-
Studies in Health Technology and... Jun 2020
Topics: Dermoscopy; Humans; Skin Diseases; Telemedicine
PubMed: 32570617
DOI: 10.3233/SHTI200400 -
JAMA Dermatology Apr 2020The clinical and dermoscopic features of the vast majority of uncommon variants of cutaneous melanoma have been rarely reported, leading to difficulty in making accurate...
IMPORTANCE
The clinical and dermoscopic features of the vast majority of uncommon variants of cutaneous melanoma have been rarely reported, leading to difficulty in making accurate diagnoses.
OBJECTIVE
To define the main clinical and dermoscopic features of the most frequently reported but uncommon histologic variants of cutaneous melanoma.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A 2-step systematic review of the literature was performed (from inception to November 2018) using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The first step identified those uncommon variants of melanoma for which at least 1 case reporting dermoscopy was described in the literature. The keywords searched were melanoma, uncommon, rare, dermoscopy, and dermatoscopy. In the second step, each previously identified uncommon variant was searched for in the same databases by combining the following terms with melanoma, dermoscopy, and dermatoscopy: amelanotic, hypopigmented, animal, melanocytoma, balloon, desmoplastic, follicular, nested, nevoid, dermal, spitz*, spindle, and verrucous. The institution's database was also searched from January 2012 to September 2019 for histopathologically confirmed cases of the same melanoma variants. Each reviewer also assessed the quality of reporting in the included articles based on previously described guidelines.
FINDINGS
In total, 62 articles met the inclusion criteria, reporting 433 melanoma cases. An additional 56 cases of uncommon melanoma variants were retrieved from the institution's database for a total of 489 cases: 283 cases of amelanotic superficial spreading melanoma, 18 cases of animal-type and pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma, 7 cases of balloon cell melanoma, 71 cases of desmoplastic melanoma, 3 cases of follicular melanoma, 10 cases of nested melanoma, 33 cases of nevoid melanoma, 2 cases of primary dermal melanoma, 57 cases of spitzoid melanoma, and 5 cases of verrucous melanoma. These variants of melanoma occurred more frequently in women than men (147 cases vs 132 cases). Clinically, these tumors were mainly palpable (162 of 217 [74.7%]) or amelanotic (283 of 489 [57.9%]) lesions that could resemble other benign or malignant skin conditions; dermoscopy typically revealed a homogeneous pinkish background, white structures, and polymorphic vessels. The mean age of all included was 58 years (range, 1-89 years).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Uncommon melanoma variants may resemble both inflammatory disorders and other cutaneous neoplasms, representing a diagnostic pitfall even for the most experienced dermatologist. The purpose of this systematic review was to provide an extensive and detailed overview of specific clinical and dermoscopic features of each uncommon melanoma variant, highlighting the main criteria for differentiating these variants from other benign or malignant skin lesions.
Topics: Dermoscopy; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Melanoma; Skin Diseases; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 32101255
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4912 -
The Laryngoscope Jan 2021Evolving hair transplantation (HT) techniques have offered new possibilities for hair restoration. However, the role of HT in patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia...
OBJECTIVE
Evolving hair transplantation (HT) techniques have offered new possibilities for hair restoration. However, the role of HT in patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) and lichen planopilaris (LPP) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes and temporal relationship of HT in this population.
METHODS
A literature search of three databases was conducted. We reviewed 1) literature reporting outcomes of patients with LPP or FFA who received HT, and 2) studies reporting the development of LPP or FFA resulting from HT.
RESULTS
Thirteen articles included 42 patients that provided data for evaluation. Fifteen patients had previously been diagnosed with FFA or LPP, and the remaining 27 patients developed disease after undergoing HT. Seven patients with FFA and eight patients with LPP received HT, with a mean sustained disease remission of 2.69 years prior to HT. In total, two of seven (29%) patients with FFA and five of eight (75%) patients with LPP experienced positive HT results over a follow-up period of 8-72 months. Interestingly, 27 patients without evidence of previous disease developed FFA or LPP following HT after a median duration of 16 months.
CONCLUSIONS
HT for LPP and FFA is feasible but results may be less favorable compared to HT for other causes. Outcomes may be more favorable for LPP than FFA but this was not statistically significant and evidence is very limited. FFA and LPP can also develop following HT in patients without previous evidence of disease.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
NA Laryngoscope, 131:59-66, 2021.
