-
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences May 2024Camels are highly suited for severe desert conditions and able to provide most of the natural products like urine, which has been used as alternative medicine to treat... (Review)
Review
Camels are highly suited for severe desert conditions and able to provide most of the natural products like urine, which has been used as alternative medicine to treat diverse infections and disorders. There is, however, a shortage and paucity of scientific reviews highlighting the antifungal, antibacterial and antiviral effects of camel urine. By better understanding its antimicrobial characteristics, our overarching aim is to provide an exhaustive overview of this valuable natural product by synthesizing and summarizing data on the efficacy of this biofluid and also describing the potential substances exhibiting antimicrobial properties. We searched three databases in order to point out relevant articles (Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar) until December 2022. Research articles of interest evaluating the antimicrobial effects of camel urine were selected. Overall, camel urine furnished promising antibacterial activities against gram-positive bacteria, namely (30 mm), (22 mm), (25 mm) and (21 mm), as well as gram-negative bacteria, especially and spp., without forgetting its efficiency on as well. The excretion also showed its potency against H1N1 virus, vesicular stomatitis virus and middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Similarly, the camel urine featured strong antifungal activity against and dermatophytes with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 0.625 μg/ml against , 2.5 μg/ml against and 1.25 μg/ml against and . This comprehensive review will be valuable for researchers interested in investigating the potential of camel urine in the development of novel broad-spectrum key molecules targeting a wide range of drug-resistant pathogenic microorganisms.
PubMed: 38495380
DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2024.103966 -
International Journal of Molecular... Feb 2024is a widely distributed dermatophyte, which is among the main etiological agents of dermatophytosis in humans and domestic animals. This fungus invades, colonizes and... (Review)
Review
is a widely distributed dermatophyte, which is among the main etiological agents of dermatophytosis in humans and domestic animals. This fungus invades, colonizes and nourishes itself on the keratinized tissues of the host through various virulence factors. This review will bring together the known information about the mechanisms, enzymes and their associated genes relevant to the pathogenesis processes of the fungus and will provide an overview of those virulence factors that should be better studied to establish effective methods of prevention and control of the disease. Public databases using the MeSH terms "", "virulence factors" and each individual virulence factor were reviewed to enlist a series of articles, from where only original works in English and Spanish that included relevant information on the subject were selected. Out of the 147 articles obtained in the review, 46 were selected that reported virulence factors for in a period between 1988 and 2023. The rest of the articles were discarded because they did not contain information on the topic (67), some were written in different languages (3), and others were repeated in two or more databases (24) or were not original articles (7). The main virulence factors in are keratinases, fungilisins and subtilisins. However, less commonly reported are biofilms or dipeptidylpeptidases, among others, which have been little researched because they vary in expression or activity between strains and are not considered essential for the infection and survival of the fungus. Although it is known that they are truly involved in resistance, infection and metabolism, we recognize that their study could strengthen the knowledge of the pathogenesis of with the aim of achieving effective treatments, as well as the prevention and control of infection.
Topics: Humans; Animals; Virulence Factors; Microsporum; Animals, Domestic; Subtilisins
PubMed: 38473782
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052533 -
Mycoses Apr 2021Dermatophyte infections usually present as various types of superficial cutaneous mycoses; on very rare occasions, dermatophytes enter deep into the dermis and cause...
Dermatophyte infections usually present as various types of superficial cutaneous mycoses; on very rare occasions, dermatophytes enter deep into the dermis and cause invasive infections. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review of all reported invasive dermatophytosis cases over the past 20 years. We performed systematic searches in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science and identified 123 papers reporting 160 individual cases of invasive dermatophytosis between 2000 and 2020. Our study included 103 (64.4%) males, and the mean age at diagnosis was 43.0 years (range: 3-87 years). The most common predisposing factor was superficial dermatophytosis (56.9%), followed by solid organ transplantation (26.9%), the use of topical immunosuppressants (15.6%), gene mutations (14.4%), diabetes (14.4%) and trauma (6.9%). Trichophyton (T.) rubrum was the most prevalent pathogen (53.1%) responsible for invasive dermatophytosis, followed by T. mentagrophytes (7.5%), Microsporum canis (6.9%), T. tonsurans (5.6%), T. interdigitale (5.0%) and T. violaceum (3.8%). Patients with CARD9 or STAT3 mutations were prone to have mixed infection of two or more dermatophytes, present with eosinophilia and high IgE, and develop disseminated infections. Overall mortality was 7.9%, and the mortality in patients with and without gene mutations was 17.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Most of the normal host patients responded well to oral antifungal agents, while gene-deficient patients usually required lifelong treatment to stabilise their infection status. Our review indicated the importance of preventive treatment of superficial tinea in patients with immunosuppression and gene deficiencies to avoid the development of invasive dermatophytosis.
Topics: Antifungal Agents; Dermatomycoses; Humans; Invasive Fungal Infections; Organ Transplantation; Risk Factors; Skin
PubMed: 33217082
DOI: 10.1111/myc.13212 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Apr 2021Dermatophyte infections are the most common fungal infections in humans; among them, tinea capitis (TC) - the most contagious fungal infection - is caused by...
Dermatophyte infections are the most common fungal infections in humans; among them, tinea capitis (TC) - the most contagious fungal infection - is caused by anthropophilic, zoophilic and geophilic dermatophytes. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the different aetiological variants involved in TC and the overall epidemiology of the causes of this infection in the last two decades. We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase databases for articles published from July 2000 to August 2019 using the following search terms: 'Tinea capitis', 'Africa', 'America', 'Asia', 'Europe', 'Oceania', and the names of the countries on each continent. The flow of information through the different phases in this systematic review was depicted using a PRISMA flow diagram, which mapped the number of records identified, included and excluded, and the reasons for exclusion. Our findings indicate that the frequency of different aetiologic agents of TC in the reported studies varied globally, from 0.4-87.7% in Africa, 0.2-74.0% in North America, 0.0-91.2% in Eastern Asia, 0.0-69.0% in Eastern Europe and 2.9-86.4% in Oceania. Microsporum canis is the most frequent reported zoophilic agent worldwide, while Trichophyton violaceum and Trichophyton tonsurans are the predominant anthropophilic agents. Over time, the frequency of these latter fungal infections has increased globally, and these fungi have become the major species globally. Anthropophilic transmission - the most prevalent type of transmission - could be explained by two factors: (i) the socioeconomic status of affected countries and population groups with associated risk factors and (ii) movement of populations importing new causes of infection to areas where they had not been encountered previously. We observed that intercontinental migration and travel; globalization; environmental, climatic and ecological changes; and accelerated evolution of health technologies may influence the observed epidemiological changes and, consequently, contributed to the variations in the global status of TC.
Topics: Arthrodermataceae; Asia; Europe; Europe, Eastern; Humans; Microsporum; Tinea Capitis; Trichophyton
PubMed: 32976663
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16951