-
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Feb 2024Telmisartan is an antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor used in the management of hypertension (alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. It... (Review)
Review
Telmisartan is an antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor used in the management of hypertension (alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. It belongs to the drug class of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Among drugs of this class, telmisartan shows particular pharmacologic properties, including a longer half-life than any other angiotensin II receptor blockers that bring higher and persistent antihypertensive activity. In hypertensive patients, telmisartan has superior efficacy than other antihypertensive drugs (losartan, valsartan, ramipril, atenolol, and perindopril) in controlling blood pressure, especially towards the end of the dosing interval. Telmisartan has a partial PPARγ-agonistic effect whilst does not have the safety concerns of full agonists of PPARγ receptors (thiazolidinediones). Moreover, telmisartan has an agonist activity on PPARα and PPARδ receptors and modulates the adipokine levels. Thus, telmisartan could be considered as a suitable alternative option, with multi-benefit for all components of metabolic syndrome including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hyperlipidemia. This review will highlight the role of telmisartan in metabolic syndrome and the main mechanisms of action of telmisartan are discussed and summarized. Many studies have demonstrated the useful properties of telmisartan in the prevention and improving of metabolic syndrome and this well-tolerated drug can be greatly proposed in the treatment of different components of metabolic syndrome. However, larger and long-duration studies are needed to confirm these findings in long-term observational studies and prospective trials and to determine the optimum dose of telmisartan in metabolic syndrome.
Topics: Humans; Telmisartan; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Metabolic Syndrome; PPAR gamma; Prospective Studies; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Hypertension; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Benzoates
PubMed: 38228033
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116169 -
Scientific Reports Jan 2024Given possible involvement of the central and peripheral angiotensin system in pain processing, we conducted clinical and preclinical studies to test whether...
Given possible involvement of the central and peripheral angiotensin system in pain processing, we conducted clinical and preclinical studies to test whether pharmacological inhibition of the angiotensin system would prevent diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) accompanying type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the preclinical study, the nociceptive sensitivity was determined in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice, a T2DM model. A clinical retrospective cohort study was conducted, using the medical records of T2DM patients receiving antihypertensives at three hospitals for nearly a decade. In the ob/ob mice, daily treatment with perindopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), or telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), but not amlodipine, an L-type calcium channel blocker (CaB), significantly inhibited DPN development without affecting the hyperglycemia. In the clinical study, the enrolled 7464 patients were divided into three groups receiving ACEIs, ARBs and the others (non-ACEI, non-ARB antihypertensives). Bonferroni's test indicated significantly later DPN development in the ARB and ACEI groups than the others group. The multivariate Cox proportional analysis detected significant negative association of the prescription of ACEIs or ARBs and β-blockers, but not CaBs or diuretics, with DPN development. Thus, our study suggests that pharmacological inhibition of the angiotensin system is beneficial to prevent DPN accompanying T2DM.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Humans; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Retrospective Studies; Antiviral Agents
PubMed: 38200077
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51572-z -
International Journal of Hypertension 2023Perindopril is an ACE inhibitor that aids in both blood pressure regulation and homocysteine reduction.
Preliminary Consequences of Blood Pressure Management and Blood Homocysteine Levels with Perindopril in Newly Diagnosed Hypertensive Patients in the Vietnamese Population.
BACKGROUND
Perindopril is an ACE inhibitor that aids in both blood pressure regulation and homocysteine reduction.
OBJECTIVES
Our study aimed to evaluate the results of controlling blood pressure and blood homocysteine levels by perindopril in patients with primary hypertension.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A cross-sectional descriptive study with a longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 105 primary hypertensive patients treated with perindopril.
RESULTS
The results of our study showed that after 6 weeks of treatment with perindopril, the proportion of patients with the target blood pressure (BP) level accounted for 70.5%, the rate of grade 1 hypertension decreased from 61.0% to 25.7%, grade 2 blood pressure decreased from 17.1% to 3.8%, and there was no case of grade 3 hypertension. At the same time, we also found that the rate of BP control in the group of patients who controlled Hcy below a threshold of 15 mol/L was significantly higher than in the other group ( < 0.05). Concerning the efficacy of decreasing homocysteine in blood, we discovered that after 6 weeks of treatment with perindopril, the proportion of patients with elevated homocysteine reduced considerably from 74.3% to 40% ( < 0.05). In addition, the homocysteine concentration was 4.33 mol/L lower after treatment than before treatment (95% CI: 3.69-4.97) ( < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Perindopril helps control blood pressure and reduces blood homocysteine levels in patients with primary hypertension.