Topics: Alopecia; Dermoscopy; Hair; Humans; Lichen Planus; Scalp
PubMed: 32045028
DOI: 10.1002/lary.28551 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Feb 2020To examine the validity and findings of studies that examine the accuracy of algorithm based smartphone applications ("apps") to assess risk of skin cancer in suspicious...
OBJECTIVE
To examine the validity and findings of studies that examine the accuracy of algorithm based smartphone applications ("apps") to assess risk of skin cancer in suspicious skin lesions.
DESIGN
Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies.
DATA SOURCES
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CPCI, Zetoc, Science Citation Index, and online trial registers (from database inception to 10 April 2019).
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Studies of any design that evaluated algorithm based smartphone apps to assess images of skin lesions suspicious for skin cancer. Reference standards included histological diagnosis or follow-up, and expert recommendation for further investigation or intervention. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed validity using QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool). Estimates of sensitivity and specificity were reported for each app.
RESULTS
Nine studies that evaluated six different identifiable smartphone apps were included. Six verified results by using histology or follow-up (n=725 lesions), and three verified results by using expert recommendations (n=407 lesions). Studies were small and of poor methodological quality, with selective recruitment, high rates of unevaluable images, and differential verification. Lesion selection and image acquisition were performed by clinicians rather than smartphone users. Two CE (Conformit Europenne) marked apps are available for download. SkinScan was evaluated in a single study (n=15, five melanomas) with 0% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the detection of melanoma. SkinVision was evaluated in two studies (n=252, 61 malignant or premalignant lesions) and achieved a sensitivity of 80% (95% confidence interval 63% to 92%) and a specificity of 78% (67% to 87%) for the detection of malignant or premalignant lesions. Accuracy of the SkinVision app verified against expert recommendations was poor (three studies).
CONCLUSIONS
Current algorithm based smartphone apps cannot be relied on to detect all cases of melanoma or other skin cancers. Test performance is likely to be poorer than reported here when used in clinically relevant populations and by the intended users of the apps. The current regulatory process for awarding the CE marking for algorithm based apps does not provide adequate protection to the public.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42016033595.
Topics: Algorithms; Biopsy; Dermoscopy; False Negative Reactions; False Positive Reactions; Humans; Melanoma; Mobile Applications; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Smartphone
PubMed: 32041693
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m127 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Oct 2020The diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) of cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM) seems promising. However, clinical scenarios in which RCM is most... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) of cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM) seems promising. However, clinical scenarios in which RCM is most useful are still to be established.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of RCM for MM diagnosis according to study design, lesion type and diagnostic modality. Secondary outcomes include a comparison with dermoscopy.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Public Library Databases for English articles published prior to January 2019. Statistical analyses were conducted with Meta-Disc v. 1.4, STATA 14.0 software and the QUADAS-2 tool.
RESULTS
A total of 32 studies (7352 lesions) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity resulted 92% (95% CI: 0.91-0.93) and 70% (95% CI: 0.69-0.71), respectively. According to study design, diagnostic sensitivity was high for all study types, confirming a lower specificity for prospective interventional studies. Diagnostic accuracy remained high for all lesion types, with the highest specificity obtained for consecutive lesions of 77% (95% CI: 0.75-0.78) vs. 65% (95% CI: 0.63-0.66) for lesions highly suspicious for MM. RCM diagnostic accuracy was superior to dermoscopy, most notably in terms of specificity of 56% (95% CI: 0.52-0.60) vs. 38% (95% CI: 0.34-0.42), respectively. Studies were generally assessed across all domains as low or unclear risk of bias with a mainly low concern regarding applicability of evidence. Publication bias was asymmetrical (11.2 ± 4.0; 95% CI 2.97-19.43; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Independent of study design, RCM has a high diagnostic power for MM detection, and unnecessary excisions are reduced compared to dermoscopy. This reduction is most evident in non-decisional RCM scenarios and for lesions analysed at RCM consecutively compared to those selected highly suspicious for MM. However, the scarcity, heterogeneity and bias associated with the data in literature should be considered when interpreting present conclusions.
