-
The Ocular Surface Oct 2019The purpose of this study was to review the published incidence, etiology, clinical features and management of patients who developed infectious interface keratitis...
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to review the published incidence, etiology, clinical features and management of patients who developed infectious interface keratitis (IIK) following lamellar keratoplasty.
DESIGN
This study is a systematic literature review.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of published Chinese and English report through a PubMed search with the medical subject headings using the following terms: corneal transplantation, keratoplasty, anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK), Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), infectious interface keratitis (IIK), fungal keratitis, and bacterial keratitis. Data collected included patient demographics, surgical technique, clinical signs, treatment, outcomes, and donor rim cultures. A review of the relevant literatures was also undertaken.
RESULTS
From 2007 to Feb. 2018, we identified 62 cases of IIK following lamellar corneal surgery. The mean age was 26.95 ± 8.80 years with a male/female ratio of 11:8 in DALK/ALK group and 69.65 ± 8.00 years with a male/female ratio of 17:16 in DSAEK/DSEK/DMEK group (no gender information for 10 cases). Of the 62 cases, 46 cases (75.41%) were fungal, 9 cases (14.75%) were bacterial, 2 cases (3.28%) were Actinomyces species, 1 case (1.64%) was acanthamoeba, and 4 cases (6.56%) were indeterminant. The mean onset of symptoms was postoperative day (POD) 49.47 ± 48.56 in DALK/ALK group, and 53 ± 112.01 in EK group, and 62.44 ± 50.07 for the bacterial keratitis, and 51.5 ± 102.42 for fungal keratitis. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 10.10 ± 9.36 months in DALK/ALK group and 12.37 ± 12.28 months in DSAEK/DSEK/DMEK group. Of the total 62 cases, 1 case (1.61%) with a Klebsiella pneumoniae positive donor rim cultures was associated with the same pathogen in the IIK, and 16 cases (25.81%) of fungal positive donor rim cultures were associated with the same pathogen in the IIK. Clinical signs included conjunctival injection, interface opacity, stromal edema for bacterial keratitis, and dense white infiltrates at the interface with endothelial plaques in some cases of fungal keratitis. Medical treatment included topical and oral antimicrobial agents. Surgical interventions included therapeutic keratoplasty. In 15 cases (24.19%), medical management was successful. Of the remaining 47 cases, 8 (12.90%) were managed with a repeat lamellar keratoplasty (LK) and 39 (62.90%) were unresponsive to conservative medical treatment and underwent a therapeutic keratoplasty (TKP). Post infectious best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was logMAR 0 in 7 eyes (11.29%), better than or equal to logMAR 0.4 in 20 eyes (32.26%), less than logMAR 0.4 in 22 eyes (35.48%) and logMAR 0.7 or worse in 13 eyes (20.97%). In the rim culture negative group(n = 19), the average BCVA was logMAR 0.59 ± 0.68, with was logMAR 0.44 ± 0.74 in rim culture positive group (n = 15). There were three recurrence cases were reported after DMEK during the postoperative follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS
Infectious interface keratitis (IIK) is an uncommon complication of lamellar keratoplasty, but it can result in a substantial loss of vision or permanent blindness. Although graft infection can occur at any time following surgery, it most commonly (87%) occurred during the first 3 months postoperatively (54/62 cases). The most commonly reported causative organism of IIK following lamellar keratoplasty was C. albicans. Positive rim culture results can provide more rapid and appropriate treatment directed to the identified organism. Therapeutic keratoplasty (TKP) was the most common surgical procedure for the management of IIK. Visual outcomes post TKP are fair with 32.26% (20/62) of patients obtaining LogMAR 0.4 or better.
Topics: Corneal Transplantation; Eye Infections, Bacterial; Global Health; Graft Survival; Humans; Incidence; Keratitis; Surgical Wound Infection; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 31415815
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.08.001 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jul 2019: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired communication, social interaction disorder, and repetitive behavior.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired communication, social interaction disorder, and repetitive behavior. Dysbiotic gut microbiota (GM) could be a contributing factor to the appearance of ASD, as gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are comorbidities frequently reported in ASD. As there is a lack of reviews about the role played by GM in the GI symptoms of ASD, this work aimed to carry out a systematic review of current studies comparing the GM of children with ASD and GI symptoms with those of healthy controls in the last six years. The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. The databases chosen were Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO, and the keywords were (gut* OR intestine* OR bowel* OR gastrointestinal*) AND (microbiota* OR microflora* OR bacteria* OR microbiome* OR flora* OR bacterial* OR bacteria* OR microorganism* OR feces* OR stool*) AND (autistic* OR autism* OR ASD*). : A total of 16 articles were included. Ten articles performed correlations analysis between GI symptoms and ASD. Among those 10 articles, 7 found differences between the GI symptoms present in children with ASD and healthy controls. The most common GI symptom was constipation. Among the seven articles that found differences, three performed correlations analysis between GI symptoms and gut microbe abundance. , , , and showed higher and lower abundance, respectively, in children with ASD and GI symptoms in more than one article. , , , , , , and / ratios showed abundance discrepancies. : It is still too early to draw a conclusion about the gut microbes involved in GI symptoms of ASD. Future research should consider the relationship between ASD behavior, GM, and GI symptoms in a multidisciplinary way and homogenize sample characteristics.
Topics: Autism Spectrum Disorder; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gastrointestinal Tract; Humans; Syndrome
PubMed: 31357482
DOI: 10.3390/medicina55080408