-
Pharmacological Research Jun 2024Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) is among the most abundant proteins in eukaryotic cells. Evolutionarily conserved across species, eEF1A is in charge of... (Review)
Review
Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) is among the most abundant proteins in eukaryotic cells. Evolutionarily conserved across species, eEF1A is in charge of translation elongation for protein biosynthesis as well as a plethora of non-translational moonlighting functions for cellular homeostasis. In malignant cells, however, eEF1A becomes a pleiotropic driver of cancer progression via a broad diversity of pathways, which are not limited to hyperactive translational output. In the past decades, mounting studies have demonstrated the causal link between eEF1A and carcinogenesis, gaining deeper insights into its multifaceted mechanisms and corroborating its value as a prognostic marker in various cancers. On the other hand, an increasing number of natural and synthetic compounds were discovered as anticancer eEF1A-targeting inhibitors. Among them, plitidepsin was approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma whereas metarrestin was currently under clinical development. Despite significant achievements in these two interrelated fields, hitherto there lacks a systematic examination of the eEF1A protein in the context of cancer research. Therefore, the present work aims to delineate its clinical implications, molecular oncogenic mechanisms, and targeted therapeutic strategies as reflected in the ever expanding body of literature, so as to deepen mechanistic understanding of eEF1A-involved tumorigenesis and inspire the development of eEF1A-targeted chemotherapeutics and biologics.
Topics: Humans; Peptide Elongation Factor 1; Neoplasms; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Clinical Relevance
PubMed: 38677532
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107195 -
Marine Drugs Mar 2024The inadequate vascularization seen in fast-growing solid tumors gives rise to hypoxic areas, fostering specific changes in gene expression that bolster tumor cell... (Review)
Review
The inadequate vascularization seen in fast-growing solid tumors gives rise to hypoxic areas, fostering specific changes in gene expression that bolster tumor cell survival and metastasis, ultimately leading to unfavorable clinical prognoses across different cancer types. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF-1 and HIF-2) emerge as druggable pivotal players orchestrating tumor metastasis and angiogenesis, thus positioning them as prime targets for cancer treatment. A range of HIF inhibitors, notably natural compounds originating from marine organisms, exhibit encouraging anticancer properties, underscoring their significance as promising therapeutic options. Bioprospection of the marine environment is now a well-settled approach to the discovery and development of anticancer agents that might have their medicinal chemistry developed into clinical candidates. However, despite the massive increase in the number of marine natural products classified as 'anticancer leads,' most of which correspond to general cytotoxic agents, and only a few have been characterized regarding their molecular targets and mechanisms of action. The current review presents a critical analysis of inhibitors of HIF-1 and HIF-2 and hypoxia-selective compounds that have been sourced from marine organisms and that might act as new chemotherapeutic candidates or serve as templates for the development of structurally similar derivatives with improved anticancer efficacy.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Antineoplastic Agents; Aquatic Organisms; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Biological Products; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1; Neoplasms; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 38667760
DOI: 10.3390/md22040143 -
The Journal of Biological Chemistry Mar 2024Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A1 (EEF1A1) is canonically involved in protein synthesis but also has noncanonical functions in diverse cellular processes. Previously, we...
Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A1 (EEF1A1) is canonically involved in protein synthesis but also has noncanonical functions in diverse cellular processes. Previously, we identified EEF1A1 as a mediator of lipotoxicity and demonstrated that chemical inhibition of EEF1A1 activity reduced mouse liver lipid accumulation. These findings suggested a link between EEF1A1 and metabolism. Therefore, we investigated its role in regulating metabolic substrate preference. EEF1A1-deficient Chinese hamster ovary (2E2) cells displayed reduced media lactate accumulation. These effects were also observed with EEF1A1 knockdown in human hepatocyte-like HepG2 cells and in WT Chinese hamster ovary and HepG2 cells treated with selective EEF1A inhibitors, didemnin B, or plitidepsin. Extracellular flux analyses revealed decreased glycolytic ATP production and increased mitochondrial-to-glycolytic ATP production ratio in 2E2 cells, suggesting a more oxidative metabolic phenotype. Correspondingly, fatty acid oxidation was increased in 2E2 cells. Both 2E2 cells and HepG2 cells treated with didemnin B exhibited increased neutral lipid content, which may be required to support elevated oxidative metabolism. RNA-seq revealed a >90-fold downregulation of a rate-limiting glycolytic enzyme, hexokinase 2, which we confirmed through immunoblotting and enzyme activity assays. Pathway enrichment analysis identified downregulations in TNFA signaling via NFKB and MYC targets. Correspondingly, nuclear abundances of RELB and MYC were reduced in 2E2 cells. Thus, EEF1A1 deficiency may perturb glycolysis by limiting NFKB- and MYC-mediated gene expression, leading to decreased hexokinase expression and activity. This is the first evidence of a role for a translation elongation factor, EEF1A1, in regulating metabolic substrate utilization in mammalian cells.
