-
Journal of Gastroenterology and... Jun 2024We aimed to verify the effectiveness of electroacupuncture on postoperative ileus prevention after abdominal surgery by meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). (Review)
Review
Effectiveness of electroacupuncture on postoperative ileus prevention after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
We aimed to verify the effectiveness of electroacupuncture on postoperative ileus prevention after abdominal surgery by meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA).
METHODS
From inception to May 14, 2024, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched. TSA was used to determine an optimal sample size and control false-positive findings. The primary outcome was the time to first defecation (hours).
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included, with 1105 participants. Meta-analysis and TSA revealed firm evidence for benefits that electroacupuncture shorted the time to first defecation (mean difference [MD] -12.73 h, I = 22%, P < 0.01), the time to first flatus (MD -7.03 h, I = 25%, P < 0.01), the time to start of sips of water (MD -12.02 h, I = 0%, P < 0.01), and the time to start of liquid diet (MD -12.97 h, I = 0%, P < 0.01) compared with usual care. While compared with sham electroacupuncture, meta-analysis and TSA also confirmed that electroacupuncture shortened the time to first defecation (MD -10.81 h, I = 31%, P = 0.02) and the time to first flatus (MD -10.81 h, I = 0%, P < 0.01). However, TSA revealed that firm evidence for benefit or futility was not reached for the length of hospital stay and the rates of postoperative prolonged ileus.
CONCLUSIONS
Electroacupuncture shortened the duration of postoperative ileus in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, and the adverse events related to electroacupuncture were minor. Further investigation of the effect of electroacupuncture on the risk of prolonged postoperative ileus is warranted in the future.
PubMed: 38943533
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16670 -
NeuroRehabilitation 2024Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder diagnosed by motor symptoms of bradykinesia, in combination with tremor, rigidity, or postural... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder diagnosed by motor symptoms of bradykinesia, in combination with tremor, rigidity, or postural instability. Many studies document the effects of exercise-based interventions, but the benefit of different exercise types remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To provide a commentary on the Cochrane Review by Ernst et al. on the effectiveness of different types of physical exercise regarding motor signs, Quality of Life (QoL), and the occurrence of adverse events.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and other databases. The search was performed also in trial registries, conference proceedings, and reference list of identified studies.
RESULTS
The review included 154 RCTs (with 7837 participants). The network meta-analyses (NMAs) on the severity of motor signs and QoL included data from 60 (2721 participants) and 48 (3029 participants) trials, respectively. The evidence from the NMA suggests that dance, gait/balance/functional training probably have a moderate beneficial effect on the severity of motor signs, and multi-domain training probably has a small beneficial effect on the severity of motor signs. Endurance, aqua-based, strength/resistance, and mind-body training might have a small beneficial effect on the severity of motor signs. In addition, aqua-based training probably has a large beneficial effect on QoL, and mind-body, gait/balance/functional, and multi-domain training and dance might have a small beneficial effect on QoL.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence supports the promotion of physical exercise among people with PD, identifying only small differences between exercises in influencing the severity of motor signs and QoL.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Quality of Life; Exercise Therapy
PubMed: 38943407
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-246004 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Jun 2024Cariprazine has emerged as a promising augmenting treatment agent for unipolar depression and as a monotherapy option for bipolar depression. We evaluated cariprazine's...
BACKGROUND
Cariprazine has emerged as a promising augmenting treatment agent for unipolar depression and as a monotherapy option for bipolar depression. We evaluated cariprazine's efficacy in treating acute major depressive episodes in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, PyscInfo, Scopus and Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and ScanMedicine. Study quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. Pairwise and dose-response meta-analyses were conducted with RStudio. Evidence quality was assessed with GRADE.
