-
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia 2024Identifying risk factors for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) progression is important. However, studies that have evaluated this subject using a...
INTRODUCTION
Identifying risk factors for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) progression is important. However, studies that have evaluated this subject using a Brazilian sample is sparce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify risk factors for renal outcomes and death in a Brazilian cohort of ADPKD patients.
METHODS
Patients had the first medical appointment between January 2002 and December 2014, and were followed up until December 2019. Associations between clinical and laboratory variables with the primary outcome (sustained decrease of at least 57% in the eGFR from baseline, need for dialysis or renal transplantation) and the secondary outcome (death from any cause) were analyzed using a multiple Cox regression model. Among 80 ADPKD patients, those under 18 years, with glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and/or those with missing data were excluded. There were 70 patients followed.
RESULTS
The factors independently associated with the renal outcomes were total kidney length - adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.137 (1.057-1.224), glomerular filtration rate - HR (95% CI): 0.970 (0.949-0.992), and serum uric acid level - HR (95% CI): 1.643 (1.118-2.415). Diabetes mellitus - HR (95% CI): 8.115 (1.985-33.180) and glomerular filtration rate - HR (95% CI): 0.957 (0.919-0.997) were associated with the secondary outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings corroborate the hypothesis that total kidney length, glomerular filtration rate and serum uric acid level may be important prognostic predictors of ADPKD in a Brazilian cohort, which could help to select patients who require closer follow up.
Topics: Humans; Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant; Male; Female; Disease Progression; Brazil; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Adult; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Cohort Studies; Uric Acid; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38935976
DOI: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2023-0040en -
Polish Archives of Internal Medicine Jun 2024Medications are a common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). There are various mechanisms that medications can induce AKI, and a better understanding of this...
Medications are a common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). There are various mechanisms that medications can induce AKI, and a better understanding of this pathophysiology can aid in clinician recognition, treatment and prevention. Hemodynamic-mediated AKI is often associated with drugs that alter renal perfusion and its autoregulation. Acute tubular injury is the result of direct renal tubular cell toxicity. Acute interstitial nephritis is a T-cell mediated immune hypersensitivity reaction to drugs leading to tubule-interstitial inflammation and AKI. Crystalline nephropathy can be caused by medications themselves that crystalize or from the altered urinary chemistries caused by medications. Some medications can cause AKI through uncommon mechanisms such as glomerulonephritis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Notably, some medications may cause a phenomenon called "pseudo-AKI" where serum creatinine is elevated without a true reduction in kidney function. Commonly used medications in clinical practice are reviewed with the focus on mechanisms of injury, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Recognizing the common medications that are associated with AKI is an important first step in reducing the risk of AKI. For each medication, understanding general and specific risk factors for AKI allows for early identification and timely discontinuation of offending agents. These measures will help mitigate the risk of AKI and promote renal recovery.
PubMed: 38934852
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16780 -
Hepatology Communications Jul 2024Sodium and water retention is a mainstay of the pathophysiology leading to ascites formation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Refractory ascites denotes the most... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Sodium and water retention is a mainstay of the pathophysiology leading to ascites formation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Refractory ascites denotes the most severe ascites status with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the natriuretic peptide ularitide in patients with refractory cirrhotic ascites.
METHODS
We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial investigating ularitide to manage refractory ascites. Until trial termination after interim analyses, we randomized 17 participants in a 2:1 ratio between ularitide (n=11) and placebo (n=6). While hospitalized, the participants received treatment for up to 48 hours. The primary efficacy endpoint was a change in renal water excretion, and secondary end points included changes in renal sodium excretion rate and body weight. The starting dose was 30 ng/kg/min, though later reduced to 20 for safety reasons.
RESULTS
In contrast to the study hypothesis, the mean urine production decreased after 24 hours of ularitide treatment compared with the baseline level (22.8 vs. 47.5 mL/h, p=0.04) and decreased more in participants randomized to ularitide than placebo (24.7 vs. -6.2 mL/h, p=0.05). Ularitide did not increase the renal sodium excretion rate or reduce the weight gain. The incidence rate ratio of adverse reactions in ularitide versus placebo was 8.5 (95% CI: 2-35, p=0.003). Participants treated with ularitide developed serious blood pressure reductions, impacting their renal responsiveness.
