-
International Journal of Colorectal... Apr 2024Surgical techniques and the prognosis of posterior pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer in female patients pose challenges that need to be...
A novel classification of posterior pelvic exenteration to assess prognosis in female patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study from China PelvEx collaborative.
PURPOSE
Surgical techniques and the prognosis of posterior pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer in female patients pose challenges that need to be addressed. Therefore, we investigated the short-term and survival outcomes of posterior pelvic exenteration in female patients using a novel Peking classification.
METHODS
We retrospectively analysed a prospective database from China PelvEx Collaborative across three tertiary referral centres. A total of 172 patients who underwent combined resection for locally advanced primary rectal cancer were classified based on four subtypes (PPE-I [64/172], PPE-II [68/172], PPE-III [21/172], and PPE-IV [19/172]) according to the Peking classification; perioperative characteristics and short-term and oncological outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS
Differences were significant among the four groups regarding colorectal reconstruction (p < 0.001), perineal reconstruction (p < 0.001), in-hospital complications (p < 0.05), and urinary retention (p < 0.05). The R resection rates for PPE-I, PPE-II, PPE-III, and PPE-IV were 90.6%, 89.7%, 90.5%, and 89.5%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates of the PPE-I, PPE-II, PPE-III, and PPE-IV groups were 73.4%, 68.8%, 54.7%, and 37.3%, respectively. Correspondingly, their 5-year disease-free survival rates were 76.0%, 62.5%, 57.7%, and 43.1%, respectively. Notably, the PPE-IV group demonstrated the lowest 5-year overall survival rate (p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival rate (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The Peking classification can aid in determining suitable surgical techniques and conducting prognostic assessments in female patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pelvic Exenteration; Rectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Prognosis; China; Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Treatment Outcome; Adult; Disease-Free Survival
PubMed: 38664256
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04632-9 -
Heliyon Apr 2024Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a major surgical procedure used as a salvage therapy for patients with locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies. Urinary...
BACKGROUND
Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a major surgical procedure used as a salvage therapy for patients with locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies. Urinary reconstruction is a major part of PE and is often associated with high rates of post-operative complications. In the current study we evaluate the short and long-term urological outcomes following PE for Colo-Rectal (CR) and gyneco-oncological (GO) malignancies.
METHODS
Study included 22 patients who underwent PE for recurrent or locally advanced CR and GO malignancies in our institution between the years 2010-2018. The endpoint was post-operative freedom from urological complications.
RESULTS
Of 22 patients included, 13 (59 %) and 9 (41 %) underwent PE for CR and GO malignancies respectively. The mean age of the patients was 54 years. The median follow-up was 19 months. Seven (78 %) patients with GO malignancy and 11 (85 %) with CR malignancy underwent PE for local recurrence. Hydronephrosis prior to surgery existed in 8 (36.3 %) patients, of which, 5 patients required kidney drainage via nephrostomy tube. Two patients underwent posterior pelvic exenteration (PPE) with bladder preservation whereas the remaining 20 underwent cystectomy with urinary diversion by ileal conduit. Hydronephrosis post PE developed in 13 patients (59 %). eight (36 %) patients needed kidney drainage by nephrostomy tubes post PE, of these, 6 (75 %) had disease recurrence. The 2 years freedom from kidney drainage was 68 %, however the median time for kidney drainage was 0.5 months. The median overall survival was 12.5 months.
CONCLUSION
The rate of urological complications following PE is relatively high and associated with disease recurrence.
PubMed: 38644885
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29640 -
Journal of Medical Case Reports Apr 2024Total pelvic exenteration is the ultimate solution for rectovesicovaginal fistula caused by radiation therapy, yet total pelvic exenteration frequently causes...
The effect of physical therapy and mechanical stimulation on dysfunction of lower extremities after total pelvic exenteration in cervical carcinoma patient with rectovesicovaginal fistula induced by radiotherapy: a case report.
