-
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research Feb 2024Hypoplastic asymmetry due to hemifacial microsomia (HFM) often represents the most difficult reconstruction in the craniomaxillofacial clinic. Although autogenous grafts... (Review)
Review
Hypoplastic asymmetry due to hemifacial microsomia (HFM) often represents the most difficult reconstruction in the craniomaxillofacial clinic. Although autogenous grafts are generally used for temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TMJR), the use of TMJR prostheses is not well established. The aim of this review was to identify, collect and analyse the use of extended TMJR (eTMJR) prostheses in patients with HFM, describing clinical features, surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Online searches of all major databases were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies with HFM patients treated with the eTMJR prostheses were included. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. A total of 19 studies, including 08 case studies, 06 case series and 05 retrospective cohort studies, met the inclusion criteria, where a total of 42 HFM patients were reported from 18 countries, mostly from the United States (05; 26%). Fifteen of the 42 cases (~36%) were male. The mean ± SD (range) age of patients in all studies was 19.79 ± 5.81 (9-36) years. The mean ± SD (range) of patient follow-up was 41.30 ± 35.50 (6-136) months. A total of 5 (10.6%) patients were implanted with bilateral eTMJR prostheses. The Pruzansky classification was used in 18 (~89.5%) studies, OMENS classification in 01 (~5%) study, whereas no classification was reported in one study. Only 01 (7.1%) study had documented the eTMJR classification for the prosthesis used. In growing patients with or without a history of failed autogenous tissues, TMJR prostheses may provide a viable alternative. Randomized studies with large cohorts are warranted to validate these preliminary results.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Young Adult; Facial Asymmetry; Goldenhar Syndrome; Joint Prosthesis; Retrospective Studies; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Child
PubMed: 37533308
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12695 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Dec 2023This study provides a systematic review on cosmetic satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This study provides a systematic review on cosmetic satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC.
METHODS
A systematic review of all articles published from inception to 1 June 2022 was performed. Articles were included if they reported on subjective assessment of cosmetic satisfaction or other PROMs by patients or their families using questionnaires or interviews.
RESULTS
Twelve articles, describing 724 surgical treatments of SSC, met the inclusion criteria. Cosmetic satisfaction was evaluated in the following ways: 1) use of the VAS score, binary questions or a 5-point scale to rate general, facial or skull appearance; 2) use of an aesthetic outcome staging in which personal opinion was added to the treating surgeon's opinion; and 3) use of an evaluation of anatomical proportions of the skull and face. A trend towards an overall improvement in cosmetic satisfaction following surgical treatment of SSC was observed. Reported PROMs included general health, socioeconomic status, patients' and their families' rating of the normalcy and noticeability of their appearance and how much this bothered them, and patients' answers to the Youth Quality of Life with Facial Differences (YQOL-FD) questionnaire. No clear overall trend of the reported PROMs was identified.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review illuminates that there is a wide variation in outcomes for evaluating cosmetic satisfaction and other PROMs of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC, suggesting that further research is needed to develop an inclusive and uniform approach to assess these outcomes.
Topics: Adolescent; Humans; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Craniosynostoses; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Sutures; Personal Satisfaction
PubMed: 37477663
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-06063-3 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Dec 2023To analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of tarsal coalition, assess the role of the surgical technique, as well as of coalition size and type on outcomes. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of tarsal coalition, assess the role of the surgical technique, as well as of coalition size and type on outcomes.
METHODS
The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and was performed in four databases: MEDLINE, Central, Scopus and Web of Science. The protocol has been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), complications, revisions and radiographic recurrence were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using MINORS criteria. A random-effects model for meta-analysis was applied for analysis of data heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Twenty-five studies including 760 tarsal coalitions were included and had a weighted average follow-up of 44 months. Studies scored fair to poor on the risk of bias assessment with a mean MINORS score of 67% (44-81%). In 77.8% (37.5-100%) of surgically treated tarsal coalitions, good/excellent/non-limiting or improved PROMs were reported. Calculated data heterogeneity was moderate (I = 57%). Open bar resection with material interposition had a clinical success rate of 78.8% (50-100%). Complications occurred in 4.96% of cases. Coalition size did not prove to be a determining factor in postoperative outcome. The influence of the coalition type was not investigated by any of the studies.
CONCLUSION
Data on outcomes of surgical management for tarsal coalitions is limited to retrospective case series with high risk of bias and moderate data heterogeneity. In about ¾ of cases, open resection and interposition of material results in improved PROMs. The arbitrary margin of ≥ 50% of TC coalition size in relation to the posterior facet has little importance in surgical decision-making. None of the studies reported on the influence of the coalition type on postoperative clinical success.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Synostosis; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Tarsal Bones; Tarsal Coalition
PubMed: 37462747
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04982-z -
Developmental Neuropsychology Jul 2023There is conflicting evidence whether single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC), is linked to adversities of cognitive development. To assess the evidence for a link between... (Review)
Review
There is conflicting evidence whether single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC), is linked to adversities of cognitive development. To assess the evidence for a link between SSC and cognition, a systematic literature search was conducted and eligible studies assessed for inclusion by two independent readers. Forty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Small to medium but persistent effects on both general and some specific cognitive functions across age bands were found in higher quality studies for SSC overall. There was limited evidence for effects related to surgical correction. Methodologies varied substantially and there was a lack of longitudinal studies using broad assessment batteries.
