the brainstem to the spinal cord, is crucial for survival and daily life. The region protects the enclosed neurovascular structure and allows a substantial portion of the head motion. Injuries of the high cervical spine are frequent, and the fractures of the C2 vertebra account for approximately 17-25% of acute cervical fractures. We review the two major types of C2 vertebral fractures, odontoid fracture and Hangman's fracture. For both types of fractures, favorable outcomes could be obtained if the delicately selected conservative treatment is performed. In odontoid fractures, as the most common fracture on the C2 vertebrae, anterior screw fixation is considered first for type II fractures, and C1-2 fusion is suggested when nonunion is a concern or occurs. Hangman's fractures are the second most common fracture. Many stable extension type I and II fractures can be treated with external immobilization, whereas the predominant flexion type IIA and III fractures require surgical stabilization. No result proves that either anterior or posterior surgery is superior, and the surgeon should decide on the surgical method after careful consideration according to each clinical situation. This review will briefly describe the basic principles and current treatment concepts of C2 fractures.
PubMed: 37461838
DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0098