Topics: Dermoscopy; Humans; Melanoma; Microscopy, Confocal; Prospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 31997465
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16248 -
Dermatology and Therapy Feb 2020An increased incidence of tinea capitis has been observed over the last few decades. Trichoscopy is a non-invasive, in-office method helpful in establishing the correct... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
An increased incidence of tinea capitis has been observed over the last few decades. Trichoscopy is a non-invasive, in-office method helpful in establishing the correct diagnosis in patients with hair loss and inflammatory hair disorders. The objective was to review and analyze current data on the trichoscopy of tinea capitis.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed, EBSCO and Scopus databases. The search terms included 'tinea capitis' combined with 'trichoscopy', 'dermatoscopy', 'dermoscopy', 'videodermatoscopy' or 'videodermoscopy'.
RESULTS
Of 326 articles, 37 were considered eligible for the quantitative analysis. The most characteristic (with a high predictive value) trichoscopic findings of tinea capitis included comma hairs (51%), corkscrew hairs (32%), Morse code-like hairs (22%), zigzag hairs (21%), bent hairs (27%), block hairs (10%) and i-hairs (10%). Other common, but not characteristic, trichoscopic features were broken hairs (57%), black dots (34%), perifollicular scaling (59%) and diffuse scaling (89%). Morse code-like hairs, zigzag hairs, bent hairs and diffuse scaling were only observed in Microsporum tinea capitis (8/29, 28%; 6/29, 21%; 4/29, 14% and 4/29, 14%, respectively). In Trichophyton tinea capitis, corkscrew hairs were more commonly detected compared to Microsporum tinea capitis (21/38, 55% vs 3/29, 10%).
CONCLUSION
The presence of characteristic trichoscopic features of tinea capitis is sufficient to establish the initial diagnosis and introduce treatment before culture results are available. Trichoscopy may be useful in distinguishing between Microsporum and Trichophyton tinea capitis.
PubMed: 31907867
DOI: 10.1007/s13555-019-00350-1 -
The British Journal of Dermatology Aug 2020Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) are noninvasive techniques for the diagnosis of skin lesions. Their accuracy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) are noninvasive techniques for the diagnosis of skin lesions. Their accuracy for amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM) has not been systematically studied.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to investigate systematically the accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM and to compare the accuracy between them for diagnosing AHM.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies about dermoscopy, RCM and AHM from inception to 31 June 2019. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. The pooled results were calculated using a random effects model in Stata 14, Meta-DiSc, RevMan 5·3 and SAS 9·4. We also explored the sources of heterogeneity by sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS
Seven studies with a total of 1111 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of dermoscopy for the diagnosis of AHM were 61% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·37-0·81] and 90% (95% CI 0·74-0·97), respectively. The corresponding respective values of RCM for the diagnosis of AHM were 67% (95% CI 0·51-0·81) and 89% (95% CI 0·86-0·92). In three studies including the performance of both RCM and dermoscopy, the relative diagnostic odds ratio of RCM over dermoscopy was 4·69 (95% CI 0·81-27·3) (P = 0·068).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates that both dermoscopy and RCM offer good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and moderate sensitivity in the diagnosis of AHM. RCM is more accurate than dermoscopy in diagnosing AHM but the comparison needs to be confirmed. What's already known about this topic? Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM) is the most lethal skin cancer. The diagnosis of AHM is a great challenge because of its nonspecific clinical manifestation. Early diagnosis can improve the prognosis. Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have high diagnostic accuracy for pigmented melanoma. What does this study add? Both dermoscopy and RCM offer good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity and moderate sensitivity for AHM. RCM might be more accurate than dermoscopy for diagnosis of AHM. More research on the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy and RCM for AHM is required in support of these findings.
Topics: Dermoscopy; Humans; Hypopigmentation; Melanoma, Amelanotic; Microscopy, Confocal; Sensitivity and Specificity; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 31747045
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18722 -
Journal of the American Academy of... Sep 2021Multiple studies have reported on dermoscopic structures in basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and its subtypes, with varying results.
BACKGROUND
Multiple studies have reported on dermoscopic structures in basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and its subtypes, with varying results.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the prevalence of dermoscopic structures in BCC and its subtypes.
METHODS
Databases and reference lists were searched for relevant trials according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were assessed for the relative proportion of BCC dermoscopic features. Random-effects models were used to estimate summary effect sizes.
