-
CNS Drugs Nov 2023In Parkinson's disease, safinamide and zonisamide are novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors with a dual mechanism of action involving the inhibition of sodium and calcium... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
In Parkinson's disease, safinamide and zonisamide are novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors with a dual mechanism of action involving the inhibition of sodium and calcium channels and the subsequent release of glutamate. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy and safety of both drugs compared with placebo on motor symptoms, cognitive function, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, PsycINFO, and trials registries up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials of adults with Parkinson's disease administered either safinamide or zonisamide and published in English. We excluded single-arm trials or if neither the efficacy nor safety outcomes of interest were reported. Primary outcomes were the change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale section III (UPDRS-III) and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included a change from baseline in OFF-time, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 to evaluate quality of life, and Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function assessment. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1. Random-effect models were used to calculate the pooled mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses by medication, doses, Parkinson's disease stage, and risk of bias were conducted. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Sensitivity analysis was conducted, and publication bias were evaluated. This meta-analysis was not externally funded, and the protocol is available on the Open Science Framework Registration ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AMNP5 ).
RESULTS
Of 3570 screened citations, 16 trials met inclusion criteria (4314 patients with Parkinson's disease). Ten safinamide trials were conducted in several countries. Six zonisamide trials were included, five of which were conducted in Japan and one in India. UPDRS Part III scores were significantly lower with both monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors than with placebo (MD = - 2.18; 95% CI - 2.88 to - 1.49; I =63%; n = 14 studies). A subgroup analysis showed a significant improvement in UPDRS-III in safinamide (MD = - 2.10; 95% CI - 3.09 to - 1.11; I = 71%; n = 8 studies) and zonisamide (MD = - 2.31; 95% CI - 3.35 to - 1.27; I = 52%; n = 6 studies) compared with placebo. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors significantly decreased OFF-time compared with placebo. No significant differences in cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination), whereas an improvement in quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 scores) was observed. There was no significant difference in incidence rates of serious adverse events among all examined doses of zonisamide and safinamide compared with placebo. Two trials were reported as a high risk of bias and sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary analysis results.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence suggests that novel monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors not only improve motor symptoms but also enhance patients' quality of life. The meta-analysis showed that both medications have a similar safety profile to placebo with regard to serious adverse events. The overall findings emphasize the effectiveness of safinamide and zonisamide in the treatment of Parkinson's disease as adjunct therapy. Further long-term studies examining the impact of these medications on motor and non-motor symptoms are necessary.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Zonisamide; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Dopamine Agents; Monoamine Oxidase
PubMed: 37973769
DOI: 10.1007/s40263-023-01048-x -
PloS One 2023The triple combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Triple combination of HAIC-FO plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
The triple combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is expected to have a synergistic anticancer effect in HCC. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination treatment in advanced HCC patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant studies from the inception of each database to May 10, 2023. All articles focusing the triple combination treatment of HAIC-FO plus TKI and ICIs for advanced HCC were eligible. The meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for case series and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary results were adverse events. Further meta-analysis of control studies demonstrated the superiority of the triple combination modality to TKI plus ICIs, and TKI alone.
RESULTS
Nine articles (four cohort studies and five one-arm studies) involving 777 advanced HCC patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of survival analysis, the pooled median PFS was 11 months (95% CI: 10.1-12.0 months) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.97). With regard to tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR was 61.6% (I2=0%, p = 0.71) and 87.9% (I2 = 13%, p = 0.33) with low heterogeneity, respectively. As compared with TKIs plus ICIs, and TKIs alone, the triple combination thrapy was associated with improved median OS (HR=0.51, 95%CI 0.41-0.62) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%, p = 0.47), median PFS (HR=0.51, 95%CI 0.41-0.64) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%, p = 0.41), ORR (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42-0.74) with high heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 69%, p = 0.02), and DCR (RR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.27-0.54) with low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 14%, p = 0.32). The most common 3/4 AEs were elevated ALT and AST, thrombocytopenia, hypertension, nausea and vomiting in this meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
The triple combination therapy of HAIC-FO plus TKI and ICIs showed promising efficacy and safety in patients with advanced HCC.
