-
Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) May 2022Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation (SER)-type ankle fractures are very common and account for up to 75% of all ankle fractures. Assessing deltoid integrity is key... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation (SER)-type ankle fractures are very common and account for up to 75% of all ankle fractures. Assessing deltoid integrity is key for surgical decision making. Ultrasound has been used recently to assess the integrity of the deltoid ligament and differentiate between SER II and SER IV fractures. The aim of this article is to review the literature for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in this group of patients.
METHODS
After registering the protocol with PROSPERO, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. Studies that satisfied the following inclusion criteria were assessed: (1) Adult patients (>16 years), (2) Acute SER-type ankle fractures assessed within 2 weeks of the injury, (3) Diagnostic accuracy studies. Risk of bias assessment was conducted and a narrative synthesis of the results presented.
RESULTS
A total of five studies satisfied our inclusion criteria and were included for review. These had a total of 175 patients studied. All studies showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90-100% for detecting a complete tear of the deltoid. All papers had a significant risk of bias inherent to the design. Only patients undergoing surgery were exposed to the gold standard of operative intervention.
CONCLUSION
Ultrasound scan has shown excellent diagnostic accuracy for detecting complete deltoid ruptures in SER ankle fractures. These results however should be interpreted with caution. Perhaps a different approach is needed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound scans in patient with SER type fractures.
Topics: Adult; Ankle Fractures; Ankle Joint; Humans; Ligaments, Articular; Rupture; Supination; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 35255405
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101897 -
JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques May 2022The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded from its original indication as a rotator cuff arthropathy treatment to include a large variety of... (Review)
Review
The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has expanded from its original indication as a rotator cuff arthropathy treatment to include a large variety of pathologies. A frequently reported complication with this surgery is postoperative shoulder instability with reported incidence varying widely from 2.3 to 38%. The etiology for this instability is broad and includes prosthesis design, mechanical impingement, surgical technique, and axillary/deltoid function. A PROSPERO-registered systematic review was performed utilizing PRISMA guidelines using Cochrane, PUBMED, Embase, and Eline. Of the 1442 studies initially identified, 7 studies met all inclusion criteria, all of which were level III or IV evidence. All 7 studies evaluated postoperative instability, but no study reported a statistically significant difference in instability rates between the groups. Dislocations occurred in 5 patients (5/679, 0.7%) with subscapularis repair and 8 patients (8/527, 1.5%) without repair. A nonsignificant difference in the risk of instability for surgeries with repair compared to surgeries without repair was found (overall risk difference: 0.01, random effects 95% confidence interval: -0.00 to 0.02, = .11). This review suggests no difference in postoperative shoulder instability rates between patients that underwent primary RTSA with or without subsequent repair of the subscapularis tendon. Interestingly, one study comparing implants with a medialized or nonlateralized implant showed a significantly increased rate of dislocation with the medialized group compared to the lateralized group. When these groups were then stratified based on subscapularis repair status, there was no increased risk with a nonrepaired tendon. This study suggests that implant design may have more influence on the stability of RTSA than subscapularis status. However, overall, there does appear to be a trend suggesting improved postoperative clinical outcomes and active range of motion for patients with a subscapularis repair vs. without a repair. Further research is needed to better elucidate the ideal combination of surgical technique and implant design to minimize postoperative glenohumeral joint instability while optimizing postoperative clinical outcomes and range of motion after primary RTSA.
PubMed: 37587956
DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.01.003 -
Canadian Journal of Surgery. Journal... 2022Deltoid ligament repair (DLR) was historically a common adjunct to ankle fracture fixation; however, prevailing clinical practice is to explore the medial side of the...
BACKGROUND
Deltoid ligament repair (DLR) was historically a common adjunct to ankle fracture fixation; however, prevailing clinical practice is to explore the medial side of the ankle only if reduction is blocked. We performed a systematic review to determine the breadth and quality of the literature evaluating DLR in the context of ankle fractures.
METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases in May 2020 for English-language articles evaluating DLR versus no repair or syndesmotic fixation in patients with acute ankle fractures. We used descriptive statistics to compare studies and draw conclusions.