BACKGROUND
Total pelvic exenteration is the ultimate solution for rectovesicovaginal fistula caused by radiation therapy, yet total pelvic exenteration frequently causes intraoperative complications and postoperative complications. These complications are responsible for the dysfunction of lower extremities, impaired quality of life, and even the high long-term morbidity rate, thus multidisciplinary cooperation and early intervention for prevention of complications are necessary. Physical therapy was found to reduce the postoperative complications and promote rehabilitation, yet the effect on how physiotherapy prevents and treats complications after total pelvic exenteration and pelvic lymphadenectomy remains unclear.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 50-year-old Chinese woman gradually developed perianal and pelvic floor pain and discomfort, right lower limb numbness, and involuntary vaginal discharge owing to recurrence and metastasis of cervical cancer more than half a year ago. Diagnosed as rectovesicovaginal fistula caused by radiation, she received total pelvic exenteration and subsequently developed severe lower limb edema, swelling pain, obturator nerve injury, and motor dysfunction. The patient was referred to a physiotherapist who performed rehabilitation evaluation and found edema in both lower extremities, right inguinal region pain (numeric pain rate scale 5/10), decreased temperature sensation and light touch in the medial thigh of the right lower limb, decreased right hip adductor muscle strength (manual muscle test 1/5) and right hip flexor muscle strength (manual muscle test 1/5), inability actively to adduct and flex the right hip with knee extension, low de Morton mobility Index score (0/100), and low Modified Barthel Index score (35/100). Routine physiotherapy was performed in 2 weeks, including therapeutic exercises, mechanical stimulation and electrical stimulation as well as manual therapy. The outcomes showed that physiotherapy significantly reduced lower limb pain and swelling, and improved hip range of motion, motor function, and activities of daily living, but still did not prevent thrombosis.
CONCLUSION
Standardized physical therapy demonstrates the effect on postoperative complications after total pelvic exenteration and pelvic lymphadenectomy. This supports the necessity of multidisciplinary cooperation and early physiotherapy intervention. Further research is needed to determine the causes of thrombosis after standardized intervention, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of physical therapy after total pelvic exenteration.
Topics: Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Activities of Daily Living; Pelvic Exenteration; Quality of Life; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Lower Extremity; Physical Therapy Modalities; Pelvic Pain; Edema; Postoperative Complications; Thrombosis
PubMed: 38610054
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04516-0 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2024Innovation in surgery and pelvic oncology have redefined the boundaries of pelvic exenteration for CRC. However, surgical approaches and outcomes following repeat... (Review)
Review
Innovation in surgery and pelvic oncology have redefined the boundaries of pelvic exenteration for CRC. However, surgical approaches and outcomes following repeat exenteration and reconstruction are not well described. The resulting defect from a second beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) presents a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. The aim of this study was to explore reconstructive options for patients undergoing repeat beyond TME for recurrent CRC following previous beyond TME and regional reconstruction. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for relevant articles, yielding 2353 studies. However, following full text review and the application of the inclusion criteria, all the studies were excluded. This study demonstrated the lack of reporting on re-do reconstruction techniques following repeat exenteration for recurrent CRC. Based on this finding, we conducted a point-by-point discussion of certain key aspects that should be taken into consideration when approaching this patient cohort.
PubMed: 38592018
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051228 -
World Journal of Gastrointestinal... Mar 2024Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second highest cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. About 5%-10% of patients are diagnosed with locally...
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second highest cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. About 5%-10% of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) on presentation. For LARC invading into other structures ( T4b), multivisceral resection (MVR) and/or pelvic exenteration (PE) remains the only potential curative surgical treatment. MVR and/or PE is a major and complex surgery with high post-operative morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been shown to improve short-term post-operative outcomes in other gastrointestinal malignancies, but there is little evidence on its use in MVR, especially so for robotic MVR.
AIM
To assess the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive MVR (miMVR), and compare post-operative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic MVR.
METHODS
This is a single-center retrospective cohort study from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2023. Inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with cT4b rectal cancer and underwent MVR, or stage 4 disease with resectable systemic metastases. Patients who underwent curative MVR for locally recurrent rectal cancer, or metachronous rectal cancer were also included. Exclusion criteria were patients with systemic metastases with non-resectable disease. All patients planned for elective surgery were enrolled into the standard enhanced recovery after surgery pathway with standard peri-operative management for colorectal surgery. Complex surgery was defined based on technical difficulty of surgery ( total PE, bladder-sparing prostatectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection or need for flap creation). Our primary outcomes were the margin status, and complication rates. Categorical values were described as percentages and analysed by the chi-square test. Continuous variables were expressed as median (range) and analysed by Mann-Whitney test. Cumulative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates with life table analysis. Log-rank test was performed to determine statistical significance between cumulative estimates. Statistical significance was defined as < 0.05.
