-
BMC Infectious Diseases Jun 2024An improper host immune response to Mycoplasma pneumoniae generates excessive inflammation, which leads to the impairment of pulmonary ventilation function (PVF).... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
An improper host immune response to Mycoplasma pneumoniae generates excessive inflammation, which leads to the impairment of pulmonary ventilation function (PVF). Azithromycin plus inhaled terbutaline has been used in the treatment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) in children with impaired pulmonary function, but previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed inconsistent efficacy and safety. This study is aimed to firstly provide a systematic review of the combined therapy.
METHODS
This study was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023452139). A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Six English and four Chinese databases were comprehensively searched up to June, 2023. RCTs of azithromycin sequential therapy plus inhaled terbutaline were selected. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2) was used to evaluate the methodological quality of all studies, and meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 with planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Publication bias was evaluated by a funnel plot and the Harbord' test. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendations.
RESULTS
A total of 1,938 pediatric patients from 20 RCTs were eventually included. The results of meta-analysis showed that combined therapy was able to significantly increase total effectiveness rate (RR = 1.20, 95%CI 1.15 to 1.25), forced expiratory volume in one second (SMD = 1.14, 95%CIs, 0.98 to 1.29), the ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (SMD = 2.16, 95%CIs, 1.46 to 2.86), peak expiratory flow (SMD = 1.17, 95%CIs, 0.91 to 1.43). The combined therapy was associated with a 23% increased risk of adverse reactions compared to azithromycin therapy alone, but no significant differences were found. Harbord regression showed no publication bias (P = 0.148). The overall quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low.
CONCLUSIONS
This first systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that azithromycin sequential therapy plus inhaled terbutaline was safe and beneficial for children with MPP. In addition, the combined therapy represented significant improvement of PVF. Due to lack of high-quality evidence, our results should be confirmed by adequately powered RCTs in the future.
Topics: Humans; Azithromycin; Terbutaline; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Child; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Drug Therapy, Combination; Administration, Inhalation; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Child, Preschool
PubMed: 38944667
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09564-x -
Health Technology Assessment... Jun 2024To limit the use of antimicrobials without disincentivising the development of novel antimicrobials, there is interest in establishing innovative models that fund...
BACKGROUND
To limit the use of antimicrobials without disincentivising the development of novel antimicrobials, there is interest in establishing innovative models that fund antimicrobials based on an evaluation of their value as opposed to the volumes used. The aim of this project was to evaluate the population-level health benefit of cefiderocol in the NHS in England, for the treatment of severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections when used within its licensed indications. The results were used to inform the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance in support of commercial discussions regarding contract value between the manufacturer and NHS England.
METHODS
The health benefit of cefiderocol was first derived for a series of high-value clinical scenarios. These represented uses that were expected to have a significant impact on patients' mortality risks and health-related quality of life. The clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol relative to its comparators was estimated by synthesising evidence on susceptibility of the pathogens of interest to the antimicrobials in a network meta-analysis. Patient-level costs and health outcomes of cefiderocol under various usage scenarios compared with alternative management strategies were quantified using decision modelling. Results were reported as incremental net health effects expressed in quality-adjusted life-years, which were scaled to 20-year population values using infection number forecasts based on data from Public Health England. The outcomes estimated for the high-value clinical scenarios were extrapolated to other expected uses for cefiderocol.
RESULTS
Among isolates with the metallo-beta-lactamase resistance mechanism, the base-case network meta-analysis found that cefiderocol was associated with a lower susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 0.32, 95% credible intervals 0.04 to 2.47), but the result was not statistically significant. The other treatments were also associated with lower susceptibility than colistin, but the results were not statistically significant. In the metallo-beta-lactamase base-case network meta-analysis, cefiderocol was associated with a lower susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 0.44, 95% credible intervals 0.03 to 3.94), but the result was not statistically significant. The other treatments were associated with no susceptibility. In the base case, patient-level benefit of cefiderocol was between 0.02 and 0.15 quality-adjusted life-years, depending on the site of infection, the pathogen and the usage scenario. There was a high degree of uncertainty surrounding the benefits of cefiderocol across all subgroups. There was substantial uncertainty in the number of infections that are suitable for treatment with cefiderocol, so population-level results are presented for a range of scenarios for the current infection numbers, the expected increases in infections over time and rates of emergence of resistance. The population-level benefits varied substantially across the base-case scenarios, from 896 to 3559 quality-adjusted life-years over 20 years.