REGISTRATION
The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID:CRD42023424281).
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Antineoplastic Agents; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors; Liver Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 37844117
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290644 -
Medicine Sep 2023To evaluate through meta-analysis whether long-term use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) increases the risk of precancerous lesions in the stomach. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Whether long-term use of proton pump inhibitor increases the risk of precancerous lesions in the stomach: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
To evaluate through meta-analysis whether long-term use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) increases the risk of precancerous lesions in the stomach.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials that compared the occurrence and progression of precancerous lesions in patients receiving PPI treatment versus non-PPI treatment were retrieved from CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, CBM, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases (from database inception to May 1, 2023). The Revman 5.3 and STATA 17.0 software were used for analysis, and subgroup analysis was conducted based on follow-up time (≤12 months and > 12 months) and lesion type (atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and epithelial dysplasia).
RESULTS
Six randomized controlled trials with a total of 1623 cases were included, including 1015 cases in the experimental group and 608 cases in the control group. The meta-analysis results showed that the overall abnormal lesion rate combined with statistical relative risk (RR) = 1.31 (0.85-2.02), P = .23. Subgroup analysis showed that the follow-up time > 12 months combined result was RR = 2.21 (1.47-3.33), P = .0001, the intestinal metaplasia group combined result was RR = 1.96 (0.91-2.47), P = .04.
CONCLUSION SUBSECTIONS
During long-term follow-up, patients using PPI exhibited a significantly higher incidence of overall abnormal lesions compared to the control group, particularly with a higher risk observed for intestinal metaplasia. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of short-term follow-up and other types of lesions. It is important to exercise caution when interpreting these findings due to the limited number of nominated investigations included in the meta-analysis.
Topics: Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stomach; Precancerous Conditions; Carcinoma in Situ
PubMed: 37747015
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035062 -
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aug 2023Liver metastasis is a frequent phenomenon in advanced tumor disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of therapeutics that can improve the prognosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Liver metastasis is a frequent phenomenon in advanced tumor disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a new class of therapeutics that can improve the prognosis of cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the relationship between liver metastasis and survival outcomes of patients receiving ICIs treatment. We searched four main databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the survival outcomes of our concern. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relationship between liver metastasis and OS/ PFS. Finally, 163 articles were included in the study. The pooled results showed that patients with liver metastasis receiving ICIs treatment had worse OS (HR=1.82, 95%CI:1.59-2.08) and PFS (HR=1.68, 95%CI:1.49-1.89) than patients without liver metastasis. The effect of liver metastasis on ICIs efficacy differed in different tumor types, and patients with urinary system tumors (renal cell carcinoma OS: HR=2.47, 95%CI:1.76-3.45; urothelial carcinoma OS: HR=2.37, 95%CI:2.03-2.76) had the worst prognosis, followed by patients with melanoma (OS: HR=2.04, 95%CI:1.68-2.49) or non-small cell lung cancer (OS: HR=1.81, 95%CI:1.72-1.91). ICIs efficacy in digestive system tumors (colorectal cancer OS: HR=1.35, 95%CI:1.07-1.71; gastric cancer/ esophagogastric cancer OS: HR=1.17, 95%CI:0.90-1.52) was less affected, and peritoneal metastasis and the number of metastases have a greater clinical significance than liver metastasis based on univariate data. For cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment, the occurrence of liver metastasis is associated with poor prognosis. Different cancer types and metastatic sites may hold a different prognostic effect on the efficacy of ICIs treatment in cancer patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Esophageal Neoplasms; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Kidney Neoplasms; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Stomach Neoplasms; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 37308706
DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10217-7 -
European Journal of Neurology Aug 2023Tremor is often perceived as severely disabling by patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD) and yet ranges among the most difficult symptoms to treat. To date,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Tremor is often perceived as severely disabling by patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD) and yet ranges among the most difficult symptoms to treat. To date, no comprehensive analysis of non-lesional therapies to manage tremor in iPD exists to base recommendations upon. We therefore present a systematic literature review and meta-analysis assessing the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of non-lesional treatments for tremor in iPD.
METHODS
Three electronic databases were searched using a combination of title/abstract keywords complemented by hand-searching of reference lists. A random-effects meta-analysis of standardized mean change scores was conducted where appropriate.