RESULTS
A total of 46 patients were included in this study [open MVR (oMVR): 12 (26.1%), miMVR: 36 (73.9%)]. Patients' American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index and co-morbidities were comparable between oMVR and miMVR. There is an increasing trend towards robotic MVR from 2015 to 2023. MiMVR was associated with lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (median 450 1200 mL, = 0.008), major morbidity (14.7% 50.0%, = 0.014), post-operative intra-abdominal collections (11.8% 50.0%, = 0.006), post-operative ileus (32.4% 66.7%, = 0.04) and surgical site infection (11.8% 50.0%, = 0.006) compared with oMVR. Length of stay was also shorter for miMVR compared with oMVR (median 10 30 d, = 0.001). Oncological outcomes-R0 resection, recurrence, OS and RFS were comparable between miMVR and oMVR. There was no 30-d mortality. More patients underwent robotic compared with laparoscopic MVR for complex cases (robotic 57.1% laparoscopic 7.7%, = 0.004). The operating time was longer for robotic compared with laparoscopic MVR [robotic: 602 (400-900) min, laparoscopic: Median 455 (275-675) min, < 0.001]. Incidence of R0 resection was similar (laparoscopic: 84.6% robotic: 76.2%, = 0.555). Overall complication rates, major morbidity rates and 30-d readmission rates were similar between laparoscopic and robotic MVR. Interestingly, 3-year OS (robotic 83.1% 58.6%, = 0.008) and RFS (robotic 72.9% 34.3%, = 0.002) was superior for robotic compared with laparoscopic MVR.
CONCLUSION
MiMVR had lower post-operative complications compared to oMVR. Robotic MVR was also safe, with acceptable post-operative complication rates. Prospective studies should be conducted to compare short-term and long-term outcomes between robotic laparoscopic MVR.
PubMed: 38577068
DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.777 -
Journal of Surgical Case Reports Mar 2024Primary acquired perineal hernia is rare with only 100 reported cases in the literature. Emergency presentations of intestinal obstruction secondary to perineal hernia...
Primary acquired perineal hernia is rare with only 100 reported cases in the literature. Emergency presentations of intestinal obstruction secondary to perineal hernia are very rare and to-date, there are only eight cases reported in the literature. We present a case of a 74-year-old lady who presented with a small bowel obstruction secondary to strangulated perineal hernia in the absence of pelvic exenteration or abdominoperineal resection requiring operative repair via combined open transabdominal and transperineal approach. To our knowledge, this case represents the first reported case of intestinal obstruction secondary to primary acquired perineal hernia in the absence of pelvic exenteration or abdominoperineal resection.
PubMed: 38505337
DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae164 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology Feb 2024Pelvic malignant tumors often originate in the rectum, bladder, uterus, and other organs. In patients with locally advanced tumours in the presence of direct invasion of...
BACKGROUND
Pelvic malignant tumors often originate in the rectum, bladder, uterus, and other organs. In patients with locally advanced tumours in the presence of direct invasion of one or more organs, negative tumor resection margin (R0) resection can be very beneficial to patient survival if it can be performed. As a multidisciplinary and high-risk surgical method, the pelvic exenteration (PE) procedure has only been reported in a few medical centres internationally. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who had undergone PE surgery in our hospital, in order to provide ideas for the best treatment of patients with pelvic malignant tumors.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted of 59 patients with pelvic malignant tumors admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2015 to July 2021, all of whom received PE surgery. They were divided into two groups according to the location of the disease: the rectal cancer group (n=40) and the cervical cancer group (n=19). Statistical analysis was performed on the baseline and follow-up data of the two groups of patients.
RESULTS
(I) Patient baseline data. Compared to the rectal cancer group, more patients in the cervical cancer group received preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy (P=0.013), and had a lower R0 resection rate (P=0.037). Postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer and cervical cancer were 27.5% and 47.3%, respectively. (II) Patient survival analysis after PE surgery. The 5-year survival rate was 36.6% in the rectal cancer group and 25.3% in the cervical cancer group. In the rectal cancer group, for the primary tumor, if there was no lymph node metastasis or no postoperative complications in the postoperative pathology, the patient had a good survival prognosis. Univariate analysis showed that recurrent rectal cancer, postoperative lymph node metastasis, postoperative complications, and microsatellite stability (MSS) were significant predictors of poor survival outcomes. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis and postoperative complications were independent prognostic factors for patient survival.
