-
Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny Apr 2022<b>Introduction:</b> Perineal hernia (PH), also termed pelvic floor hernia, is a protrusion of intraabdominal viscera into the perineum through a defect in...
<b>Introduction:</b> Perineal hernia (PH), also termed pelvic floor hernia, is a protrusion of intraabdominal viscera into the perineum through a defect in the pelvic floor. </br></br> <b>Aim:</b> The study was conducted to evaluate the cases of perineal hernia resulting as a complication of abdominoperineal resection (APR) of rectal cancer. </br></br> <b> Material and methods:</b> 30 cases from 24 articles published in reputable peer reviewed journals were evaluated for eight variables including [I] patient age, [II] gender, [III] time since APR, [IV] clinical presentation, [V] approach to repair, [VI] type of repair, [VII] presence/absence of pelvic adhesions [VIII] complications. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> There was a total of 30 cases (18 males and 12 females) with a mean age of 71.5 years. The time of onset of symptoms ranged from 6 days to 12 years. Perineal lump with pain was the chief presenting feature followed by intestinal obstruction. Different approaches were adopted to repair by various methods. </br></br> <b>Conclusions:</b> Perineal hernia as a complication of abdominoperineal resection is reported increasingly nowadays, as the approach to management of rectal cancer has gradually got shifted from open to minimally invasive in recent years. There is a need to spread awareness about this condition, so that it is actively looked for, during the postoperative follow-up. Management is surgical repair; the approach and type of repair should be individualized.
Topics: Female; Male; Humans; Aged; Proctectomy; Rectal Neoplasms; Intestinal Obstruction; Abdominal Cavity; Hernia
PubMed: 36468514
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.7677 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Nov 2022
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Surgical Mesh; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Hernia, Abdominal; Proctectomy; Surgical Flaps
PubMed: 36426619
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16386 -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Dec 2022Functional disorders impart significant morbidity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who undergo restorative proctocolectomy.
BACKGROUND
Functional disorders impart significant morbidity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who undergo restorative proctocolectomy.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aimed to summarize the management strategies for various functional disorders of the pouch.
DATA SOURCES
A database search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant clinical studies assessing the management of various functional disorders in patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy.
STUDY SELECTION
Published clinical studies investigating a functional disorder of the pouch in patients who previously underwent a colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
INTERVENTIONS
Restorative proctocolectomy was completed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease or other indications such as a diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcomes described in this review include the prevalence of functional disorders of the pouch in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy and the relevant management strategies.
RESULTS
Ten clinical studies were identified using the predetermined search terms and screened for relevancy to patients with inflammatory bowel disease who previously underwent colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A qualitative summary was developed on the basis of data from these studies and from current guidelines developed for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.
LIMITATIONS
This systematic review is limited by the small number and low quality of the clinical studies included as well as the nonquantitative summary of the findings.
CONCLUSIONS
Functional disorders of the pouch are likely underdiagnosed. Although a source of significant morbidity, these diseases require additional clinical studies to better elucidate effective management strategies.
Topics: Humans; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Colectomy; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Prevalence
PubMed: 36399771
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002586 -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Dec 2022In patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who develop neoplasia or fail medical therapy and require colectomy, restorative proctocolectomy...
BACKGROUND
In patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis who develop neoplasia or fail medical therapy and require colectomy, restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA is often indicated. Although often well tolerated, IPAA can be complicated by cuffitis or inflammation of the remaining rectal cuff. Although much has been published on this subject, there is no clear and comprehensive synthesis of the literature regarding cuffitis.
METHODS
Our systematic literature review analyzes 34 articles to assess the frequency, cause, pathogenesis, diagnosis, classification, complications, and treatment of cuffitis.
RESULTS
Cuffitis occurs in an estimated 10.2% to 30.1% of pouch patients. Purported risk factors include rectal cuff length >2 cm, pouch-rectal anastomosis, stapled anastomosis, J-pouch configuration, 2- or 3-stage IPAA, preoperative Clostridium difficile infection, toxic megacolon, fulminant colitis, preoperative biologic use, medically refractory disease, immunomodulator/steroids use within 3 months of surgery, extraintestinal manifestations of IBD, and BMI <18.5 kg/m2 at the time of colectomy. Adverse consequences associated with cuffitis include decreased quality-of-life scores, increased risk for pouchitis, pouch failure, pouch excision, and pouch neoplasia.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the similarities between pouchitis and cuffitis, diagnosis and treatment of cuffitis should proceed according to the International Ileal Pouch Consortium guidelines. This review found that the majority of the current literature fails to distinguish between classic cuffitis (a form of reminant ulcerative proctitis) and nonclassic cuffitis (resulting from other causes). Further work is needed to distinguish the unique risk factors and endoscopic characteristics associated with each subtype, and further randomized clinical trials should be conducted to strengthen the evidence for treatment options.