RESULTS
Some 114 studies met inclusion criteria involving 8045 patients. The meta-analysis revealed an overall reduction of standardized mean change scores by (-0.93 [CI: -1.42; -0.43], p < 0.001) by 14 different dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic classes of agents. No significant differences were identified between direct comparisons. Subgroup analysis comparing dopamine receptor agonists resulted in superior effects of pramipexole and rotigotine compared with ropinirole. There was little cumulative evidence to support the use of individual non-pharmacological interventions for tremor, except for electrical stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this meta-analysis suggest a large but nonspecific effect of established pharmacological therapies on tremor in iPD. Based on high-quality studies, there is sufficient evidence to support that levodopa, dopamine receptor agonists, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors provide tremor relief in most patients, while evidence supporting other treatments is less well established. Sufficient evidence to draw conclusions on effects of non-lesional treatments in cases with refractory tremor is lacking.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Dopamine Agonists; Antiparkinson Agents; Tremor; Levodopa
PubMed: 37154268
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15823 -
European Neuropsychopharmacology : the... Jul 2023Selegiline is an irreversible, selective type-B monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) approved for Parkison's disease-oral and major depressive disorder-transdermal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Selegiline is an irreversible, selective type-B monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) approved for Parkison's disease-oral and major depressive disorder-transdermal formulation) resulting in non-selective MAOI activity at oral doses≥20 mg/day. The present systematic review and meta-analysis appraises the evidence of different formulations/dosages of selegiline across different psychiatric conditions. We inquired PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane-Central/WHO-ICTRP/Clarivate-WebOfScience and the Chinese-Electronic-Journal Database from inception to 10/26/2022 for selegiline trials involving psychiatric patients. Random-effects meta-analyses assessed heterogeneity, publication/risk biases, and confidence in the evidence, followed by sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses. Co-primary outcomes were: changes in symptom score (standardized mean difference=SMD) and author-defined response (risk ratios=RRs). RRs of adverse events and all-cause discontinuation were secondary and acceptability outcomes, respectively. Systematic-review included 42 studies; meta-analysis, 23. Selegiline outperformed placebo in depressive symptom reduction (SMD=-0.96, 95%C.I.=-1.78, -0.14, k = 10, n = 1,308), depression (RR=1.61, 95%C.I.=1.20, 2.15, k = 9, n = 1,238) and atypical-depression response (RR=2.23, 95%C.I.=1.35, 3.68, k = 3, n = 136). Selegiline failed to outperform the placebo in negative (k = 4) or positive symptoms of schizophrenia (k = 4), attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms reduction (k = 2), and smoking abstinence rate (k = 4). Selegiline did not differ from methylphenidate and ADHD scores (k = 2). No significant difference emerged in acceptability, incident diarrhea, headache, dizziness, and nausea RRs, in contrast to xerostomia (RR=1.58, 95%C.I. =1.03, 2.43, k = 6, n = 1,134), insomnia (RR=1.61, 95%C.I.=1.19, 2.17, k = 10, n = 1,768), and application-site reaction for transdermal formulation (RR=1.81, 95%C.I.=1.40, 2.33, k = 6, n = 1,662). Confidence in findings was low/very-low for most outcomes; moderate for depressive symptoms reduction (transdermal). Selegiline proved effective, safe, and well-tolerated for depressive disorders, yet further evidence is warranted about specific psychiatric disorders.
Topics: Humans; Selegiline; Depressive Disorder, Major; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Methylphenidate
PubMed: 37087864
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.03.012 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023The number of publications on acupuncture for cancer pain is increasing rapidly with an upward tendency. Considering that no bibliometric articles related to this topic...
BACKGROUND
The number of publications on acupuncture for cancer pain is increasing rapidly with an upward tendency. Considering that no bibliometric articles related to this topic have been published yet. It is necessary to evaluate the global scientific output of research in this field, and shed light on the direction of clinical cancer pain management in the future.
METHODS
Research publications regarding acupuncture on cancer pain from inception to 2022 were downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric analyses were performed using CiteSpace software, the bibliometrix R package, and VOSviewer software. Network maps were generated to assess the collaborations between different countries, institutions, authors, and keywords. And clusters map was generated to evaluate reference.