RESULTS
Nine RCTs meeting inclusion criteria encompassed 4877 participants. Cariprazine, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the MADRS score (MD = -1.49, 95 % CI: -2.22 to -0.76) and demonstrated significantly higher response (RR = 1.21, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 1.30) and remission (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.06 to 1.34) rates. Subgroup analysis unveiled statistically significant reductions in MADRS score in MDD (MD = -1.15, 95 % CI: -2.04 to -0.26) and bipolar I disorder (BDI) (MD = -2.53, 95 % CI: -3.61 to -1.45), higher response rates for both MDD (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.08 to 1.31) and BDI (RR = 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 1.46), and higher remission rates only for BDI (RR = 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.24 to 1.60). A higher rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was observed.
LIMITATIONS
Reliance solely on RCTs limits generalisability; strict criteria might not reflect real-world diversity.
CONCLUSIONS
Cariprazine demonstrates efficacy in treating major depressive episodes, although variations exist between MDD and BDI and tolerability may be an issue.
PubMed: 38942207
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.099 -
Endoscopy Jun 2024Introduction The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of Barrett's associated neoplasia (BEN) has been evolving. We examined the efficacy and...
Introduction The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of Barrett's associated neoplasia (BEN) has been evolving. We examined the efficacy and safety of ESD and EMR for BEN. Methods A database search was performed for studies reporting efficacy and safety outcomes of ESD and EMR for BEN. Pooled proportional and comparative meta-analyses were performed. Results 47 studies (23 ESD, 19 EMR, and 5 comparative) were included. Mean lesion size for ESD and EMR were 22.5 mm and 15.8 mm respectively. Majority of lesions were Paris type IIa. Pooled analysis for ESD showed en-bloc resection, R0 resection, curative resection, and local recurrence rates of 98%, 78%, 65%, and 2%, respectively. Complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) were achieved in 94% and 59% of cases. Pooled rates of perforation, intraprocedural bleeding (IPB), delayed bleeding (DB), and stricture were 1%, 1%, 2%, and 10%, respectively. Pooled analysis for EMR showed en-bloc resection, R0 resection, curative resection, and local recurrence rates of 37%, 67%, 62%, and 6%, respectively. CE-D and CE-IM were achieved in 94% and 76% of cases. Pooled rates of perforation, IPB, DB, and stricture were 0.1%, 1%, 0.4%, and 7.7%, respectively. The mean procedure time for ESD and EMR were 111.3 and 22.3 mins respectively. Comparative analysis showed higher en-bloc and R0 resection rates with ESD compared to EMR, with comparable adverse events. Conclusion ESD and EMR both can be employed to treat BEN depending on the lesion type, size, and expertise.
PubMed: 38942058
DOI: 10.1055/a-2357-6111 -
The American Journal of Emergency... Jun 2024Status epilepticus (SE) is potentially life-threatening, however, it is unclear which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be used as second-line AEDs. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Status epilepticus (SE) is potentially life-threatening, however, it is unclear which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be used as second-line AEDs.
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiple second-line AEDs for SE to investigate the efficacy of AEDs.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal and included RCTs for patients aged ≥15 years with SE on December 31, 2023. We compared multiple second-line AEDs for SE including fosphenytoin (fPHT), lacosamide (LCM), levetiracetam (LEV), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PHB), and valproate (VPA). The primary and secondly outcomes were termination of seizures integrating the absence of seizure recurrence at 30 min and 60 min, and adverse events associated with AEDs, respectively, with expressing as relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We conducted a NMA using frequentist-based approach with multivariate random effects, and assessed the certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.
RESULTS
Seven RCTs (n = 780) were included, and statistically significant difference was detected between VPA vs. PHB (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.85; very low certainty), fPHT vs. PHB (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; very low certainty), LCM vs. PHB (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93; very low certainty), and LEV vs. PHB (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.94; very low certainty). Moreover, PHB was the highest in the ranking for termination of seizures. For adverse events, no significant reduction was observed owing to the selection of AEDs, although the ranking of PHB was the lowest.
CONCLUSIONS
PHB may have been the most effective for seizure termination as second-line AEDs in adult patients with SE. However, the certainty of almost all comparisons was "very low", and careful interpretation is essential.