RESULTS
Included were 31 studies consisting of 5950 BCCs. The most common dermoscopic features seen in BCC were arborizing vessels (59%), shiny white structures (49%), and large blue-grey ovoid nests (34%). Arborizing vessels, ulceration, and blue-grey ovoid nests and globules were most common in nodular BCC; short-fine telangiectasia, multiple small erosions, and leaf-like, spoke wheel and concentric structures in superficial BCC; porcelain white areas and arborizing vessels in morpheaform BCC; and arborizing vessels and ulceration in infiltrative BCC.
LIMITATIONS
Studies had significant heterogeneity. Studies reporting BCC histopathologic subtypes did not provide clinical data on pigmentation of lesions.
CONCLUSION
In addition to arborizing vessels, shiny white structures are a common feature of BCC. A constellation of dermoscopic features may aid in differentiating between BCC histopathologic subtypes.
Topics: Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Dermoscopy; Humans; Pigmentation; Pigmentation Disorders; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 31706938
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.11.008 -
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology Mar 2020Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides dynamic information and allows in vivo monitoring, with excellent histologic...
BACKGROUND
Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides dynamic information and allows in vivo monitoring, with excellent histologic correlation. In the last decade, the use of RCM for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) has been reported. CTCL may require multiple biopsies for diagnosis due to its equivocal clinical presentation. RCM was described as a possible tool to help determine the best site for skin biopsy. This study aims to systematically review all RCM features reported in literature for CTCL.
METHOD
A systematic literature search concerning CTCL evaluated by RCM was performed in eight electronic databases until May 2019 following PRISMA-DTA quality assessment.
RESULTS
Eighteen RCM features were described in patients with CTCL. The most frequent were: interface dermatitis (89%), epidermal lymphocytes (82%), epidermal architectural disarray (81%), and vesicle-like structure (Pautrier microabscess) (51%).
CONCLUSION
In order to establish comparable parameters among the studies identified, we proposed descriptors for CTCL features and a grading system to quantify them. This will facilitate to define the role of RCM in the diagnosis and monitoring of CTCL patients.
Topics: Dermoscopy; Humans; Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous; Microscopy, Confocal
PubMed: 31618473
DOI: 10.1111/cup.13598 -
BMJ Open Aug 2019Most skin lesions first present in primary care, where distinguishing rare melanomas from benign lesions can be challenging. Dermoscopy improves diagnostic accuracy...
OBJECTIVE
Most skin lesions first present in primary care, where distinguishing rare melanomas from benign lesions can be challenging. Dermoscopy improves diagnostic accuracy among specialists and is promoted for use by primary care physicians (PCPs). However, when used by untrained clinicians, accuracy may be no better than visual inspection. This study aimed to undertake a systematic review of literature reporting use of dermoscopy to triage suspicious skin lesions in primary care settings, and challenges for implementation.
DESIGN
A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.
DATA SOURCES
We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and SCOPUS bibliographic databases from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2017, without language restrictions.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Studies including assessment of dermoscopy accuracy, acceptability to patients and PCPs, training requirements, and cost-effectiveness of dermoscopy modes in primary care, including trials, diagnostic accuracy and acceptability studies.
RESULTS
23 studies met the review criteria, representing 49 769 lesions and 3708 PCPs, all from high-income countries. There was a paucity of studies set truly in primary care and the outcomes measured were diverse. The heterogeneity therefore made meta-analysis unfeasible; the data were synthesised through narrative review. Dermoscopy, with appropriate training, was associated with improved diagnostic accuracy for melanoma and benign lesions, and reduced unnecessary excisions and referrals. Teledermoscopy-based referral systems improved triage accuracy. Only three studies examined cost-effectiveness; hence, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions. Costs, training and time requirements were considered important implementation barriers. Patient satisfaction was seldom assessed. Computer-aided dermoscopy and other technological advances have not yet been tested in primary care.
CONCLUSIONS
Dermoscopy could help PCPs triage suspicious lesions for biopsy, urgent referral or reassurance. However, it will be important to establish further evidence on minimum training requirements to reach competence, as well as the cost-effectiveness and patient acceptability of implementing dermoscopy in primary care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42018091395.
Topics: Biopsy; Dermoscopy; Humans; Melanoma; Primary Health Care; Reproducibility of Results; Skin Neoplasms; Triage
PubMed: 31434767
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027529