-
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Feb 2022Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a validated treatment for early rectal tumors, but whether this therapy is efficient or not for rectal tumors extending to the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a validated treatment for early rectal tumors, but whether this therapy is efficient or not for rectal tumors extending to the dentate line (RTDL) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of ESD in RTDL compared to non-RTDL. A search in PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane library up to April 2020 was conducted to identify studies that compared ESD in both localizations (RTDL and non-RTDL), reporting at least one main outcome (en bloc, complete resection, recurrence). Secondary outcomes were adverse event occurrence. Five observational studies including 739 patients with a total of 201 RTDL and 538 non-RTDL were considered. The proportion of female sex (66% vs. 36.9%, P < 0.001) and tumor size [mean difference = 7.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.01-12.49, P = 0.001] were higher in the RTDL group. There were no differences in en bloc resection rates between RTDL and non-RTDL groups [odds ratio (OR): 0.95, 95% CI: 0.50-1.79, P = 0.087]. The complete resection rate was significantly higher in the non-RTDL group (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.18-2.53, P = 0.005, I2 = 0%). However, recurrence rates were comparable (RD: -0.04, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.00, P = 0.06, I2 = 0%). Concerning adverse events, there were no differences in terms of perforation (OR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.26-3.08, P = 0.86, I2 = 0%) or delayed bleeding (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.17-2.42, P = 0.51, I2 = 35%). Anal pain rate was 28% (95% CI: 21.4-35.8%). ESD is an effective and safe therapeutic approach for RTDL with comparable recurrence rate to non-RTDL. The lower complete resection rate in RTDL needs to be clarified in studies.
Topics: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection; Female; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Rectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34967816
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001998 -
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia 2021Endometriosis is a common disease in reproductive-age women and it is estimated to occur in up to 50% of those with infertility. Intestinal involvement is reported in up...
BACKGROUND
Endometriosis is a common disease in reproductive-age women and it is estimated to occur in up to 50% of those with infertility. Intestinal involvement is reported in up to a third of the cases. This condition is related to chronic pain and loss of quality of life, resulting in emotional, social and economic costs. Treatment consists of hormonal block and surgical resection, with variable side effects and efficacy. The best choice for surgical treatment for rectal endometriosis is a matter of discussion regarding the indication and the best technique to be employed.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize data on indications, results and complications of surgical techniques for the treatment of rectal endometriosis.
METHODS
This comprehensive systematic review is a compilation of the available literature and discussion, carried out by a team with experience in the surgical treatment of intestinal endometriosis. Data regarding indications, results and complications of conservative and radical techniques for the surgical treatment of rectal endometriosis was carefully reviewed. Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to May 2021 were performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared at least two of the three surgical techniques of interest (i.e., shaving, discoid resection, segmental resection).
RESULTS
One RCT and nine case series studies with a total of 3,327 patients met the eligibility criteria. Participants ages ranged from a mean of 30.0 to 37.9 years old. Mean follow-up ranged from 1.2 to 42.76 months. With regards the methodological quality, overall the included studies presented a low risk of bias in the majority of the domains. Surgical treatment of rectal endometriosis is indicated for patients with obstructive symptoms and those with pain scores above 7/10. Patients with disease involving beyond muscularis propria of the rectum, documented in magnetic resonance imaging or transvaginal pelvic ultrasound with intestinal preparation, are candidates for discoid or segmental resection. The presence of multifocal disease, extension greater than 3 cm and infiltration greater than 50% of the loop circumference favor the radical technique. The distance from the lesion to the anal verge, age, symptoms and reproductive desire are other factors that influence the choice of the technique to be employed. The risk of complications and unfavorable functional results seems to be directly related to the complexity of the procedure.
CONCLUSION
The choice of surgical technique performed for the treatment of rectal endometriosis is a matter of discussion and depends not only on the preoperative staging, but also on the patient's expectations, risks and potential complications, recurrence rates and the expertise of the multidisciplinary team.
Topics: Adult; Endometriosis; Female; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rectal Diseases; Rectum; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 34909864
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-2803.202100000-97 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Jan 2022Anal fissure is a common condition that can be treated medically or surgically. Chemical sphincterotomy is often used before surgical intervention. This study aims to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anal fissure is a common condition that can be treated medically or surgically. Chemical sphincterotomy is often used before surgical intervention. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of topical agents for chemical sphincterotomy on healing of anal fissures and side-effects.