PubMed: 38941904
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.019 -
International Immunopharmacology Jun 2024Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has been approved as an initial treatment strategy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the efficacy of... (Review)
Review
Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has been approved as an initial treatment strategy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the efficacy of adding immunotherapy to perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) remains uncertain. Therefore, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the effectiveness of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced resectable GC/GEJC.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of online databases was conducted to identify RCTs published until November 30, 2023. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for primary outcomes, including R0 resection rate, D2 lymphadenectomy, pathologic complete response (pCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
RESULTS
A total of 2718 patients from five RCTs (six reports) were included in the analysis. The pooled ORs of R0 resection rate and D2 lymphadenectomy demonstrated that combination therapy with ICIs showed no significant difference compared to chemotherapy alone. However, the addition of ICIs significantly improved pCR rates (OR = 3.43, 95 % CI 2.61-4.50, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences observed in the incidence of any grade TRAEs and grade 3-4 TRAEs. However, ICIs combination therapy was associated with significantly higher incidences of any grade irAEs (OR = 4.03, 95 % CI: 2.70-6.00, p < 0.0001), as well as grade 3-4 irAEs (OR = 4.51, 95 % CI: 2.27-8.97, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
This study represents the first meta-analysis to demonstrate that perioperative combination therapy with ICIs yields superior pCR rates for patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC compared to chemotherapy.
PubMed: 38941672
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112576 -
Medicine Jun 2024Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been considered a prognostic biomarker of mortality and other major cardiac events. This study investigates NLR's efficacy in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been considered a prognostic biomarker of mortality and other major cardiac events. This study investigates NLR's efficacy in predicting in-hospital and long-term outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS
Electronic databases (PUBMED, Cochrane CENTRAL, ERIC, Embase, Ovid, and Google Scholar) were searched till June 2022 to identify studies having STEMI patients who underwent PCI. Risk ratios and mean differences (MDs), along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (Cis) and standard deviations (SDs), were pooled using a random-effect model. This meta-analysis has been registered on Prospero (ID: CRD42022344072).
RESULTS
A total of 35 studies with 28,756 patients were included. Pooled estimates revealed an increased incidence of primary outcomes; in-hospital all-cause mortality (RR = 3.52; 95% CI = 2.93-4.24), long-term all-cause mortality (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.00-1.14), (RR = 3.32; 95% CI = 2.57-4.30); in-hospital cardiovascular mortality (RR = 2.66; 95% CI = 2.04-3.48), long-term cardiovascular mortality (RR = 6.67; 95% CI = 4.06-10.95); in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.17-1.46), long-term MACE (RR = 2.92; 95% CI = 2.16-3.94); length of hospital stay (WMD = 0.60 days; 95% CI = 0.40-0.79) in patients with high NLR compared to those with a low NLR.
CONCLUSION
NLR might be a valuable tool for prognostication (in-hospital) and stratification of patients with STEMI who underwent PCI.
Topics: Humans; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Neutrophils; Prognosis; Lymphocytes; Biomarkers; Lymphocyte Count; Hospital Mortality
PubMed: 38941418
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038692 -
Medicine Jun 2024Frailty has been identified as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in older adults with diabetes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty on the prognosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Frailty has been identified as a risk factor for adverse outcomes in older adults with diabetes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty on the prognosis of older adults with diabetes through a systematic review and meta-analysis, with the goal of offering insights for clinical decision-making.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane were systematically searched from inception to September 10th, 2023. Reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and evaluated the quality of studies. Stata 15.1 Software was used to perform the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes of this study were mortality, hospitalization and disability, and the secondary outcomes were diabetes complications (including nephropathy, microvascular complications, macroangiopathy, cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia) and urolithiasis.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were included in this study, with low risk of bias and moderate to good quality. The results showed that frailty increased the risk of mortality (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.55-2.35, P < .001), hospitalization (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.53-3.13, P < .001), and disability in older adults with diabetes (HR 3.84, 95% CI 2.35-6.28, P < .001). In addition, frailty was associated with diabetes complications (including nephropathy, microvascular complications, macroangiopathy, cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia), urolithiasis.