PubMed: 37886230
DOI: 10.1155/2023/1933783 -
Advances in Therapy Jan 2024The present real-world analysis aims to compare the drug utilization, hospitalizations and direct healthcare costs related to the use of single-pill combination (SPC) or... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
A Retrospective Observational Real-Word Analysis of the Adherence, Healthcare Resource Consumption and Costs in Patients Treated with Bisoprolol/Perindopril as Single-Pill or Free Combination.
INTRODUCTION
The present real-world analysis aims to compare the drug utilization, hospitalizations and direct healthcare costs related to the use of single-pill combination (SPC) or free-equivalent combination (FEC) of perindopril and bisoprolol (PER/BIS) in a large Italian population.
METHODS
This observational retrospective analysis was based on administrative databases covering approximately 7 million subjects across Italy. All adult subjects receiving PER/BIS as SPC or FEC between January 2017-June 2020 were included. Subjects were followed for 1 year after the first prescription of PER/BIS as FEC (± 1 month) or SPC. Before comparing the SPC and FEC cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics. Drug utilization was investigated as adherence (defined by the proportion of days covered, PDC) and persistence (evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves). Hospitalizations and mean annual direct healthcare costs (due to drug prescriptions, hospitalizations and use of outpatient services) were analyzed during follow-up.
RESULTS
The original cohort included 11,440 and 6521 patients taking the SPC and FEC PER/BIS combination, respectively. After PSM, two balanced SPC and FEC cohorts of 4688 patients were obtained (mean age 70 years, approximately 50% male, 24% in secondary prevention). The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥ 80%) was higher for those on SPC (45.5%) than those on FEC (38.6%), p < 0.001. The PER/BIS combination was discontinued by 35.8% of patients in the SPC cohort and 41.7% in the FEC cohort (p < 0.001). The SPC cohort had fewer cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (5.3%) than the free-combination cohort (7.4%), p < 0.001. Mean annual total healthcare costs were lower in the SPC (1999€) than in the FEC (2359€) cohort (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
In a real-world setting, patients treated with PER/BIS SPC showed higher adherence, lower risk of drug discontinuation, reduced risk of CV hospitalization, and lower healthcare costs than those on FEC of the same drugs.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Aged; Female; Perindopril; Antihypertensive Agents; Hypertension; Bisoprolol; Retrospective Studies; Delivery of Health Care; Medication Adherence
PubMed: 37864626
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02707-7 -
PloS One 2023Angiotensin II (AII), has been suggested to promote muscle loss. Reducing AII synthesis, by inhibiting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity has been proposed as... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Angiotensin II (AII), has been suggested to promote muscle loss. Reducing AII synthesis, by inhibiting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity has been proposed as a method to inhibit muscle loss. The LACE clinical trial was designed to determine whether ACE inhibition would reduce further muscle loss in individuals with sarcopenia but suffered from low recruitment and returned a negative result. Polymorphic variation in the ACE promoter (I/D alleles) has been associated with differences in ACE activity and muscle physiology in a range of clinical conditions. This aim of this analysis was to determine whether I/D polymorphic variation is associated with muscle mass, strength, in sarcopenia or contributed to the lack of response to treatment in the LACE study.
METHODS
Sarcopenic individuals were recruited into a 2x2 factorial multicentre double-blind study of the effects of perindopril and/or leucine versus placebo on physical performance and muscle mass. DNA extracted from blood samples (n = 130 72 women and 58 men) was genotyped by PCR for the ACE I/D polymorphism. Genotypes were then compared with body composition measured by DXA, hand grip and quadriceps strength before and after 12 months' treatment with leucine and/or perindopril in a cross-sectional analysis of the influence of genotype on these variables.
RESULTS
Allele frequencies for the normal UK population were extracted from 13 previous studies (I = 0.473, D = 0.527). In the LACE cohort the D allele was over-represented (I = 0.412, D = 0.588, p = 0.046). This over-representation was present in men (I = 0.353, D = 0.647, p = 0.010) but not women (I = 0.458, D = 0.532, p = 0.708). In men but not women, individuals with the I allele had greater leg strength (II/ID = 18.00 kg (14.50, 21.60) vs DD = 13.20 kg (10.50, 15.90), p = 0.028). Over the 12 months individuals with the DD genotype increased in quadriceps strength but those with the II or ID genotype did not. Perindopril did not increase muscle strength or mass in any polymorphism group relative to placebo.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest that although ACE genotype was not associated with response to ACE inhibitor therapy in the LACE trial population, sarcopenic men with the ACE DD genotype may be weaker than those with the ACE I/D or II genotype.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Aged; Sarcopenia; Perindopril; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Cross-Sectional Studies; Leucine; Hand Strength; Genotype; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
PubMed: 37862321
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292402 -
Advances in Therapy Nov 2023Differences in class or molecule-specific effects between renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors have not been conclusively demonstrated. This study used...