CONCLUSION
This work has provided quantitative estimates of the value of cefiderocol within its areas of expected usage within the NHS.
LIMITATIONS
Given existing evidence, the estimates of the value of cefiderocol are highly uncertain.
FUTURE WORK
Future evaluations of antimicrobials would benefit from improvements to NHS data linkages; research to support appropriate synthesis of susceptibility studies; and application of routine data and decision modelling to assess enablement value.
STUDY REGISTRATION
No registration of this study was undertaken.
FUNDING
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Policy Research Programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135591), conducted through the Policy Research Unit in Economic Methods of Evaluation in Health and Social Care Interventions, PR-PRU-1217-20401, and is published in full in ; Vol. 28, No. 28. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Topics: Humans; Cephalosporins; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Cost-Benefit Analysis; England; Technology Assessment, Biomedical; Cefiderocol; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; State Medicine; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38938145
DOI: 10.3310/YGWR4511 -
Nutrients Jun 2024The use of natural products as alternatives to traditional pharmacological treatments in orthodontics is gaining interest due to their anti-inflammatory, antibacterial,... (Review)
Review
The use of natural products as alternatives to traditional pharmacological treatments in orthodontics is gaining interest due to their anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of natural products in reducing inflammation and bacterial presence in orthodontic and orthognathic treatment settings. The database search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to January 2024. The review focused on randomized controlled trials only. The selected studies centered on the anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant effects of natural products, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for data extraction. Nine studies, totaling 358 participants, were included. Significant findings demonstrated a reduction in gingival inflammation by over 40% with the use of Aloe vera compared to chlorhexidine. Another study noted a decrease in bleeding on probing by 13.6 points in the treatment group over placebo. Additionally, honey showed a rapid modulation of plaque pH and significantly reduced bacterial counts of . Furthermore, the use of resveratrol emulgel was linked to substantial improvements in gingival health, with a reduction in the gingival index and probing pocket depth. The results indicate that natural products can significantly enhance orthodontic treatment outcomes by reducing inflammation and bacterial levels. These products offer effective alternatives to traditional treatments and show potential for integration into routine orthodontic care protocols. Further research is encouraged to standardize application methods and dosages to maximize clinical benefits and patient satisfaction.
Topics: Humans; Aloe; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antioxidants; Biological Products; Chlorhexidine; Dentofacial Deformities; Gingivitis; Honey; Orthodontics; Plant Preparations; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Resveratrol; Streptococcus mutans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38931295
DOI: 10.3390/nu16121941 -
F1000Research 2023Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in pregnant women. There has been a wide variance in clinical practice worldwide, with some favoring an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in pregnant women. There has been a wide variance in clinical practice worldwide, with some favoring an antibiotic-only approach while others prefer surgery as the first-line management. Therefore, we designed the current analysis to synthesize the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics versus surgery management. We searched PubMed, Scopus, EuropePMC, and Cochrane Central from March 4, 1904 until November 25, 2022, to look for studies comparing antibiotics and surgery in pregnant patients with acute appendicitis. We only included studies that provided a comparison between the two treatments. We included preterm delivery, fetal loss, maternal death, and complications as outcomes. The results were compared using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. We also performed a sensitivity analysis by excluding studies with a serious risk of bias. We included five non-randomized studies for the analysis. We found that patients in the antibiotic group had a lower risk of preterm labor (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.92]; p 0.02) but a higher risk of complications (OR 1.79 [95% CI 1.19-2.69]; p 0.005). We did not find any difference in the other outcomes. The increased risk of complications should caution clinicians about using antibiotics as the first-line management. More studies are required to identify patients who would benefit the most before antibiotics could be adopted as a treatment for acute appendicitis in pregnant patients.
