-
Biomolecules Feb 2021Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most widely used classes of medicines in the treatment of inflammation, fever, and pain. However, evidence...
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most widely used classes of medicines in the treatment of inflammation, fever, and pain. However, evidence has demonstrated that these drugs can induce significant toxicity. In the search for innovative strategies to overcome NSAID-related problems, the incorporation of drugs into cyclodextrins (CDs) has demonstrated promising results. This study aims to review the impact of cyclodextrin incorporation on the biopharmaceutical and pharmacological properties of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A systematic search for papers published between 2010 and 2020 was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and the following search terms: "Complexation"; AND "Cyclodextrin"; AND "non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug". A total of 24 different NSAIDs, 12 types of CDs, and 60 distinct inclusion complexes were identified, with meloxicam and β-CD appearing in most studies. The results of the present review suggest that CDs are drug delivery systems capable of improving the pharmacological and biopharmaceutical properties of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cyclodextrins; Humans
PubMed: 33673414
DOI: 10.3390/biom11030361 -
Indian Pediatrics Feb 2021We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of nine non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of nine non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NSAIDs for the treatment in children with JIA were searched systematically by using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for available literature up to January 1, 2019. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidence on treatment effectiveness and safety.
RESULTS
Eight eligible RCTs involving 1112 patients with JIA were identified, addressing 9 interventions. The ranking probability plot based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that celecoxib (6 mg/kg twice-a-day) had the highest probability of being most effective (SUCRA = 76.4%) among four NSAIDs (celecoxib, rofecoxib, meloxicam, and naproxen). Also, rofecoxib (0.3 mg/kg once-a-day) and piroxicam demonstrated a higher probability of safety in treating children with JIA (SUCRA = 33.0% and 35.5%, respectively), compared with other interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
The quality of available evidence limits the formation of powerful conclusions regarding the comparative efficacy or safety of NSAIDs used to treat JIA.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthritis, Juvenile; Child; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33632948
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ Open Sep 2020To assess the comparative efficacy of traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors in patients with acute gout. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To assess the comparative efficacy of traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors in patients with acute gout.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Data published as of 4 April 2020.
METHODS
We performed meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional non-selective NSAIDs versus cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and RCTs of various cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors in patients with acute gout. The main outcome measures were mean change in pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and 5-point Likert scale score on days 2-8.
RESULTS
Twenty-four trials involving five drugs were evaluated. For pain Likert scale, etoricoxib was comparable to indomethacin (standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.09, 95% CI: -0.27 to 0.08) but better than diclofenac 50 mg three times a day (SMD: -0.53, 95% CI: -0.98 to 0.09). Regarding pain VAS score, etoricoxib was comparable to diclofenac 75 mg two times per day (SMD: -1.63, 95% CI: -4.60 to 1.34) and diclofenac 75 mg four times a day (SMD: -1.82, 95% CI: -5.18 to 1.53), while celecoxib was comparable to diclofenac 100 mg four times a day (SMD: -2.41, 95% CI: -5.91 to 1.09). Etoricoxib showed similar patients' global assessment of response (SMD: -0.10, 95% CI: -0.27 to 0.07) and swollen joint count (SMD: -0.25, 95% CI: -0.74 to 0.24), but better investigator's global assessment of response (SMD: -0.29, 95% CI: -0.46 to 0.11) compared with indomethacin. Etoricoxib showed more favourable pain VAS score than celecoxib (SMD: -2.36, 95% CI: -3.36 to 1.37), but was comparable to meloxicam (SMD: -4.02, 95% CI: -10.28 to 2.24). Etoricoxib showed more favourable pain Likert scale than meloxicam (SMD: -0.56, 95% CI: -1.10 to 0.02). Etoricoxib 120 mg four times a day was more likely to achieve clinical improvement than celecoxib 200 mg two times per day (OR: 4.84, 95% CI: 2.19 to 10.72).
CONCLUSION
Although cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-selective NSAIDs may be equally beneficial in terms of pain relief, cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (especially etoricoxib) may confer a greater benefit.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; China; Diclofenac; Etoricoxib; Gout; Humans
PubMed: 32912981
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036748 -
Global Spine Journal Apr 2021Systematic review.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) resulting in motor deficits can be devastating injuries resulting in millions of health care dollars spent per incident. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a potential class of drugs that could improve motor function after an SCI. This systematic review utilizes PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the effectiveness of NSAIDs for SCI.