RESULTS
Of 362 articles identified, 8 (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 5 retrospective cohort studies) were included in our final analysis. Five studies compared DLR to conservative management, and 3 compared DLR to transsyndesmotic fixation. Functional outcomes were equivalent between groups. Five of the 6 studies that included radiographic outcomes showed a statistically significant decrease in the medial clear space and decreased malreduction rates postoperatively in the DLR groups.
CONCLUSION
High-quality evidence guiding treatment of deltoid ligament injury in acute ankle fractures is lacking; currently available evidence appears to support DLR. Given recent increased interest in DLR and syndesmotic fixation, a comprehensive multicentre RCT is warranted. Although radiographic evidence indicates the potential benefit of DLR, further research is required to establish the superiority of DLR versus clinical equipoise.
Topics: Ankle Fractures; Humans; Joint Diseases; Ligaments, Articular; Orthopedic Procedures; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
PubMed: 35017184
DOI: 10.1503/cjs.020320 -
PloS One 2021Rupture of the deltoid ligament (DL) in acute ankle fracture is very common. However, there is still insufficient evidence on whether to repair the DL in acute ankle... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Rupture of the deltoid ligament (DL) in acute ankle fracture is very common. However, there is still insufficient evidence on whether to repair the DL in acute ankle fracture. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies was performed to report the outcome of DL repair in acute ankle fracture.
METHODS
The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched from the inception dates to October 31, 2020, for comparative studies. The methodological quality was evaluated based on the risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) or the Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS). The post-operative medial clear space (MCS), final MCS, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and incidence of complications were analysed.
RESULTS
A total of 8 comparative studies involving 388 participants who suffered Weber type B or C ankle fractures were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the post-operative MCS, final MCS, AOFAS score and rate of complications were statistically superior in the DL repair group. For the VAS score, there was no significant difference between the DL repair group and the DL non-repair group.
CONCLUSIONS
In this meta-analysis of comparative studies, DL repair offered great advantages in terms of the post-operative MCS, final MCS, AOFAS score and rate of complications compared with non-repair. The repair of the DL in patients with acute ankle fractures might be beneficial to ankle joint stability and assist in improving the quality of ankle reduction. More high-quality and prospective studies with long follow-up durations are needed to further demonstrate the superiority of DL repair over non-repair.
Topics: Adult; Ankle Fractures; Ankle Joint; Bone Screws; Follow-Up Studies; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Ligaments, Articular; Middle Aged; Rupture; Suture Anchors; Treatment Outcome; Visual Analog Scale
PubMed: 34767584
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258785 -
Injury Feb 2022Supination-external rotation (SER) ankle fractures account for the majority of ankle fractures and can be divided into stable or unstable fractures, based on the state... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Diagnostic tools to evaluate ankle instability caused by a deltoid ligament rupture in patients with supination-external rotation ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
AIM
Supination-external rotation (SER) ankle fractures account for the majority of ankle fractures and can be divided into stable or unstable fractures, based on the state of the deltoid ligament. The objective of this review was to appraise the available literature concerning diagnostic tools to evaluate deltoid ligament integrity in patients with SER-type ankle fractures.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed and Embase was performed up to December 2020. The outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of the diagnostic tools. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain an overview of sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC). The methodological quality of the articles was evaluated using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies investigating tools for deltoid ligament rupture in patients with SER-type ankle fractures were included. The present study found sensitivity (and specificity) ranges of 0.20-0.90 (and 0.38-0.97) for clinical features, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) 0.57-0.85 (and 0.81-1.00), ultrasonography 1.00 (and 0.89-1.00), Malleolar Medial Fleck Sign (MMFS) 0.25 (and 0.99), conventional ankle mortise radiography 0.33-0.57 (and 0.60-0.94), gravity stress radiography 0.71-1.00 (and 0.72-0.88) and manual stress ankle radiography 0.65-1.00 (and 0.00-0.77). The largest AUC was found for ultrasonography, followed by MMFS, gravity stress radiography and MRI.
CONCLUSION
Ultrasonography and gravity stress radiography seem the most accurate diagnostic tools to evaluate deltoid ligament integrity. To strengthen this conclusion, future research should use an identical reference test to ensure comparability of results. Nevertheless, present study is of high value to close the knowledge gap about which presently available diagnostic tool is to be preferred to evaluate deltoid ligament integrity in patients with SER-type ankle fractures.