Topics: Humans; Appendicitis; Pregnancy; Female; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Pregnancy Complications; Appendectomy; Acute Disease
PubMed: 38919838
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.129906.2 -
The British Journal of General Practice... Jun 2024Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (VVC) is a fungal infection causing inflammation of the vagina and/or the vulva. Symptoms include itching, irritation, and discharge. VVC... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (VVC) is a fungal infection causing inflammation of the vagina and/or the vulva. Symptoms include itching, irritation, and discharge. VVC presents commonly across primary care and, despite its mild symptoms, carries psychological burden and has a significant impact on women's quality of life. UK guidelines support treatment via oral or topical azole antifungal agents. Recent evidence attests to the superiority of novel non-azole antifungals. Thus, rigorous financial assessment of both antifungals is necessary for optimal VVC treatment allocation in UK primary care.
AIM
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ibrexafungerp against the gold standard fluconazole as first-line treatment of VVC within the NHS.
METHOD
A systematic review on the efficacy of ibrexafungerp and fluconazole in acute VVC was conducted. Cost-effectiveness analysis was initiated using health outcome data from the DOVE trial, a Phase 2 RCT. Costs in pound sterling were ascertained in monetary units, and effectiveness determined as reduced need for follow-up medication.
RESULTS
An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2185.74 was determined. This suggests oral ibrexafungerp being largely more costly yet slightly more effective than fluconazole, and thus has unfavourable net benefit. Two sensitivity analyses were conducted considering follow-up medication combination and market price, which provided confidence in the calculated cost-effectiveness ratio.
CONCLUSION
This analysis highlights fluconazole's cost-effectiveness in current UK guidelines and favourability.
Topics: Humans; Fluconazole; Female; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal; Antifungal Agents; Administration, Oral; United Kingdom; Amphotericin B; State Medicine; Primary Health Care; Acute Disease; Treatment Outcome; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Glycosides; Triterpenes
PubMed: 38902100
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp24X738189 -
Helicobacter 2024The amoxicillin dose used in dual therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori varies across studies and the optimal amoxicillin dose for vonoprazan-based dual therapies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The amoxicillin dose used in dual therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori varies across studies and the optimal amoxicillin dose for vonoprazan-based dual therapies remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of low- and high-dose amoxicillin in vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive systematic review was conducted by searching databases from inception to October 2023. All trials that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for eradicating H. pylori were included. Pooled eradication rate, incidence of adverse events, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals are presented.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies with 12 low-dose amoxicillin (VLA) and 13 high-dose amoxicillin (VHA) arms were included. The pooled eradication rates were 82.4% and 86.8% for VLA therapy, and 86.0% and 90.9% for VHA therapy by the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. In the subgroup analysis stratified by duration, the eradication rates achieved in 7 days, 10 days, and 14 days treatments with VLA and VHA dual therapies were 80.8%, 84.2%, 83.1%, and 67.3%, 88.8%, 87.5%, respectively. In the four randomized controlled trials that directly compared VLA and VHA dual therapies, the efficacy was not statistically different in the intention-to-treat (76.9% vs 81.4%, p = 0.337) and per-protocol (81.6% vs 84.0%, p = 0.166) analyses. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events (p = 0.965) and compliance (p = 0.994) were similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION
VLA therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to VHA therapy, along with regional differences. An appropriately extended treatment duration may be critical for therapeutic optimization of vonoprazan-amoxicillin treatment.
Topics: Amoxicillin; Humans; Helicobacter Infections; Sulfonamides; Pyrroles; Helicobacter pylori; Drug Therapy, Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Treatment Outcome; Proton Pump Inhibitors
PubMed: 38900537
DOI: 10.1111/hel.13054 -
Helicobacter 2024Due to irregular antibiotic use, the rate of antibiotic resistance to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is increasing and varies from region to region. Therefore, for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Due to irregular antibiotic use, the rate of antibiotic resistance to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is increasing and varies from region to region. Therefore, for the purpose of further clarifying the changes in antibiotic resistance rates nowadays, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to update and assess the 10-year trend of primary H. pylori antibiotic resistance rate to the commonly prescribed antibiotics worldwide.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
According to the PRISMA statement, we systematically searched electronic databases for studies that assessed rates of H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, or tetracycline published from 2013 to 2023. AHRQ was adopted to estimate methodological quality and publication bias in the included studies, and statistical analysis was performed using Stata 17.0.