Topics: Humans; Craniosynostoses; Cognition; Longitudinal Studies; Sutures
PubMed: 37341559
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2023.2225662 -
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Sep 2023Primary craniosynostosis is a congenital craniofacial disorder in which cranial sutures prematurely close. Iatrogenic secondary stenosis is abnormal cranial suture...
BACKGROUND
Primary craniosynostosis is a congenital craniofacial disorder in which cranial sutures prematurely close. Iatrogenic secondary stenosis is abnormal cranial suture closure caused by surgical manipulation of the suture. In contrast, idiopathic secondary stenosis develops in a suture that did not undergo surgical manipulation. The objective of this systematic review was to consolidate and characterize the incidence, classification, and management of idiopathic secondary stenosis in the literature.
METHODS
Literature from PubMed, Web Of Science, and EMBASE from 1970 to March 2022 was reviewed. The following information was extracted for individual patients: incidence of idiopathic secondary stenosis, index primary craniosynostosis, primary surgical correction, presenting signs of secondary stenosis, management, and further complications.
RESULTS
Seventeen articles detailing 1181 patients were included. Ninety-one developed idiopathic secondary stenosis (7.7%). Only 3 of these patients were syndromic. The most common index craniosynostosis was sagittal synostosis (83.5%). The most common suture undergoing idiopathic secondary stenosis was the coronal suture (91.2%). Patients presented at a median age of 24 months. The most common presenting sign was a radiologic finding (85.7%), although some patients presented with headache or head deformity. Only 2 patients, both syndromic, had complications following surgical correction of secondary stenosis.
CONCLUSIONS
Idiopathic secondary stenosis is a rare, long-term complication following index surgical repair of craniosynostosis. It can occur following any surgical technique. It most commonly affects the coronal suture but can affect any of the sutures, including pansynostosis. Surgical correction is curative in nonsyndromic patients.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Child, Preschool; Constriction, Pathologic; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Craniosynostoses; Cranial Sutures; Neurosurgical Procedures
PubMed: 37316986
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009495 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Dec 2023Reconstructive surgery of the clavicle using free vascularised fibula grafting (FVFG) is sometimes required for the management of severe bone loss or non-union. As the... (Review)
Review
Reconstructive surgery of the clavicle using free vascularised fibula grafting (FVFG) is sometimes required for the management of severe bone loss or non-union. As the procedure is relatively rare, there is no universal agreement on the management and outcome. This systematic review aimed to first, identify the conditions for which FVFG has been applied; second, to gain an understanding of the surgical techniques used; and third, to report outcomes related to bone union, infection eradication, function and complications. A PRISMA strategy was used. Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and EMBASE library databases were interrogated using pre-defined MeSH terms and Boolean operators. Quality of evidence was evaluated based on OCEBM and GRADE systems. Fourteen studies based on 37 patients were identified with a mean follow-up time of 33.3 months. The most common reasons for the procedure were: fracture non-union; tumours requiring resection; post-radiation treatment osteonecrosis and osteomyelitis. The operation approaches were similar, involving graft retrieval, insertion and fixation and vessels chosen for reattachment. The mean clavicular bone defect size was 6.6 cm (± 1.5), prior to FVFG. Bone union occurred in 94.6% with good functional outcomes. Complete infection eradication occurred in those with preceding osteomyelitis. The main complications were broken metalwork, delayed union/non-union and fibular leg paraesthesia (n = 20). The mean re-operation number was 1.6 (range 0-5.0). The study demonstrates that FVFG is well tolerated and has a high success rate. However, patients should be advised about complication development and re-intervention requirement. Interestingly, overall data is sparse with no large cohort groups or randomised trials.
Topics: Humans; Fibula; Treatment Outcome; Clavicle; Fractures, Bone; Osteomyelitis; Bone Transplantation; Synostosis
PubMed: 37289244
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03598-8 -
Operative Neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) Aug 2023Few studies have described a transmandibular approach for decompression in a patient with Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) for cervical myelopathy.
