-
Pharmacology & Therapeutics Sep 2020Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS) is an adaptable and finely tuned system that sustains proteostasis network under a large variety of physiopathological conditions. Its...
Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS) is an adaptable and finely tuned system that sustains proteostasis network under a large variety of physiopathological conditions. Its dysregulation is often associated with the onset and progression of human diseases; hence, UPS modulation has emerged as a promising new avenue for the development of treatments of several relevant pathologies, such as cancer and neurodegeneration. The clinical interest in proteasome inhibition has considerably increased after the FDA approval in 2003 of bortezomib for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, which is now used in the front-line setting. Thereafter, two other proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib and ixazomib), designed to overcome resistance to bortezomib, have been approved for treatment-experienced patients, and a variety of novel inhibitors are currently under preclinical and clinical investigation not only for haematological malignancies but also for solid tumours. However, since UPS collapse leads to toxic misfolded proteins accumulation, proteasome is attracting even more interest as a target for the care of neurodegenerative diseases, which are sustained by UPS impairment. Thus, conceptually, proteasome activation represents an innovative and largely unexplored target for drug development. According to a multidisciplinary approach, spanning from chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology to pharmacology, this review will summarize the most recent available literature regarding different aspects of proteasome biology, focusing on structure, function and regulation of proteasome in physiological and pathological processes, mostly cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, connecting biochemical features and clinical studies of proteasome targeting drugs.
Topics: Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; Drug Resistance; E2F4 Transcription Factor; Holoenzymes; Humans; Lipid Droplets; Molecular Chaperones; Muscle Proteins; NF-kappa B; Neoplasms; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Proteasome Inhibitors; Proteostasis; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53; Ubiquitin
PubMed: 32442437
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107579 -
Clinical Laboratory Oct 2019Heat shock protein 60 has been reported to have a high diagnostic value for digestive system cancers. We sought to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of HSP60... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Heat shock protein 60 has been reported to have a high diagnostic value for digestive system cancers. We sought to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of HSP60 in patients with gastric cancer (GC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS
Relevant literature was adopted from the online databases. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled using random effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to express the overall test performance. Statistical analysis was performed by STATA 14.0 and Meta-DiSc 1.4 software.
RESULTS
We merged 12 studies in a meta-analysis, including 1 GC, 5 CRC, and 6 HCC. Overall, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR to predict GC/CRC/HCC patients were 70%, 71%, and 8.49, respectively, corresponding to an AUC of 0.81. In subgroup analysis, the 82% specificity prompted a more advanced diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing CRC than HCC.
CONCLUSIONS
HSP60 was an advanced biomarker for digestive system cancers and its abnormal expression might have implications for early diagnosis in screening of GC/CRC/HCC.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Chaperonin 60; Digestive System Neoplasms; Gastrointestinal Tract; Humans; Mitochondrial Proteins; Odds Ratio; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 31625354
DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190523 -
Current Medicinal Chemistry 2020Although secretory clusterin (sCLU) plays a crucial role in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) cells proliferation, Multiple Drug Resistance (MDR), metastasis and so on, its...
BACKGROUND
Although secretory clusterin (sCLU) plays a crucial role in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) cells proliferation, Multiple Drug Resistance (MDR), metastasis and so on, its targeted effects and exact mechanism are still unknown. This review summarizes some new progress in sCLU as a molecular-targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC.
METHODS
A systematic review of the published English-language literature about sCLU and HCC has been performed using the PubMed and bibliographic databases. Some valuable studies on sCLU in HCC progression were searched for relevant articles with the keywords: HCC, diagnosis, MDR, as molecular-targeted in treatment, and so on.
RESULTS
The incidence of the positive rate of sCLU was significantly higher in HCC tissues as compared to the surrounding tissues at mRNA or protein level, gradually increasing with tumor-nodemetastasis staging (P<0.05). Also, the abnormal level of sCLU was related to poor differentiation degree, and considered as a useful marker for HCC diagnosis or independent prognosis for patients. Hepatic sCLU could be silenced at mRNA level by specific sCLU-shRNA or by OGX-011 to inhibit cancer cell proliferation with an increase in apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, reversal MDR, alteration of cell migration or invasion behaviors, and a decrease in GSK-3β or AKT phosphorylation in vitro, as well as significant suppression of the xenograft growth by down-regulating β-catenin, p-GSK3β, and cyclinD1 expression in vivo.
CONCLUSION
Abnormal hepatic sCLU expression should not only be a new diagnostic biomarker but also a novel promising target for inhibiting HCC growth.
Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Clusterin; Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta; Humans; Liver Neoplasms
PubMed: 31232234
DOI: 10.2174/0929867326666190624161158 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Sep 2019Progestogens are widely used for the conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, they do not achieve the regression in...
INTRODUCTION
Progestogens are widely used for the conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, they do not achieve the regression in all cases. Although several immunohistochemical markers have been assessed to predict the response to treatment, their usefulness is still unclear. We aimed to analyze the usefulness of each immunohistochemical marker studied in predicting the response to progestogens in endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles from January 2000 to June 2018. All studies assessing the association of immunohistochemical markers with the outcome of the progestogen-based therapy in endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer were included. The expression of immunohistochemical markers in pretreatment phase and changes of expression during the follow-up were evaluated in relation to response to therapy and relapse.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies with 1360 women were included in the systematic review; 43 immunohistochemical markers were assessed. The most studied predictive markers in the pretreatment phase were progesterone and estrogen receptors, although with conflicting results; their isoforms, and in particular progesterone receptor B, appeared more promising. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of mismatch repair proteins, Dusp6, GRP78 and PTEN combined with other molecules such as phospho-AKT or phospho-mTOR. In the follow-up phase, Nrf2 and survivin showed the stronger evidence; a role may also be played by Bcl2 and Ki67. Further studies are necessary for Fas, NCoR, AKR1C1, HE4, PAX2 and SPAG9.
CONCLUSIONS
Several immunohistochemical markers might be helpful in predicting the response to conservative treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer on pretreatment and follow-up specimens. Further studies are needed to confirm their usefulness and possibly integrate them in a predictive immunohistochemical panel.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Conservative Treatment; Endometrial Hyperplasia; Endometrial Neoplasms; Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP; Female; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Predictive Value of Tests; Progestins
PubMed: 30793281
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13587