RESULTS
We identified 163 studies, comprising 47,002 isolates from 36 countries. The meta-analysis showed that the primary antibiotic resistance rate of H. pylori varied widely among antibiotics. Subgroup analysis showed higher rates of antibiotic resistance in the adult population than in children, and a general trend of increased resistance was observed from 2013 to 2023. There was considerable heterogeneity (I > 75%) among all analyses, which may be due to high variability in resistance rates across the global regions.
CONCLUSIONS
Resistance of H. pylori to antibiotics has reached alarming levels worldwide, which has a great effect on the efficacy of treatment. Local surveillance networks are required to select appropriate eradication regimens for each region.
Topics: Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Helicobacter Infections; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Global Health
PubMed: 38898622
DOI: 10.1111/hel.13103 -
Advances in Rheumatology (London,... Jun 2024To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).
OBJECTIVE
To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).
METHODS
Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.
RESULTS
All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.
CONCLUSION
This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.
Topics: Lupus Nephritis; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Brazil; Societies, Medical; Creatinine; Proteinuria; Mycophenolic Acid; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Rheumatology; Rituximab; Biopsy; Cyclophosphamide; Leflunomide; Glucocorticoids; Hydroxychloroquine; Azathioprine; Remission Induction; Cyclosporine; Evidence-Based Medicine; Consensus; Disease Progression; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38890752
DOI: 10.1186/s42358-024-00386-8 -
Clinical Cardiology Jun 2024Long-term follow-up results of various trials comparing Zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) with Everolimus eluting stents (EES) have been published recently. Additionally,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Temporal Trends in the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Zotarolimus Eluting Stents Versus Everolimus Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
INTRODUCTION
Long-term follow-up results of various trials comparing Zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) with Everolimus eluting stents (EES) have been published recently. Additionally, over the last decade, there have been new trials comparing the ZES with various commercially available EES. We aim to conduct an updated meta-analysis in light of new evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide comprehensive evidence regarding the temporal trends in the clinical outcomes.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. RCTs comparing ZES with EES for short (<2 years), intermediate (2-3 years), and long-term follow-ups (3-5 years) were included. Relative risk was used to pool the dichotomous outcomes using the random effects model employing the inverse variance method. All statistical analysis was conducted using Revman 5.4.
RESULTS
A total of 18 studies reporting data at different follow-ups for nine trials (n = 14319) were included. At short-term follow-up (<2 years), there were no significant differences between the two types of stents (all-cause death, cardiac death, Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis or safety outcomes (target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, target vessel failure, target lesion failure). At intermediate follow-up (2-3 years), EES was superior to ZES for reducing target lesion revascularization (RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.05-1.58, p < 0.05). At long-term follow-up (3-5 years), there were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the pooled outcomes (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
ZES and EES have similar safety and efficacy at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-ups.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Agents; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Everolimus; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Prosthesis Design; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38888152
DOI: 10.1002/clc.24306 -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Jun 2024Rapamycin has been extensively utilized for coating coronary artery stents to reduce the occurrence of restenosis, yet there has been limited research on the potential...
BACKGROUND
Rapamycin has been extensively utilized for coating coronary artery stents to reduce the occurrence of restenosis, yet there has been limited research on the potential harms of rapamycin-eluting stents. Herein, We report a case of eosinophilia and interstitial pneumonia caused by a cobalt-based alloy stent eluted with rapamycin.
CASE PRESENTATION
The patient was admitted due to fever, cough, and expectoration symptoms. Previously, the patient had undergone a procedure of percutaneous coronary stent implantation in our hospital's cardiology department, which led to a gradual rise in blood eosinophil count. This time, the eosinophil count was higher than the previous admission. A chest CT scan revealed multiple flocculent density increases in both lungs and bronchiectasis. The rapamycin-eluting stents may have caused eosinophilia and interstitial pneumonia, which improved after administering corticosteroids. A systematic review of relevant literature was conducted to summarize the characteristics of interstitial pneumonia caused by drug-eluting stents.
CONCLUSION
Paclitaxel, everolimus, zotarolimus, and rapamycin are the types of drugs that can lead to drug-eluting stents, and because of the rarity of their onset, clinical doctors must be precise and prompt in diagnosing suspected cases to avoid misdiagnosis and delayed treatment.
Topics: Humans; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Drug-Eluting Stents; Sirolimus; Eosinophilia; Male; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Aged
PubMed: 38886703
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03101-x