CONCLUSIONS
Frailty is an important predictor of adverse outcomes, such as mortality, hospitalization, and disability in older adults with diabetes. Accurate assessment of the frailty in older adults with diabetes can help improve the adverse outcomes of patients.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Frailty; Hospitalization; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Risk Factors; Prognosis; Frail Elderly; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Male
PubMed: 38941383
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038621 -
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Jun 2024Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) is required in select cases including infected or symptomatic collections. In this network meta-analysis, we have...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) is required in select cases including infected or symptomatic collections. In this network meta-analysis, we have compared lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS), and double-pigtail stents (DPS) to identify the most useful stent type in the management of PFCs.
METHODS
We reviewed several databases to identify studies that compared DPS or FCSEMS with LAMS and the ones which compared DPS with FCSEMS for the treatment of PFCs. Our outcomes of interest were clinical success, adverse events, technical success, recurrence of PFCs, and procedure duration. Random effects model and frequentist approach were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
We included 28 studies with 2974 patients. Rate of clinical success was significantly lower with DPS compared to LAMS, OR (95% CI): 0.43 (0.32, 0.59). Rate of recurrence was higher with DPS compared to LAMS, OR (95% CI): 2.06 (1.19, 3.57). We found no significant difference in rate of adverse events between groups. Rate of technical success was higher for FCSEMS compared to LAMS. Procedure duration was significantly shorter for LAMS compared to DPS and FCSEMS. Based on frequentist approach, LAMS was found to be superior to DPS and FCSEMS in achieving higher clinical success, lower rate of adverse events and recurrence, and shorter procedure time.
CONCLUSIONS
This network meta-analysis demonstrates the superiority of LAMS over DPS and FCSEMS in the management of PFCs in achieving a higher clinical success, shorter procedure time, and lower rate of recurrence. Some of the analyses are not adequately powered to make firm conclusions, and future large multicenter RCTs are required to further evaluate this issue.
PubMed: 38940974
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08538-y -
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Jun 2024Congenital anal atresia poses a significant challenge in pediatric surgery, necessitating precise and effective interventions to ensure optimal outcomes. While...
BACKGROUND
Congenital anal atresia poses a significant challenge in pediatric surgery, necessitating precise and effective interventions to ensure optimal outcomes. While traditional anterior sagittal approach anoplasty has been a standard procedure, emerging evidence suggests potential benefits of anal dimple anorectoplasty.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of anal dimple anorectoplasty in treating congenital anal atresia.
METHODS
We conducted a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis, extensively searching various databases such as Wanfang, CNKI, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Our aim was to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of traditional anterior sagittal approach anoplasty with anal dimple anorectoplasty in treating congenital anal atresia. Search terms included "anal dimple anorectoplasty," "congenital anal atresia," and "RCT." Data regarding operation time, postoperative hospitalization duration, and complication rates were collected.
RESULTS
Anal dimple anorectoplasty exhibited significantly greater clinical efficacy (odds ratio [OR]=4.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.02-11.94, P < .00001), along with markedly reduced postoperative hospitalization duration (95% CI: -1.27 to -0.57, P < .00001), and a substantially lower incidence of complications (OR=0.1, 95% CI: 0.04-0.25, P < .00001) compared to traditional anterior sagittal approach anoplasty. These findings underscore the clear advantage of anal dimple anorectoplasty over conventional methods, indicating its potential as a preferred surgical approach for congenital anal atresia.
CONCLUSIONS
Anal dimple anorectoplasty emerges as a highly effective intervention for pediatric patients with congenital anal atresia, demonstrating a notable decrease in postoperative complications. These findings highlight its potential as a preferred surgical approach to enhance patient outcomes and minimize adverse events.
PubMed: 38940776
DOI: No ID Found