-
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Jan 2024To determine bony knee morphological factors associated with primary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture or PCL graft failure after PCL reconstruction. (Review)
Review
Decreased posterior tibial slope is a risk factor for primary posterior cruciate ligament rupture and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: A systematic review.
PURPOSE
To determine bony knee morphological factors associated with primary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture or PCL graft failure after PCL reconstruction.
METHODS
Three databases, namely MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE, were searched on 30th May 2023. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data such as receiver operating characteristic curve parameters, as well as p-values for comparisons of values between patients with PCL pathology and control patients, were recorded.
RESULTS
Nine studies comprising 1054 patients were included. Four studies reported that patients with PCL injury had flatter medial posterior tibial slopes (MTS) than controls, with mean values of 4.3 (range: 3.0-7.0) and 6.5 (range: 5.0-9.2) degrees, respectively. Two studies reported an MTS cutoff value ranging below 3.90-3.93° being a significant risk factor for primary PCL rupture or PCL graft failure. Two studies reported that shallow medial tibial depths were associated with primary PCL rupture, with mean values of 2.1 (range: 2.0-2.2) and 2.6 (range: 2.4-2.7) mm in PCL injury and control groups, respectively. Stenotic intercondylar notches and femoral condylar width were not consistently associated with PCL injuries.
CONCLUSION
Decreased MTS is associated with primary PCL rupture and graft failure after PCL reconstruction with values below 3.93° being considered as a significant risk factor. Less common risk factors include shallow medial tibial depth, while femoral condylar width and parameters with regards to the intercondylar notch, such as notch width, notch width index and intercondylar notch volume, demonstrated conflicting associations with primary or secondary PCL injuries.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III.
Topics: Humans; Posterior Cruciate Ligament; Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Case-Control Studies; Knee Joint; Knee Injuries; Tibia; Sprains and Strains; Soft Tissue Injuries; Risk Factors; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
PubMed: 38226729
DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12025 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Jan 2024The purpose of this study is to systematically review and quantitatively analyse the clinical outcomes of combined derotational distal femoral osteotomy (D-DFO) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Derotational distal femoral osteotomy improves subjective function and patellar tracking after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation patients with increased femoral anteversion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to systematically review and quantitatively analyse the clinical outcomes of combined derotational distal femoral osteotomy (D-DFO) and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) with increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA).
METHODS
This study was performed in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality Of Systematic Reviews) Guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes of combined D-DFO and MPFL-R in RPD patients with increased FAA. Data on patient-reported outcome measures, radiological parameters, patellar tracking as revealed by J-sign and complications were extracted based on the inclusion criteria. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Study score was used for quality assessment. Review Manager and R statistical software were used to perform the statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Eleven studies with a total of 569 knees in 553 patients were included. Patients were predominantly female (79%). The weighted mean of FAA decreased from 33.6° to 13.0° (weighted mean difference = 20.59; p < 0.00001) after the combined procedure. Significant improvements (p < 0.00001) were identified in the Lysholm score (weighted mean: 55.5 vs. 80.4), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (weighted mean: 52.8 vs. 78.6) and Kujala score (weighted mean: 54.5 vs. 80.6). The incidence of residual J-sign ranged from 14.3% to 38.3% with an overall pooled rate of 28.2% (95% confidence interval = 22.8%-33.6%). The overall redislocation rate was 1.1%. No patients experienced surgical site infection or bone nonunion. Two studies compared the clinical outcomes of MPFL-R with and without D-DFO. Compared with isolated MPFL-R, the combined procedure yielded a better Lysholm score (weighted mean: 84.9 vs. 79.3, p < 0.0001), IKDC score (weighted mean: 84.1 vs. 79.9, p = 0.001), Kujala score (weighted mean: 84.3 vs. 79.4, p < 0.0001) and a lower residual J-sign rate (26/97 [26.8%] vs. 44/105 [41.9%], p = 0.02), respectively.