METHODS
A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) compliant systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials which compared topical sphincterotomy agents with topical placebo agents or each other. Studies that included surgical treatments were excluded. Overall evidence was synthesized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.
RESULTS
Thirty-seven studies met the study selection criteria. Seventeen studies show that glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was significantly more likely to heal anal fissure than placebo (relative risk (RR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.35-2.84, I2 = 80%). Eleven studies showed a marginally significant difference between healing rates for diltiazem vs GTN, RR = 1.16, (1.01-1.33) I2 = 48%. There was no significant difference in healing between diltiazem and placebo, RR = 1.65, (0.64-4.23), I2 = 92%. GTN significantly reduced pain on the visual analog scale compared to the placebo group, MD-0.97 (-1.64 to -0.29) I2 = 92%. There was high certainty of evidence that GTN was significantly more likely to cause headache than placebo (RR = 2.73 (1.82-4.10) I2 = 58%) and diltiazem RR = 6.88 (2.19-21.63) I2 = 17%.
CONCLUSION
There is low certainty evidence topical nitrates are an effective treatment for anal fissure healing and pain reduction compared to placebo. Despite widespread use of topical diltiazem, more evidence is required to establish the effectiveness of calcium channel blockers compared to placebo.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Chronic Disease; Diltiazem; Fissure in Ano; Humans; Nitroglycerin; Sphincterotomy; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 34608561
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04040-3 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Nov 2021This study was designed to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This study was designed to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure (CAF).
METHODS
The present systematic review of the literature was conducted on the basis of the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary endpoint of our study was the CAF recurrence rate. Quality assessment was based on the RoB 2 tool and the Case Series Quality Checklist.
RESULTS
Overall, 5 studies and 102 patients were included. A considerably heterogeneity in the neuromodulation technique and setting was identified. The pooled recurrence rate was estimated at the level of 19% (16/84). Post-interventional pain and Wexner scores were considerably reduced. The 2-month healing rate was 72% (18/25), whereas 73.6% of patients were symptom-free at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS
PTNS is an effective alternative for the non-operative management of CAF. Due to several limitations further larger and higher quality studies are required.
Topics: Fecal Incontinence; Fissure in Ano; Humans; Quality of Life; Tibial Nerve; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34132862
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03976-w -
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Dec 2021Rectal cancer is common and it is often treated by surgery with or without chemoradiation. Cancer treatment frequently results in bowel symptoms. (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Rectal cancer is common and it is often treated by surgery with or without chemoradiation. Cancer treatment frequently results in bowel symptoms.
OBJECTIVES
The review aim was to chart the management options for bowel symptoms following rectal cancer surgery.
METHODS
A scoping review was undertaken searching nine healthcare databases, using relevant search terms and Boolean operators following PRISMA-ScR guidance. Data were extracted into an Excel spreadsheet using headings from the United Kingdom Department of Health guidance and are reported narratively.
RESULTS
30 heterogeneous studies met the inclusion criteria, including 853 patients. The most commonly reported bowel symptom was fecal incontinence; the most frequent management strategy was sacral nerve stimulation. Most studies reported on a single management option, often used to manage more than one bowel symptom. Often failure to satisfactorily improve symptoms using options such as medication was needed prior to progressing to other management options. In some studies more than one management option was used, such as rehabilitation programmes.
CONCLUSION
It is likely that to effectively manage the bowel symptoms experienced after rectal cancer treatment, more than one management option may be used-. Additionally, different management options may need to be tried concurrently.
Topics: Anal Canal; Chemoradiotherapy; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; United Kingdom
PubMed: 34119617
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.05.022 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2021To describe the available knowledge on vulvo-perineal endometriosis including its diagnosis, clinical management and recurrence rate. We followed the PRISMA guidelines...
