-
Ultraschall in Der Medizin (Stuttgart,... Jun 2024To assess the prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To assess the prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Five electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2022 for all studies allowing calculation of the prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma. Pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for each sonographic sign and was a priori defined as "very high" when it was ≥ 80%, "high" when it ranged from 80% to 70%, and less relevant when it was ≤ 70%.
RESULTS
6 studies with 317 sarcoma patients were included. The pooled prevalence was: · 25.0% (95%CI:15.4-37.9%) for absence of visibility of the myometrium. · 80.5% (95%CI:74.8-85.2%) for solid component. · 78.3% (95%CI:59.3-89.9%) for inhomogeneous echogenicity of solid component. · 47.9% (95%CI:41.1-54.8%) for cystic areas. · 80.7% (95%CI:68.3-89.0%) for irregular walls of cystic areas. · 72.3% (95%CI:16.7-97.2%) for anechoic cystic areas. · 54.8% (95%CI:34.0-74.1%) for absence of shadowing. · 73.5% (95%CI:43.3-90.9%) for absence of calcifications. · 48.7% (95%CI:18.6-79.8%) for color score 3 or 4. · 47.3% (95%CI:37.0-57.8%) for irregular tumor borders. · 45.4% (95%CI:27.6-64.3%) for endometrial cavity not visualizable. · 10.9% (95%CI:3.5-29.1%) for free pelvic fluid. · 6.4% (95%CI:1.1-30.2%) for ascites. · 21.2% (95%CI:2.1-76.8%) for intracavitary process. · 81.5% (95%CI:56.1-93.8%) for singular lesion..
CONCLUSION
Solid component, irregular walls of cystic areas, and singular lesions are signs with very high prevalence, while inhomogeneous echogenicity of solid component, anechoic cystic areas, and absence of calcifications are signs with high prevalence. The remaining signs were less relevant.
Topics: Humans; Female; Uterine Neoplasms; Sarcoma; Ultrasonography; Myometrium; Prevalence; Uterus
PubMed: 37562447
DOI: 10.1055/a-2151-9205 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Compound Kushen injection (CKI) combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) is widely used in the treatment of malignant ascites (MA). However, evidence about its...
Evaluation of efficacy and safety for compound kushen injection combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with malignant ascites: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Compound Kushen injection (CKI) combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) is widely used in the treatment of malignant ascites (MA). However, evidence about its efficacy and safety remains limited. This review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI combined with IPC for the treatment of MA. Protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022304259). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of IPC with CKI for the treatment of patients with MA were searched through 12 electronic databases and 2 clinical trials registration platforms from inception until 20 January 2023. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included trials through the risk of bias assessment. We included RCTs that compared IPC single used or CKI combined with IPC for patients with MA schedule to start IPC. The primary outcome was identified as an objective response rate (ORR), while the secondary outcomes were identified as the quality of life (QoL), survival time, immune functions, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The Revman5.4 and Stata17 software were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR) at 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary outcomes and the mean difference (MD) at 95% CI for continuous outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the GRADE criteria. A total of 17 RCTs were assessed, which included 1200 patients. The risk of bias assessment of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool revealed that one study was rated high risk and the remaining as unclear or low risk. Meta-analysis revealed that CKI combined with IPC had an advantage in increasing ORR (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.43, < 0.00001) and QoL (RR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.83, < 0.0001) when compared with IPC alone. Moreover, the combined treatment group showed a lower incidence of myelosuppression (RR = 0.51, 95%CI 0.40-0.64, < 0.00001), liver dysfunction (RR = 0.33, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.70, = 0.004), renal dysfunction (RR = 0.39, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.89, = 0.02), and fever (RR = 0.51, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.75, = 0.0007) compared to those of the control group. The quality of evidence assessment through GRADE criteria showed that ORR, myelosuppression, and fever were rated moderate, renal dysfunction and liver dysfunction were rated low, and QoL and abdominal pain were rated very low. The efficacy and safety of CKI combined with IPC were superior to that with IPC alone for the treatment of MA, which indicates the potentiality of the treatment. However, more high-quality RCTs are required to validate this conclusion. [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022304259], identifier [PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022304259].
PubMed: 36937874
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1036043 -
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology Mar 2023The association of malnutrition and a poor prognosis does not prove that providing nutrition support improves that prognosis. The proof of such efficacy requires its...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The association of malnutrition and a poor prognosis does not prove that providing nutrition support improves that prognosis. The proof of such efficacy requires its demonstration in well designed and executed randomized trials. A systematic review of 40 such trials in 2014 failed to make such a finding. The purpose of this work is to update that review.
RECENT FINDINGS
A search of multiple databases identified 12 new trials (3 of enteral nutrition and 9 of nutritional supplements) comparing the nutritional intervention to standard care. Meta-analyses suggested that the provision of enteral nutrition reduced infection rates in patients undergoing liver transplantation and total complication rates after hepatic resections. Supplement usage appeared to improve mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or transplanted livers and reduce rates of ascites in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma as well as improve encephalopathy resolution in those with cirrhosis. However, the risks of bias, some study designs, and the use of potentially pharmacologically active micronutrients limit the reliability of these observations.