CONCLUSION
The combination of D-DFO and MPFL-R led to improved clinical outcomes and a low redislocation rate in patients with RPD and increased FAA. Additional D-DFO can achieve more favourable results in subjective function and patellar tracking than isolated MPFL-R in the setting of excessive FAA.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Joint; Femur; Joint Dislocations; Osteotomy; Ligaments, Articular; Joint Instability; Patellar Ligament
PubMed: 38226710
DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12021 -
The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal... Jun 2024Total knee replacements (TKRs) are successful operations that utilities several operative techniques including cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilising (PS)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilising prostheses for primary total knee arthroplasty in treating osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Total knee replacements (TKRs) are successful operations that utilities several operative techniques including cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior stabilising (PS) prostheses. To date, neither approach has proved superior. Techniques and implants are under constant evolution and new trials are published. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine the current risks and benefits of these two approaches so that an up-to-date clinical recommendation can be given as to which approach if any is superior.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, EBCSO, and Google Scholar. Risk of bias was assessed based on the Cochrane risk of bias criteria. Meta-analysisusing the random effects model was performed by the STATA software and results were displayed on forest plots. Sensitivity analysis was performed for possible causes of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
From 1164 studies, 15 eligible trials were included. Meta-analysis showed that the CR approach had significantly lower Range of Motion and HSS scores. There was no significant difference in KSS, OKS, VAS, or WOMAC scores. Blood loss was significantly less in the CR group. However, there was no significant difference in total complications or revisions. Sensitivity analysis did not reveal any differences in the results.
CONCLUSION
Despite inherent limitations, this updated meta-analysis suggests that both CR and PS approaches continue to be equivocal in terms of clinical outcomes. Both patients and surgeons can be confident in selecting either approach.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level I.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
the protocol of this systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO.
REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42023391435.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Knee Prosthesis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Posterior Cruciate Ligament; Prosthesis Design
PubMed: 38176995
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.12.002 -
Sports Health Dec 2023Knee injury and subsequent surgery are widespread in the military setting. Associations between knee surgery and expected outcomes over time have not been consolidated... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Knee injury and subsequent surgery are widespread in the military setting. Associations between knee surgery and expected outcomes over time have not been consolidated and characterized systematically by procedure type across the body of literature, and the temporal expectations of these outcomes remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize common postoperative follow-up times and associated outcomes that determine clinical or surgical failure in US service members after elective knee surgery.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic search was conducted with 3 bibliographic databases of published research reports from 2010 through 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies in US military service members undergoing elective knee surgery, with a minimum of 1-year follow-up, and reporting on a functional/occupational outcome were included. Three reviewers screened all abstracts and full-text articles to determine eligibility.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review of longitudinal cohort studies.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level 2a.
DATA EXTRACTION
Extracted data included military demographics, surgical procedure variables, surveillance period, and outcome measures. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach were used to determine study quality and risk of bias.
RESULTS
A total of 22 studies (mean follow-up time of 40.7 months) met the inclusion criteria. For cruciate ligament repair, approximately one-third of patients required a second surgery or were medically separated from military service by 2 years from surgery; 100% were reinjured by 4 years, and 85% sustained a new injury within 5 years of surgery. For meniscal repair, nearly one-third of patients were medically separated, and half were placed on activity restrictions within 3 years of surgery. For articular cartilage repair, within 5 years, 39% of patients required a second surgery, 30% were placed on activity restrictions, and 36% were medically separated. For patellar repair, 37% of patients were medically separated and over half were placed on activity restrictions within 5 years.
CONCLUSION
Common knee surgeries can have long-term implications for military careers that may not become apparent with shorter follow-up periods (<2 years). When longer surveillance periods are used (eg, up to 5 years), additional surgical procedures are more common and the likelihood of being injured or medically separated from military service is higher.
PubMed: 38148688
DOI: 10.1177/19417381231217449 -
Medical Sciences (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2023(1) Background: Acute patella dislocation (APD) is a prevalent knee injury, with rates between 5.8-77.8 per 100,000. APD often results in repeat lateral patella... (Review)
Review
(1) Background: Acute patella dislocation (APD) is a prevalent knee injury, with rates between 5.8-77.8 per 100,000. APD often results in repeat lateral patella dislocations due to the instability of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Non-operative treatments have a 50% recurrence rate. While autologous grafting for MPFL has been favored, surgeons are now exploring synthetic grafts. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of synthetic grafts in MPFL reconstruction surgeries for repeated patellar dislocations; (2) Methods: Our research was based on a thorough search from the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence Healthcare Databases, using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score for quality assessment; (3) Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 284 patients and 230 knees were included. Seventy-five percent of patients were graded to have excellent-good clinical outcomes using the Crosby and Insall Grading System. International Knee Documentation Committee score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score scores showed 59% and 60% post-operative improvement, respectively; (4) Conclusions: All studies showed improvement in post-operative functional outcomes and report no serious adverse events. The 6 mm, LARS (Orthomedic Ltd., Dollard-des-Ormeaux, QC, Canada) proved to have the most improvement in post-operative outcomes when used as a double bundle graft.