CONCLUSIONS
PE is a viable option for pelvic malignancies; aggressive radical resection of lesions and reduced postoperative complications can effectively improve patient outcomes.
PubMed: 38482226
DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-973 -
The British Journal of Surgery Mar 2024Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration (PE), but is undefined. EPS outcome reporting and descriptors of...
BACKGROUND
Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration (PE), but is undefined. EPS outcome reporting and descriptors of radicality of PE are inconsistent; therefore, the best approaches for prevention are unknown. To facilitate future research into EPS, the aim of this study is to define a measurable core outcome set, core descriptor set and written definition for EPS. Consensus on strategies to mitigate EPS was also explored.
METHOD
Three-stage consensus methodology was used: longlisting with systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient engagement, and Delphi-piloting; shortlisting with two rounds of modified Delphi; and a confirmatory stage using a modified nominal group technique. This included a selection of measurement instruments, and iterative generation of a written EPS definition.
RESULTS
One hundred and three and 119 participants took part in the modified Delphi and consensus meetings, respectively. This encompassed international patient and healthcare professional representation with multidisciplinary input. Seventy statements were longlisted, seven core outcomes (bowel obstruction, enteroperineal fistula, chronic perineal sinus, infected pelvic collection, bowel obstruction, morbidity from reconstruction, re-intervention, and quality of life), and four core descriptors (magnitude of surgery, radiotherapy-induced damage, methods of reconstruction, and changes in volume of pelvic dead space) reached consensus-where applicable, measurement of these outcomes and descriptors was defined. A written definition for EPS was agreed.
CONCLUSIONS
EPS is an area of unmet research and clinical need. This study provides an agreed definition and core data set for EPS to facilitate further research.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Quality of Life; Pelvis; Pelvic Exenteration; Health Personnel; Delphi Technique; Research Design
PubMed: 38456677
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae042 -
Translational Cancer Research Jan 2024Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) is a highly invasive surgery associated with high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality and is commonly performed for several... (Review)
Review
Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) is a highly invasive surgery associated with high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality and is commonly performed for several types of locally advanced or recurrent pelvic cancers. It involves multivisceral resection, including the rectum, sigmoid colon, bladder, prostate, uterus, vagina, or ovaries, and urologists normally perform radical cystectomy or radical prostatectomy and urinary diversion in collaboration with colorectal surgeons and gynecologists. In the urological field, robot-assisted surgeries have been widely performed as one of the main minimally invasive procedures because of their superior perioperative or oncological outcomes compared to open or laparoscopic surgeries. In pelvic exenteration (PE) surgery, laparoscopic surgeries have shown superior rates of mortality, morbidity, and R0 resection compared to open surgeries. Robot-assisted TPE for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer was first reported in 2014, and reports of its safety and usefulness have gradually increased. Robot-assisted PE, in which multivisceral resection in a narrow pelvic space is easier, will eventually be a standard minimally invasive procedure, although evidence has been limited to date. This clinical practice review summarizes the indications for surgery, perioperative complications, and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted TPE and highlights the current status of robot-assisted TPE for patients with urological malignancies and its surgical technique, focusing on the manipulation of urological organs.
PubMed: 38410226
DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-1039 -
Cancers Feb 2024Pelvic exenteration represents a radical procedure aimed at achieving complete tumor resection with negative margins. Although it is the only therapeutic option for some... (Review)
Review
Pelvic exenteration represents a radical procedure aimed at achieving complete tumor resection with negative margins. Although it is the only therapeutic option for some cases of advanced tumors, it is associated with several perioperative complications. We believe that careful patient selection is related to better oncologic outcomes and lower complication rates. The objectives of this review are to identify the most current indications for this intervention, suggest criteria for case selection, evaluate recommendations for perioperative care, and review oncologic outcomes and potential associated complications. To this end, an analysis of English language articles in PubMed was performed, searching for topics such as the indication for pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic neoplasms selection of oncologic cases, the impact of tumor size and extent on oncologic outcomes, preoperative and postoperative surgical management, surgical complications, and outcomes of overall survival and recurrence-free survival.
PubMed: 38398208
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040817