Topics: Animals; Cricetinae; Humans; Adenosine Triphosphate; Cell Line; Cricetulus; Hexokinase; Lipids; Peptide Elongation Factor 1; Glycolysis; Oxidation-Reduction; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Lipid Metabolism
PubMed: 38272231
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.105684 -
International Journal of Infectious... Oct 2023To evaluate the compassionate use of plitidepsin as an antiviral treatment in hospitalized immunocompromised adult patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the compassionate use of plitidepsin as an antiviral treatment in hospitalized immunocompromised adult patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19.
DESIGN
Retrospective observational study of data -collected from January 01, 2021 to April 30, 2022- from 35 immunocompromised adult patients with COVID-19 non-eligible for other available antiviral treatments. Main outcome measures were time to respiratory recovery (SpFi ≥ 315); COVID-19-related 30-day-cumulative mortality after first plitidepsin infusion; and time to undetectable levels of viral RNA.
RESULTS
Thirty-three patients receiving a full course of plitidepsin (2.5 mg [n = 29] or 1.5 mg [n = 4]) were included. Most (69.7%) had a malignant hematologic disease and 27.3% had solid tumors. A total of 111 infusions were administered with lack of relevant safety events. Median time from plitidepsin initiation to SpFi ≥315 was 8 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-19). Median time to first negative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 (cycle threshold >36) was 17 days (95% CI 13-25). Mortality rate was 16.3% (95% CI 3-37.3).
CONCLUSION
These data support plitidepsin as a well-tolerated treatment that might have potential clinical and antiviral efficacy in COVID-19 immunocompromised patients.
Topics: Humans; Adult; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Compassionate Use Trials; Neoplasms; Antiviral Agents
PubMed: 37481109
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.07.011 -
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Nov 2023The occurrence of pneumomediastinum (PM) and/or pneumothorax (PTX) in patients with severe pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
INTRODUCTION
The occurrence of pneumomediastinum (PM) and/or pneumothorax (PTX) in patients with severe pneumonia due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated.
METHODS
This was a prospective observational study conducted in patients admitted to the intermediate respiratory care unit (IRCU) of a COVID-19 monographic hospital in Madrid (Spain) between December 14, 2020 and September 28, 2021. All patients had a diagnosis of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and required noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS): high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP). The incidences of PM and/or PTX, overall and by NIRS, and their impact on the probabilities of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and death were studied.
RESULTS
A total of 1306 patients were included. 4.3% (56/1306) developed PM/PTX, 3.8% (50/1306) PM, 1.6% (21/1306) PTX, and 1.1% (15/1306) PM + PTX. 16.1% (9/56) of patients with PM/PTX had HFNC alone, while 83.9% (47/56) had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP. In comparison, 41.7% (521/1250) of patients without PM and PTX had HFNC alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.27; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.13-0.55; < .001), while 58.3% (729/1250) had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.81-7.68; < .001). The probability of needing IMV among patients with PM/PTX was 67.9% (36/53) (OR 7.46; 95% CI 4.12-13.50; < .001), while it was 22.1% (262/1185) among patients without PM and PTX. Mortality among patients with PM/PTX was 33.9% (19/56) (OR 4.39; 95% CI 2.45-7.85; < .001), while it was 10.5% (131/1250) among patients without PM and PTX.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients admitted to the IRCU for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia requiring NIRS, incidences of PM/PTX, PM, PTX, and PM + PTX were observed to be 4.3%, 3.8%, 1.6%, and 1.1%, respectively. Most patients with PM/PTX had HFNC + CPAP/BiPAP as the NIRS device, much more frequently than patients without PM and PTX. The probabilities of IMV and death among patients with PM/PTX were 64.3% and 33.9%, respectively, higher than those observed in patients without PM and PTX, which were 21.0% and 10.5%, respectively.
Topics: Humans; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Respiratory Care Units; Mediastinal Emphysema; Pneumothorax; Pneumonia; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy; Respiratory Insufficiency; Noninvasive Ventilation
PubMed: 37306158
DOI: 10.1177/08850666231180165