Topics: Ankle; Ankle Fractures; Ankle Joint; Humans; Ligaments, Articular; Range of Motion, Articular; Supination
PubMed: 34602247
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.034 -
JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques Nov 2021As reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) cases increase, so too will the need to revise subsequent failures. Many of the complications associated with revising anatomic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
As reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) cases increase, so too will the need to revise subsequent failures. Many of the complications associated with revising anatomic total shoulder and hemiarthroplasty have been adequately addressed by RSA including glenoid bone deficiency, instability, and functional outcomes. However, the risk for complication when revising a failed reverse prosthesis may be more pronounced with increased bone and soft tissue deficiency. The ability for the reversed prosthesis to accommodate these insufficiencies following a prior reversed prosthesis is unclear.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were queried for articles which fit the inclusion criteria of a reversed prosthesis used to revise a failed primary reverse prosthesis with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and clinical outcome reporting.
RESULTS
After exclusions, 9 studies reporting on 242 reverse shoulders with a mean follow-up of 40.29 months were analyzed. The differences between preoperative and postoperative weighted means were not significant for Constant ( = .26), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score ( = .61), SSV ( = .57), and visual analog scale for pain ( = .48). Functional improvements in elevation (74°-102°) and external rotation (18°-21°) were consistent with those reported for primary reverse procedures, although differences in preoperative and postoperative measures were not statistically significant. Patient satisfaction was 89% with a major complication rate of 25%.
DISCUSSION
The reverse shoulder prosthesis has proven satisfactory in revising hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The current results indicate RSA is also a satisfactory treatment option when revising a prior reverse prosthesis. Inherent to revision shoulder surgery is the obstacle of humeral and glenoid bone loss, an attenuated soft-tissue envelope, and instability. The reverse prosthesis may adequately address these commonly confronted difficulties with its inherent design characteristics. RSA provides a secure glenoid fixation for bone grafting, the ability to increase construct stability with component sizing, and a reliance on the deltoid for function. As our learning about revision of RSA improves, so will our ability to preemptively address potential issues which may lead to decreased complications in these cases. Despite the 25% rate of major complication, patients reported satisfaction of 89% which demonstrates the improvements in function and pain relief that are provided by the reverse prosthesis.
PubMed: 37588710
DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.07.002 -
Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) Apr 2021High ankle sprains are insidious injuries associated with a long recovery period, functional impairment and long-term sequelae if mistreated. This systematic review... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
High ankle sprains are insidious injuries associated with a long recovery period, functional impairment and long-term sequelae if mistreated. This systematic review investigates the biomechanical knowledge on the kinematic consequences of sequential syndesmotic ligamentous injuries, aiming to furnish an updated and objective contribution for the critical appraisal and further elaboration of current diagnostic algorithms for high ankle sprains.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed to identify human biomechanical studies evaluating the stabilizing role of the syndesmotic ligaments. Special attention was paid to identify the smallest lesion within the progressive simulated injuries able to provoke statistically significant changes of the syndesmotic kinematic on the specimen, the mechanical solicitation that provoked it, and the measurement methodology.
FINDINGS
Fourteen studies were included. In eight articles already an isolated injury to the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament provoked significant changes of the syndesmotic kinematic, which was always depicted under an external rotation torque. In three articles an isolated deltoid ligament injury provoked significant changes of the syndesmotic kinematic. Four articles described a direct measure of the bony movements, whereas seven collected data through conventional radiography or CT-scan imaging and three via a 3D motion analysis tracking system.
INTERPRETATION
An isolated lesion of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament can provoke significant kinematic modifications in ex vivo syndesmotic models and may be responsible of subtle patterns of dynamic instability, regardless of further syndesmotic ligamentous injuries. The data observed support efforts to define reliable CT imaging parameters to improve non-invasive diagnostic of subtle forms of syndesmotic instability.
Topics: Ankle Injuries; Biomechanical Phenomena; Humans; Joint Instability; Lateral Ligament, Ankle; Ligaments, Articular; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33756400
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105312 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Oct 2022Anatomic (AN) Endoprosthesis (EPR) reconstructions of the shoulder after intra-articular proximal humerus (Malawer type 1) resections are characterized by early recovery... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Anatomic (AN) Endoprosthesis (EPR) reconstructions of the shoulder after intra-articular proximal humerus (Malawer type 1) resections are characterized by early recovery and low complications rate. However, shoulder instability and limited mobility can occur. Reverse shoulder (RS) EPR has been introduced to improve functional outcome. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate shoulder reconstructions with AN or RS EPR after Malawer type 1 resection, comparing complications and functional results.