RESULTS
A total of 790 articles related to acupuncture therapy for cancer pain were identified. We observe that the number of publications is gradually increasing over time. China and the United States were the main contributors. Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr (38 papers) and Beijing Univ Chinese Med (28 papers) contributed the most publications, becoming the leading contributors in this field. Although J Clin Oncol (28 articles) ranked ninth in terms of publication volume, it was the journal with the most citations and the highest number of IF (50.717) and H-index (494) at the same time. MAO J from Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr was the most prolific author (23 articles). The main hot topics included matters related to acupuncture (239 times), pain (199 times), management (139 times), quality of life (107 times), electroacupuncture (100 times), and breast cancer (82 times).
CONCLUSION
Our bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the development of acupuncture for cancer pain, enabling relevant authors and research teams to identify the current research status in this field. At the same time, acupuncture for breast cancer (BC) pain, aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia (AIA), and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) may soon become prospective focus.
PubMed: 36950556
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1077961 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2023We aim to identify the optimal treatment option of systemic therapy with or without locoregional therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Outcomes of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We aim to identify the optimal treatment option of systemic therapy with or without locoregional therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Outcomes of interest include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and incidence of treatment discontinuation due to AEs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values were applied to rank the interventions. 23 randomized-controlled trials including 14,303 patients with advanced HCC were included. Lenvatinib plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) ranked best regarding OS benefit (SUCRA: 0.99). Immuno-oncology (IO)-multikinase inhibitor (MKI)/vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor combinations had a higher probability of providing better OS than IO-IO combinations. IO monotherapies demonstrated superior safety profile while combination therapies caused more toxicity in general. We conclude that combination therapies achieve remarkable efficacy in patients with advanced HCC and clinical decision making requires a careful balance of efficacy versus risk.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic
PubMed: 36805079
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103940 -
Immunotherapy Dec 2022This meta-analysis was designed to explore the association between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This meta-analysis was designed to explore the association between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The authors retrieved relevant studies published before May 25, 2022. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI was used to evaluate the relationship between SII and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). 14 articles comprising 2721 patients were included in this study. The pooled results proved that high SII levels were closely related to poor prognosis in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (OS HR = 2.40; 95% CI: 2.04-2.82; PFS HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.33-1.86) and that an SII value of 750 was appropriate as a cut-off value (OS HR = 2.20; 95% CI: 1.83-2.63; PFS HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.33-1.80). High SII levels (>750) may be an indicator of worse OS and PFS in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Prognosis; Neoplasms; Inflammation; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 36537255
DOI: 10.2217/imt-2022-0133 -
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Oct 2022Ketamine is increasingly prescribed for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), often as add-on to regular antidepressants. Augmentation of ketamine to monoamine oxidase...
Ketamine is increasingly prescribed for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), often as add-on to regular antidepressants. Augmentation of ketamine to monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) is advised against, as this practice might increase blood pressure or cause serotonin syndrome. Despite the potential relevance for patients, little is known about actual side effects of combined use. We summarize literature on the safety and add results of our case series. PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to July 2021 for English-language articles describing concomitant use of ketamine and MAOIs. The search strategy included terms for "ketamine" AND "monoamine oxidase inhibitor" including generic and brand names. Additionally, we describe the safety of twice weekly oral esketamine administration over the course of 5 weeks to 9 months in 8 TRD patients using MAOIs. After deduplication, we screened 138 articles and assessed 43 full texts. Twelve studies were included with a total of 39 patients receiving ketamine and MAOIs. Blood pressure and heart rate increased in multiple cases, though this was deemed clinically insignificant in all but 1 patient. No signs of hypertensive crisis or serotonin syndrome were observed. In our case series, we observed minor elevations in blood pressure and heart rate and no serious adverse events. The results suggest that combined use of MAOIs and esketamine is less prone to severe side effects than presumed. The investigated sample size was small, and prescribed doses of MAOIs were relatively low. Further research is required before definite conclusions about the safety of this combination can be drawn.
Topics: Humans; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors; Serotonin Syndrome; Depression; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Monoamine Oxidase
PubMed: 36300995
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.21m14267