Topics: Humans; Pouchitis; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Colonic Pouches; Colitis, Ulcerative; Adenomatous Polyposis Coli
PubMed: 36399769
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002593 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Jun 2023Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become standard surgical treatment of choice in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and...
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become standard surgical treatment of choice in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in which the medical management fails. Despite the wide use of laparoscopic method, the enhanced and innovative features that come with the robotic platform, such as endo-wrist technology, 3D visualization, surgeon-controlled camera and motion scaling, make it an appealing choice. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of robotic approach for proctectomy or proctocolectomy with IPAA as compared to conventional laparoscopic approach. A systematic review was completed for studies done between 2010 and 2022 comparing the robotic approach with the laparoscopic approach. Nine studies were found to be feasible to be included in this review. In terms of the outcomes, although the mean operating time was slightly higher than the laparoscopic approach, the other outcomes, such as mean blood loss, return of the bowel movement, mean hospital stay, and conversion to open, were found to be significantly lower in the robotic approach as compared to both laparoscopic and conventional open techniques. Despite the overall increased rate of complications combined from all the studies, the rate of significant complications such as anastomotic leaks requiring readmission and return to theater was also found to be substantially less. This study concludes that although robotic approach is in its initial stages for pelvic surgeries, it can be safely employed due to improved dexterity and visibility.
Topics: Humans; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Anastomosis, Surgical; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Colonic Pouches; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36380262
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01490-x -
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Nov 2023Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for medically refractory ulcerative colitis or dysplasia may be associated with structural and...
BACKGROUND
Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for medically refractory ulcerative colitis or dysplasia may be associated with structural and inflammatory complications. However, even in their absence, defecatory symptoms secondary to dyssynergic defecation or fecal incontinence may occur. Although anorectal manometry is well established as the diagnostic test of choice for defecatory symptoms, its utility in the assessment of patients with IPAA is less established. In this systematic review, we critically evaluate the existing evidence for anopouch manometry (APM).
METHODS
A total of 393 studies were identified, of which 6 studies met all inclusion criteria. Studies were not pooled given different modalities of testing with varying outcome measures.
RESULTS
Overall, less than 10% of symptomatic patients post-IPAA were referred to APM. The prevalence of dyssynergic defecation as defined by the Rome IV criteria in symptomatic patients with IPAA ranged from 47.0% to 100%. Fecal incontinence in patients with IPAA was characterized by decreased mean and maximal resting anal pressure on APM, as well as pouch hyposensitivity. The recto-anal inhibitory reflex was absent in most patients with and without incontinence.
CONCLUSION
Manometry alone is an imperfect assessment of pouch function in patients with defecatory symptoms, and confirmatory testing may need to be performed with dynamic imaging.
Topics: Humans; Fecal Incontinence; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Anastomosis, Surgical; Rectum; Colitis, Ulcerative; Anal Canal; Colonic Pouches
PubMed: 36351035
DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac234 -
PloS One 2022Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) before total mesorectal excision (TME) and followed systemic chemotherapy is widely accepted as the standard therapy for locally... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) before total mesorectal excision (TME) and followed systemic chemotherapy is widely accepted as the standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence regarding nCRT in combination with induction or consolidation chemotherapy for rectal cancer in terms of oncological outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic search of medical databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) was conducted up to the end of July 1, 2021. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of TNT in terms of pathological complete remission (pCR), nCRT or surgical complications, R0 resection, local recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in LARC.
RESULTS
Eight nRCTs and 7 RCTs, including 3579 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of pCR was significantly higher in the TNT group than in the nCRT group, (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.39-2.46, p < 0.0001), DFS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.92, p = 0.001), OS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.89, p = 0.002), nCRT complications (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.77-1.44, p = 0.75), surgical complications (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.83-1.26, p = 0.83), local recurrence (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.95-3.49, p = 0.07), distant metastasis (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58-1.03, p = 0.08) did not differ significantly between the TNT and nCRT groups.
CONCLUSION
TNT appears to have advantages over standard therapy for LARC in terms of pCR, R0 resection, DFS, and OS, with comparable nCRT and postoperative complications, and no increase in local recurrence and distant metastasis.
Topics: Humans; Chemoradiotherapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Rectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Standard of Care; Proctectomy; Mesentery; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 36331947
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276599 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Dec 2022Primary mucosal anorectal malignant melanoma (AMM) is an invasive malignancy with poor survival. Management options have been variable, due to limited data and lack of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Primary mucosal anorectal malignant melanoma (AMM) is an invasive malignancy with poor survival. Management options have been variable, due to limited data and lack of randomised control trials available on the optimal surgical strategy. The aim of this review was to compare local excision versus radical resection.