Topics: Humans; Patellofemoral Joint; Joint Instability; Knee Joint; Patellar Dislocation; Ligaments, Articular
PubMed: 38132916
DOI: 10.3390/medsci11040075 -
BMC Medical Imaging Dec 2023To conduct a systematic review looking into the possibility of US imaging to anticipate and identify future patellar or Achilles tendinopathy symptoms.
BACKGROUND
To conduct a systematic review looking into the possibility of US imaging to anticipate and identify future patellar or Achilles tendinopathy symptoms.
METHODS
The studies that were taken into consideration for this review were prospective studies that employed baseline US imaging of the patellar OR Achilles tendons in asymptomatic patients and follow-up measures of pain and/or function. Two impartial reviewers evaluated the study's quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme instrument.
RESULTS
Participants in the included studies in this review came from various sports. The systematic review revealed a link between baseline tendon abnormalities in the US and a higher chance of developing both patellar and Achilles tendinopathy as well as their future occurrence. Nine of the included studies examined the patellar tendon alone, eight the patellar and Achilles tendon together, and four the Achilles tendon exclusively. For both tendons, US administration is done in a largely consistent manner. The tendon abnormalities of tendon thickness, hypoechogenicity and vascularity at baseline were associated with an increased risk of both Achilles and patellar tendinopathy.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review shows that abnormal tendon structures seen by US in asymptomatic persons can predict the development of tendinopathy.
Topics: Humans; Achilles Tendon; Prospective Studies; Patellar Ligament; Tendinopathy; Ultrasonography; Athletes; Lower Extremity
PubMed: 38129787
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01181-5 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery May 2024Elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injuries have become increasingly common, leading to a higher number of mUCL reconstructions (UCLR). Various techniques and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injuries have become increasingly common, leading to a higher number of mUCL reconstructions (UCLR). Various techniques and graft choices have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of each available graft choice, the surgical techniques most utilized, and the reported complications associated with each surgical method.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysesguidelines. We queried PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify all articles that included UCLR between January 2002 and October 2022. We included all studies that referenced UCLR graft choice, surgical technique, and/or ulnar nerve transposition. Studies were evaluated in a narrative fashion to assess demographics and report current trends in utilization and complications of UCLR as they pertain to graft choice and surgical techniques over the past 20 years. Where possible, we stratified based on graft and technique.
RESULTS
Forty-seven articles were included, reporting on 6671 elbows. The cohort was 98% male, had a weighted mean age of 21 years and follow-up of 53 months. There were 6146 UCLRs (92%) performed with an autograft and 152 (2.3%) that utilized an allograft, while 373 (5.6%) were from mixed cohorts of autograft and allograft. Palmaris longus autograft was the most utilized mUCL graft choice (64%). The most utilized surgical configuration was the figure-of-8 (68%). Specifically, the most common techniques were the modified Jobe technique (37%), followed by American Sports Medicine Institute (ASMI) (22%), and the docking (22%) technique. A concomitant ulnar nerve transposition was performed in 44% of all patients, with 1.9% of these patients experiencing persistent ulnar nerve symptoms after ulnar nerve transposition. Of the total cohort, 14% experienced postoperative ulnar neuritis with no prior preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms. Further, meta-analysis revealed a significantly greater revision rate with the use of allografts compared to autograft and mixed cohorts (2.6% vs. 1.8% and 1.9%, P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS
Most surgeons performed UCLR with palmaris autograft utilizing a figure-of-8 graft configuration, specifically with the modified Jobe technique. The overall rate of allograft use was 2.3%, much lower than expected. The revision rate for UCLR with allograft appears to be greater compared to UCLR with autograft, although this may be secondary to limited allograft literature.
Topics: Humans; Male; Young Adult; Adult; Female; Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction; Elbow; Collateral Ligament, Ulnar; Ulnar Nerve; Ulnar Neuropathies; Elbow Joint; Collateral Ligaments; Baseball
PubMed: 38072032
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.023 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Mar 2024Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, and fracture of the coronoid. These injuries are commonly managed surgically with fixation or replacement of the radial head and repair of the collateral ligaments with or without fixation of the coronoid. Postoperative mobilization is a significant factor that may affect patient outcomes; however, the optimal postoperative mobilization protocol is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature regarding postoperative rehabilitation of terrible triad injuries to aid clinical decision making.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies with populations aged ≥16 years with terrible triad injury in which operative treatment was performed, a clear postoperative mobilization protocol was defined, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was reported. Secondary outcomes were pain, instability, and range of motion (ROM). Postoperative mobilization was classified as either "early," defined as active ROM commencement before or up to 14 days, or "late," defined as active ROM commencement after 14 days.