METHODS
Through an electronic systematic search of PubMed, articles concerning EPR after shoulder Malawer type 1 resections were reviewed. Complications rate, range of motion (ROM) and functional outcome (Musculoskeletal Society Tumor Society-MSTS score) of AN and RS EPR were evaluated.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included. A similar complication rate was observed between AN and RS EPR rate (26.4% and 22.4%, respectively, p = 0.37). Soft tissue failure was the most frequent complication and cause of revision in both groups. Mean post-operative flexion and abduction ROM and MSTS scores were significantly higher in RS EPR, particularly among patients with preserved deltoid function (p = 0.013, p = 0.025 and p = 0.005, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Anatomic and reverse shoulder EPR represent safe and effective implants for shoulder reconstruction, with similar implant stability and complication rates. RS EPR significantly improves post-operative ROM and functional outcomes, especially when at least a partial function of the abductor apparatus is preserved.
Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Humans; Humerus; Joint Instability; Range of Motion, Articular; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33721053
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03857-5 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Jul 2022Excluding deep deltoid ligament (DDL) rupture in isolated type B ankle fractures is crucial in the decision-making process for surgical or conservative treatment. There... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Excluding deep deltoid ligament (DDL) rupture in isolated type B ankle fractures is crucial in the decision-making process for surgical or conservative treatment. There is no consensus about the most accurate radiologic diagnostic test to determine medial injury. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature concerning radiologic diagnostics that evaluate medial injury in adult patients with isolated type B ankle fractures.
METHODS
The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, COCHRANE Library, and Emcare were searched to identify studies published from January 1990 to December 2020 concerning sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests that evaluate medial injury in patients with an isolated type B ankle fracture. For inclusion, comparison to a reference test was required to provide results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and preferably positive predictive value and negative predictive value RESULTS: This review included 8 studies. Ultrasound showed the highest sensitivity of 100% and a specificity between 90 and 100% for detecting DDL rupture. Gravity stress radiographs showed a sensitivity of 71-100% and a specificity between 88 and 92%. The mortise, external rotation stress test, and MRI had lower sensitivity and specificity values, between 65 and 88%.
CONCLUSION
The most accurate and available methods for diagnosing deltoid integrity seem to be the ultrasound and the GS radiograph. Further research is needed to confirm the results of this review.
Topics: Adult; Ankle Fractures; Ankle Joint; Humans; Ligaments, Articular; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Radiography
PubMed: 33689017
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03850-y -
JSES International Jan 2021Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Globally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this study was to provide a focused, updated systematic review for each of the most common complications of RSA by limiting each search to publications after 2010. In this part II, the following were examined: (1) instability, (2) humerus/glenoid fracture, (3) acromial/scapular spine fractures (AF/SSF), and (4) problems/miscellaneous.
METHODS
Four separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall, 137 studies for instability, 94 for humerus/glenoid fracture, 120 for AF/SSF, and 74 for problems/miscellaneous were included in each review, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed with chi-square and Fisher exact tests.
RESULTS
The Grammont design had a higher instability rate vs. all other designs combined (4.0%, 1.3%; < .001), and the onlay humerus design had a lower rate than the lateralized glenoid design (0.9%, 2.0%; = .02). The rate for intraoperative humerus fracture was 1.8%; intraoperative glenoid fracture, 0.3%; postoperative humerus fracture, 1.2%; and postoperative glenoid fracture, 0.1%. The rate of AF/SSF was 2.6% (371/14235). The rate for complex regional pain syndrome was 0.4%; deltoid injury, 0.1%; hematoma, 0.3%; and heterotopic ossification, 0.8%.
CONCLUSIONS
Focused systematic reviews of recent literature with a large volume of shoulders demonstrate that using non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including instability, intraoperative humerus and glenoid fractures, and hematoma are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications continue to expand for RSA, it is imperative to accurately track the rate and types of complications in order to justify its cost and increased indications.
PubMed: 33554177
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.018