BACKGROUND
Few studies have described a transmandibular approach for decompression in a patient with Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) for cervical myelopathy.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the transmandibular approach in a KFS patient with cervical myelopathy and to perform a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Embase and PubMed databases were searched from January 2002 to November 2022 for articles examining patients with KFS undergoing cervical decompression and/or fusion for cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy were included. Articles describing compression due to nonbony causes, lumbar/sacral surgery, nonhuman studies, or symptoms only from basilar invagination/impression were excluded. Data collected were sex, median age, Samartzis type, surgical approach, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies were included, with 80 total patients. Thirty-three patients were female, and the median age ranged from 9 to 75 years. Forty-nine patients, 16 patients, and 13 patients were classified as Samartzis Types I, II, and III, respectively. Forty-five patients, 21 patients, and 6 patients underwent an anterior, posterior, and combined approach, respectively. Five postoperative complications were reported. One article reported a transmandibular approach for access to the cervical spine.
CONCLUSION
Patients with KFS are at risk of developing cervical myelopathy. Although KFS manifests heterogeneously and may be treated through a variety of approaches, some manifestations of KFS may preclude traditional approaches for decompression. Surgical exposure through the anterior mandible may prove an option for cervical decompression in patients with KFS.
Topics: Humans; Female; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Male; Klippel-Feil Syndrome; Spinal Cord Compression; Cervical Vertebrae; Spinal Cord Diseases; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37219571
DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000754 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Feb 2024Genetic research in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis remains limited compared with syndromic craniosynostosis. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively summarize the...
BACKGROUND
Genetic research in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis remains limited compared with syndromic craniosynostosis. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively summarize the genetic literature of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and highlight key signaling pathways.
METHODS
The authors performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases from inception until December of 2021 using search terms related to nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and genetics. Two reviewers screened titles and abstract for relevance, and three reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and genetic data. Gene networks were constructed using Search Tool for Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (version 11) analysis.
RESULTS
Thirty-three articles published between 2001 and 2020 met inclusion criteria. Studies were further classified into candidate gene screening and variant identification studies ( n = 16), genetic expression studies ( n = 13), and common and rare variant association studies ( n = 4). Most studies were good quality. Using our curated list of 116 genes extracted from the studies, two main networks were constructed.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review concerns the genetics of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, with network construction revealing TGF-β/BMP, Wnt, and NF-κB/RANKL as important signaling pathways. Future studies should focus on rare rather than common variants to examine the missing heritability in this defect and, going forward, adopt a standard definition.
Topics: Humans; Craniosynostoses; Genomics; Signal Transduction; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 37070824
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010522 -
Genes Feb 2023Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the cranial sutures, affects ~1 in 2000 children. Although many patients with a genetically determined cause harbor a variant...
Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the cranial sutures, affects ~1 in 2000 children. Although many patients with a genetically determined cause harbor a variant in one of just seven genes or have a chromosomal abnormality, over 60 genes are known to be recurrently mutated, thus comprising a long tail of rarer diagnoses. Genome sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases is increasingly used in clinical settings, but analysis of the data is labor intensive and involves a trade-off between achieving high sensitivity or high precision. PanelApp, a crowd-sourced disease-focused set of gene panels, was designed to enable prioritization of variants in known disease genes for a given pathology, allowing enhanced identification of true-positives. For heterogeneous disorders like craniosynostosis, these panels must be regularly updated to ensure that diagnoses are not being missed. We provide a systematic review of genetic literature on craniosynostosis over the last 5 years, including additional results from resequencing a 42-gene panel in 617 affected individuals. We identify 16 genes (representing a 25% uplift) that should be added to the list of bona fide craniosynostosis disease genes and discuss the insights that these new genes provide into pathophysiological mechanisms of craniosynostosis.
Topics: Child; Humans; Craniosynostoses; Cranial Sutures
PubMed: 36980886
DOI: 10.3390/genes14030615 -
Science Progress 2023The purpose of this meta-analysis was to strengthen the credibility of primary research results by combining open-source scientific material, namely a comparison of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to strengthen the credibility of primary research results by combining open-source scientific material, namely a comparison of craniofacial features (Cfc) between Crouzon's syndrome (CS) patients and non-CS populations. All articles published up to October 7, 2021, were included in the search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this study. PECO framework was applied in the following ways: Those who have CS are denoted by the letter P, those who have been diagnosed with CS via clinical or genetic means by the letter E, those who do not have CS by the letter C, and those who have a Cfc of CS by the letter O. Independent reviewers collected the data and ranked the publications based on their adherence to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. A total of six case-control studies were reviewed for this meta-analysis. Due to the large variation in cephalometric measures, only those published in at least two previous studies were included. This analysis found that CS patients had a smaller skull and mandible volumes than those without CS.in terms of SNA° (MD = -2.33, = <0.001, = 83.6%) and ANB°(MD = -1.89, = <0.005, = 93.1%)), as well as ANS (MD = -1.87, = 0.001, = 96.5%)) and SN/PP (MD = -1.99, = 0.036, = 77.3%)). In comparison to the general population, people with CS tend to have shorter and flatter cranial bases, smaller orbital volumes, and cleft palates. They differ from the general population in having a shorter skull base and more V-shaped maxillary arches.
Topics: Humans; Craniofacial Dysostosis; Case-Control Studies
PubMed: 36803068
DOI: 10.1177/00368504231156297