RESULTS
A total of 119 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 11 (301 patients) were included in the final review. The most common protocols (6 studies) favored early mobilization, whereas 5 studies undertook late mobilization. Meta-regression analysis including mobilization as a covariate showed an estimated mean difference in the pooled mean MEPS between early and late mobilization of 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-12) with a higher pooled mean MEPS for early mobilization (MEPS, 91.2) than for late mobilization (MEPS, 85; P = .041). Rates of instability reported ranged from 4.5% to 19% (8%-11.5% for early mobilization and 4.5%-19% for late mobilization).
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that early postoperative mobilization may confer a benefit in terms of functional outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries without appearing to confer an increased instability risk. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials between early and late mobilization is advised to provide a higher level of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Radius Fractures; Elbow Injuries; Treatment Outcome; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Joint Dislocations; Elbow Joint; Range of Motion, Articular; Retrospective Studies; Ulna Fractures
PubMed: 38036253
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.012 -
Neurosurgical Review Nov 2023Revision surgery for OPLL is undesirable for both patients and physicians. However, the risk factors for reoperation are not clear. Thus, we sought to review the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Revision surgery for OPLL is undesirable for both patients and physicians. However, the risk factors for reoperation are not clear. Thus, we sought to review the existing literature and determine the factors associated with higher reoperation rates in patients with OPLL. A search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Ovid to include studies regarding the risk factors of reoperation for OPLL. RoBANS (Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Nonrandomized Studies) was used for risk of bias analysis. Heterogeneity of studies and publication bias was assessed, and sensitivity analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was performed with a p-value < 0.05 using SPSS software (version 23). Twenty studies with 129 reoperated and 2,793 non-reoperated patients were included. The pooled reoperation rate was 5% (95% CI: 4% to 7). The most common cause of reoperation was residual OPLL or OPLL progression (n = 51, 39.53%). An increased risk of additional surgery was found with pre-operative cervical or thoracic angle (Standardized mean difference = -0.44; 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.19; p = 0.0061), post-operative CSF leak (Odds ratio, OR = 4.97; 95% CI: 2.48 to 9.96; p = 0.0005), and graft and/or hardware failure (OR = 192.09; 95% CI: 6.68 to 5521.69; p = 0.0101). Apart from the factors identified in our study, the association of other variables with the risk of second surgery could not be ruled out, owing to the complexity of the relationship and significant bias in the current literature.
Topics: Humans; Reoperation; Treatment Outcome; Osteogenesis; Longitudinal Ligaments; Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; Risk Factors; Cervical Vertebrae; Decompression, Surgical; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37996772
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02215-w -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2023To determine whether a double anchor is more effective than a single anchor in the surgical repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) in patients with ankle... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To determine whether a double anchor is more effective than a single anchor in the surgical repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) in patients with ankle instability.
METHODS
This study searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify potential studies that compared the clinical outcomes of double anchors and single anchors for ATFL repair from inception to July 31st, 2023. The study aligned with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to evaluate methodologic quality and risk of bias. The meta-analysis was performed with random effects. Outcomes, including American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score (AOFAS), Karlsson Ankle Functional Score (KAFS), Tegner activity score, return to sport rate, complications and revision surgery events, were recorded.
RESULTS
A total of 845 articles were identified after an initial search of the three databases. Four retrospective studies involving 231 individuals were included for further analysis. There was no significant difference between the single-anchor group and the two-anchor group in terms of the AOFAS (risk ratio, -0.44, [-2.22; 1.34]) or KAFS (mean difference, -2.81, [-6.87; 1.25]). However, in terms of the Tegner activity score and the return to sport rate, the single-anchor group had significantly lower scores and longer times than the double-anchor group. No complications or revision surgery events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with chronic ankle instability, both single anchors and double anchors can provide good functional outcomes. For patients who participate in physically demanding sports, double anchors may be a superior option.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level Ⅲ, meta-analysis of Level Ⅲ.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Arthroscopy; Lateral Ligament, Ankle; Ankle Joint; Cohort Studies; Joint Instability
PubMed: 37992222
DOI: 10.1177/10225536231217914