CONCLUSIONS
Ularitide in doses of 20-30 ng/kg/min did not benefit urine production and renal sodium excretion rate in patients with refractory ascites. The participants randomized to ularitide overall developed more adverse reactions than placebo. EudraCT no. 2019-002268-28.
Topics: Humans; Male; Ascites; Liver Cirrhosis; Female; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Double-Blind Method; Aged; Adult; Sodium
PubMed: 38934679
DOI: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000481 -
Cardiorenal Medicine Jun 2024Cardiac implantable electrical devices are able to affect kidney function through hemodynamic improvements. The Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) is a device-based...
BACKGROUND
Cardiac implantable electrical devices are able to affect kidney function through hemodynamic improvements. The Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) is a device-based therapy option for patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) despite optimized medical treatment. The long-term cardiorenal interactions for CCM treated patients are yet to be described.
METHODS
CCM recipients (n=187) from the Mannheim Cardiac Contractility Modulation Observational Study (MAINTAINED) were evaluated in the long-term (up to 60 months) for changes in serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), other surrogate markers of kidney function, and the chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage-distribution. With regard to kidney function at baseline, the patients were furthermore grouped to either advanced CKD (aCKD, CKD-stage ≥3, eGFR≤59mL/min/1.73 m2, n=107) or preserved kidney function and mild CKD (pCKD, CKD stages 1-2, eGFR≥60mL/min/1.73 m2, n=80). The groups were compared for differences regarding kidney function, New York Heart Association classification (NYHA), biventricular systolic function, HF hospitalizations and other parameters in the long-term (60 months).
RESULTS
CKD stage distribution remained stable during the entire follow-up (p=0.65). An increase in serum creatinine (1.47±1 vs. 1.6±1mg/dL) with a corresponding decline of eGFR (58.2±23.4 vs. 54.2±24.4mL/min/1.73 m2, both p<.05) were seen after 60 months but not before for the total cohort, which was only significant in pCKD patients in terms of group comparison. Mean survival (54.3±1.3 vs. 55.3±1.2months, p=0.53) was comparable in both groups. Improvements in NYHA (3.11±0.46 vs. 2.94±0.41 to 2.28±0.8 vs. 1.94±0.6) and LVEF (24.8±7.1 vs. 22.9±6.6 to 31.1±11.4 vs. 35.5±11.1%) were likewise similar after 60 months (both p <.05). The aCKD patients suffered from more HF-hospitalizations and ventricular tachycardias during the entire follow-up period (both p<.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The kidney function parameters and CKD stage distribution might remain stable in CCM treated HF patients in the long-term, who experience improvements in LVEF and functional status, regardless of their kidney function before. An impaired kidney function might be associated with further cardiovascular comorbidities and more advanced HF before CCM, and could be an additional risk factor of HF complications afterwards.
PubMed: 38934137
DOI: 10.1159/000539259 -
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Jun 2024Acute kidney disease (AKD) is a critical transitional period between acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. The incidence of AKD following acute kidney injury...
Acute kidney disease (AKD) is a critical transitional period between acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. The incidence of AKD following acute kidney injury is approximately 33.6%, and it can occur without identifiable preceding acute kidney injury. The development of AKD is associated with increased risks of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, and mortality. Biomarkers and subphenotypes are promising tools to predict prognosis in AKD. The complex clinical situations in patients with AKD necessitate a comprehensive and structured approach, termed "KAMPS" (kidney function check, advocacy, medications, pressure, sick day protocols). We introduce "MAND-MASS," an acronym devised to summarize the reconciliation of medications during episodes of acute illness, as a critical component of the sick day protocols at AKD. A multidisciplinary team care, consisting of nephrologists, pharmacists, dietitians, health educators, and nurses, is an optimal model to achieve the care bundle in KAMPS. Although the evidence for patients with AKD is still lacking, several potential pharmacological agents may improve outcomes, including but not limited to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. In conclusion, accurate prognosis prediction and effective treatment for AKD are critical yet unmet clinical needs. Future studies are urgently needed to improve patient care in this complex and rapidly evolving field.