Comparing Cardiovascular Outcomes and Costs of Perindopril-, Enalapril- or Losartan-Based Antihypertensive Regimens in South Africa: Real-World Medical Claims Database Analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Differences in class or molecule-specific effects between renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors have not been conclusively demonstrated. This study used South African data to assess clinical and cost outcomes of antihypertensive therapy with the three most common RAAS inhibitors: perindopril, losartan and enalapril.
METHODS
Using a large, South African private health insurance claims database, we identified patients with a hypertension diagnosis in January 2015 receiving standard doses of perindopril, enalapril or losartan, alone or in combination with other agents. From claims over the subsequent 5 years, we calculated the risk-adjusted rate of the composite primary outcome of myocardial infarction, ischaemic heart disease, heart failure or stroke; rate of all-cause mortality; and costs per life per month (PLPM), with adjustments based on demographic characteristics, healthcare plan and comorbidity.
RESULTS
Overall, 32,857 individuals received perindopril, 16,693 losartan and 13,939 enalapril. Perindopril-based regimens were associated with a significantly lower primary outcome rate (205 per 1000 patients over 5 years) versus losartan (221; P < 0.0001) or enalapril (223; P < 0.0001). The risk-adjusted all-cause mortality rate was lower with perindopril than enalapril (100 vs. 139 deaths per 1000 patients over 5 years; P = 0.007), but not losartan (100 vs. 94; P = 0.650). Mean (95% confidence interval) overall risk-adjusted cost PLPM was Rands (ZAR) 1342 (87-8973) for perindopril, ZAR 1466 (104-9365) for losartan (P = 0.0044) and ZAR 1540 (77-10,546) for enalapril (P = 0.0003).
CONCLUSION
In South African individuals with private health insurance, a perindopril-based antihypertensive regimen provided better clinical and cost outcomes compared with other regimens.
Topics: Humans; Losartan; Antihypertensive Agents; Enalapril; Perindopril; South Africa; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Hypertension; Blood Pressure
PubMed: 37730949
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02641-8 -
Journal of Hypertension Jan 2024This analysis compared adherence, cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause mortality incidence, and healthcare costs among hypertensive patients treated with perindopril... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVES
This analysis compared adherence, cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause mortality incidence, and healthcare costs among hypertensive patients treated with perindopril (PER)/indapamide (IND)/amlodipine (AML) in single-pill combination (SPC) vs. multiple-pill combination, in a real-world setting in Italy.
METHODS
In this observational retrospective analysis of Italian administrative databases, adult patients treated with PER/IND/AML between 2010 and 2020 were divided into two cohorts: single-pill vs. multiple-pill. Patient data were available for at least one year before and after index date. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias. Adherence was defined as proportion of days covered: non-adherence, <40%; partial adherence, 40-79%, and adherence ≥80%. Mortality incidence and CV events as single, or composite, endpoints were evaluated after first year of follow-up. Healthcare cost analyses were performed from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.
RESULTS
Following PSM, the single-pill cohort included 12 150 patients, and the multiple-pill cohort, 6105. The SPC cohort had a significantly higher percentage of adherent patients vs. the multiple-pill cohort (59.9% vs. 26.9%, P < 0.001). Following the first year of follow-up, incidence of all-cause mortality, and combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and CV events were lower in the SPC cohort compared with multiple-pill cohort. Average annual direct healthcare costs were lower in the single-pill cohort (€2970) vs. multiple-pill cohort (€3642); cost of all drugs and all-cause hospitalizations were major contributors.
CONCLUSION
The SPC of PER/IND/AML, compared with multiple-pill combination, is associated with higher adherence to medication, lower incidence of CV events and mortality, and reduced healthcare costs.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Perindopril; Indapamide; Antihypertensive Agents; Retrospective Studies; State Medicine; Medication Adherence; Amlodipine; Hypertension; Drug Combinations; Health Care Costs; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
PubMed: 37728093
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003570 -
Journal of Traditional and... Sep 2023Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome that represents the end result of several pathophysiologic processes. Despite a dramatic evolution in diagnosis and...
Xin-Li formula attenuates heart failure induced by a combination of hyperlipidemia and myocardial infarction in rats via Treg immunomodulation and NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition.