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were reviewed linking the keywords of "ibuprofen," "meloxicam," "naproxen," "ketorolac," "indomethacin," "celecoxib," "ATB-346," "NSAID," and "nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug" with "spinal." Results were reviewed for relevance and included if they met inclusion criteria. The SYRCLE checklist was used to assess sources of bias.
RESULTS
A total of 2960 studies were identified in the PubMed/MEDLINE database using the above-mentioned search criteria. A total of 461 abstracts were reviewed in Scopus, 340 in CINAHL, 179 in PsycINFO, and 7632 in Embase. A total of 15 articles met the inclusion criteria.
CONCLUSIONS
NSAIDs' effectiveness after SCI is largely determined by its ability to inhibit Rho-A. NSAIDs are a promising therapeutic option in acute SCI patients because they appear to decrease cord edema and inflammation, increase axonal sprouting, and improve motor function with minimal side effects. Studies are limited by heterogeneity, small sample size, and the use of animal models, which might not replicate the therapeutic effects in humans. There are no published human studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of these drugs after a traumatic cord injury. There is a need for well-designed prospective studies evaluating ibuprofen or indomethacin after adult spinal cord injuries.
PubMed: 32875860
DOI: 10.1177/2192568220901689 -
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Sep 2020The mainstay of the treatment for desmoid-type fibromatoses has been shifting from surgery to drug treatment, making accurate prediction of the efficacy of drug...
BACKGROUND
The mainstay of the treatment for desmoid-type fibromatoses has been shifting from surgery to drug treatment, making accurate prediction of the efficacy of drug treatment of extreme importance. On the other hand, desmoid-type fibromatoses arise everywhere in the body. The purpose of this systematic review was to address the clinical question of whether tumour location has an impact on the efficacy of drug treatment.
METHODS
A literature search from January 1990 to August 2017 was conducted. Four reviewers independently assessed and screened the literature for eligibility and determined the final articles. They rated each report according to the Grading of Recommendations Development and Evaluation approach. Based on the quality of 'Body of Evidence', our clinical guideline committee developed a recommendation for the clinical question.
RESULTS
In total, 128 articles were extracted. After the screenings, 5 were chosen for the final evaluation. The drugs used in these articles were one each of toremifene, sorafenib, and methotrexate and vinblastine and of meloxicam. There were no randomized controlled trials, and two prospective and three retrospective case series were included. Therapeutic effects were observed slightly more markedly in extremity using meloxicam or methotrexate and vinblastine. In contrast, the efficacy of toremifene was slightly higher in non-extremity. However, the evidence level of all of the reports was judged to be low.
CONCLUSIONS
Considering the low evidence level, we concluded that the site-specific therapeutic effects of drugs could not be confirmed in desmoid-type fibromatoses.
Topics: Adult; Female; Fibromatosis, Aggressive; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis
PubMed: 32533161
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa078 -
Pharmacological Research Feb 2020To conduct a comprehensive systematic meta-analysis investigating the association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and their subtypes with skin cancer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a comprehensive systematic meta-analysis investigating the association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and their subtypes with skin cancer (SC) and its subclasses (basal cell carcinoma BCC; squamous cell carcinoma SCC; melanoma; nonmelanoma skin cancer NMSC) in general, American and European populations.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to 24 February 2019. Pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were used to estimate associations.
RESULTS
Results based on 26 original studies including 223,619 cases and 1,398,507 controls showed both NSAIDs and nonselective Cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors to be statistically significantly associated with a reduced risk of SC, BCC, SCC and NMSC but not with melanoma. Conversely, no association was observed between selective Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors and SC or its subclasses. Further subgroup analysis showed that the results analyzed for American populations were almost the same as those for the general population. For European populations, neither NSAIDs nor its subtypes correlated significantly with susceptibility to SC or its subclasses.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of NSAIDs might reduce the risk of SC, but many factors including study population, drug subtype, and disease subclass affect the significance of the association.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Europe; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Skin Neoplasms; United States
PubMed: 31689521
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104499 -
Clinical Rheumatology Dec 2019This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for Kashin-Beck disease (KBD). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for Kashin-Beck disease (KBD).
METHOD
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, reference lists and published systematic reviews and registries of ongoing trials through May 2015 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of treatments for KBD. Outcomes of interest were pain, function, stiffness, overall clinical improvement, radiographic improvement (X-ray) and adverse events. Frequentist network meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects consistency model to assess the efficacy of treatments for KBD.