PubMed: 38934037
DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.289 -
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Jun 2024Identifying risk factors and improving prognostication for mortality among patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing continuous kidney...
Association between systemic inflammation biomarkers and mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury receiving intensive care and continuous kidney replacement therapy: results from the RENERGY (REsearches for NEphRology and epidemioloGY) study.
BACKGROUND
Identifying risk factors and improving prognostication for mortality among patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is important in improving the adverse prognosis of this patient population. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of existing systemic inflammation biomarkers and determine the optimal systemic inflammation biomarker in patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving CKRT.
METHODS
This multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included 1,500 patients with sepsis-associated AKI treated with intensive care and CKRT. The main predictor was a panel of 13 different systemic inflammation biomarkers. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality after CKRT initiation. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality after CKRT initiation, CKRT duration, kidney replacement therapy dependence at discharge, and lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays.
RESULTS
When added to the widely accepted Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR) and neutrophil-platelet score (NPS) had the highest improvements in prognostication of 28-day mortality, where the corresponding increases in C-statistic were 0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00-0.02) and 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.03). Similar findings were observed for 90-day mortality. The 28- and 90-day mortality rates were significantly lower for the higher PAR and NPS quartiles. These associations remained significant even after adjustment for potential confounding variables in multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
CONCLUSION
Of the available systemic inflammation biomarkers, the addition of PAR or NPS to conventional ICU prediction models improved the prognostication of patients with sepsis-associated AKI receiving intensive care and CKRT.
PubMed: 38934032
DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.321 -
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Jun 2024Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant challenge in healthcare, imposing a significant social burden. While there are considerable researches dedicated to AKI and...
BACKGROUND
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant challenge in healthcare, imposing a significant social burden. While there are considerable researches dedicated to AKI and the recovery of AKI patients, a crucial factor in their prognosis, is often overlooked. Thus, our study aims to address this issue through the development of a machine learning-based approach to predict restoration of kidney function in patients with AKI.
METHODS
Our study encompassed data from 350,345 cases, derived from two hospitals. AKI was classified in accordance with the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Criteria for recovery were established as either a 33% decrease in serum creatinine levels at AKI onset or reduction to values lower than the baseline, which was initially employed for the diagnosis of AKI. We employed various machine learning models, selecting 43 pertinent features for analysis.
RESULTS
Our analysis contained 7,041 and 2,929 patients' data from internal cohort and external cohort respectively. The Categorical Boosting model demonstrated significant predictive accuracy, as evidenced by an internal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.7860, and an external AUROC score of 0.7316, thereby confirming its robustness in predictive performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations values were employed to explain key factors impacting recovery of renal function in AKI patients, highlighting factors such as elevated urine specific gravity, body temperature, and phosphorus levels.
CONCLUSION
This study presented a novel machine learning framework for predicting renal function recovery in patients with AKI, offering a deeper understanding of the key variables affecting recovery. The clinical applicability of the model was assessed across distinct hospital settings, which revealed variations in its efficacy. Although the model exhibited favorable outcomes, the necessity for further enhancements and the incorporation of more diverse datasets is imperative for its application in real-world scenarios.
PubMed: 38934029
DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.23.330 -
Qatar Medical Journal 2024SGLT2 inhibitors are known for their osmotic diuretic effect, and their use by Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes during the fasting month of Ramadan may pose an...
BACKGROUND
SGLT2 inhibitors are known for their osmotic diuretic effect, and their use by Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes during the fasting month of Ramadan may pose an increased risk of volume depletion, potentially impacting renal function.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020204582) of studies published between 2013 and January 2023, sourced from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The study selection criteria included controlled studies that reported the use of SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) by fasting adult type 2 diabetes patients and provided data on creatinine or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as outcomes.