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome that represents the end result of several pathophysiologic processes. Despite a dramatic evolution in diagnosis and management of HF, most patients eventually become resistant to therapy. Xin-Li Formula (XLF) is a Chinese medicine formula which shows great potential in the treatment of HF according to our previous studies. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of XLF on HF induced by a combination of hyperlipidemia and myocardial infarction (MI) in rats and reveal the underlying mechanism.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A rat model of HF induced by hyperlipidemia and MI was established with intragastric administration of XLF and Perindopril. In vitro, CD4 T cells from mouse spleen and LPS/ATP-stimulated THP-1 macrophages were employed.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
XLF was shown to have markedly protective effects on MI-induced HF with hyperlipidemia in rats, including improvement of left ventricular function, reduction of left ventricular fibrosis and infarct size. Moreover, XLF administration significantly increased the number of Foxp3 Tregs, and inhibited mTOR phosphorylation and NLRP3 signaling pathway. In vitro, we found that XLF had induced Treg activation via the inhibition of mTOR phosphorylation in CD4 T cells. Additionally, XLF inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation in LPS/ATP-stimulated THP-1 macrophages. Taken together, this study raises the exciting possibility that Xin-Li Formula may benefit HF patients due to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects via Treg activation and NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition.
PubMed: 37693100
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2023.03.009 -
European Journal of Internal Medicine Jan 2024Arterial hypertension is the most common cardiovascular comorbidity in atrial fibrillation (AF). Few studies investigated management strategies of hypertension in AF.
BACKGROUND
Arterial hypertension is the most common cardiovascular comorbidity in atrial fibrillation (AF). Few studies investigated management strategies of hypertension in AF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We included 5769 AF patients on oral anticoagulants from the nationwide ongoing Italian START registry. We investigated the prescription of antihypertensive drugs and mortality risk. Subgroup analyses according to sex and major cardiovascular comorbidities were performed.
RESULTS
Mean age was 80.8 years, 46.1% were women; 80.3% of patients were hypertensive. Furosemide (30.1%) was the most frequent diuretic followed by hydrochlorothiazide (15.4%) and potassium canrenoate (7.9%). 61.1% received β-blockers: 34.2% bisoprolol, 6.2% atenolol. Additionally, 36.9% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I): ramipril (20.9%), enalapril (5.3%) and perindopril (2.8%); 31.7% were on angiotensin receptors blockers (ARBs): valsartan (7.6%) and irbesartan (6.4%). Amlodipine and lercanidipine were prescribed in 14.0% and 2.3%, respectively. ACE-I (p < 0.001), α-blockers (p = 0.020) and Dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers (p = 0.004) were more common in men, while ARBs (p = 0.008), thiazide diuretics (p < 0.001) and β-blockers (p < 0.001) in women. During 22.61 ± 17.1 months, 512 patients died. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that ACE-I (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.758, 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 0.612-0.940, p = 0.012) and ARBs (HR 0.623, 95%CI 0.487-0.796, p < 0.001) inversely associated with mortality. ACE-I/ARBs inversely associated with mortality in both sexes and in patients with diabetes. This associastion was evident for ACE-I in patients with previous cardiovascular disease, and for ARBs in HF.
CONCLUSION
A lower mortality risk was found in AF patients on ACE-I/ARBs. Different prescription patterns of antihypertensive drugs between men and women do exist.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Renin-Angiotensin System; Atrial Fibrillation; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Hypertension; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
PubMed: 37648584
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.08.019 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Aug 2023Wunderlich syndrome is a rare and life-threatening condition that is characterized by spontaneous renal hemorrhage into the subcapsular and perinephric regions. This...
UNLABELLED
Wunderlich syndrome is a rare and life-threatening condition that is characterized by spontaneous renal hemorrhage into the subcapsular and perinephric regions. This case report describes the diagnosis and management of bilateral Wunderlich syndrome during pregnancy, resulting in Page kidney.
CASE PRESENTATION
The patient presented with complaints of left flank pain and breathlessness. After stabilization, an emergency lower cesarean delivery was performed, and a percutaneous drainage procedure was carried out to alleviate the compression on the left kidney. The patient was treated with blood transfusion, methyldopa, and perindopril. Follow-up examinations performed 3 months later revealed a significant decrease in fluid volume surrounding the left kidney.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION
Lenk's triad provides the primary description of the classical manifestations of this syndrome. Some instances have been connected to the Page kidney phenomenon. The relationship between pregnancy and Wunderlich syndrome has not been extensively studied, primarily because the symptoms can resemble other complications related to pregnancy. Due to the scarcity of evidence in the literature, there is no definitive guideline for managing Wunderlich syndrome during pregnancy. Consequently, each patient is treated on an individual basis. Conservative treatment is recommended once malignancy has been ruled out.
CONCLUSION
The case highlights the importance of considering Wunderlich syndrome as a differential diagnosis in pregnant patients with abdominal or flank pain, a palpable mass, and hypovolemia. Furthermore, the case illustrates the successful management of Wunderlich syndrome during pregnancy.
PubMed: 37554856
DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001062