SUMMARY
There is inadequate evidence for clinicians to be sure that nutrition support is actually of benefit to patients with liver disease.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Reproducibility of Results; Parenteral Nutrition; Nutritional Support; Liver Neoplasms
PubMed: 36821460
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000914 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Jan 2023Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.
METHODS
Relevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).
CONCLUSIONS
LRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
Topics: Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Hepatectomy; Disease-Free Survival; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36637531
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0 -
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Apr 2023Immunotherapy-based regimes have changed the management of HCC. However, evidence of efficacy in patients with impaired liver function is unknown. This systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Immunotherapy-based regimes have changed the management of HCC. However, evidence of efficacy in patients with impaired liver function is unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses survival of HCC patients and liver dysfunction treated with immunotherapy-based regimens.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis of original articles or abstracts reporting survival of HCC patients treated with immunotherapy according to liver function between 2017 and 2022. Overal survival (OS) according to restricted mean survival time (RMST) and median OS, and hazard ratio (HR) of Child-Pugh B or B/C versus Child-Pugh A were assessed while considering the line of treatment.
RESULTS
Of the 2218 articles considered, 15 articles recruiting 2311 patients were included. Of these, 639 (27.7%) were Child-Pugh B and 34 (1.5%) C. RMST was 8.36 (95% CI, 6.15-10.57; I2 =93%) months, estimated from 8 studies. The HR was reported in 8 studies for survival between Child-Pugh B versus Child-Pugh A and metanalysis disclosed a 1.65 HR (95% CI,1.45-1.84; I2 =0% heterogeneity; p = 0.45). Treatment line data were available for 47% of the patients and 3 studies included patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab in the first line.
CONCLUSIONS
The high heterogeneity across studies reflects the incapacity of the current evidence to support the indication of immunotherapy in HCC patients with relevant liver dysfunction. It is mandatory to report complementary information to Child-Pugh classification such as prior liver decompensation, use of concomitant medication to control ascites, or signs of clinically significant portal hypertension to allow better patient stratification in future studies.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 36632997
DOI: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000030 -
Chinese Clinical Oncology Dec 2022Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is associated with...
BACKGROUND
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is commonly accompanied by a variety of distressing symptoms. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend palliative treatment modalities for patients with AGC and the treatment of AGC patients should be influenced by palliative care principles. The objective of this systematic review was to explore the published literature on palliative interventions for patients with AGC.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search to identify English language studies that investigated interventions to improve or treat the symptoms caused by AGC using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 2010 to August 18, 2022. Two independent reviewers performed title and abstract review, followed by full-text review and data abstraction. Overall study quality and risk of bias was assessed using published quality assessment tools.
RESULTS
We identified 10,364 studies and included 66 studies published between 2010 and 2022 for final review. Among the studies, quality of life (QoL) metrics were most commonly a secondary outcome. Twenty-three studies addressed the palliative management of bleeding with the use of radiation therapy, surgery, arterial embolization, chemotherapy, or endoscopic interventions. Twenty-two studies addressed the management of obstructive symptoms with endoscopic stenting or surgical interventions. Most of these studies were of moderate quality and included well characterized outcomes focused on symptom reduction. Five studies assessed palliative modalities to reduce the symptomatic burden of intraabdominal ascites; these studies were less well characterized, and on average low quality. Fifteen studies of mixed quality assessed QoL for patients with AGC, with only one study evaluating specialty palliative care consultation. No studies outlined the prevalence or practices of advanced care planning in this patient population.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with AGC undergo a variety of interventions aimed at palliating the symptoms associated with their diagnosis and improving their QoL. Future research on palliative interventions for patients with AGC should utilize qualitative methodologies to measure outcomes related to symptom management and QoL, further explore the patient experience of living with AGC, and delineate best practices for advanced care planning in this population.
Topics: Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Palliative Care
PubMed: 36632980
DOI: 10.21037/cco-22-102 -
Scientific Reports Nov 2022Pseudocirrhosis is a clinical and radiological entity mimicking liver cirrhosis in patients without a history of chronic liver disease. We performed a systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Pseudocirrhosis is a clinical and radiological entity mimicking liver cirrhosis in patients without a history of chronic liver disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature to evaluate the state-of-the-art and investigate the epidemiology and clinical features of pseudocirrhosis. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for literature published until February 28, 2022. We included in the final analysis 62 articles (N = 389 patients): 51 case reports (N = 64 patients), 5 case series (N = 35 patients) and 6 observational studies (N = 290 patients). About 80% of patients included in the case reports and case series had breast cancer. Most patients had at least one clinical sign of portal hypertension and ascites was the most common clinical manifestation of portal hypertension. The median time from pseudocirrhosis to death was 2 months (IQR 1-7 months). Alkylating agents and antimitotics were the most common classes of anticancer drugs reported in our study population. Notably, about 70% of patients received three or more anticancer drugs. Finally, pseudocirrhosis is a condition that occurs in patients with hepatic metastases and may have a negative impact on survival and clinical management of patients because of the potential development of portal hypertension and its complications.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Cirrhosis; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 36400809
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24241-2 -
Journal of Ovarian Research Sep 2022Ovarian malignant mesoderm mixed tumor (OMMMT) is a rare clinical entity. To provide reference for the treatment and prognosis of OMMMT, we analyzed the clinical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Ovarian malignant mesoderm mixed tumor (OMMMT) is a rare clinical entity. To provide reference for the treatment and prognosis of OMMMT, we analyzed the clinical features, pathology and molecular biology characteristic of published cases.