RESULTS
Two prospective observational studies, encompassing a total of 359 participants, of which 197 utilized SGLT2 inhibitors, were identified. Our findings indicated that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors during Ramadan did not result in a significant alteration in eGFR. In one study by Hassanein et al., the mean changes in eGFR for the SGLT2i group, as compared to the non-SGLT2i group, were -1.2 ± 19.4 and 3.1 ± 14.8, respectively ( = 0.06). In a study by Shao et al., the least squares mean changes for eGFR in the SGLT2i group, compared to the non-SGLT2i group, were -6.0 ± 1.5 (95% CI, -8.9 to -3.1) and -4.2 ± 1.6 (95% CI, -7.3 to -1.1), respectively ( = 0.39).
CONCLUSION
Despite the limited number of observational studies available, our analysis suggests that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors by type 2 diabetes patients during Ramadan does not appear to significantly impact kidney function.
PubMed: 38933780
DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2024.29 -
Infection and Drug Resistance 2024Previous studies have indicated that the development of severe adverse events is associated with linezolid peak concentration (C), but the factors affecting linezolid C...
PURPOSE
Previous studies have indicated that the development of severe adverse events is associated with linezolid peak concentration (C), but the factors affecting linezolid C and evidences on therapeutic drug monitoring to anticipate toxicity in drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients have not been clarified clearly. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing linezolid C and investigate the association between linezolid concentration and hematological toxicity.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This study included patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis treated with linezolid from January 2022 to September 2023. We analyzed the factors affecting linezolid C using chi-squared and binary logistic regression. The diagnostic utility of linezolid C in predicting hematological toxicity was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 76 patients were enrolled in the study. 63.20% met the standard rates for linezolid C. Age (P=0.036), weight (P=0.0016), and creatinine clearance (P=0.0223) significantly correlated with the C. Hematological toxicity was observed in 46.05% (35/76) of patients, characterized by thrombocytopenia (31.58%, 24/76), anemia (6.58%, 5/76), and leukopenia (21.05%, 16/76). ROC curve analysis confirmed the predictive value of linezolid C for thrombocytopenia with an area under curve of 0.728.
CONCLUSION
Suboptimal linezolid C was prevalent among patients with DR-TB, with age, weight, and renal function emerging as influential factors. Elevated linezolid C increases the risk of thrombocytopenia. Meticulous monitoring of linezolid C is imperative during anti-DR-TB therapy to tailor treatment and mitigate hematological toxicity.
PubMed: 38933777
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S464429 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2024Unusual site deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was defined as venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurring outside the conventional deep veins of the lower extremity or pulmonary...
BACKGROUND
Unusual site deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was defined as venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurring outside the conventional deep veins of the lower extremity or pulmonary arteries. However, the optimal anticoagulation therapy for unusual site DVT remained unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in unusual site DVT.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study enrolled consecutive patients at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between January 2011 and December 2021 who were diagnosed with unusual site DVT. Patients were divided into two groups based on their ultimate medication choice: the warfarin group and the rivaroxaban group. The demographic characteristics were recorded for all enrolled patients. Clinical outcomes included recurrent VTE, bleeding complications and major bleeding.
RESULTS
A total of 1,088 patients were divided into warfarin ( = 514) and rivaroxaban ( = 574) groups. After the stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, Hazard Ratios for warfarin vs. rivaroxaban of recurrent VTE, bleeding complications and major bleeding were 0.52(95% CI: 0.25-1.08), 0.30(95% CI: 0.14-0.60), and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.13-0.74), respectively. Risk of clinical outcomes in specified subgroups for age, gender, renal function, thrombosis sites and diagnosis were assessed. The interaction of gender and treatment on major bleeding was significant (P for interaction = 0.062). Otherwise, there was no significant interaction between the other subgroups and the treatment group in terms of clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban exhibited comparable efficacy for the anticoagulant treatment of unusual site DVT, associated with a lower risk of bleeding complications and major bleeding.
PubMed: 38933677
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1419985