To describe the available knowledge on vulvo-perineal endometriosis including its diagnosis, clinical management and recurrence rate. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for Systematic Reviews and our study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020202441). The terms " and " or " were used as keywords. Cochrane Library, Medline/Pubmed, Embase and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Papers in English, Spanish, Portuguese, French or Italian from inception to July 30, 2020 were considered. Reference lists of included articles and other literature source such as Google Scholar were also manually scrutinized in order to identify other relevant studies. Two independent reviewers screened potentially eligible studies according to inclusion criteria. Out of 539 reports, 90 studies were eligible including a total of 283 patients. Their mean age was 32.7 ± 7.6 years. Two hundred sixty-three (95.3%) presenting with vulvo-perineal endometriosis have undergone either episiotomy, perineal trauma or vaginal injury or surgery. Only 13 patients (4.7%) developed vulvo-vaginal endometriosis spontaneously i.e., without any apparent condition favoring it. The reasons that motivated the patients to take medical advice were vulvo-perineal cyclical pain increasing during menstruations (98.2% of the patients, = 278). Out of the 281 patients for whom a clinical examination was described, 274 patients (97.5%) showed a vulvo-perineal nodule, mass or swelling while six presented with bluish cutaneous lesions (2.1%) and 1 with bilateral polyps of the labia minora (0.4%). All but one patients underwent surgical excision of their lesions but only 88 patients (28.1%) received additional hormonal therapy. The recurrence rate was 10.2% (29 patients) considering a median follow-up period of 10 months (based on 61 studies). In conclusion, vulvo-perineal endometriosis is a rare entity with approximately 300 cases reported in the literature since 1923. With the available knowledge shown in this systematic review, we encourage all practitioners to think about perineal endometriosis in case of perineal cyclical pain with or without previous perineal damage. Diagnosis should be done with clinical exam, perineal ultrasound and pelvic MRI when available. In case of anal sphincter involvement, perianal ultrasound should be performed. Surgical excision of the lesion should be realized in order to remove the lesion and to confirm the diagnosis histologically. Hormonal treatment could be proposed to attempt to decrease the size of a large lesion before surgery or to avoid recurrence of the lesion. As evidence-based approach to the diagnosis, treatment and recurrence rate of affected patients remains a challenge given its low prevalence, the variations in management found in the articles included and the limited quality of available studies, we suggest that a prospective database on vulvo-perineal endometriosis should be generated to increase knowledge but also awareness among healthcare professionals and optimize patients' care. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42020202441.
PubMed: 34046423
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.637180 -
Cancers Mar 2021Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease is a very disabling condition with poor quality of life. Patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease are also at risk of... (Review)
Review
Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease is a very disabling condition with poor quality of life. Patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease are also at risk of perianal fistula-related squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Cancer arising at the site of a chronic perianal fistula is rare in patients with Crohn's disease and there is a paucity of data regarding its incidence, diagnosis and management. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane and Web of Science. Several small series have described sporadic cases with perianal cancer in Crohn's disease. The incidence rate of SCC related to perianal fistula was very low (<1%). Prognosis was poor. Colorectal disease, chronic perianal disease and HPV infection were possible risk factors. Fistula-related carcinoma in CD (Chron's disease) can be very difficult to diagnose. Examination may be limited by pain, strictures and induration of the perianal tissues. HPV is an important risk factor with a particular carcinogenesis mechanism. MRI can help clinicians in diagnosis. Examination under anesthesia is highly recommended when findings, a change in symptoms, or simply long-standing disease in the perineum are present. Future studies are needed to understand the role of HPV vaccination in preventing fistula-related cancer.
PubMed: 33809997
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061445 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Jun 2021The aim of this study was to review clinical outcome of haemorrhoidectomy and rubber band ligation in grade II-III haemorrhoids. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to review clinical outcome of haemorrhoidectomy and rubber band ligation in grade II-III haemorrhoids.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO International Trial Registry Platform were searched, from inception until May 2018, to identify randomised clinical trials comparing rubber band ligation with haemorrhoidectomy for grade II-III haemorrhoids. The primary outcome was control of symptoms. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, postoperative complications, anal continence, patient satisfaction, quality of life and healthcare costs were assessed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.
RESULTS
Three hundred and twenty-four studies were identified. Eight trials met the inclusion criteria. All trials were of moderate methodological quality. Outcome measures were diverse and not clearly defined. Control of symptoms was better following haemorrhoidectomy. Patients had less pain after rubber band ligation. There were more complications (bleeding, urinary retention, anal incontinence/stenosis) in the haemorrhoidectomy group. Patient satisfaction was equal in both groups. There were no data on quality of life and healthcare costs except that in one study patients resumed work more early after rubber band ligation.