METHODS
The English and Chinese reported cases of OMMMT were selected from PubMed, Clinical Trials.gov and CNKI database from 2000 to December 15th, 2021 following the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 63 literatures including 199 OMMMT cases were included. The average age of patients at diagnosis was 56.46 years, the highest incidence age was 60-65 years, and 82% of them were menopausal women. Most patients were diagnosed in FIGO III stage (59.64%). The most common symptom of OMMMT was abdominal pain (60.5%). 61.6% of patients were accompanied by ascites, while ascites was not associated with metastatic tumor and local recurrence. The CA125 of 88.68% patients increased. The most common reported carcinomatous component and sarcomatous component were serous adenocarcinoma (44.96%) and chondrosarcoma (24.81%), respectively. Initial treatment included surgery (94.97%) and taxanes-based (55.10%) or platinum-based (85.71%) chemotherapy regimens. The median survival time of patients was 20 months. Heterologous sarcoma component did not shorten life expectancy. The optimal ovarian tumor cell debulking surgery (OOTCDS), radiotherapy and chemotherapy could significantly prolong the median survival time of patients. Furthermore, platinum drugs could significantly prolong the survival time after comparing various chemotherapy schemes. Besides, the combination of platinum and taxanes was therapeutically superior to the combination of platinum and biological alkylating agents.
CONCLUSION
The OOTCDS and platinum-based chemotherapy regimen can improve the prognosis of OMMMT. Targeted therapy might become a new research direction in the future. Since the elderly patients are the majority, the toxicity of new drugs on the elderly patients is more noteworthy.
Topics: Aged; Alkylating Agents; Carcinoma; Female; Humans; Mesoderm; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms; Taxoids
PubMed: 36114551
DOI: 10.1186/s13048-022-01037-6 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022Malignant ascites (MA) is a common complication of terminal cancer, which seriously affects the life quality and prognosis of patients. Both hyperthermic...
Malignant ascites (MA) is a common complication of terminal cancer, which seriously affects the life quality and prognosis of patients. Both hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) preparations have achieved significant efficacy in the treatment of MA. The treatment strategy of TCM combined with HIPEC has been gradually promoted and applied in China. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of TCM combined with HIPEC in the treatment of MA. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCM combined with HIPEC for MA were searched from seven electronic databases. Two researchers used the Cochrane Collaboration's tool to assess the risk of bias. Excel 2019 was used to establish a database for information extraction, RevMan 5.4 software was used to analyze the included test data, and STATA v16.0 was used to conduct Egger's test to further detect publication bias. A total of 19 studies involving 1,504 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that compared with the single use of HIPEC, TCM combined with HIPEC could significantly improve the clinical efficacy (RR = 1.51, 95% CI [1.40, 1.63], < 0.00001) and karnofsky performance status (KPS) score (MD = 8.16, 95% CI [6.46, 9.85], < 0.00001), reduce the ascites volume (MD = -156.98, 95% CI [-213.71, -100.25], < 0.00001). However, there was no statistical significance in reducing abdominal circumference between TCM combined with HIPEC and HIPEC alone (MD = -1.8, 95% CI [-4.57, -0.97], = 0.2). This study found that TCM combined with HIPEC had a beneficial therapeutic effect on MA. However, more standard, double-blind, multicenter RCTs are needed to further confirm the efficacy of TCM combined with HIPEC in the treatment of MA. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, identifier CRD42022319993.
PubMed: 36105234
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.938472 -
Hepatology International Oct 2022The efficacy of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) in non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is well-established. However, their impact on complications of portal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The efficacy of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) in non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is well-established. However, their impact on complications of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) is less well characterized.
METHODS
MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts of major international hepatology meetings were searched for publications from Jan 1, 1995 to Nov 30, 2021. Randomized control trials and observational studies reporting the efficacy of NAs in ACLD patients were eligible. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) for outcomes of interest were calculated with a random-effect or fixed-effect model, as appropriate.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies including 14,212 ACLD patients were included. NA treatment was associated with reduced risks of overall hepatic decompensation events (RR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.71), such as variceal bleeding (RR, 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and ascites (RR, 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01-1.59), on a trend-wise level. Moreover, the risks of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (RR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30-0.75) and liver transplantation/death (RR, 0.36; 95% CI: 0.25-0.53) were also reduced by NA treatment and the first-line NAs were superior to non-first-line NAs in improving these outcomes (RR, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75-0.97 and RR, 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.99, respectively).
CONCLUSION
NA therapy lowers the risk of portal hypertension-related complications, including variceal bleeding, HCC, and liver transplantation/death.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Esophageal and Gastric Varices; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Liver Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36083440
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10369-w