METHODS
A systematic search of articles in PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The outcomes of interest were the impact that surgical strategy had on survival (primary) and recurrence rates (secondary) for the treatment of AMM, comparing sphincter sparing local excision (LE) versus extensive abdominoperineal resection (APR).
RESULTS
Ten studies met the predefined criteria. Overall, there were 303 patients, with a median age of 58.2 years. Sixty-one percent (n = 187/303) had radical surgery (abdominoperineal resection) for the primary treatment of AMM. Overall, 5-year survival for the APR and LE was 23% and 32% respectively. Meta-analysis on the median OS noted no statistical difference between the two groups. However, local recurrence occurred in 20.82% and 47.04% in the APR and LE groups respectively. Meta-analysis observed a statistically significant reduction in recurrence when patients had an APR as primary treatment (OR 0.15, 95% CI = 0.08-0.28, p < 0.00001).
CONCLUSION
Though local recurrence rates are more common with local excision of AMM, this does not confer an inferior OS when comparing LE versus APR. The decision to proceed with LE vs. APR should be made on a case-by-case basis.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Anus Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Anal Canal; Organ Sparing Treatments; Melanoma; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
PubMed: 36331615
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02715-1 -
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum Dec 2022Continent ileostomy was first introduced by Nils Kock in 1969 as Kock pouch (K-pouch). Its most characteristic feature, the nipple valve that offers continence' was a...
BACKGROUND
Continent ileostomy was first introduced by Nils Kock in 1969 as Kock pouch (K-pouch). Its most characteristic feature, the nipple valve that offers continence' was a later addition. Even though today's continent ileostomy is sidelined by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the gold standard of restorative procedures for colectomy patients, it remains an excellent option for select patients, offering an alternative to end-ileostomy or a poorly functioning ileoanal pouch.
OBJECTIVE
The study aimed to summarize principles and techniques behind K-pouch construction, both de novo and as "J to K" conversion, as well as examine surgical outcomes following the procedure in the modern era regardless of indication.
DATA SOURCES
Data sources included PubMed and the Cochrane Library up to July 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
The study selection materials included articles reviewing continent ileostomy procedures and outcomes between 2000-2021. Case reports and series <15 were excluded.
RESULTS
Fifteen articles were selected for review, describing 958 patients with a K-pouch, 510 patients who had undergone a Barnett continent intestinal reservoir, and 40 who had undergone construction of a T-pouch.
CONCLUSION
Continent ileostomies carried out in specialized centers by experienced surgeons can be a great option for patients who would otherwise be confined by an end ileostomy. High pouch survival rates with higher quality-of-life scores than end ileostomy and comparable with IPAA make continent ileostomy a great option, even if we consider the less than ideal reoperation and complication rates. However, it is of paramount importance that patients are carefully selected, thoroughly educated, highly motivated, and engaged in their care. Specifically, for patients with Crohn's disease, further research is needed to help elucidate factors that affect pouch survival and candidacy for K-pouch creation. Finally, continuous surgical technique modifications and refinements can allow even more patients to be considered suitable for the procedure.
Topics: Humans; Ileostomy; Colonic Pouches; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Crohn Disease; Reoperation
PubMed: 36165572
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002631 -
Pediatric Surgery International Dec 2022The incidence of pediatric onset ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing, with increasing rate of children eventually requiring surgical treatment. Total proctocolectomy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The incidence of pediatric onset ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing, with increasing rate of children eventually requiring surgical treatment. Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical treatment. Although transanal IPAA (ta-IPAA) is becoming widely accepted for adult UC patients, data regarding this procedure in children are scarce. Nevertheless, some adult publications also include patients under 18 years old. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize surgical and functional outcomes following ta-IPAA, and extract conclusion regarding pediatric UC patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of science and Google Scholar databases were searched, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] guidelines. The final search was updated in April 2022. Four comparative cohorts (n = 868) and 11 non-comparative case series (n = 241) were included. Six reports included children. Anastomotic leak, complications, operative time, conversion rate, length of stay and functional outcomes were examined.
RESULTS
A total of 1103 patients, ranging 9-79 years were included in this review. We found no difference in risk for anastomotic leak (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.46-4.06), minor and major complications (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48-1.76 and OR 0.78 95% CI 0.36-1.69, respectively) comparing ta-IPAA to transabdominal IPAA. Short- and long-term follow-up showed satisfying functional outcomes and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS
Our review suggests that ta-IPAA is not inferior to transabdominal IPAA. Implementation of this method in children is technically feasible due to familiarity with the dissection plane. Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life are paramount in the pediatric population and should be particularly investigated. Multicenter prospective studies are required to investigate pediatric UC patients undergoing ta-IPAA.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Adolescent; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Colitis, Ulcerative; Anastomotic Leak; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Colonic Pouches; Anastomosis, Surgical; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36114863
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05222-y