CONCLUSIONS
Haemorrhoidectomy seems to provide better symptom control but at the cost of more pain and complications. However, due to the poor quality of the studies analysed/it is not possible to determine which of the two procedures provides the best treatment for grade II-III haemorrhoids. Further studies focusing on clearly defined outcome measurements taking patients perspective and economic impact into consideration are required.
Topics: Fecal Incontinence; Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoids; Humans; Ligation; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33683503
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02430-x -
European Journal of Pediatrics Jun 2021Group A Streptococcus has been associated with a perianal infection. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on childhood streptococcal perianitis in three...
Group A Streptococcus has been associated with a perianal infection. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on childhood streptococcal perianitis in three databases: Excerpta Medica, National Library of Medicine, and Web of Science. The main purposes were to document the clinical features, the tendency to recur, the association with an asymptomatic streptococcal throat carriage, the accuracy of rapid streptococcal tests, and the mechanism possibly underlying the acquisition of this infection. More than 80% of cases are boys ≤7.0 years of age with defecation disorders, perianal pain, local itch, rectal bleeding, or fissure and a sharply demarcated perianal redness. Perianitis is associated with a streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in about every fifth case. The time to diagnosis is ≥3 weeks in 65% of cases. Recurrences occur within 3½ months in about 20% of cases. An asymptomatic group A streptococcal throat carriage occurs in 63% of cases. As compared with perianal Streptococcus A culture, the rapid streptococcal tests have a positive predictive value of 80% and a negative predictive value of 96%. It is hypothesized that digital inoculation from nasopharynx to anus underlies perianitis. Many cases are likely caused directly by children, who are throat and nasal carriers of Streptococcus A. Some cases might occur in children, who have their bottoms wiped by caregivers with streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis or carriage of Streptococcus.Conclusion: Perianitis is an infection with a distinctive presentation and a rather long time to diagnosis. There is a need for a wider awareness of this condition among healthcare professionals. What is Known: • Group A Streptococcus may cause perianitis in childhood. • Systemic antimicrobials (penicillin V, amoxycillin, or cefuroxime) are superior to topical treatment. What is New: • The clinical presentation is distinctive (defecation disorders, perianal pain, local itch, rectal bleeding, or fissure and a sharply demarcated perianal redness). • The time to diagnosis is usually ≥3 weeks. Recurrences occur in about 20% of cases.
Topics: Amoxicillin; Anal Canal; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Pharyngitis; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes
PubMed: 33532889
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-03965-9 -
European Urology Focus Jan 2022Patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) may have pain refractory to conventional management strategies. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is a potential therapeutic... (Review)
Review
The Benefits and Harms of Botulinum Toxin-A in the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndromes: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Chronic Pelvic Pain Panel.
CONTEXT
Patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) may have pain refractory to conventional management strategies. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) is a potential therapeutic option.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the benefits and harms of BTX-A injections in the treatment of CPPS.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review of the use of BTX-A in the treatment of CPPS was conducted (PROSPERO-ID: 162416). Comprehensive searches of EMBASE, PUBMED, Medline, and SCOPUS were performed for publications between January 1996 and May 2020. Identified studies were screened and selected studies assessed for quality prior to data extraction. The primary outcomes were improvement in pain and adverse events following treatment. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, global response assessment, sexual function, bowel function, and bladder function.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
After screening 1001 abstracts, 16 studies including 11 randomised controlled trials were identified, enrolling 858 patients and covering a range of CPPS subtypes. Most studies showed high risks of bias and confounding across all domains. A narrative synthesis was performed as heterogeneity of included studies precluded a meta-analysis and calculation of pooled effect estimates of measured outcomes. BTX-A reduced pain significantly in patients with bladder pain syndrome in two studies and in patients with prostate pain syndrome in one study, but no included studies showed benefit for patients with gynaecological pelvic pain. Adverse event reporting was variable and generally poor, but no serious adverse events were described.
CONCLUSIONS
Beneficial effects of BTX-A on pain, quality of life, and functional symptoms were seen in patients with certain CPPS subtypes, but the current evidence level is too weak to allow recommendations about BTX-A use for treating CPPS.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Botulinum toxin A is used to treat different pain disorders, but current studies are of insufficient quality to determine whether it reduces pain and improves quality of life in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Further research is needed.
Topics: Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Humans; Male; Pelvic Pain; Quality of Life; Syndrome; Urology
PubMed: 33526405
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.005