RESULTS
Forty-four RCTs with 9815 participants were included in the review. In children or adolescents, selenium (risk ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-2.33), vitamin C (2.03, 1.40-2.95) and aspirin (2.14, 1.12-4.08) were effective for radiographic structure improvement. In adults, chondroitin plus glucosamine was the best for pain (standardised mean difference 1.46, 95% CI 1.07-1.85), followed by intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (IAH) (1.09, 0.70-1.48), chondroitin (0.84, 0.47-1.21), diclofenac (0.63, 1.18-1.08), naproxen (0.55, 0.12-0.98), meloxicam (0.52, 0.03-1.01) and glucosamine (0.40, 0.13-0.67) compared to placebo, with similar results for other clinical outcomes in adults. However, the strength of most evidence was limited by the small number of trials with low to moderate quality.
CONCLUSIONS
Selenium supplement has demonstrated some benefits for structural improvement of the disease in children. Chondroitin, glucosamine, IAH and nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs are effective for symptom improvements of KBD in adults. Evidence of surgical and complementary treatments for symptoms and aspirin and vitamin C for structure has yet to be established.Key Points• There were 23 nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals and surgical and complementary treatments assessed for Kashin-Beck disease (KBD) in randomised trials.• Among the 23 treatments, chondroitin, glucosamine, IAH and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs are more effective than placebo to relieve symptoms for adults with KBD.• Selenium supplement is more effective than placebo for radiographic improvement in children or adolescents.• The efficacy of surgeries, aspirin, vitamin C and complementary treatments for KBD has not been established yet.
Topics: Chondroitin; Dietary Supplements; Glucosamine; Humans; Kashin-Beck Disease; Pain Management; Selenium
PubMed: 31376086
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04704-0 -
European Journal of Orthodontics Sep 2019Pain relief drugs are used and misused widely and may theoretically affect the events leading to orthodontic tooth movement.
BACKGROUND
Pain relief drugs are used and misused widely and may theoretically affect the events leading to orthodontic tooth movement.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically investigate and appraise the quality of the available evidence regarding the effect of pain relief medications on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
SEARCH METHODS
Search without restrictions in eight databases (including grey literature) and hand searching until October 2018.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Animal controlled studies investigating the effect of pain relievers on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Following study retrieval and selection, relevant data were extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were finally identified, most of which at unclear risk of bias. Ibuprofen and loxoprofen did not show any significant effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement, whereas indomethacin, ketorolac, morphine, and high doses of etoricoxib were found to decrease it. Inconsistent or conflicting effects were noted after the administration of acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, celecoxib, meloxicam, and tramadol. The quality of the available evidence was considered at best as low.
CONCLUSIONS
Long-term consumption of pain relievers may affect the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. The orthodontist should be capable of identifying patients taking pain relievers independently of orthodontic treatment and consider the possible implications.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42017078208).
Topics: Acetaminophen; Analgesics; Animals; Humans; Ibuprofen; Pain; Tooth Movement Techniques
PubMed: 30590549
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjy079 -
European Journal of Orthodontics Aug 2019Theoretically, root resorption could be modulated by any medication taken that exhibits possible effects on the implicated molecular pathways.
BACKGROUND
Theoretically, root resorption could be modulated by any medication taken that exhibits possible effects on the implicated molecular pathways.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically investigate and appraise the quality of the available evidence from animal studies, regarding the effect of commonly prescribed systemic medication on root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement.
SEARCH METHODS
Search without restrictions in eight databases (PubMed, Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Arab World Research Source, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global) and hand searching until April 2018 took place. One author developed detailed search strategies for each database that were based on the PubMed strategy and adapted accordingly.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Controlled studies investigating the effect of systemic medications on root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Following study retrieval and selection, relevant data were extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE's Risk of Bias Tool.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies were finally identified, most of which at unclear risk of bias. Root resorption was shown to increase in Vitamin C treated animals in comparison with the control group, whereas a comparative decrease was noted after the administration of the alendronate, ibuprofen, growth hormone, low doses of meloxicam, simvastatin, lithium chloride and strontium ranelate. No difference was noted for acetaminophen, aspirin, fluoxetine, atorvastatin, misoprostol, zoledronic acid and zinc. Finally, inconsistent effects were observed after the administration of celecoxib, prednisolone and L-thyroxine. The quality of the available evidence was considered at best as low.
CONCLUSIONS
The pharmaceutical substances investigated were shown to exhibit variable effects on root resorption. Although the overall quality of evidence provides the clinician with a cautious perspective on the strength of the relevant recommendations, good practice would suggest that it is important to identify patients consuming medications and consider the possible implications.
REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42017078208).
Topics: Acetaminophen; Animals; Data Management; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Root Resorption; Tooth Movement Techniques
PubMed: 29992228
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjy048